This document discusses a case study of a university professor who allegedly stole research from his student, sold it to a pharmaceutical company without crediting the student. It notes issues in the past at the university of research advisers taking students' work and publishing or selling it without attribution. It recommends putting policies in place to protect students' intellectual property rights and make clear the limits of research advisers' authority over students' work.
This document discusses a case study of a university professor who allegedly stole research from his student, sold it to a pharmaceutical company without crediting the student. It notes issues in the past at the university of research advisers taking students' work and publishing or selling it without attribution. It recommends putting policies in place to protect students' intellectual property rights and make clear the limits of research advisers' authority over students' work.
This document discusses a case study of a university professor who allegedly stole research from his student, sold it to a pharmaceutical company without crediting the student. It notes issues in the past at the university of research advisers taking students' work and publishing or selling it without attribution. It recommends putting policies in place to protect students' intellectual property rights and make clear the limits of research advisers' authority over students' work.
This document discusses a case study of a university professor who allegedly stole research from his student, sold it to a pharmaceutical company without crediting the student. It notes issues in the past at the university of research advisers taking students' work and publishing or selling it without attribution. It recommends putting policies in place to protect students' intellectual property rights and make clear the limits of research advisers' authority over students' work.
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10
When a Mentor Becomes a Thief:
A Case Study Analysis
JOE MARI N. FLORES, CPAss
Introduction
It was widely reported a few months ago that
a pharmacy professor, Ashim Mitra at the University of Missouri allegedly stole his gifted student’s research, sold it to a pharmaceutical company, and did not credit his student or the university with having made the discovery. Introduction • Issues pertaining to corruption of students’ research are visible in X University in the previous years, where research advisers allegedly take the soft copy of their advisee’s manuscripts or copies of research materials and eventually publish it with different publications or worst sell it with the students from other institutions.
• Since outputs of the students are not published in
any medium locally or internationally, such act where not able to be detected the authorities of the university. Did You Know?
“Ghost authoring " - works in most universities
much like a pyramid scheme. PhD students put the real work in at the bottom of the pyramid, while academics at the top benefit. Frequently, a senior academic’s name is used on a paper to gain access to a prestigious journal, to curry favour with a particular editor and so on. In other words, academic journals themselves have failed to care more about the actual ideas in a paper, over the name of the author. Literature
Plagiarism can occur at any point in the career of a
researcher, but it is more frequently reported in the early stages (Martinson et al. 2005), and relatively few studies have explored its origins during undergraduate and early post-graduate research (Krstic, 2015). Early training stages may constitute a critical period to prevent plagiarism, when students begin to actively engage in research. If uncorrected, plagiarism and cheating may continue throughout the researcher’s career, and can potentially lead to other misconduct (Lovett-Hopper et al. 2007; Park 2003). . Literature
It is ironic if the mentor is the one
plagiarizing the output of the students. Several recorded cases around the internet Professors becoming a ghost author, where academics take the credit for the work of their PhD students. Academics leverage their seniority to demand that students credit them in every single article they write, regardless of their actual contribution. Findings
During compliance of the research course,
the alleged thesis adviser will require the researchers to submit the softcopy of the manuscript in a CD format, where such is not a requirement. Although, thesis advisers become co-authors automatically of the study but student researchers should be given proper credits, in any ways when it is to be published. Conclusion
Research plays a vital part in a promotion,
especially if you are connected with the academe. However, we as professors or mentors should be their role models towards our student. In no circumstance, benefitting from the expense of the other becomes ethical. We should be promoted based on what we have substantially achieved and reached. Recommendation
It is highly recommended to place internal
policies pertaining to intellectual property of the students as a result of the hard work in thesis writing. Moreover, it is also relevant to subject all research personnel on which line their authority as research personnel ends. It is important to value the core values of Honesty and Integrity which should emanate from school. Works Cited • “Boston Columnist Resigns Amid New Plagiarism Charges.” CNN.com 19 Aug. 1998 3 March 2003 <http://www.cnn.com/US/9808/19/barnicle/> • Fain, Margaret. “Internet Paper Mills.” Kimbal Library. 12 Feb. 2003. <http://www.coastal.edu/library/mills2.htm> • Lathrop, Ann and Kathleen Foss. Student Cheating and Plagiarism in the Internet Era. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 2000. • Lewis, Mark. “Doris Kearns Goodwin And The Credibility Gap.” Forbes.com 2 Feb. 2002. <http://www.forbes.com/2002/02/27/0227goodwin.html> • “New York Times Exposes Fraud of own Reporter.” ABC News Online. 12 May, 2003. <http://www.pbs.org/newshour/newshour_index.html> • Sabato, Larry J. “Joseph Biden's Plagiarism; Michael Dukakis's 'Attack Video' – 1988.” Washington Post Online. 1998. 3 March 2002. <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- srv/politics/special/clinton/frenzy/biden.htm>