Job Analysis
Job Analysis
1 2 3
The systematic study of the It is the foundation for Job analysis is the process of
tasks, duties, and almost all human resources determining the work
responsibilities of a job and activities (Aamodt, 2010). activities and requirements,
the qualities needed to and the job description is the
perform it (Riggio, 2008). written result of the job
analysis (Aamodt, 2010).
Writing Job Description
It is a detailed description of job tasks, procedures, and
responsibilities; the tools and equipment used; and the
end product or service.
Products of Job
Analysis Employee Selection
It is only possible to select employees if there is a clear
understanding of the tasks performed and the
competencies needed to perform those tasks. By knowing
the requirements, it is possible to choose tests and
develop interview questions that will determine the
needed KSAos in a particular job.
Training
It is difficult to see how employees can be trained unless the requirements of
the job are known. Job analyses yield lists of job activities that can be
systematically used to create training programs.
Job Classification
Job analysis enables a human resources professional to classify jobs into
groups based on similarities in requirements and duties. Job classification is
useful for determining pay levels, transfers, and promotions.
Job Evaluation
Job analysis information can also be used to determine the worth of a job. Job
evaluation is an assessment of the relative value of a job to determine
appropriate compensation.
Job Design
Job analysis information can be used to determine the optimal way in which a job
should be performed.
Job Specification
A job analysis leads to job specification, which provides information about the human
characteristics required to perform the job, such as physical and personal traits, work
experience, and education.
Compliance with Legal Guidelines
One legally acceptable way to directly determine job relatedness is by job
analysis.
Job analysts often become aware of
certain problems within an organization.
For example, during a job analysis
interview, an employee may indicate
Organizational Analysis that she does not know how she is
evaluated or to whom she is supposed to
report. The discovery of such lapses in
organizational communication can then
be used to correct problems and help an
organization function better.
WRITING JOB DESCRIPTION
Job Title
>Describes the nature of the job.
>Provide workers with some form of identity.
>Job titles can also affect perceptions of the status and worth of a
job.
Brief Summary
Work Performance
The job description should outline standards of performance.
This section contains a relatively brief description of how an
employee’s performance is evaluated and what work standards
are expected of the employee.
Compensation Information
This section of the job description should contain information on the
salary grade, whether the position is exempt, and the compensable
factors used to determine salary.
Job Competencies
This section contains what are commonly called job specifications or
competencies. These are the knowledge, skills, abilities, and other
characteristics (KSAOs) (such as interest, personality, and training)
that are necessary to be successful on the job.
Preparing for a Job Analysis
Who will conduct the analysis? o Internal Department (may
include Human resource, compensation, training, engineering)
o Internal task force
o Supervisors
o Employees/job incumbents
o Consultants
o Interns/class projects
JCI
AET
X
X
X
O*NET X X
CIT X X
TTA X
F-JAS X
JAI X
PPRF X
Evaluation of the Methods
The PAQ is seen as the most standardized technique and the CIT the least
standardized.
TheCIT takes the least amountof job analyst training
and task analysis the most.
The PAQ is the least costly method and the CIT the most.
The PAQ takes the least amount of time to complete
and task analysis the most.
Task analysis has the highest-quality results and TTA the lowest.
Task analysis reports are the longest and job-elements reports the shortest.
The CIT has been rated the most useful and the PAQ the least.
Task analysis gives the best overall job picture and the
PAQ the worst.
Job Evaluation
• Itis the process of assessing the relative value of to
determine
jobs appropriate compensation. A job evaluation is typically
done in two stages: determining internal pay equity and
determining external pay equity.
• Internal pay equity involves comparing jobs within an organization
to ensure that the people in jobs worth the most money are paid
accordingly. The difficulty in this process, of course, is determining
the worth of each job.
• With external equity, the worth of a job is determined by
comparing the job to the external market (other organizations).
External equity is important if an organization is to attract and
retain employees. In other words, it must be competitive with the
compensation plans of other organizations.
STEPS PROCESS
Step 1: Determining Compensable job factors – these are factors such as level of
Compensable Job Factors responsibility, physical demands, mental demands, education
requirements, training and experience requirements, and
working condition.
Step 2: Determining the Determine the levels of each factor.
Levels for Each
Compensable Factor Examples:
Education
Determining Internal Pay Equity o High school degree or less
o Two-year college degree
o Bachelor’s degree
o Master’s degree
Responsibility
o Makes no decisions
o Makes decisions for self
o Makes decisions for 1-5 employees
o Makes decisions for more than 5 employees
Physical demands
o Lifts no heavy objects
o Lifts objects between 25 and 100 pounds
o Lifts objects more than 100 pounds
Step 3: Determining the In determining the weights of the factors, it is important to
Factor Weights know which factor should weigh more than the others. The
following is the process for doing the weight assignment:
1. A job evaluation committee determines the total
number of points that will be distributed among the
factors. Usually the number is some multiple of 100 (e.g.,
100, 500, 1000) and is based on the number of
compensable factors. The greater the number of factors,
the greater the number of points.
2. Each factor is weighted by assigning a number of points.
The more important the factor, the greater the number
of points that will be assigned.
3. The number of points assigned has been assigned to a
factor is then divided into each of the levels.
Example: If 100 points is assigned to the factor of
education, then 20 points (100points/5 degrees) would
be assigned to each level.