0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views

Ecim - 2

Management approaches have evolved over time from a focus on efficiency and scientific principles to considering human and behavioral factors as well as external environments. Early approaches emphasized division of labor and specialization while more recent approaches examine quantitative analysis, systems thinking, contingencies, and organizational behavior to understand how both internal and external factors influence management practices. Contemporary views recognize there is no single best approach and managers must consider situational variables to determine the most effective strategies.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views

Ecim - 2

Management approaches have evolved over time from a focus on efficiency and scientific principles to considering human and behavioral factors as well as external environments. Early approaches emphasized division of labor and specialization while more recent approaches examine quantitative analysis, systems thinking, contingencies, and organizational behavior to understand how both internal and external factors influence management practices. Contemporary views recognize there is no single best approach and managers must consider situational variables to determine the most effective strategies.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

Management

Yesterday and Today


Historical Background
Organized endeavor practiced since long
involving Plan, Organize, Lead, Direct,
Impose

–Dates back when people attempted to


accomplish goals working together

–Pyramids / Great Wall / Taj Mahal

–Military Organization found managing


larger groups with techniques of leadership
Cont
Adam Smith 1776 – The Wealth of Nation
brought concept of Division of Labor for
increased productivity by enhanced skill
saving time
–Breakdown of Jobs with Job specialization

Industrial Revolution during late 18th century


led substitute to Machine from Man
–Economic way to manufacturing
–Mass production
Scientific Management
Studies during early 20th century with
work of Frederick Taylor , emphasized
thinking with rationality to make
organization and workers efficient

Taylor’s “Principles of Scientific


Management” in 1911 urged to create a
mental change among workers and
managers by defining clear guidelines
of improving production efficiency –
“one best way” for doing each job
cont
Taylor’s Principles:
– Develop science of each element of individual’s work
– Scientifically select and then train to develop the worker
– Cooperate with workers to ensure all work is done as developed
– Divide work and responsibility equally between management and
workers
Frank and Lillian Gilbreths studied to eliminate
inefficient hand and body motions using motion
pictures of hand and body motions and invented a
device (microchronometer) recording worker’s motions
and the amount of time spent in each motion
Taylor and Gilbreths technique of improving
efficiency are used:
– Analyzing basic task of work
– Use time and motion study
– Eliminate wasted motions
– Hire best qualified worker for the job
– Design incentive system based on output
General Administrative Theory
Henri Fayol from the perspective of entire
organization constituting good management practice
developed 14 principles of management:
– Division of work -specialization increase output making efficient
– Authority –managers must be able to give orders
– Discipline –employees must obey and respect rules of organization
– Unity of command - receive orders from one superior
– Unity of direction – single plan to guide managers and workers
– Subordination of individual interests to general interest
– Remuneration - Fair wage for the service
– Centralization – degree to which subordinates are involved in
decision making
– Scalar chain – the line of authority from top to lowest rank
– Order – people and materials in the right place at the right time
– Equity – kind and fair to subordinates
– Stability of tenure – replacement are available to fill vacancies
– Initiative – high levels of effort to carry out plans
– Team spirit – to build harmony and unity in the organization
Bureaucracy
Max Weber in early 1900 developed theory of
authority structures and relations called bureaucracy
Bureaucracy – a form of organization;
– division of labor (jobs broken down into simple defined tasks)
– clearly defined hierarchy (positions with clear chain of command)
– Detailed rules and regulations (standard operating procedures)
– Impersonal relationships (Uniform application of rules)
– Career orientation (Managers as career professionals)
– Formal selection (selected for jobs on technical qualifications)
These days this model is regarded hindrance to
individual’s creativity, and organizations’ limit to
respond dynamic environment
However some of the bureaucratic mechanisms even
in flexible organizations of creative professionals as
Infosys, Cisco, are felt necessary to ensure resource
efficiency and effectivity
Quantitative Approach
Use of quantitative techniques to
improve decision making as :
–Applying statistics
–Optimization models
–Information models
–Computer simulations
–Linear programming to improve resource
allocation
–Critical path scheduling analysis
Cont
One of the area where Quantitative
techniques used was Total Quality
Management initiated by quality
experts as Edwards Deming and
Joseph Juran during 50s
Quality became major thrust during
80s and 90s both in business and public
agencies when Japanese organizations
started to outsmart US organizations
Total Quality Management (TQM)
TQM –a philosophy to continual
improvement responding to customer needs
and expectation
Customers means all who interacts with
organization products and service internally
and externally
Continuous improvement is possible with
measurements requiring statistical techniques
measuring every critical variables in work
process
Measurements compared against standards
to correct
TQM a great departure from keeping costs
low to increase productivity
Behavioral Approach
Management is to get works done with
people
Organizational Behavior has been the focus
of research on actions of people
–motivating,
–leading,
–building trust and team,
–managing conflict
Early advocates of OB approach led
foundation for selection, motivation, team
building –
–Robert Owen (Late 1700) - improving
labor and work place
–Hugo Munsterberg (Early 1900) –scientific
study of people at work, suggested
psychological tests for selection, learning
for training, human behavior for
motivation
Cont
– Mary Parker Follet (Early 1900) –
perspective of individual and group
behavior, group ethics, proposed people
oriented ideas
– Chester Barnard (1930s) – organization as
social system requiring cooperation,
communicate and stimulate, organization as
open system
– Great Depression of 1930 forced Managers
to examine their job rather than production
with least cost in materials and labor
– Recently group effectiveness became key to
survival as Managers to think more on
Motivation, Group behavior and leadership
Contemporary Approach
Coming to 60s researchers looked external
environment outside organization as system
approach and contingency approach departing
from early approach of internal concern of
managers in the organization
System theory as a set of interrelated and
interdependent parts arranged in a way to
have result of a unified whole
– Closed Systems do not interact with
environment
– Open systems –in organization takes
resources as inputs from the environment
and transform as process into output that
are distributed into environment
Cont
System Approach envision Organizations
made up of interdependent factors as
individual, groups, attitudes, motives, formal
structure, goals, authority, status, interactions
and so on as a system ensuring all these are
working to unified goals
Systems approach implies that decisions /
action in one area affect others in the
organization
System Approach Recognize that
organizations are not self-contained but they
rely on environment for inputs and outlets for
output
Contingency Approach
Early theorists relied on principles to
be universally applicable
It is realized changing situation
require different techniques and
approaches
Contingency approach is situational
as organizations are different requiring
different ways of managing facing
different situations
No simplistic rule to follow for
managers
Even units within organization differs
in size, goals, activities
Cont
Situational or contingency variables
may be numerous but most widely used
are:
– Size of Organization differs with problem
of coordination
– Structures, leadership style and control
system of routine technologies differ from
customized technologies
– Best in stable environment may be
inappropriate in rapidly changing
unpredictable environment
– Individual differences for growth,
autonomy, expectations matters for job
design, leadership and motivation
Class exercise
Many management theories/philosophies
exist in business circles today, which
theory would you adopt as a business
manager/owner in your organization,
justify your perspective and give reasons
why????

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy