4 Qualitative and Quantitative Dichotomy in Research
4 Qualitative and Quantitative Dichotomy in Research
4 Qualitative and Quantitative Dichotomy in Research
QUICK REVIEW
Differences between basic and applied research
Differences between Scientific and nonscientific inquiry
QUALITATIVE AND
QUANTITATIVE
DICHOTOMY IN
RESEARCH
Subtitle
KWL
Quantitative Study
Qualitative Quantitative
Reality is subjective and multiple Reality is objective out there, and
as seen by participants in a singular, apart from the
study. It is constructed by the researcher, and can be measured
individuals involved in the objectively by using a
research situation. questionnaire or an instrument
Epistemological: What is the relationship of the researcher to
the researched?
Qualitative Quantitative
Researcher interacts with Researcher is independent
that being researched. from that being researched.
Axiological: What is the role of values?
Qualitative Quantitative
Value-laden and biased wherein Value-free and unbiased,
the researcher admits the value- accomplished through entirely
laden nature of the study and omitting statements about values
actively reports his or her values from a written report—arguing
and biases closely from the evidence
gathered in the study.
Rhetorical: What is the language of the research?
Qualitative Quantitative
Informal Formal
Evolving decisions Based on set definitions
Personal voice Impersonal voice
Accepted qualitative words— Use of accepted quantitative
words—” relationship,
“understanding, discover, and comparison, and within-group”
meaning”
Methodological: What is the process of research?
Qualitative Quantitative
Inductive process Deductive process
Mutual simultaneous shaping of Cause and effect
factors
Static design
Emerging design
Context-free
Context-bound
Generalizations leading to prediction,
Patterns, theories developed for
understanding
explanation and understanding
Accurate and reliable through Accurate and reliable through validity and
verification reliability
Some Common Contrast
Quantitative Qualitative
Numbers Words
Point of view of researcher Points of view of participants
Researcher distant Researcher close
Theory testing Theory emergent
Static Process
Structured Unstructured
Generalization Contextual understanding
Hard, reliable data Rich, deep data
Macro Micro
Behavior Meaning
Artificial setting Natural setting
Critique of Qualitative and Quantitative Research
Quantitative Qualitative
Failure to distinguish people and social Too subjective—qualitative findings rely
institutions from the world of nature too much on the researcher’s often
unsystematic views and close personal
Artificial and spurious sense of precision relationship with the people being
and accuracy of the measurement studied
process
Difficult to replicate- unstructured nature
Heavy reliance on instruments and of data
procedures that hinders connection
between research and everyday life Problems of generalizations
Less focus on meanings of events to Lack of transparency
individuals
IDENTIFY WHERE THE STUDY IS
QUALITATIVE OR QUANTITATIVE
The correlation between height and IQ level
Whether a plant grows faster indoors or outdoors
Population density and environmental degradation
A political detainee’s ordeal inside his or her prison
cell
Basic Principles of
Research Ethics
Lesson 4
Objectives:
I have read and understood the information about the study and my participation in
the study. I voluntarily agree to participate in this study.
Date
• Note on instructions on how to communicate a participant’s informed
consent to participate in the study.