0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views

Invariance: LING 285 Spring 2021 Mary Byram Washburn

This document discusses the problem of invariance in speech recognition and synthesis. It notes that the acoustic features of words are never the same between utterances due to interspeaker variation based on factors like geography, age, social class, race, and gender. It discusses a 1968 study analyzing nasal deletion patterns across social groups in Detroit. The study found differences based on social class, age, race, and their interactions. The document introduces the concepts of phonemic and phonetic inventories, and how minimal pairs are used to determine if sounds are distinct phonemes for a speaker.

Uploaded by

Bebe
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views

Invariance: LING 285 Spring 2021 Mary Byram Washburn

This document discusses the problem of invariance in speech recognition and synthesis. It notes that the acoustic features of words are never the same between utterances due to interspeaker variation based on factors like geography, age, social class, race, and gender. It discusses a 1968 study analyzing nasal deletion patterns across social groups in Detroit. The study found differences based on social class, age, race, and their interactions. The document introduces the concepts of phonemic and phonetic inventories, and how minimal pairs are used to determine if sounds are distinct phonemes for a speaker.

Uploaded by

Bebe
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 46

Invariance

LING 285
Spring 2021
Mary Byram Washburn
Speech Speech
Synthesis Recognition

Speech
Recognition

Challenge: Challenge:
Coarticulation Invariance
Which of these is the word “ship”?
1 2 3 4 5

ship

Invariance
Which of these is the word “ship”?
1 2 3 4 5

ship

Invariance
Which is the word “ship”?

ship

Invariance
The Problem of Invariance
 The acoustic features of a word are never the same from one
utterance to another
Invariance
 Interspeaker Variation
 Each speaker has unique acoustic features

Car?
Bag?
Interspeaker  What is your generic term for a sweetened carbonated beverage?
Variation
Interspeaker
Variation
Interspeaker  pecan
Variation
Interspeaker
Variation
 A Study of the Social Dialects in Detroit
 Roger W. Shuy (1968)

Interspeaker
Variation
 Interview
 700 informants across Detroit in 1966
 1.5 hrs

 Interested in who used a variety of different features.


Interspeaker  Full Nasal vs. Deletion of Syllable Final Nasal
Variation:  If deleted, replaced with a nasalized vowel.

Shuy 1968  an’ he started vs. ã he started


 come down vs. cõe dõw̃
 man from Uncle vs. mã frõ Ũcle
Social Class Sex
20 20
Percent of Nasals Deleted

Percent of Nasals Deleted


16 16
12.9 12
12 12 11.1
9.5
8 6.8 8
5.5
4 4
0 0

I II III IV Female Male

Age Race
Percent of Nasals Deleted

Percent of Nasals Deleted


20 20

15 15 14.2
12.3
9.7 8.7
10 10
6.6
5 5

0 0

Adult Teenager Child Black White


Social Class and Race
20 19.3
18
14.8
Percent of Nasals Deleted
16
14 13.3
12 11.3
10
8 6.3
6 5.3 5
4
2 0
0
Black White
I II III IV
Social Class and Age
20
Percentage of Nasals Deleted 18
16
13.9
14 12.8 12.7 Adult
12 11.4
Teenager
10
Child
8
6 5.4 4.6
4
2
0
Middle Class Working Class
The Problem of Invariance
 The acoustic features of a word are never the same from one
utterance to another
Invariance
Geographic Region
 Interspeaker Variation Age
 Each speaker has unique acoustic features Social Class
Race
Gender
Who is the
Interspeaker system built to
understand?
Variation
The Problem of Invariance
 The acoustic features of a word are never the same from one
utterance to another
Invariance
Geographic Region
 Interspeaker Variation Age
 Each speaker has unique acoustic features Social Class
Race
What, specifically, is different?
Gender
Acoustic differences in the word “car”?

Adult Female Boston Northern


Male Child Cities
 Phoneme:
 Minimal unit of sound

Phonemic
 Phonemic Inventory
Inventory  Set of phonemes a speaker uses
 Different for different speakers
 ex: Different for different languages
Phonemic  Phonetic Inventory: sounds of a language
 Every language has a unique phonetic inventory.
Inventories
How do you determine whether a
phoneme exists in your speech?
Minimal Pairs

 Phoneme:
 Minimal unit of sound

Phonemic
 Phonemic Inventory
Inventory  Set of phonemes a speaker uses
 Different for different speakers
 ex: Different for different languages, different dialects

Eastern American: /ɔ/ Southeastern American: no /ɛ/ Detroit, Working Class,


Dawn: /dɔn/ Pen: /pɪn/ Black, Male, Teenager
Don: /dɑn/ Pin: /pɪn/ down: /dɑ̃ ʊ̃/
 Minimal Pairs
Phonemic  Words that differ by only one phoneme
Inventory
 Minimal Pairs?
 capevs. Kate
 ridervs. writer
 to bow vs. a bow
 lei vs. ray
 baked vs. bagged
Minimal Pairs
 Write Minimal Pairs for these phonemes?
 /p/ vs. /b/
 /s/ vs. /z/
 /n/ vs. /ŋ/
 /θ/ vs. /ð/
 Minimal Pairs
 Words that differ by only one phoneme
Phonemic
Inventory  If changing the phoneme changes the word
 phonemes are contrastive (different)!
 Actual acoustics of a phoneme varies…

 pa /pɑ/
 pop /pɑ/
Phonemes
/phoneme/
[actual acoustics]
 Actual acoustics of a phoneme varies…

 pa /pɑ/ [pɑ]
 pop /pɑ/[pɐ̗]
Phonemes
 Actual acoustics of a phoneme varies…

 pa /pɑ/ [pɑ]
Phonemes  pop /pɑ/[pɐ̗]

 top /tɑp/
 stop /stɑp/
 Actual acoustics of a phoneme varies.
 Accept a range of acoustic signals for a phoneme

Phonemes

t
 Actual acoustics of a phoneme varies…

 pa /pɑ/ [pɑ]
Phonemes  pop /pɑ/[pɐ̗]

 top /tɑp/ [thɑp]


 stop /stɑp/ [stɑp]
aspiration
 Aspiration = big difference acoustically!
 tock /tɑk/ [thɑk]
 stock /stɑk/ [stɑk]

As big as tock vs. dock

Phonemes

tock stock dock


 Actual acoustics of a phoneme varies.
Contrastive
Phonemic

Phonemes Noncontrastive

/t/ /d/
 Actual acoustics of a phoneme varies.
 Accept a range of acoustic signals for a phoneme
 What that range is depends on your language/dialect.

 English
 [thɑl] tall
 [tɑl] Aspiration isn’t contrastive.
Minimal Pairs (same phoneme with or without aspiration)
 [sthɑl] stall
 [stɑl]

 Korean
 [tal] 달 moon Aspiration is contrastive.
 [thal]탈 mask (different phoneme!)
[thɑk] [stɑk] [dɑk]
Aspiration is
noncontrastive.

Voicing is
phonemic.

Phonemes
Aspiration is
contrastive/
phonemic.

[tal] [thal] [t*al]


달 탈 Tensed
moon mask 딸
daughter
tuɛidifɑiviz
pronunciation English pronunciation English
translation translation

1 [phif] horse [pif] look


2 [nɛm] house [nɛn] house

Minimal Pairs 3 [fop] door [pof] cup


4 [fin] tissue [fɛn] spoon
5 [sop] snow [top] printer

Phonemes?
 Actual acoustics of a phoneme varies.
 What is contrastive depends on your language/dialect.

Contrastive
Phonemic

Phonemes Noncontrastive

/t/ /d/
New All 4 are
England different 4 phonemes
words.

1. /dɔn/
2. /dɑn/ 1&2 are
different
Phonemic Southeast
US
words.
3 phonemes
Inventory 3. /pɛn/ 3&4 are
the same
4. /pɪn/ word.

1&2 are
the same
West Coast word.
US 3&4 are
3 phonemes
different
words.
The Problem of Invariance
 The acoustic features of a word are never the same from one
utterance to another

 Interspeaker Variation Dialectology


 Each speaker has unique acoustic features and unique sets of
phonemes for a given word
Invariance  Speakers have different phonemic inventories
 Each speaker accepts a different range of acoustic values for a phoneme
Phonemic Inventory:
 Milwaukee, WI Front Vowels

/ɪ, e, a/

 Los Angeles, CA
/i, ɪ, ɛ, e, æ/
Dialectology

 Conway, AR

/i, ɪ, e, æ/
Phonemic Inventory:
 Milwaukee, WI Consonants

White Black
/t, d, θ, ð/ /t, d/
/læst/  /læs/

 Los Angeles, CA

Dialectology White Black, Hispanic


/t, d, θ, ð/ /t, d/
/læst/  /læs/

 Conway, AR

Higher Class Lower Class


/t, d, θ, ð/ /t, d/
/læst/  /læs/ /læst/  /læs/
The Problem of Invariance
 The acoustic features of a word are never the same from one
utterance to another

 Interspeaker Variation
Dialectology
 Each speaker has unique acoustic features and unique sets of
Invariance phonemes for a given word
 Speakers have different phonemic inventories
 Each speaker accepts a different range of acoustic values for a phoneme

 Intraspeaker Variation Phonology


 An individual speaker pronounces a phoneme different depending
on the phoneme’s environment

How do humans do it…?


In what
peek environment do keep
[phik] American English [khip]
speakers use a lot
of aspiration?

Phonology: Phonological Rule


Aspiration
Rules
Word IPA Environment
peek [phik] Word initial, before [i]
NOT word final, after [i]
keep [khip]

totes [thots]

Phonology:
Aspiration
Rules
Phonological Rule for Big Aspiration:
Word IPA Environment
peek [phik] Word initial, before [i]
NOT word final, after [i]
keep [khip]

totes [thots]

Phonology: peeking [phi.khiŋ]

Aspiration
Rules
Phonological Rule for Big Aspiration:
Speech Recognition:
- Range of acceptable acoustics to represent a phoneme
- That range will be different for every speaker

The Problem of Invariance


 The acoustic features of a word are never the same from one
utterance to another

 Interspeaker Variation
Dialectology
 Each speaker has unique acoustic features and unique sets of
Invariance phonemes for a given word
 Speakers have different phonemic inventories
 Each speaker accepts a different range of acoustic values for a phoneme

 Intraspeaker Variation Phonology


 An individual speaker pronounces a phoneme different depending
on the phoneme’s environment
Jobs for
Linguists Panel

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy