Lecture Notes Topic 5 Part 1
Lecture Notes Topic 5 Part 1
Percentage Return
Company A
Ri = P(R1) x R1 + P(R2) x R2 + … + P(Rn) x Rn
RA = 0.20 x 0.04 + 0.50 x 0.08 + 0.30 x 0.14 = 0.09 = 9%
Case Study
State of Probability Return
economy P A B
Company B
Ri = P(R1) x R1 + P(R2) x R2 + … + P(Rn) x Rn
RB = 0.20 x -0.10 + 0.50 x 0.18 + 0.30 x 0.30 = 0.16 = 16%
Risk
How to measure risk?
Variance, standard deviation, beta.
How to reduce risk?
Diversification.
How to price risk?
Security market line, CAPM.
Risk
What is the required rate of return on a Treasury Security?
The histograms show the frequency of each return. For example, for Asset A
the 9% return (the expected return for Asset A) occurs most often, 50% of the
time, and the 4% and 14% returns each occur 25% of the time.
Slide 12
Measuring Risk
General idea: Asset’s price range over the past
year.
More scientific approach: Asset’s standard
deviation of returns.
Standard deviation is a measure of the
dispersion (range) of possible outcomes.
The greater the standard deviation,
deviation the greater
the uncertainty, and therefore, the greater the
risk.
Measuring Risk
Standard Deviation of Returns: An Individual Asset
n
2
i ( Ri R i ) ( PRi )
i 1
Slide 14
Measuring Risk
n
2
i ( Ri R i ) ( PRi )
i 1
Company A
( 0.04 – 0.09)2 (0.20) = 0.0005
( 0.08 – 0.09)2 (0.50) = 0.00005
( 0.14 – 0.09)2 (0.30) = 0.00075
Variance = σi2 = 0.0013 = 0.13%
Standard Deviation = σi = √0.0013 = 0.0361 = 3.61%
Measuring Risk
n
2
i ( Ri R i ) ( PRi )
i 1
Company B
(-0.10 – 0.16)2 (0.20) = 0.01352
(0.18 - 0.16)2 (0.50) = 0.0002
(0.30 – 0.16)2 (0.30) = 0.00588
Variance = σi2 = 0.0196 = 1.96%
Standard Deviation = σi = √0.0196 = 0.14 = 14%
Measuring Risk
σA = 3.61%
68%
95%
1.78% 5.39% 9% 12.61% 16.22%
Mean return
Slide 17
Measuring Risk
Co. A: exp. ret. = 9%
std. dev. = 3.61%,
1 std. dev. of exp. ret. = 9% ± 3.61% = 5.39%
to 12.61%
Therefore, 68 out of 100 returns for Co. A will
range from 5.39% to 12.61%
Slide 18
Measuring Risk
2 std. dev. = 2 x 3.61% = 7.22%
2 std. dev. of exp. ret. = 9% ± 7.22%
= 1.78% to 16.22%
Therefore, 95 out of 100 returns for Co. A
will range from 1.78% to 16.22%
Slide 19
Measuring Risk
3 std. dev. = 3 x 3.61% = 10.83%
3 std. dev. of exp. ret. = 9% ± 10.83%
= -1.83% to 19.83%
Therefore, 99 out of 100 returns for Co. A
will range from -1.83% to 19.83%
Slide 20
Measuring Risk
Range of Possible Returns: Company B
σB = 14%
68%
95%
Slide 21
Measuring Risk
Co. B: exp. ret. = 16%
std. dev. = 14%,
1 std. dev. of exp. ret. = 16% ± 14% = 2%
to 30%
Therefore, 68 out of 100 returns for Co. B
will range from 2% to 30%
Slide 22
Measuring Risk
2 std. dev. = 2 x 14% = 28%
2 std. dev. of exp. ret. = 16% ± 28%
= -12% to 44%
Therefore, 95 out of 100 returns for Co. B
will range from -12% to 44%
Slide 23
Measuring Risk
3 std. dev. = 3 x 14% = 42%
3 std. dev. of exp. ret. = 16% ± 42%
= -26% to 58%
Therefore, 99 out of 100 returns for Co. B
will range from -26% to 58%
Slide 24
Measuring Risk
Coefficient of Variation (CV)
Coefficient of variation measures risk per unit of return -
for every unit of return how much risk is incurred?
i
CVi
Ri
Slide 25
Measuring Risk
Coefficient of Variation
Expected Return Std. Dev.
Share A 9% 3.61%
Share B 16% 14.0%
-0.04
-0.05 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Time Period
Portfolio Analysis
The Effect of Diversification
On the previous page we see that the returns for Assets A
and B are more varied (extreme) than is the case if they are
combined into a portfolio (with a weighting in this example of
50% each).
Example 1: In Period 2 the return for Asset A is 4.25% and
for Asset B is -1.5%, while the return on the Portfolio is 1%.
Example 2: In Period 5 the return for Asset A is -4.5% and
for Asset B is 2.5%, while the return on the Portfolio is -1%.
In both these example the return on the Portfolio is less
extreme than the returns on the two assets making up the
portfolio.
Portfolio Analysis
The Effect of Diversification
The aim of portfolio diversification is to eliminate the
risk that comes from price changes.
If a portfolio is optimally diversified this means the net
price change in the portfolio in a given period will be
zero.
Example, in a two asset portfolio of Asset A and Asset
B if the portfolio is diversified correctly then if the price
of Asset A rises by 5% the price of Asset B should fall
by 5%. Therefore, the net price change will be 0%.
Slide 33
Portfolio Analysis
The Effect of Diversification
The question should now be asked : Then how do we
make any money out of our portfolio?
Total return on an asset (including a portfolio) is made
up of an income yield and a capital gains yield.
Income yield comes from the periodic income on the
asset e.g. the dividend on a share or the
coupon/interest payment on a bond/debenture.
Capital gains yield comes from the change in the price
of an asset in a given time period.
Slide 34
Portfolio Analysis
The Effect of Diversification
Even if a portfolio is optimally diversified (which means
the net price change in the portfolio in a given period is
$0 (i.e. the net capital gains yield will be 0%)) a positive
return can still be earned because periodic income will
still be earned (dividends and interest/coupon payments
will still be received) which means the return on the
portfolio will be equal to the income yield.
Slide 35
Portfolio Analysis
The Effect of Diversification
Why would you want the net price change (capital gain) to be zero?
This example will help to explain: Assume your portfolio is made up of the
shares of only two companies - ANZ Bank and Westpac Bank.
If the Australian finance sector does well then you do very well with your
portfolio – the price of both ANZ Bank and Westpac Bank shares will rise
e.g. ANZ Bank by +7% and Westpac Bank by +10%. Your capital gains
yield is good.
But what if the Australian finance sector is doing badly? This would
probably cause the price of both ANZ Bank and Westpac Bank shares to
fall e.g. ANZ Bank shares fall in price by 5% and Westpac Bank shares fall
in price by 7%. Your capital gains yield is bad..
Portfolio theory states it’s better to eliminate the effect of price changes
(net price change/capital gains yield = 0) and receive a return on your
portfolio equal to the income yield. This will mean the returns on your
portfolio will be less varied, meaning there’s less risk in your portfolio.
Slide 36
Portfolio Analysis
Measures of Portfolio Risk
Covariance (cov(x,y)) - a statistical measure of the degree
to which the prices or returns on two assets "co-vary" or
move together – measures only the direction of the
relationship - can be positive or negative. Covariance can
be written as cov(x,y) or ρx,y σx σy.
Correlation Coefficient (ρx,y) - a standardised statistical
measure of the covariance – measures both the direction
and the strength of the relationship between the prices or
returns on two assets.
Correlation coefficient is always between -1 and +1.
Portfolio Analysis
Correlation Co-Efficient
Perfectly Positively Correlated Returns ρx,y = +1
- exact proportional movements in the same direction for the
prices or returns for two assets. If the price of Asset A goes up
by 1% the price of Asset B will go up by 1%.
Standard Deviation
σp = (W1)2(σ1)2 + (W2)2(σ2)2 + 2(W1)(W2)(ρ1,2)(σ1)(σ2)
Slide 39
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolio Risk
Taking into account the correlation between each pair of assets in a
portfolio
Slide 40
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolio Diversification
In the previous example we have a correlation coefficient ρx,y = 0.30,
meaning the prices/returns on the two assets making up the portfolio
are less than perfectly positively correlated.
The best way to interpret this correlation coefficient of 0.30 is to say if
the price of Asset 1 goes up by 1% the price of Asset 2 will go up by
0.30%.
Has there been any diversification (reduction of risk) in this portfolio?
One way of checking is by comparing the portfolio’s standard deviation
with the average weighted standard deviation of the portfolio.
The weighted average standard deviation of a portfolio is equal to W 1σ1
+ W2σ2
In the previous example this works out to be:
(0.55) (0.20) + (0.45) (0.28) =0.236= 23.6%
Slide 41
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolio Diversification
Since the standard deviation of the portfolio, 19.05%, is less than the
weighted average standard deviation of the portfolio, 23.6%, we can
conclude that by combining the two assets into a portfolio we have
reduced risk.
Whenever the standard deviation of a portfolio is less than the
weighted average standard deviation of the portfolio risk is reduced.
Whenever the correlation coefficient between a pair of assets in a
portfolio is less than +1 the standard deviation of the portfolio will be
less than the weighted average standard deviation of the portfolio and
there will be diversification of risk and risk reduction.
The closer the correlation coefficient between a pair of assets in a
portfolio is to -1, the greater the diversification benefits and risk
reduction in the portfolio.
Slide 42
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolio Risk
For portfolios with more than two assets, the "co-movement" between
each pair of assets must be considered
For a three asset portfolio:
p2 = w1212 + w2222 + w3232
+ 2 w1 w2
+ 2 w1 w3
+ 2 w2 w3
p =
w1212 + w2222 + w3232
+ 2 w1 w2
+ 2 w1 w3
+ 2 w2 w3
Slide 43
Portfolio Analysis
Correlation Coefficient
What is the impact of different correlation coefficients (ρx,y) on portfolio
risk?
Let’s try a range of correlation coefficients and see what happens to the
risk of the portfolio (as measured by standard deviation)?
Asset σi Wi ρx,y
1 .20 .55 -1.0, -0.5, 0, 0.5, 1.0
2 .28 .45
Slide 44
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolio Diversification
Where the correlation coefficient is + 1 the Std. Dev. of the portfolio is
23.6%.:
σP = (W1)2(σ1)2+(W2)2(σ2)2+2W1W2ρ1,2σ1σ2
σP = (0.55)2(0.20)2+(0.45)2(0.28)2+2(0.55)(0.45)(+1)(0.20)(0.28)
σP = (0.3025)(0.04)+(0.2025)(0.0784)+2(0.01386)
σP = (0.0121)+(0.015876)+(0.02772)
σP = 0.055696
σP = 0.236 = 23.6%
Slide 45
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolio Diversification
This gives the same result as using the weighted average standard
deviation formula:
W1σ1+W2σ2:
(0.55)(0.20)+(0.45)(0.28) = 0.11+0.126 = 0.236
Slide 46
Portfolio Analysis
Correlation Matrix: ASX Companies
Correlation Matrix
Correlation Coefficients
Slide 47
Portfolio Analysis
In general, the lower the correlation between asset prices or returns,
the greater the potential reduction of risk.
The amount of risk reduction achieved is also dependent upon the
proportions in which the assets are combined.
There is potentially an infinite number of asset combinations possible
in a given portfolio of assets.
As a theoretical exercise we can make use of all risky assets and
combine them in every possible combination and plot the resulting
risk-return outcome. The graph is called the opportunity set.
Slide 48
Portfolio Analysis
Opportunity Set
Expected
Return
Opportunity
Set
Risk σP
Portfolio Analysis
Rebel
Expected Opportunity Set Sport P/F
Return
CBA P/F
Eastpac P/F
Billabong P/F
Alpha Sport P/F
PMA P/F
ALG P/F
Risk σP
Portfolio Analysis
Efficient Frontier
How does an individual choose among all possible investments?
Investors are risk averse and rational, therefore they will choose
investments that provide the highest return for a given level of
risk or lowest risk for a given level of return. These portfolios are
known as efficient portfolios.
Efficient portfolios are found on the upper boundary of the bullet
shaped graph of the opportunity set. The upper boundary is known
as the efficient frontier.
Efficient portfolios on the efficient frontier provide:
a) maximum return for a given level of risk
b) minimum risk for a given level of return.
Portfolio Analysis
Expected
Return
P/F B
15% Efficient Frontier
P/F A
12% P/F C
P
7% 10%
Portfolio Analysis
Efficient Portfolios
Which of the portfolios, P/F A, P/F B or P/F C are efficient?
P/F A and P/F B are the efficient portfolios as they lie on the efficient frontier.
P/F C is below the efficient frontier so, therefore, it is not an efficient portfolio.
Compare P/F A to P/F C – They both have the same expected return (12%),
but P/F A has lower risk (P/F A σA = 7%, P/F C σC = 10%).
Wouldn’t you rather have P/F A? If you’re rational you would. With P/F A you
have less chance of losing your money (because it has lower risk) but you still
have the same expected return as P/F C.
Compare P/F B to P/F C – They both have the same level of risk (σp = 10%),
but P/F B has a higher expected return than P/F C (RpB = 15%, RpC = 12%).
Wouldn’t you rather have P/F B? If you’re rational you would. With P/F B you
have the same chance of losing your money as with P/F C (because they both
have the same standard deviation), but you have a higher expected return with
P/F B.
Slide 53
Portfolio Analysis
Efficient Frontier
The efficient frontier shows all possible returns open to the individual
to choose from.
Each point on the frontier represents a particular and different
combination of risky assets.
Which point on the frontier the individual will choose will depend on
their own attitude towards risk and return.
Slide 54
Portfolio Analysis
Investor Risk Preference
Expected Return
15%
B
Higher risk, higher expected return
A
7% Lower risk, lower expected return
Risk σp
5% 10%
Slide 55
Risk-Return Relationship
Risk-Averse Investor
For a risk averse investor as the level of risk increases the investor
needs increasing amounts of expected return to compensate for
each additional unit of risk, i.e. for each 1% rise in risk (as
measured by standard deviation), expected return must increase by
more and more.
Example: standard deviation increases from 5% to 6% and
expected return increases from 10% to 12%, and increase of 2
percentage points in expected return for a one unit increase in risk.
Then, standard deviation increases from 6% to 7% and expected
return has to increase from 12% to 15%, and increase of three
percentage points in expected return for a one unit increase in risk.
Slide 56