Mathematical Modelling of Centrifuge - MTECH
Mathematical Modelling of Centrifuge - MTECH
Mathematical Modelling of Centrifuge - MTECH
BY
“SHIVAKUMARREDDY P N”
USN:1NT13MTP10
1 INTRODUCTION
2 LITERATURE SURVEY
3 OBJECTIVES
4 METHODOLOGY
5 MATHEMATICAL MODELING
6 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
7 CONCLUSION
8 SCOPE FOR FUTURE WORK
9 REFERENCES
2
INTRODUCTION
• The main principle that govern centrifuge casting are the same as that of centrifugal
casting process.
• For producing FGMs, centrifuge casting technique is one of the promising candidate
because of its good reproducibility, low production cost and specially to produce solid
cylinders.
• Centrifuge casting process need not have rotational symmetry and metal castings of
desired shapes can be manufactured with all the distinct benefits of castings produced
by a centrifugal casting process.
3
INTRODUCTION
5
LITERATURE SURVEY
6
LITERATURE SURVEY
7
LITERATURE SURVEY
8
LITERATURE SURVEY
9
OBJECTIVES
1. To study the particle distribution in Functionally Graded Materials (FGM) along the longitudinal axis
of solid cylinders fabricated by centrifuge casting technique.
2. To develop a one-dimensional mathematical model for particle distribution based on particle size and
rotational speed of the mould for centrifuge casting technique.
3. To study the influence of different process parameters like rotational speed of the mold, particle size
and relative density difference between the particles and the melt on the segregation of particle.
4. To develop a mathematical model to describe the solidification time and the influence of other process
parameters on the solidification time and temperature distribution.
10
METHODOLOGY
Mathematical Modeling
Centrifuge casting technique used for producing FGM is very effective and can produce solid
shapes when compared to conventional centrifugal casting process that can produce only hollow
symmetric shapes.
11
MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION
= +⍴
= +
12
MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION
Considering spherical particles in a matrix, the equation of motion for the particles in a
rotational stoke flow
F = -6πμbV = -6πμb
= -6πμb
Thus, the two equation of motion of each co-ordinates direction are given by
=-6πμ + ⍴
= -6πμb⍴ - 2
13
MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION
= exp- exp
Where,
k = and =
14
MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION
Variance 0.5 mµ
15
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
150 150
Number of Particles
100 100
Number of Particle
50 50
0 0
30 31 32 33 34 35 30 31 32 33 34 35
Final Position [cm] Final position [cm]
2 secs 4 secs
150
CASE 1
Number of particles
100
Angular Velocity, ,
250
rpm
Viscosity, µ, mPa-s 1.38 50
Time of rotation,
2, 4 & 8
secs
0
30 31 32 33 34 35
Final position [cm]
8 secs
Particle distribution at different time intervals. 16
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
150 150
Number of Particles
Number of Particles
100 100
50 50
0 0
30 31 32 33 34 35 30 31 32 33 34 35
Final Position [cm] Final Position [cm]
2 secs 150
4 secs
Number of Particles
100
CASE 1
Angular Velocity, ,
400
rpm
50
30 31 32 33 34 35
Final Position [cm]
8 secs
Particle distribution at different time interval. 17
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
150
Number of Particles 150
Number of Particles
100 100
50 50
0 0
30 31 32 33 34 35 30 31 32 33 34 35
Final Position [cm] Final Position [cm]
2 secs 4 secs
150
CASE 1
Number of Particles
100
Angular Velocity, ,
800
rpm
Viscosity, µ, mPa-s 1.38 50
Time of rotation,
2, 4 & 8
secs
0
30 31 32 33 34 35
Final Position [cm]
8 secs
Particle distribution at different time interval.
18
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
150
150
100
Number of Particle
100
Number of Particle
50
50
0
0
30 31 32 33 34 35
30 31 32 33 34 35
Final Position [cm]
2 secs Final Position [cm]
4 secs 150
CASE 2 100
Number of Particle
Angular Velocity, ,
250
rpm
50
Viscosity, µ, mPa-s 2.66
Time of rotation,
2, 4 & 8
secs
0
30 31 32 33 34 35
Final Position [cm]
8 secs
Particle distribution at different time interval. 19
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
150
150
Number of Particles
100
Number of Particles
100
50 50
0 0
30 31 32 33 34 35 30 31 32 33 34 35
Final Position [cm] Final Position [cm]
2 secs 150
4 secs
Number of Particles
100
CASE 2
Angular Velocity, ,
400
rpm
50
Viscosity, µ, mPa-s 2.66
Time of rotation,
2, 4 & 8
secs
0
30 31 32 33 34 35
Final Position [cm]
8
Particle distribution at different time
interval.
secs 20
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
150 150
Number of Particles
Number of Particles
100 100
50 50
0 0
30 31 32 33 34 35 30 31 32 33 34 35
Final Position [cm] Final Position [cm]
2 secs
4 secs 150
Number of Particles
CASE 2
100
Angular Velocity, ,
800
rpm
50
Time of rotation,
2, 4 & 8
secs 0
30 31 32 33 34 35
Final Position [cm]
8
Particle distribution at different time secs
interval.
21
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
150
Number of Particles 150
Number of Particles
100 100
50 50
0 0
30 31 32 33 34 35 30 31 32 33 34 35
Final Position [cm] Final Position [cm]
2 secs 4 secs
150
Number of Particles
100
CASE 3
Angular Velocity, ,
400
rpm
50
30 31 32 33 34 35
Final Position [cm]
8 secs
Particle distribution density change at different time interval. 22
CONCLUSION
• Mold rotational speed directly affects the particle concentration gradient, so is the solidification
rate. Hence both are good parameters to control particle segregation.
• Analytical solution was carried out for centrifuge casting technique to study the particle
distribution in a fluid under centrifugal forces.
• Particle distribution is affected by the density difference between particle and fluid and the
denser particle will settle far from the center of axis of rotation.
• Particle distribution is affected by the viscosity of the fluid. As the viscosity of fluid is
increased the particle distribution rate decreases.
23
SCOPE FOR FUTURE WORK
• In the present work, a mathematical model is developed to study the particle distribution in a fluid
using centrifuge casting technique. The influence of different process parameters like viscosity of
fluid, rotational speed of mold, particle size and relative density difference between the particles
and fluid is studied.
• The mathematical model developed during the present work do not consider the solidification of
molten metals under varying viscosity with respect to time and this can be incorporated for future
study to analyse particle distribution.
24
REFERENCES
• Fukui, Y. (1991). Fundamental Investigation of Functionally Gradient Material Manufacturing
System using Centrifugal Force. JSME international journal. Ser. 3, Vibration, control engineering,
engineering for industry 34(1): 144-148
• Hur, B.-Y., S.-H. Park, et al. (2003). Viscosity and surface tension of Al and effects of additional
element. Materials Science Forum 439: 51-56.
• Lavine, A. S., F. P. Incropera, et al. (2006). Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. Sixth Edition
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
• Panda, E., D. Mazumdar, et al. (2006). Mathematical Modeling of Particle Segregation During
Centrifugal Casting of Metal Matrix Composites. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions
• Suresh, S. and A. Mortensen (1998). Fundamentals of functionally graded materials : processing
and thermomechanical behaviour of graded metals and metal-ceramic composites. London, IOM
Communications Ltd.
• Watanabe, Y., A. Kawamoto, et al. (2002). Particle size distributions in functionally graded materials
fabricated by the centrifugal solid-particle method. Composites Science and Technology 62(6): 881-
888.
• FGM research: design (Ogawa et al 2006), processing (Song et al 2006), (Zhang et al 2009), (Peng
et al 2007) and modeling (Panda et al 2006).
25
REFERENCES
• Victor Birman, Larry W. Byrd, “Modeling and Analysis of Functionally Graded Materials
and Structures”, September 2007.
• J.W. Gao, C.Y. Wang, “Modeling the solidification of functionally graded materials by centrifugal
casting”.
• Yoshimi Watanabe, Akihiro Kawamoto, Koichi Matsuda, “Particle size distributions in functionally
graded materials fabricated by the centrifugal solid-particle method”, December, 2001.
• Michael M. Gasik, “Micromechanical modelling of functionally graded materials”.
• J N Reddy, “Thermomechanical behavior of FGMs”, August 1998.
• Song, C J., Xu, Z M.and Li, J G., "Study of in-situ Al/Mg2Si functionally graded materials by
electromagnetic separation method," Materials Science & Engineering, vol. 424, pp. 6-16, 2005.
• Lin, C Y., Bathias, C., McShane, H B., and Rawlings, R D, "Production of silicon carbide Al 2124
alloy functionally graded materials by mechanical powder metallurgy technique," Powder
Metallurgy, vol. 1, no. 42, pp. 29-33, 1999.
• Watanabe, Y, "Particle size distributions in functionally graded materials fabricated by the
centrifugal solid-particle method," Composites science and Technology, vol. 62, pp. 881-888, 2002.
• Kiran, Aithal, S., Vijay, Desai., Narendranath, S. and P G Mukunda., "“Effect of process parameters
on centrifugally cast Al-Si FGM”," Light metals, 2013.
26
27