The document compares the design of ICF and FIAT bogies used in Indian trains. It outlines some limitations of the ICF bogie design related to flexibilities, space constraints, and damping. The FIAT bogie design addresses these issues through features like an H-shaped frame without headstocks, articulated frame-axle joints, and directly mounted secondary springs. It also allows for higher speeds, longer maintenance intervals, and improved riding comfort compared to the ICF bogie. Key components of the bogies like wheel-axle arrangements, bearings, suspensions, and braking systems are also compared.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document compares the design of ICF and FIAT bogies used in Indian trains. It outlines some limitations of the ICF bogie design related to flexibilities, space constraints, and damping. The FIAT bogie design addresses these issues through features like an H-shaped frame without headstocks, articulated frame-axle joints, and directly mounted secondary springs. It also allows for higher speeds, longer maintenance intervals, and improved riding comfort compared to the ICF bogie. Key components of the bogies like wheel-axle arrangements, bearings, suspensions, and braking systems are also compared.
The document compares the design of ICF and FIAT bogies used in Indian trains. It outlines some limitations of the ICF bogie design related to flexibilities, space constraints, and damping. The FIAT bogie design addresses these issues through features like an H-shaped frame without headstocks, articulated frame-axle joints, and directly mounted secondary springs. It also allows for higher speeds, longer maintenance intervals, and improved riding comfort compared to the ICF bogie. Key components of the bogies like wheel-axle arrangements, bearings, suspensions, and braking systems are also compared.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document compares the design of ICF and FIAT bogies used in Indian trains. It outlines some limitations of the ICF bogie design related to flexibilities, space constraints, and damping. The FIAT bogie design addresses these issues through features like an H-shaped frame without headstocks, articulated frame-axle joints, and directly mounted secondary springs. It also allows for higher speeds, longer maintenance intervals, and improved riding comfort compared to the ICF bogie. Key components of the bogies like wheel-axle arrangements, bearings, suspensions, and braking systems are also compared.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 76
COMPAPISOM 8ETWEEM
ICF & LH8 8O0IE
Presenfed by S.Sinqh. AP/C&W / IPIMEE / JomoIpur Limitations of ICF bogie Design Required IongitudinaI and transverse fIexibiIities at frame-axIe joint can not be obtained. VerticaI space constraints to accommodate Ionger secondary suspension springs. Non avaiIabiIity of friction damping in the transverse suspension. Headstocks increase the yaw inertia of the bogie. Large wheeIbase affects curvabiIity / WheeI fIange wear. Isometric View of FIAT Bogie Achievement Through FAT Bogie Better Comfort ncreased Speed #ide ndex CF 2.6 at 160 kmph in vertical modes and 3.4 / 3.5 at 160 kmph in lateral mode FAT #ide index shall be 2.5 but not exceeding 2.75 both in vertical and lateral modes conomic Advantage Speed potential LHB CF Test speed 180 kmph 160 kmph Service speed 160 kmph 140 kmph Oil leakage problem No Very high conomic Advantage Higher availability Shop Attention Schedule CF LHB 1 st attn 9 months/2 lakh kms (ioh) 18 months / 5 lakh kms 2 nd attn 18 months/4 lakh kms (poh) 36 months/ 10 lakh kms NO PAINTING REQUIRED FOR 6 YEARS ain Units of a Bogie 1. Bogie Frame 2. Wheel and Axle 3. Bearing Arrangement 4. Bogie Frame Axle Joint 5. Bolster 6. Primary Suspension 7. Secondary Suspension 8. Bogie Body Joint 9. Brake System Bogie Frame CF Box type with headstock FAT H type boxes construction without headstock Two side frame of Y Shaped longitudinal beam connected by two tubular steel members Bogie Frame ICF FIAT Bogie Frame of FAT Wheel Diameter CF New: 915 mm Condemned: 813 mm FAT New: 915 mm Condemned: 845 mm Wheel and Axle Wheel Gauge of LHB Wheel and Axle CF 2896 mm FAT 2560 mm Less Wheel-base improves its ability to negotiate curves Wheel and Axle Wheel Base aximum distance between nner Wheel CF 11887 mm FAT 12345 mm Wheel and Axle Bearing Arrangement CF Spherical roller Bearing FAT Cartridge tapered roller bearing Lesser maintenance attention Bearing Arrangement ICF FIAT Bogie Frame Axle Joint CF #igid FAT Articulated by control arm Longitudinal and transverse flexibilities of the axle can be optimised independently. Bogie Frame Axle Joint ICF FIAT Bogie Frame Axle Joint of FAT Bolster ICF FIAT Bolster ICF FIAT Bolster Beam of FAT Primary Suspension Unit CF Coil spring with dashpot level FAT Coil springs are nested with hydraulic damper and control arm ore reliable and maintenance free as compared to dash pot. Primary Suspension Unit ICF FIAT Primary Suspension Unit of FAT Primary Suspension Unit of FAT CF Secondary spring on lower spring beam through hangers FAT Secondary spring directly mounted on the side frames Vertical space constraints to accommodate desirably softer secondary suspension springs. Secondary Suspension Unit ICF FIAT Secondary Suspension Unit Secondary Suspension Unit Bogie - Body Joint CF Through Centre pivot FAT Through pivot assembly on transverse beam and bracket on doom Bogie Body Joint of CF Bogie - Body Joint of FAT Bogie - Body Joint of FAT Bogie - Body Joint of FAT Bogie - Body Joint of FAT Bogie - Body Joint of FAT Bogie - Body Joint of FAT Brake System CF Clasp type brake FAT Axle mounted disc brake #educes wheel tread wear Suitable for offer higher braking force #equire lesser maintenance Brake System ICF FIAT Clasp type brake Disc Brake Brake System of LHB Brake System of LHB Brake System of LHB aintenance requirement in POH CF ore due to - Axle guide arrangement - Spherical #oller Bearing - Clasp brake - ore pin joints FAT Very little due to - Disc Brake - CT#B - Bogie frame, springs and rubber components. - Wheel with improved curving characteristic Body Secondary Suspension springs Bogie Frame the primary suspension springs and Irame - axle bearing control arm. Axle VERTICAL FORCES TRANSMISSION Body Secondary Suspension Springs Bogie Irame Elastic elements oI the Irame axle bearing control arm. Axle LATERAL FORCES TRANSMISION Coach Body Traction Lever and Traction Centre Rods Bogie Frame Frame Axle bearing Control Axle. LONGITUDINAL FORCES TRANSMISSION (TRACTION EFFORTS AND BRAKING POWERS) NOSING BOUNCING PITCHING LURCHING SHUTTLING ROLLING Z Z Y Y X X Oscillation modes oI vehicles There are six modes oI oscillations: Shuttling ffect from Body Bolster to Bogie Frame Shuttling ffect from Body Bolster to Bogie Frame Shuttling ffect from Body Bolster to Bogie Frame Shuttling ffect from Body Bolster to Bogie Frame Shuttling ffect from Body Bolster to Bogie Frame Shuttling ffect from Body Bolster to Bogie Frame Shuttling ffect from Body Bolster to Bogie Frame Longitudinal Bump Shuttling ffect from Body Bolster to Bogie Frame Shuttling ffect from Body Bolster to Bogie Frame Longitudinal Bump Shuttling ffect from Bogie Frame to Axle CF Not provided FAT Provided #olling ffect Anti #olling Arrangement #olling ffect Anti #olling Arrangement of FAT #olling ffect Anti #olling Arrangement of FAT #olling ffect Anti #olling Arrangement of FAT Lurching ffect Lurching ffect Lurching ffect Lurching ffect Lateral Bump Lurching ffect Lateral Bump Pitching ffect Pitching ffect Pitching ffect Bouncing ffect Bouncing ffect Bouncing ffect Yaw ffect Yaw ffect Thank you