Phase 1 ASSESS
Phase 1 ASSESS
Phase 1 ASSESS
1
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
PHASE 1 - ASSESS
2
Objectives of Phase 1: Assess
Phase 1:
Assess
Phase 2:
Plan
Phase 3: Act
Step 2: Identify/Review Priority Improvement
Areas
2.2
Identify / Review Priority
Improvement Areas
Activity 2.1: Present and discuss the information
gathered during the preparatory activities
KEY
SIP needs to be
Idea evidence-based
Division Targets
B2. CURRENTLY
B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
Drop out
Rate is 0
Promotion
Rate: 91%
National
Achievement
Test (NAT)
Mean
Percentage
Score (MPS)
65
Gap Analysis
B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
B2. CURRENTLY CONTRIBUTING
A. DIVISION
TARGETS B3. INHIBITING B4. PROJECTS B5. GROUPS THAT
B1. DATA NEEDED YES/
EXPLANATION FACTORS IMPLEMENTED REQUIRE ATTENTION
NO
High dropout
Drop out rate Overall rates due to
SY 2018-2019 dropout rates in the Adopt A 40 learners in
Drop – 1.5% No school over the following: Child Grades K to 3
out SY 2019-2020 last three years -financial Program
Rate: – 1.3% have not been matters
SY 2020-2021 lower than -health
0.1%
– 1.4% 0.1% problems
-child labor
Gap Analysis
B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
B2. CURRENTLY CONTRIBUTING
A. DIVISION
TARGETS B3. INHIBITING B4. PROJECTS B5. GROUPS THAT
B1. DATA NEEDED YES/
EXPLANATION FACTORS IMPLEMENTED REQUIRE ATTENTION
NO
A. DIVISION
TARGETS B3. INHIBITING B4. PROJECTS B5. GROUPS THAT
B1. DATA NEEDED YES/
EXPLANATION FACTORS IMPLEMENTED REQUIRE ATTENTION
NO
OUTPUT CHECK:
Documentation of the discussion
Initial list of improvement areas
Gap Analysis Template (Annex 3)
For Year 2 and Year 3
BEGIN WITH THIS STEP.
2.2
Identify / Review Priority
Improvement Areas
Activity 2.2: Identify / Review the Priority
Improvement Areas
5 – Very high
The urgency or need to improve the area 4 – High
Urgency as soon as possible.
3 – Moderate
2 – Low
The number of learners that will benefit
Magnitude when the improvement area is 1 – Very low
addressed.
High dropout
2 5 3 3 3.25 Moderate Priority
rate
Low promotion
1 5 5 4 3.75 High Priority
rate
Low English
3 5 5 5 4.5 Very High Priority
literacy
Improvement Strategic
Urgency Magnitude Feasibility Average Interpretation
Areas Importance
Low promotion
1 5 5 4 3.75 High Priority
rate
Low English
3 5 5 5 4.5 Very High Priority
literacy
Improvement Strategic
Urgency Magnitude Feasibility Average Interpretation
Areas Importance
• Strategic importance – can benefit dropout rates, promotion rates, and low literacy
• Urgency – needs to be addressed immediately before rainy season starts
• Magnitude – affects learners who have to pass through flood-prone roads just outside the
school
• Feasibility – school can only mitigate flooding, and only within its immediate vicinity
Annex 5: Planning Worksheet
Activity 2.2: Identify / Review PIAs
OUTPUT CHECK:
32
Rate your knowledge about the concepts using the
following Vocabulary Knowledge Scale:
S M A R T
SPECIFI MEASURABLE ATTAINABLE REALISTIC TIME-BOUND
C
What do you How will you Is it in your Can you When exactly
want to do know when power to realistically do you want
specifically? you’ve reach accomplish it? achieve it? to accomplish
it? it?
For Year 2 and Year 3
Verb Indicator
To increase the MPS in English from a
range of 49.88 to 53.96 to 75 in 3 years
Baseline Target Time Period
Let’s Set the
Objectives
1. Using low English proficiency as the PIA, set your
objectives by filling out the template. (10 minutes)
What is it
What do you “To do” on
about the PIA What “to Time
PIA want to what? (a.k.a. Objective BL T
that made it do”? Period
happen? Indicator)
an IA?
Low
English
profi-
ciency
1. Transfer your objective statement to the 2 nd
column of the Planning Worksheet. (3 minutes)
43
OUTPUT CHECK:
The members of the Project Team may be drawn from the community,
teachers, and learners with at least one member coming from the SPT.
Schools may use the IPCRF to determine project team members and to
encourage teachers to join project teams.
OUTPUT CHECK:
Project team member list with roles and
responsibilities or Team Charter
While SIP is a
process/methodological,
listening to the voice of the
learners can happen at any
time.
For Year 2 and Year 3
OUTPUT CHECK:
Waiting
58
Activity 3.4: Analyze school process
Analyzing
Checking the test Recording the test
papers scores performance END
on items
61
Activity 3.4: Analyze the school process
63
Exercise:
65
INTERVIEW WITH LEARNER
Project team (PT): Kamusta ang
Learner (L): Maayos naman po.
grades mo sa school?
PT: Ah, mabuti ‘yan! Hindi ka L: Nahihirapan din po.
nahihirapan sa lessons mo?
PT: Sa anong subject ka nahirapan. L: Sa English po.
PT: Saan ka nahihirapan sa English?
PT: Anong lesson ka nahihirapan? L: Hindi ko po naiintindihan ang
lesson.
PT: Nagagawa mo naman i- L: Marami po. Marami kasi pinapa-
memorize? memorize si teacher.
PT: Tinutulungan ka ni teacher kapag L: ‘Yung iba po. Nakakapagod po kasi
hindi mo na magawa? magbasa.
L: Sinasabi lang po niya na basahin ko
pa.
Instructions
67
Workshop
Presentation of
Output
Takes more than 10
32% of students (22 out
minutes for students to Takes less than
of 68) doodle on their
settle down per class 30 seconds per
notebooks per day
class
70
For Year 2 and Year 3
71
For Year 2 and Year 3
OUTPUT CHECK:
72
Step 3. Analyze the Priority Improvement Areas
3.1 Set general objectives
3.2 Organize the project teams
75
Teaching-Learning
Takes more than 10
Takes less than 32% of students (22 out
minutes for students to
30 seconds per of 68) doodle on their
settle down per class
class notebooks per day
76
Activity 3.5: Select Area of Focus
Having identified your area of
focus from the storm clouds,
formulate it into a problem
statement.
What is the magnitude of the
54 out of 68 Grade 3 problem?
students incorrectly How often is it happening?
Where is it happening?
answered during When does it happen?
recitation.
77
For Year 2 and Year 3
78
Activity 3.5: Select Area of Focus
Output Check:
Problem statement based on your area of foucs
79
In 2 minutes,
find out the
root cause of your
partner’s response
Person A to Person B:
“What is your favorite TV show?”
In 2 minutes,
find out the
root cause of your
partner’s response
Person B to Person A:
“Who was your childhood crush?”
Step 3. Analyze the Priority Improvement Areas
3.1 Set general objectives
3.2 Organize the project teams
“The weed”
• Symptoms of the
problem.
• Above the surface
The root cause is (obvious)
the deepest
underlying cause “The root”
• Underlying causes.
of the problems • Below the surface
within any (not obvious)
process
84
Activity 3.6: Do Root Cause Analysis
85
Activity 3.6 Do root cause analysis
88
Activity 3.6: Do Root Cause Analysis
Approach 2: Why-Why Diagram
89
Activity 3.6: Do Root Cause Analysis
92
For Year 2 and Year 3
95
Activity 3.6: Do Root Cause Analysis
OUTPUT CHECK:
3.4
Analyze the school process
101
Activity 3.7: Present the root cause to the SPT
OUTPUT CHECK:
Presentation (in powerpoint or hard copy) of the
root cause, with the supporting data, process
flowchart, and area of focus
102
Q&A
103
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Preparatory
Activities
Phase 1:
Assess
Phase 2:
Plan
Phase 3: Act
Identify / Review Priority Improvement Areas
3.4
Analyze the school process