Dielectric Properties of Foods
Dielectric Properties of Foods
Dielectric Properties of Foods
The typical frequencies used in microwaves are 2450 MHz for home type
ovens and 915 MHz for industrial use.
The physically separated charges are called dipoles. Molecules with such
separated charges are known as polar molecules.
Molecules having a center of symmetry such as methane (CH 4) are nonpolar and
exhibit zero dipole moment. Molecules such as water or gelatin are polar because
they have no charge symmetry and exhibit strong dipole moments.
The parameter that measures microwave absorptivity is the loss factor. The
values of dielectric constant and loss factor will play important roles in
determining the interaction of microwaves with food.
The rate of heat generation per unit volume (Q) at a location inside the food
during microwave heating can be characterized by
Q = 2π f ε0ε’’E2
where f is the frequency, ε0 is the dielectric constant of free space (8.854 ×
10−12 F/m), ε’’ is the dielectric loss factor, and E is the electric field.
As microwaves move through the slab at any point, the rate of heat
generated per unit volume decreases.
For materials having a high loss factor, the rate of heat generated decreases
rapidly and microwave energy does not penetrate deeply.
As can be seen in the figures, dielectric properties of cooking oil are very low
because of its nonpolar characteristic. Dielectric properties of water and high-
moisture-containing foods such as fruits, vegetables, and meat are high because of
dipolar rotation. The highest loss factor is observed in the case of salt-containing
foods such as ham.
Estimate the penetration depth of a chicken meat during processing in home type
microwave oven. Chicken meat has a dielectric constant of 53.2 and dielectric loss
factor of 18.1. Assume that dielectric properties are constant during heating.
Solution
The dielectric loss factor is affected by the losses in free and bound water but
since relaxation of bound water takes place below microwave frequencies,
its effects are small in microwave processing.
The stronger the binding forces between protein or carbohydrates and water,
the smaller the value of the dielectric constant and loss factor since free
water in the system decreases.
For food materials having high moisture contents, bound water does not play a
significant role and the dielectric properties are affected by dissolved
constituents as well as water content.
During thawing, both dielectric constant and loss factor show large increases
with temperature. After the material thaws, dielectric properties decrease with
increasing temperature for different food materials except for a salted food
(ham).
The variation of dielectric loss factor of a salt solution or a salty material with
respect to temperature is different because the loss factor of a salt solution is
composed of two components: dipolar loss and ionic loss.
Figure below shows the variation of loss factor components with temperature.
At higher temperatures, ions become more mobile and not tightly bound to water, and thus the
loss factor from ionic loss component increases with temperature.
On the other hand, microwave heating of water molecules or food containing free moisture
decreases with increasing temperature. The reasons are the rare hydrogen bonds and more
intense movements which require less energy to overcome intermolecular bond at higher
temperatures.
For materials containing both dipolar and ionic components, it is possible to observe first a
decrease and then an increase in loss factor with temperature.
Effects of Composition of Foods on Dielectric Properties
The presence of free and bound water, surface charges, electrolytes, non-
electrolytes, and hydrogen bonding in the food product play important
roles in dielectric properties.
Starches, sugars, and gums are the major carbohydrates in food systems.
When the dielectric properties of different starches in powder form were measured at
2450 MHz, both the dielectric constant and the loss factor increased with
temperature. The difference between loss factors of different starches in powder form
was explained by the differences in their bulk densities.
Table below shows the variation of loss factor of starch with bulk densities. The
lower the bulk density, the lower the loss factor observed.
For starch suspensions, the effect of free water on dielectric properties becomes
significant. Dielectric constant and loss factor of different starch suspensions were
shown to decrease as temperature and starch concentration increased.
The increase in starch concentration decreases both the dielectric constant and loss
factor since starch molecules bind water and reduce the amount of free water in
the system.
(b) Sugar
Gums have the ability to bind high amounts of free water in the system.
Since lipids are hydrophobic except for ionizable carboxyl groups of fatty
acids, they do not interact much with microwaves.
Therefore, dielectric properties of fats and oils are very low. The effect of fat
on dielectric properties of food systems is mainly the result of their dilution
effect in the system.
The increase in fat content reduces the free water content in the system, which
reduces the dielectric properties.
Dielectric Properties of Proteins
Free amino acids are dielectrically reactive. Free amino acids and polypeptides
contribute to the increase in dielectric loss factor.
The water adsorbed on the protein also affects their dielectric properties
2. The dielectric constant and loss factor of heated gluten–starch mixture were found to be less
than unheated mixture. As the amount of gluten protein in the system increased, there was a
decrease in the dielectric constant but the loss factor remained constant. The interaction of
gluten with microwaves has been known to adversely affect the texture of microwave baked
breads . Microwave-baked breads containing low amounts of gluten were shown to be softer
than the ones containing high amounts of gluten .
3. Addition of low levels of gliadin, mildly hydrolyzed wheat gluten, or wheat protein isolate to
the bread formula was effective in reducing the microwave induced toughness of pup loaf
bread but was not effective in reducing microwave induced toughness of hoagie buns.