Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 51 views

    Comparison of Signature-Based Detection and Behavior-Based Detection For Effective Malware Detection

    Uploaded by

    AkbarRosyidi
    The document compares signature-based and behavior-based malware detection methods. Signature-based detection identifies malware based on unique signatures or patterns by comparing files against a database of known malware signatures. Behavior-based detection analyzes software behavior in real-time to detect potentially malicious activity. While signature-based detection is effective for known malware, behavior-based detection is better for unknown malware. Using a combination of both methods provides more comprehensive protection against evolving malware threats.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Comparison of Signature-Based Detection and Behavior-Based Detection For Effective Malware Detection

    Uploaded by

    AkbarRosyidi
    51 views16 pages
    The document compares signature-based and behavior-based malware detection methods. Signature-based detection identifies malware based on unique signatures or patterns by comparing files against a database of known malware signatures. Behavior-based detection analyzes software behavior in real-time to detect potentially malicious activity. While signature-based detection is effective for known malware, behavior-based detection is better for unknown malware. Using a combination of both methods provides more comprehensive protection against evolving malware threats.

    Original Title

    Untitled

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document compares signature-based and behavior-based malware detection methods. Signature-based detection identifies malware based on unique signatures or patterns by comparing files against a database of known malware signatures. Behavior-based detection analyzes software behavior in real-time to detect potentially malicious activity. While signature-based detection is effective for known malware, behavior-based detection is better for unknown malware. Using a combination of both methods provides more comprehensive protection against evolving malware threats.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    51 views16 pages

    Comparison of Signature-Based Detection and Behavior-Based Detection For Effective Malware Detection

    Uploaded by

    AkbarRosyidi
    The document compares signature-based and behavior-based malware detection methods. Signature-based detection identifies malware based on unique signatures or patterns by comparing files against a database of known malware signatures. Behavior-based detection analyzes software behavior in real-time to detect potentially malicious activity. While signature-based detection is effective for known malware, behavior-based detection is better for unknown malware. Using a combination of both methods provides more comprehensive protection against evolving malware threats.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 16

    Comparison of

    Signature-based Detection
    and Behavior-based
    Detection for Effective
    Malware Detection
    Akbar Rosyidi - 20220130008
    Table of
    Introduction
    01 What is malware and how Contents
    Detect it

    Study Literature
    02 What Method we use to
    detect it

    Discussion
    03 Sample Case and Evaluation

    Conclusion
    04 It is a Good Method?
    01
    Study
    Literature
    What is Malware
    What is Malware
    Malware is a term used to describe malicious software
    that is designed to harm or exploit computer systems.
    These types of software are designed to carry out
    unauthorized actions on a computer system, such as
    stealing sensitive information, compromising the
    security of the system, or disrupting the normal
    functioning of the computer.
    Methods Of Malware Detection
    In recent years, various
    techniques have been
    developed to detect malware,
    ranging from signature-based
    methods to behavior-based and
    machine learning-based
    approaches. Each of these
    methods has its own strengths
    and weaknesses, and the choice
    of approach depends on the
    specific requirements of the
    organization and the type of
    malware that is being targeted.
    02
    Introduction
    What Method We Use To Detect It
    Methods Of Malware Detection

    01 02
    Signature-based Behavior-based
    identifies malware analyzes the behavior
    based on its unique of software.
    signature or pattern.

    03 04
    Heuristics-based Machine learning
    uses algorithms and uses artificial intelligence
    statistical analysis to and machine learning
    detect malware. algorithms to detect
    malware.
    03
    Discussion
    Example Case
    Signature-based detection Case

    The signature-based detection system


    works by comparing files on the system
    against a database of predefined
    signatures of known malware. The
    database is updated regularly to ensure
    that it contains the latest information on
    known malware.
    Signature-based detection Case

    user on the system downloads a The system generates an


    file from the internet that is
    suspected to be malware alert

    1 2 3 4

    The signature-based detection the user is notified that


    system determines that the file
    contains a signature that is the file is malicious and
    associated with a known piece of should not be opened
    malware
    Behavior-based detection Case

    The behaviour-based detection system


    works by analysing the behaviour of
    software on the system to determine if it
    is malicious. The system uses algorithms
    to monitor the behaviour of software in
    real-time and look for signs of malicious
    activity.
    Signature-based detection Case

    user on the system downloads a The behaviour-based detection


    new piece of software from the system generates an alert
    internet

    1 2 3 4

    The behaviour-based detection the user is notified that


    system determines that the
    software is exhibiting behaviour the software is
    that is associated with malware potentially malicious
    and should not be run
    Evaluation
    Signature-based detection: Behaviour-based detection:

    Pros: Pros:
    • Simple and straightforward to • Effective against unknown malware.
    implement. • Can detect malware that is designed to evade
    • Requires relatively few resources. signature-based detection.
    • Effective against known malware. •Does not rely on a database.

    Cons: Cons:
    • Can be easily defeated by malware. • More complex.
    • The signature database must be updated • Can generate false positives.
    regularly. • May require more expertise.
    • Can generate false positives.
    04
    Conlusion
    Conclusion

    Given the advantages and


    disadvantages of each
    the detection of malware is
    method, it is recommended to important to continue
    a critical task for ensuring
    use a combination of researching and developing
    the security and stability of
    different methods for new methods for detecting
    computer systems. There
    comprehensive protection malware, as the threat
    are several methods for
    against malware. This allows landscape is constantly
    detecting malware,
    the strengths of each method evolving, and new forms of
    including signature-based
    to complement each other malware are being developed
    detection and behavior-
    and provide a more complete all the time.
    based detection
    solution for detecting and
    preventing malware
    “Cybercrime is one of the
    greatest threats facing our
    society, and malware is one of
    the most dangerous weapons in
    the cybercriminal's arsenal.”
    — Rob Wainwright, Former
    Executive Director of Europol.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy