Unit 3
Unit 3
Performance Management
Performance Management system (PMS)
Performance management is a process intended to improve
individual and organizational performance. Employees and
their manager mutually establish goals and expectations that are
specific, measurable, attainable and are linked to the goals of
higher level management.
Evolution of performance management
System (PMS)
Evolution of performance management
system (Pms)
The philosophy behind a performance appraisal system is to improve human
resource management. This in turn improves the company’s overall
performance. It is an opportunity to recognize individual performance and
achievement. Individual’s need positive feedback in order to feel that they are
being recognized as contributing to a company’s overall success. Appraisals
are also an opportunity to improve performance by setting further goals and
agreeing upon suitable actions to achieve them. Traditionally appraisals are
carried out annually or half yearly. More and more organizations now are
moving more towards slightly more informal and more frequent performance
discussions with team members. This has the benefit of keeping goals and
performance in people’s minds and grows a positive culture of open
communication and recognition within an organization.
Objectives of performance management
system (pms)
• To enable the employees towards achievement of superior standards of work performance.
• To help the employees in identifying the knowledge and skills required for performing the job efficiently
as this would drive their focus towards performing the right task in the right way.
• Boosting the performance of the employees by encouraging employee empowerment, motivation and
implementation of an effective reward mechanism.
• Promoting a two way system of communication between the supervisors and the employees for clarifying
expectations about the roles and accountabilities, communicating the functional and organizational goals,
providing a regular and a transparent feedback for improving employee performance and continuous
coaching.
• Identifying the barriers to effective performance and resolving those barriers through constant monitoring,
coaching and development interventions.
• Creating a basis for several administrative decisions strategic planning, succession planning, promotions
and performance based payment.
• Promoting personal growth and advancement in the career of the employees by helping them in acquiring
the desired knowledge and skills.
Characteristics of PMS
• Fair and Accurate
A major issue with the traditional performance management system is
the personal bias and perspectives of managers, which inhibits the
fairness in the process. Fair and accurate performance review is done by
involving multiple people in the review process of an employee.
A modern performance management system involves 360 degree
feedback and reviews that incorporate feedback from multiple partners.
Such a review process eliminates the personal bias and perspectives of
managers and takes anonymous feedback from the concerned people.
Continue..
• The System Must be Efficient
An efficient performance appraisal system establishes and communicates goals and
performance expectations to employees. It helps in reducing the manual efforts and
overall time required to conduct the performance review process. Thereby providing
accurate results for taking actions.
Continue..
• Continuous, Flexible, and Intuitive
As organizations have started embracing automation, they look for performance
management systems that can simplify complex tasks and are flexible enough to
accommodate changing business dynamics. Performance management systems are
continually evolving with technology. They offer intelligent insights based on the
input data and solve multiple technical problems that is difficult for human resource
managers to comprehend.
Continue..
1. Traditional
Many of us associate the term ‘traditional’ with something primitive. However, the
traditional performance management model – the annual performance management
model – is still the best one for several organizations. The yearly review model of
performance management works well for teams that work with long-term, yearly
goals with fixed plans. This performance management model is ideal for
organizations that have exceptionally high employee retention rates.
The downside of this model, however, is that the employee would have to stick
with an organization for at least a year to receive even one of these annual reviews
and might not experience feedback or suggestions for improvement over the year.
Continue..
2. Bi-annual
A bi-annual performance management model is essentially the
traditional/yearly model broken into two sections. The employee will be
evaluated for their work twice over the course of a year. This
performance management model is again perfect for teams that work
with long-term goals but have some room for change. This model gives
teams a chance to bring all operations back on track in case of
deviations and calibrate the processes that are in motion.
This model could also work for an organization that works with
flexible/multiple goals but is inflexible with the execution process.
Continue..
3. Project-based
The project-based performance management model, as the name implies, is one where an employee is
evaluated on a project-by-project basis. For this model to be successful, one needs to decide on every
outcome one wants from a project and have the exact evaluation metrics mapped out in advance.
After each project is completed, the team members review every step taken, every setback, and every
goal achieved, and management can analyze an employee’s performance on that particular project.
This works well for teams that work with different clients and receive different requirements from
each project they take up. In the case of long-term projects, the frequency of these reviews can be
increased. The regular, continuous feedback sessions that this performance management model
promotes help employees with significant professional development and fast-paced growth.
One downside to adopting the project-based performance management model is that reviews might
not be the perfect barometer for the evaluation of an employee’s overall performance, since the
reviews are only based on performance in one particular project.
Continue..
4. Stack ranking
Stack ranking is a relatively old model of performance management that works on the
foundation of improving performance by driving competition amongst employees. It is a model
in which management gives ratings to employees, and the stack ranking fosters a competitive
atmosphere in the workplace that motivates people to perform better. With numbers and
defined metrics in place, evaluations become easier to understand, document, and analyze.
There are a few cons to using stack ranking as a performance management model:
The performance measuring practices become more quantitative rather than qualitative.
The practice could promote a negative work culture where people might feel like they are pitted
against one another.
The model could lower morale and result in dissatisfaction among employees.
When not done right, and without the right tools of positive reinforcement, this performance
management model can also end up decreasing productivity instead of increasing it.
Continue..
5. High-growth (Highly recommended)
The high-growth model of performance management is one that is holistic and
built on the pillars of planning, monitoring, reviewing, and rewarding.
The high-growth model is relatively new and is suited for agile teams across
industries. This model supports annual and bi-annual review sessions,
reinforced by smaller periodic check-ins to evaluate employees more
extensively and frequently. Since the high-growth performance management
model involves shorter assessment periods and frequent evaluations,
incorporating performance improvement feedback becomes easier.
Goals for a high-growth performance management model are typically set based
on a lot of factors and are SMART, which stands for specific, measurable,
achievable, relevant, and time-bound.
Performance measurement planning and
methods
1. Defining performance and selecting a measurement approach
2. Developing job descriptions
3. Defining performance standards
4. KRA’s and KPI’s based on job descriptions
5. Designing appraisal forms
6. Methods of performance appraisal
Defining performance and selecting a measurement approach
Continue..
Defining Performance :
Continue..
Determinants of Performance:
Continue..
Continue..
Continue..
Continue..
Performance Dimension
Continue..
Continue..
Continue..
Continue..