Theory of Planned Change

THEORY OF PLANNED
CHANGE
BSSW
LOUR DIANNE S. EMATA
LIEZL ANN ELGARAN
What is Planned Change?
• Planned change is defined as the process of

preparing the entire organization or at least a
significant part of it for new goals or new direction.
The direction can be culture, internal structures,
metrics and records, processes, or any other
relevant and related aspect.
Theories of planned change
There are three significant organizational change or planned change

theories used to help the organizational members manage the
change.
• 1. Lewin’s change model

• 2. Action Research Model
• 3. Contemporary approaches to change
1. Lewin’s change model
Lewin’s model is the basis for comprehending organizational

change. It was developed by Kurt Lewin and had three steps in it.
Lewin’s change model suggests increasing the factors which push

for change in the organization and reduce the forces or factors
which promote to maintain the existing state in the organization.
This produces reduced tension and also less resistance to change.
There are three primary steps in this model which are as follows:
1.) Unfreezing
• As the name suggests, this step involves the reduction of the

factors which maintain the existing organizational behavior at
the current level. This is why it is named as unfreezing because
the existing state is unfrozen here.
• Unfreezing is sometimes accomplished by the causes of

psychological disconfirmation.
2.) Moving
• In moving, there is the displacement of existing

organizational behavior, Individual or department, to a
different level.
• It also involves interfering in the present system to

develop new attitudes and values and relevant change
in the organization.
3.) Refreezing
• In this step, the stabilization of the organizational

equilibrium occurs. Supporting mechanisms and
procedures are used to achieve refreezing, which forces
the new organizational state.
2. Action Research Model
• Planned change is a cycle, and the action research model focuses on the planned
change as the cycle. The primary research about the organization gives
information to guide further action. The results are assessed to provide
information to guide further action.
• Action research has the objective of assisting companies with implementing

their planned change. Also, it is aimed at developing general knowledge gathered
from implementing the planned change so that it can be applied to other
companies as well.
• The action research was developed to have a two focus on changing and
knowledge generation; it has been changed and adopted to efforts in which the
primary emphasis is on the planned change.
3. Contemporary approaches to change
• The contemporary approaches to change are adopted

from an action research model. Although there is the
difference that the member involvement is relatively
high in the change process.
Steps in planned change
Once an organization is committed to planned change, it should create a

logical and stepwise approach to reach those objectives.
1.) Identification of the need
• The need for recognition happens at a higher level of the organization,

which involves senior management. They are the ones who recognize that
there is a need to change.
• The change may be necessitated due to external or internal forces, and

the senior management determines it.
2.) Develop goals of change
• Goals that change are necessary to be defined before the starting of the
planned change. Evaluation of both threats as well as opportunities should be
done, and the required changes in specific terms should be determined like the
changes required for the product, culture, etc.
3.) Change agent

• The change agent, as the name suggests, is the one who drives change in the
organization. He may be internal or external. The change agent should realize
the things which need a change, be it a product, culture, or other things in the
organization.
4.) Analysis of the current situation
• In this step, an analysis of the existing situation is performed. The

change agent, which is selected, gathers data about the organization’s
current situation. This data gathering has only one intention, which is
to help the existing employees prepare.
5.) Select the implementation method
• Now that the current method is analyzed and evaluated, different

possible methods of implementation would be presented. Once all the
queries are solved, the chosen plan is selected for the implementation.
6.) Developing a plan
• in this step, planning takes place. Specifics of the plan such as
what, where, and how is determined in this step, and the plan is
expected to act like a GPS map providing direction for the
organization.
7. ) Implementation of the selected plan

• There could be multiple plans in the process, some of which may
be rejected and is one of which will be selected. After all the
queries are answered, the plan is put into effect. Everyday
problems faced by employees during the implementation of
change can dilute the excitement of the change.
8.) Follow-up and evaluation
• The goals which were defined before the initiation of the

change process are compared to the results which are
obtained and changes if any, are done in the
implementation process to obtain the desired results.
Effects on Different stages of change
• Organizations require change leaders to drive the change, and

they may hire both external and internal change leaders for their
expertise and specialization. Both of them have unique abilities
and influence on the change process.
Following are the effects on different change stages:
1. The entering stage

• The internal change leaders are at an advantage in the entering stage since they
have access to the clients. This means they do not have to spend time building
relations with the existing clients.
• They also understand the organizational goals and the problems associated and have
direct access to direct information of the company, which saves their time further.
• This helps them to function smoothly by increasing efficiency. On the other hand,
external change leaders will need to spend more time obtaining information and
data about the company, which delays their work as compared to internal change
leaders.
2.) The contracting stage
• Internal change leaders will have fewer things to worry

about since they are already in the organization. Things
like internal contracts and ample expenses will remove
their concern on such things.
• On the other hand, external changes leaders do not get it

so easy. They will have a formal contract and can decide
whether their specialties and skills match the
organizational goals agreeing to the assignment.
3.) The diagnosis stage
• In this third stage, internal change leaders already have a

basic level of trust with most people in the organization,
but external change leaders will have to spend more time
building rapport.
• On the other hand, external changes leaders have high

status as compared to their internal counterparts. This
helps them investigate more pressing issues and provide
their assessment more objectively to the company seniors.
4.) The intervention stage
• To ensure success, both internal, as well as external change

leaders, should depend on valid information to make
decisions. In this stage, compared to the external change
leader, the internal counterpart will be more cautious
because of having more robust bonds with the company.
• A person in higher authority or power will be able to

influence the decisions made. Still, the same person will not
have a similar authority over the external change leader
since he is not related to the organization.
5.) The evaluation stage
• The internal change leader is present for the change as it is

implemented in the organization. This will allow the
internal leaders to make minor modifications as the
change progresses.
• On the other hand, external change leaders are not

present to see long-term results. This is because they are
not available in the organization and are not internal
employees to look out for the long-term results.
THANK YOU! 
Reference:
https://www.marketing91.com/planned-change/?
fbclid=IwAR38h3gDGaGDSBvo68lX-
7bdDS1hWne1PBZ_pqbni4ZYEm77Gtwz71JgzIA

Theory of Planned Change

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Theory of Planned Change

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Theory of Planned Change

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

THEORY OF PLANNED

• Planned change is defined as the process of

There are three significant organizational change or planned change

• 1. Lewin’s change model

Lewin’s model is the basis for comprehending organizational

Lewin’s change model suggests increasing the factors which push

• As the name suggests, this step involves the reduction of the

• Unfreezing is sometimes accomplished by the causes of

• In moving, there is the displacement of existing

• It also involves interfering in the present system to

• In this step, the stabilization of the organizational

• Action research has the objective of assisting companies with implementing

• The contemporary approaches to change are adopted

Once an organization is committed to planned change, it should create a

1.) Identification of the need

• The need for recognition happens at a higher level of the organization,

• The change may be necessitated due to external or internal forces, and

3.) Change agent

• In this step, an analysis of the existing situation is performed. The

5.) Select the implementation method

• Now that the current method is analyzed and evaluated, different

7. ) Implementation of the selected plan

• The goals which were defined before the initiation of the

• Organizations require change leaders to drive the change, and

1. The entering stage

• Internal change leaders will have fewer things to worry

• On the other hand, external changes leaders do not get it

• In this third stage, internal change leaders already have a

• On the other hand, external changes leaders have high

• To ensure success, both internal, as well as external change

• A person in higher authority or power will be able to

• The internal change leader is present for the change as it is

• On the other hand, external change leaders are not

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.