Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 29 views

    Bong Revilla Case

    Uploaded by

    Angelica Maunahan
    The case filed was plunder and graft charges against Revilla for his alleged involvement in the P10 billion pork barrel scam. The prosecuting lawyers presented evidence like bank transactions and asset lists totaling P224 million to prove Revilla's guilt. Revilla's legal counsel, Atty. Ramon Esguerra, presented defenses like forged signatures on documents and inconsistencies in witness testimonies. The verdict was acquittal from plunder and graft charges due to insufficient evidence presented by the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Bong Revilla Case

    Uploaded by

    Angelica Maunahan
    29 views19 pages
    The case filed was plunder and graft charges against Revilla for his alleged involvement in the P10 billion pork barrel scam. The prosecuting lawyers presented evidence like bank transactions and asset lists totaling P224 million to prove Revilla's guilt. Revilla's legal counsel, Atty. Ramon Esguerra, presented defenses like forged signatures on documents and inconsistencies in witness testimonies. The verdict was acquittal from plunder and graft charges due to insufficient evidence presented by the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

    Original Description:

    BONG REVILLA PORK BARREL CASE

    Original Title

    BONG REVILLA CASE

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The case filed was plunder and graft charges against Revilla for his alleged involvement in the P10 billion pork barrel scam. The prosecuting lawyers presented evidence like bank transactions and asset lists totaling P224 million to prove Revilla's guilt. Revilla's legal counsel, Atty. Ramon Esguerra, presented defenses like forged signatures on documents and inconsistencies in witness testimonies. The verdict was acquittal from plunder and graft charges due to insufficient evidence presented by the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    29 views19 pages

    Bong Revilla Case

    Uploaded by

    Angelica Maunahan
    The case filed was plunder and graft charges against Revilla for his alleged involvement in the P10 billion pork barrel scam. The prosecuting lawyers presented evidence like bank transactions and asset lists totaling P224 million to prove Revilla's guilt. Revilla's legal counsel, Atty. Ramon Esguerra, presented defenses like forged signatures on documents and inconsistencies in witness testimonies. The verdict was acquittal from plunder and graft charges due to insufficient evidence presented by the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 19

    ACTIVITY FOR

    FINAL-2: The Trials


    and Execution
    Table of Contents

    01 03
    CASE FILED legal counsel of the defendant/
    evidences defense

    02 04
    prosecuting lawyer / evidences verdict
    to prove guilt
    Contents of this
    Template
    About the case
    of

    Ramon
    “Bong”
    Bautista
    Revilla Jr.
    Senator Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr., along with Juan Ponce Enrile
    and Jinggoy Estrada, was enjoying his political career and influence
    when the P10-billion pork barrel scam hit the headlines after the
    elections in 2013.

    They were charged for plunder before the Sandiganbayan and


    became the highest-ranking public officials to be taken into
    custody for the non-bailable crime of plunder since the ousted
    President Joseph Estrada in 2001 he pocketed more than P200
    million in kickbacks after channeling his priority development
    assistance fund allocations to bogus NGOs controlled by Janet Lim
    Napoles.
    0
    1
    What case
    was filed?
    The National Bureau of
    Investigation files plunder
    and graft cases against
    Revilla with the pork
    barrel scam
    AN ACT DEFINING AND PENALIZING. THE
    CRIME OF PLUNDER

    R.A. 7080
    R.A. 3019
    ANTI-GRAFT AND CORRUPT PRACTICES
    ACT

    An Act Declaring Forfeiture in Favor of the State Any Property


    Found To Have Been Unlawfully Acquired By Any Public Officer
    or Employee and Providing for the Proceedings Therefor.
    0
    Who was the
    prosecuting lawyer 2
    and what pieces of
    evidence were
    presented to prove his
    or her guilt?
    The prosecuting
    lawyers

    Teach civics Current events Project base


    Mercury is the smallest Venus is the second planet
    planet of them all from the Sun

    extracurricular Democratic
    Jupiter is the biggest planet Neptune process
    is the farthest planet
    of them all from the Sun
    ● The Ombudsman files an ex-parte motion for the issuance of a writ of
    preliminary attachment or garnishment of Revilla’s assets amounting to P224
    million allegedly acquired illegally from kickbacks from the pork barrel
    scam.

    ● The list includes 44 bank accounts and investments, 28 real properties, 15


    motor vehicles, 5 separate shares of stock totaling P1.14 million in 3
    different corporations, and shares in 12 other exclusive sports clubs and
    private companies. The list excluded accounts already closed by Revilla
    when news on the PDAF scam broke out.
    0
    3 Who was the legal
    counsel of the defendant
    and what pieces of
    evidence were presented
    in his or her defense?
    Practice
    areas:
    Anti-corruption & anti-bribery; corporate &
    commercial; intellectual property; litigation;
    criminal law

    Atty. Ramon
    esguerra
    Forged signatures
    ● During the bail hearings, Desiderio Pagui, a handwriting
    expert examined the documents in open court and concluded
    that the signatures were forged.

    Marina sula
    testimonies
    one of the whistleblowers in the multibillion peso PDAF scam
    involving her ● she
    former admitted
    boss, that she
    businesswoman did
    Janet Limnot personally
    see Revilla receiving
    Napoles
    money from businesswoman Janet Lim Napoles.
    Revilla lawyer:
    Ombudsman ‘fell short’ of
    proving kickbacks
    Ombudsman prosecutors “fell short” of
    piecing together bank deposit evidence to
    paint a complete picture of Senator Bong
    Revilla’s supposed kickbacks from the pork
    barrel scam, said the lawmaker’s lawyer
    Ramon Esguerra
    What was the
    verdict
    Former Senator Ramon "Bong" Revilla
    Jr. is a free man after four years in jail on
    plunder and graft charges.

    Sandiganbayn's first division ruled that


    the the prosecution failed to prove that
    Revilla was guilty beyond reasonable
    doubt for plunder.
    The Sandiganbayan issued a release order for
    Revilla on Friday, the same day he was acquitted of
    plunder in the controversial pork barrel scam case.

    As of graft case, The Sandiganbayan’s Special First


    Division, in a narrow 3-2 vote, has acquitted Sen.
    Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr. of 16 counts of graft over
    his alleged involvement in the multibillion-peso
    pork barrel scam that was exposed in 2013.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy