Knights and Willmott (1990) provide an overview of the history and development of labour process theory. They discuss Marx's foundational work on capital and the dynamics of capitalist development. Braverman's influential work on deskilling and the degradation of work under monopoly capital is examined. The article also critiques Braverman and considers contributions that advanced the debate from others like Littler, Thompson, and Edwards. Knights and Willmott conclude that the world is too complex for any single theory, and theories should be evaluated based on their emancipatory potential rather than claiming to capture all of social reality.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Knights and Willmott (1990) provide an overview of the history and development of labour process theory. They discuss Marx's foundational work on capital and the dynamics of capitalist development. Braverman's influential work on deskilling and the degradation of work under monopoly capital is examined. The article also critiques Braverman and considers contributions that advanced the debate from others like Littler, Thompson, and Edwards. Knights and Willmott conclude that the world is too complex for any single theory, and theories should be evaluated based on their emancipatory potential rather than claiming to capture all of social reality.
Original Description:
Presentation by Chew Yang and Kang Kai on "Labour Process Theory".
Knights and Willmott (1990) provide an overview of the history and development of labour process theory. They discuss Marx's foundational work on capital and the dynamics of capitalist development. Braverman's influential work on deskilling and the degradation of work under monopoly capital is examined. The article also critiques Braverman and considers contributions that advanced the debate from others like Littler, Thompson, and Edwards. Knights and Willmott conclude that the world is too complex for any single theory, and theories should be evaluated based on their emancipatory potential rather than claiming to capture all of social reality.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Knights and Willmott (1990) provide an overview of the history and development of labour process theory. They discuss Marx's foundational work on capital and the dynamics of capitalist development. Braverman's influential work on deskilling and the degradation of work under monopoly capital is examined. The article also critiques Braverman and considers contributions that advanced the debate from others like Littler, Thompson, and Edwards. Knights and Willmott conclude that the world is too complex for any single theory, and theories should be evaluated based on their emancipatory potential rather than claiming to capture all of social reality.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10
Labour Process Theory
Knights and Willmott (1990)
Present by: Chew Yang
Kang Kai Presentation Outline • Authors’ Background • Contents Of Article • Conclusion
Labour Process Theory - Knights and Willmott (1990)
Authors’ Background David Knights
David Knights is Professor Organisational Analysis and Head of the
School of Management at Keele University. In 1994 he founded and managed a Financial Services Research Forum of 26 leading corporations to fund strategic research at 50K per annum. He still helps run this research activity at the University of Nottingham Business School where he was briefly prior to coming to Keele. He has supervised over 30 externally funded research grants to the value of around million and currently is involved in 5 ESRC funded projects on Bank Fraud, Business Reengineering, Innovation, Education, and Virtual Markets.
Labour Process Theory - Knights and Willmott (1990)
Authors’ Background Hugh Willmott
Professor Willmott is currently a member of the editorial
boards of Academy of Management Review, Journal of Management Studies and Organization Studies. In the past he has been the Associate Editor of Gender, Work and Organization, as well as a member of the editorial boards of Accounting, Organizations and Society and Administrative Science Quarterly. Professor Willmott was a founding member of the journals Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Advances in Public Interest Accounting, Critical Perspectives in Accounting and Organization. Labour Process Theory - Knights and Willmott (1990) Contents Of Article • Overview of the history of labour process theory • Critical moments of the development of labour process theory • Other contribution to a continuing debate.
Labour Process Theory - Knights and Willmott (1990)
Foundations Of Labour-process Analysis • Capital (1976) - Marx • Labour Power and Wage Labour • Dynamics of Capitalist Development
Labour Process Theory - Knights and Willmott (1990)
Labour In The Era Of Monopoly Capital • Labor and Monopoly Capital – Braverman • Primary focus – degradation of work • Two other related elements – An outline of developments in the wider organisation of ‘monopoly capitalist’ societies. – An examination of changes in their occupational and class structures.
Labour Process Theory - Knights and Willmott (1990)
Critiques Of Braverman • Deskilling • Management strategy • The full circuit of capital • The ontology of class relations
Labour Process Theory - Knights and Willmott (1990)
Advancing The Debate • Craig Littler • Paul Thompson • Paul Edwards • Mark Wardell
Labour Process Theory - Knights and Willmott (1990)
Conclusion Three perspectives of labor process theory on capitalist labour theory
• The world is too complex to be captured adequately by
any one theory.
• Assumes that there is one fundamental key to
understand the nature and dynamics of social reality.
• The belief that the value of any theory resides in its
emancipatory potential.
Labour Process Theory - Knights and Willmott (1990)