BIOFLX
BIOFLX
BIOFLX
• Aesthetic concern plays a vital role in modern dental practice. Understanding the child’s and
parental aesthetic perception is necessary for good clinical practice.
An optimal anterior restoration should have better durability, ease of handling, be aesthetically
acceptable, and be cost effective.
A child’s looks can affect their achievement in social acceptance, quality of life, and physical and
psychological health.
There are numerous possibilities for treating carious teeth in young children, ranging from
stainless steel crowns and their modifications to other aesthetic crowns like Bioflex and zirconium
crowns.
They are available as aesthetic preformed pediatric crowns that offer properties of both stainless
steel and zirconia crowns.
BIOFLEX CROWNS
Bioflx Crowns are the world’s first flexible, durable, self-adaptable
and esthetic pre-formed pediatric crowns which offer properties of
both stainless steel crowns and zirconia crowns.
CHARACTERISTICS
SNUG FIT/ACTIVE FIT
Distinctively flexible and versatile nature for easy placement
and snug/active fit
CHAIR TIME
Tooth preparation and handling properties similar to SSC, hence
saving valuable chair side time
NOT RECOMMENDED
BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIAL
Laser marking on the inner occlusal surface for easy identification and
optimal esthetics.
DURABLE
Wear resistance of Bioflx crowns is similar to or better than traditional
SSC.
COLOR STABLE
RECOMMENDED CEMENTS
2. To compare the clinical performance of Bioflex, zirconia, and stainless steel crowns in
primary dentition at zero, three, six and 12 months.
3. To assess the child and parental satisfaction of Bioflex, zirconia, and stainless steel
crowns in primary dentition at zero, three, six, and 12 months.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
1. Children aged three to seven years old who are healthy and free of any systemic
disease
2. Deciduous teeth indicated for crowns
3. Deciduous teeth having two-thirds of root structure left radiographically
4. Presence of one-third of crown shape
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
1. A pathological discrepancy of root resorption
2. Inflammation at the furcation area
3. The child having oral parafunctional habits
4. Deciduous teeth having not sufficient crown structure
5. Teeth with root caries
EVALUATION CRITERIA
The study will be clinically evaluated from the following criteria: crown retention, modified
gingival index, plaque index, stain resistance, gingival marginal extension, occlusion, proximal
contact, opposing tooth wear, and radiographic assessment.
Clinician’s Satisfaction Criteria will be as follows: surface gloss, roughness, stain resistance,
aesthetic, anatomical form, crown fracture, recurrent caries.
Parental satisfaction ratings of aesthetic characteristics and their impact of treatment on their
children will be evaluated on the basis of size, shape, color and stain using five-point Likert’s
scale