Presentation 3
Presentation 3
kij represent the force fi in the ith degree of freedom/ node due to a unit
(Matrix form)
Derivation….
evaluating u at each node and solving for
a1 and a2
u(0) = u1 = a1
u(L) = u2 = a2L + u1
Therefore,
u = a1+ a2x
Derivation….
are called the shape functions because the Ni’s express the
shape of the assumed displacement function over the
domain (x coordinate) of the element.
N1 and N2 are linear functions,
Tensile force, T = kδ
T = k(u2 - u1 )
Derivation….
f1x= -T , f2x = T
T = - f1x = = k(u2 - u1 )
T = f2x = k(u2 - u1 )
Derivation….
Spring assemblage
Here Newton’s third law, of equal but opposite forces, is applied in moving
from a node to an element associated with the node.
Element -1
Element -2
Super imposing method
[K] is then constructed simply by directly adding terms
associated with degrees of freedom in [ke1 ] and [ke2 ]
into their corresponding identical degree-of-freedom
locations in [K] as follows.
Boundary Conditions
• The first type—primary, essential, or Dirichlet—
boundary condition
• specifies the values a solution, such as the
displacement, must satisfy on the boundary of the
domain.
• The second type—natural or Neumann—boundary
condition
• specifies the values that the derivatives
of a solution must satisfy on the boundary of the
domain
Homogeneous boundry condition
• Here we first consider the case of
homogeneous boundry condition.
• Here all boundry conditions are such that the
displacements are zero at certain nodes.
• Here we have u1 = 0, as it is fixed
properties of the stiffness matrix
• [K ]is square, as it relates the same number of forces and
displacements.
• [K] is symmetric, as is each of the element stiffness matrices.
• [ K] is singular (its determinant is equal to zero), and thus, no inverse
exists until sufficient boundary conditions are imposed to remove the
singularity and prevent rigid body motion.
• The main diagonal terms of [K] are always positive. Otherwise, a
positive nodal force Fi could produce a negative displacement di— a
behavior contrary to the physical behavior of any actual structure.
• [K] is positive semidefinite (that is {x}T[K]{x} > 0 for all non-zero
vector {x} with real numbers).
Example 1:For the spring assemblage with arbitrarily
numbered nodes shown in Figure obtain
(a) the global stiffness matrix,
(b) the displacements of nodes 3 and 4,
(c) the reaction forces at nodes 1 and 2, and
(d) the forces in each spring.
A force of 25 kN is applied at node 4 in the x direction.
The spring constants are given in the figure. Nodes 1 and
2 are fixed.
Free-body diagrams of each element and node
Here Newton’s third law, of equal but opposite forces, is applied in moving
from a node to an element associated with the node.
Global stiffness matrix
Use Super positioning concept
Global stiffness matrix
Applying the BC (u1 ,u4 = 0) i or deleting the 1st and 4 th rows and columns, we have
we get the reaction forces
spring force as
find the global stiffness matrix.
applying the superposition method
Nonhomogeneous Boundary Conditions
Here one or more of the specified displacements are nonzero..
.For simplicity’s sake, let u1 = δ, Then
(B)
• Therefore, when dealing with nonhomogeneous boundary
conditions, we cannot initially delete row 1 and column 1 of
Eq.(A)
• corresponding to the nonhomogeneous boundary condition,
as indicated by the resulting Eq. (B) because we are
multiplying each element by a nonzero number. Had we done
so, the k1δ term in Eq. (B) would have been neglected,
resulting in an error in the solution for the displacements.
• For nonhomogeneous boundary conditions, we must, in
general, transform the terms associated with the known
displacements to the right-side force matrix before solving for
the unknown nodal displacements.
• It is illustrated by transforming the k1δ term of the second of
Eqs. (1) to the right side of the second of Eqs. (2).
• We could now solve for the displacements in Eq. (B)
in a manner similar to that used to solve Eq. of
homogeneous equations.
• However, we will not further pursue the solution of
Eq. (B) because no new information is to be gained.
• However, on substituting the displacement back
into Eq. (A), the reaction now becomes
(D)
where {F1} are the known nodal forces and {F2} are the
unknown nodal forces at the specified displacement nodes.
{F2} is found from Eq. ((D))after {d1} is determined from
Eq. ( C).
In Eq. (C), we assume that [K11] is no longer singular,
allowing for the determination of {d }.
Example
• For the spring assemblage shown in Figure 2–13,
obtain (a) the global stiffness matrix,
• (b) the displacements of nodes 2–4,
• (c) the global nodal forces, and
• (d) the local element forces. Node 1 is fixed while
node 5 is given a fixed,
• known displacement δ = 20:0 mm. or 0.02 mtere
• The spring constants are all equal to k = 200 kN/m
Spring assemblage for solution
• The global stiffness matrix, Eq. (), relates the
global forces to the global displacements as
follows:
(E)
F1x = 200 x u1 -200 x u2
F2x = -220 x u1 + 400 x u2 +200 x u3
F3x = -220 x u2 + 400 x u3 -200 x u4
F4x = -220 x u3 + 400 x u4 -200 x u5
F5x = -220 x u4 + 200 x u5
Applying the boundary conditions u1 = 0 and u5 = 20 mm
(= 0:02 m),
substituting known global forces F2x = 0, F3x = 0, and F4x = 0, and
partitioning the first and fifth equations of above Eq.
corresponding to these boundary conditions, we obtain
F5 -4 =-220 x u4
We obtain:
Solving:
u2 = 0:005 m u3 = 0:01 m u4 = 0:015 m (F)
The global nodal forces are obtained by back-substituting the
boundary condition displacements and Eqs. (F) into Eq. (E). This
substitution yields
(G )
The results of Eqs. (G) yield the reaction F1x opposite that of the nodal
force F5x required to displace node 5 by δ = 20:0 mm. This result
verifies equilibrium of the whole spring assemblage.
problem 1:
Obtain the global stiffness matrix [K] of the assemblage
shown in Figure P2–1 by superimposing the stiffness
matrices of the individual springs.
If nodes 1 and 2 are fixed and a force P acts on node 4 in the
positive x direction, find an expression for the displacements
of nodes 3 and 4 Determine the reaction forces at nodes 1
and 2
• problem 2:
• For the spring assemblage shown in Figure
P2–3, obtain the global stiffness matrix by
direct superposition. b. If nodes 1 and 5 are
fixed and a force P is applied at node 3,
determine the nodal displacements. c.
Determine the reactions at the fixed nodes 1
and 5.
problem 3: