BDH 3e PPT C11 Reviewed
BDH 3e PPT C11 Reviewed
Risk and
Return in
Capital
Markets
Chapter Outline
Problem:
• Microsoft paid a one-time special dividend of $3.08 on
November 15, 2004. Suppose you bought Microsoft stock for
$28.08 on November 1, 2004 and sold it immediately after
the dividend was paid for $27.39. What was your realized
return from holding the stock?
Solution:
Plan:
• We can use Eq 11.1 to calculate the realized return. We need
the purchase price ($28.08), the selling price ($27.39), and
the dividend ($3.08) and we are ready to proceed.
Execute:
• Using Eq. 11.1, the return from Nov 1, 2004 until Nov 15,
2004 is equal to
• This 8.51% can be broken down into the dividend yield and
the capital gain yield:
Divt 1 3.08
Dividend Yield = .1097, or 10.97%
Pt 28.08
Pt 1 Pt 27.39 28.08
Capital Gain Yield = 0.0246, or 2.46%
Pt 28.08
Evaluate:
• These returns include both the capital gain (or in
this case a capital loss) and the return generated
from receiving dividends. Both dividends and
capital gains contribute to the total realized return
—ignoring either one would give a very misleading
impression of Microsoft’s performance.
Problem:
• Health Management Associates (HMA) paid a one-time
special dividend of $10.00 on March 2, 2007. Suppose you
bought HMA stock for $20.33 on February 15, 2007 and sold
it immediately after the dividend was paid for $10.29. What
was your realized return from holding the stock?
Solution:
Plan:
• We can use Eq 11.1 to calculate the realized return. We need
the purchase price ($20.33), the selling price ($10.29), and
the dividend ($10.00) and we are ready to proceed.
Execute:
• Using Eq. 11.1, the return from February 15, 2007 until
March 2, 2007 is equal to
• This -0.2% can be broken down into the dividend yield and
the capital gain yield:
Divt 1 10.00
Dividend Yield 0.4919, or 49.19%
Pt 20.33
Pt 1 Pt 10.29 20.33
Capital GainYield 0.4939, or 49.39%
Pt 20.33
Evaluate:
• These returns include both the capital gain (or in this case a
capital loss) and the return generated from receiving
dividends. Both dividends and capital gains contribute to the
total realized return—ignoring either one would give a very
misleading impression of HMA’s performance.
Problem:
• Limited Brands paid a one-time special dividend of $3.00 on
December 21, 2010. Suppose you bought LTD stock for
$29.35 on October 18, 2010 and sold it immediately after the
dividend was paid for $30.16. What was your realized return
from holding the stock?
Solution:
Plan:
• We can use Eq 11.1 to calculate the realized return. We need
the purchase price ($29.35), the selling price ($30.16), and
the dividend ($3.00) and we are ready to proceed.
Execute:
• Using Eq. 11.1, the return from October 18, 2010 until
December 21, 2010 is equal to
• This 12.98% can be broken down into the dividend yield and
the capital gain yield:
Divt 1 3.00
Dividend Yield 0.1022, or10.22%
Pt 29.35
Pt 1 Pt 30.16 29.35
Capital GainYield 0.0276, or 2.76%
Pt 29.35
Evaluate:
• These returns include both the capital gain (or in this case a
capital loss) and the return generated from receiving
dividends. Both dividends and capital gains contribute to the
total realized return—ignoring either one would give a very
misleading impression of LTD’s performance.
Problem:
• Suppose you purchased Microsoft stock (MSFT) on Nov 1,
2004 and held it for one year, selling on Oct 31, 2005. What
was your annual realized return?
Solution:
Plan:
• We need to analyze the cash flows from holding MSFT stock
for each quarter. In order to get the cash flows, we must look
up MSFT stock price data at the purchase date and selling
date, as well as at any dividend dates. From the data we can
construct the following table to fill out our cash flow
timeline:
Plan:
Execute:
• In Example 11.1, we already computed the realized return
for Nov 1, 2004 to Nov 15, 2004 as 8.51%. We continue as
in that example, using Eq. 11.1 for each period until we have
a series of realized returns. For example, from Nov 15, 2004
to Feb 15, 2005, the realized return is
Execute:
• The table below includes the realized return at each period.
Execute:
• We then determine the one-year return by compounding.
Evaluate:
• By repeating these steps, we have successfully computed the
realized annual returns for an investor holding MSFT stock
over this one-year period. From this exercise we can see that
returns are risky. MSFT fluctuated up and down over the year
and ended-up only slightly (2.75%) at the end.
Problem:
• Suppose you purchased Health Management Associate’s
stock (HMA) on March 16, 2006 and held it for one year,
selling on March 15, 2007. What was your realized return?
Solution:
Plan:
• We need to analyze the cash flows from holding HMA stock
for each period. In order to get the cash flows, we must look
up HMA stock price data at the start and end of both years,
as well as at any dividend dates. From the data we can
construct the following table to fill out our cash flow
timeline:
Execute:
• In Example 11.1a, we already computed the realized return
for February 15, 2007 to March 2, 2007 as -.2%. We
continue as in that example, using Eq. 11.1 for each period
until we have a series of realized returns. For example, from
August 9, 2006 to November 8, 2006, the realized return is
Execute:
• The table below includes the realized return at each period.
Execute:
• We then determine the one-year return by compounding.
Evaluate:
• By repeating these steps, we have successfully computed the
realized annual returns for an investor holding HMA stock
over this one-year period. From this exercise we can see that
returns are risky. HMA fluctuated up and down over the year
and yielded a return of only 4.11% at the end.
Problem:
• Suppose you purchased Intel stock (INTC) on December 3,
2012 and held it for one year, selling on December 2, 2013.
What was your annual realized return?
Solution:
Plan:
• We need to analyze the cash flows from holding INTC stock
for each quarter. In order to get the cash flows, we must look
up INTC stock price data at the purchase date and selling
date, as well as at any dividend dates. From the data we can
construct the following table to fill out our cash flow
timeline:
Plan:
Date Price Dividend
3-Dec-12 $19.54
1-Mar-13 $21.03 $ 0.225
1-Jun-13 $24.28 $ 0.225
1-Sep-12 $21.98 $ 0.225
1-Dec-13 $23.84 $ 0.225
2-Dec-13 $23.70
Execute:
• We use Eq. 11.1 for each period until we have a series of
realized returns. For example, from December 3, 2012 to
March 1, 2013, the realized return is
Execute:
• The table below includes the realized return at each period.
Execute:
• We then determine the one-year return by compounding.
Evaluate:
• We have successfully computed the realized annual returns
for an investor holding INTC stock over this one-year period.
From this exercise we can see that returns are risky. INTC
fluctuated up and down over the year but ended-up returning
26.17% for the year.
1
R ( R1 R2 ... RT ) (Eq. 11.3)
T
1
Var R
T 1
( R1 R )2 ( R2 R )2 ... ( RT R ) 2 (Eq. 11.4)
– Standard Deviation
Problem:
• Using the data below, what is the standard deviation of the
S&P 500’s returns for the years 2005-2009?
Solution:
Plan:
Execute:
• In the previous section we already computed the average
annual return of the S&P 500 during this period as 3.1%, so
we have all of the necessary inputs for the variance
calculation:
• Applying Eq. 11.4, we have:
1
Var ( R) ( R1 R ) 2 ( R2 R ) 2 ... ( RT R ) 2
T 1
1
(.049 .031)2 (.158 .031)2 (.055 .031)2 0.370 .0312 .265 .0312
5 1
.058
Execute:
• Alternatively, we can break the calculation of this equation
out as follows:
Evaluate:
• Our best estimate of the expected return for the S&P 500 is
its average return, 3.1%, but it is risky, with a standard
deviation of 24.1%.
Problem:
• Using the data below, what is the standard deviation of
small stocks’ returns for the years 2005-2009?
• With the five returns, compute the average return using Eq.
11.3 because it is an input to the variance equation. Next,
compute the variance using Eq. 11.4 and then take its square
root to determine the standard deviation, as shown in Eq.
11.5.
Execute:
• Using Eq. 11.3, the average annual return for small stocks
during this period is:
1
R (.0569 .1671 .0522 .3672+.2809) .0171
5
• We now have all of the necessary inputs for the variance
calculation:
• Applying Eq. 11.4, we have:
1
Var ( R) ( R1 R )2 ( R2 R )2 ... ( RT R )2
T 1
1
(.0569 .0171)2 (.1671 .0171)2 (.0522 0171)2 .3672 .01712 .2809 .01712
5 1
.0615
Execute:
• Alternatively, we can break the calculation of this equation
out as follows:
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Return 0.0569 0.1671 -0.0522 -0.3672 0.2809
Average 0.0171 0.0171 0.0171 0.0171 0.0171
Difference 0.0398 0.15 -0.0693 -0.3843 0.2638
Squared 0.0016 0.0225 0.0048 0.1477 0.0696
Evaluate:
• Our best estimate of the expected return for small stocks is
its average return, 1.71%, and they are risky, with a
standard deviation of 24.80%.
Problem:
• Using the data below, what is the standard deviation of the
Large Stock returns for the years 2008-2012?
Solution:
Plan:
• With the five returns, compute the average return using Eq.
11.3 because it is an input to the variance equation. Next,
compute the variance using Eq. 11.4 and then take its square
root to determine the standard deviation, as shown in Eq.
11.5.
Execute:
• The average annual return for Large Stocks during this period
is 4.5%, so we have all of the necessary inputs for the
variance calculation:
• Applying Eq. 11.4, we have:
1
Var ( R) ( R1 R )2 ( R2 R )2 ... ( RT R )2
T 1
1
(0.370 .045)2 (.265 .045)2 (.151 .045)2 0.021 .0452 .160 .0452
5 1
.0615
Execute:
• Alternatively, we can break the calculation of this equation
out as follows:
Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Return -0.370 0.265 0.151 0.021 0.160
Average 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045
Difference -0.415 0.220 0.106 -0.024 0.115
Squared 0.173 0.048 0.011 0.001 0.013
Evaluate:
• Our best estimate of the expected return for Large Stocks is
the average return, 4.5%, but it is risky, with a standard
deviation of 24.8%.
Problem:
• In Example 11.3 we found the average return for the S&P
500 from 2005-2009 to be 3.1% with a standard deviation of
24.1%. What is a 95% confidence interval for 2010’s return?
Solution:
Plan:
• We can use Eq. 11.6 to compute the confidence interval.
Execute:
• Using Eq. 11.6, we have:
• Average ± (2 standard deviation) = 3.1% – (2 24.1%) to
3.1% + (2 24.1% )
= –45.1% to 51.3%.
Evaluate:
• Even though the average return from 2005 to 2009 was
3.1%, the S&P 500 was volatile, so if we want to be 95%
confident of 2010’s return, the best we can say is that it will
lie between –45.1% and +51.3%.
Problem:
• The average return for small stocks from 2005-2009 was
1.71% with a standard deviation of 24.8%. What is a 95%
confidence interval for 2010’s return?
Solution:
Plan:
• We can use Eq. 11.6 to calculate the confidence interval.
Execute:
• Using Eq. 11.6, we have:
Evaluate:
• Even though the average return from 2005-2009 was 1.71%,
small stocks were volatile, so if we want to be 95% confident
of 2010’s return, the best we can say is that it will lie
between -47.89% and +51.31%.
Problem:
• The average return for corporate bonds from 2005-2009 was
6.49% with a standard deviation of 7.04%. What is a 95%
confidence interval for 2010’s return?
Solution:
Plan:
• We can use Eq. 11.6 to calculate the confidence interval.
Execute:
• Using Eq. 11.6, we have:
Evaluate:
• Even though the average return from 2005-2009 was 6.49%,
corporate bonds were volatile, so if we want to be 95%
confident of 2010’s return, the best we can say is that it will
lie between -7.59% and +20.57%.
Problem:
• You are playing a very simple gambling game with your
friend: a $1 bet based on a coin flip. That is, you each bet
$1 and flip a coin: heads you win your friend’s $1, tails you
lose and your friend takes your dollar. How is your risk
different if you play this game 100 times in a row versus just
betting $100 (instead of $1) on a single coin flip?
Solution:
Plan:
• The risk of losing one coin flip is independent of the risk of
losing the next one: each time you have a 50% chance of
losing, and one coin flip does not affect any other coin flip.
We can compute the expected outcome of any flip as a
weighted average by weighting your possible winnings (+$1)
by 50% and your possible losses (-$1) by 50%. We can then
compute the probability of losing all $100 under either
scenario.
Execute:
• If you play the game 100 times, you should lose about 50
times and win 50 times, so your expected outcome is 50 (+
$1) + 50 (-$1) = $0. You should break-even. Even if you
don’t win exactly half of the time, the probability that you
would lose all 100 coin flips (and thus lose $100) is
exceedingly small (in fact, it is 0.50100, which is far less than
even 0.0001%). If it happens, you should take a very careful
look at the coin!
Execute:
• If instead, you make a single $100 bet on the outcome of
one coin flip, you have a 50% chance of winning $100 and a
50% chance of losing $100, so your expected outcome will
be the same: break-even. However, there is a 50% chance
you will lose $100, so your risk is far greater than it would be
for 100 one dollar bets.
Evaluate:
• In each case, you put $100 at risk, but by spreading-out that
risk across 100 different bets, you have diversified much of
your risk away compared to placing a single $100 bet.
Problem:
• You are playing a very simple gambling game with your
friend: a $1 bet based on a roll of two six-sided dice. That is,
you each bet $1 and roll the dice: if the outcome is even you
win your friend’s $1, if the outcome is odd you lose and your
friend takes your dollar. How is your risk different if you play
this game 100 times in a row versus just betting $100
(instead of $1) on a roll of the dice?
Solution:
Plan:
• The risk of losing one dice roll is independent of the risk of
losing the next one: each time you have a 50% chance of
losing, and one roll of the dice does not affect any other roll.
We can compute the expected outcome of any roll as a
weighted average by weighting your possible winnings (+$1)
by 50% and your possible losses (-$1) by 50%. We can then
compute the probability of losing all $100 under either
scenario.
Execute:
• If you play the game 100 times, you should lose about 50%
of the time and win 50% of the time, so your expected
outcome is 50 (+$1) + 50 (-$1) = $0. You should break-
even. Even if you don’t win exactly half of the time, the
probability that you would lose all 100 dice rolls (and thus
lose $100) is exceedingly small (in fact, it is 0.50 100, which is
far less than even 0.0001%). If it happens, you should take a
very careful look at the dice!
Execute:
• If instead, you make a single $100 bet on the outcome of
one roll of the dice, you have a 50% chance of winning $100
and a 50% chance of losing $100, so your expected outcome
will be the same: break-even. However, there is a 50%
chance you will lose $100, so your risk is far greater than it
would be for 100 one dollar bets.
Evaluate:
• In each case, you put $100 at risk, but by spreading-out that
risk across 100 different bets, you have diversified much of
your risk away compared to placing a single $100 bet.