Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 18 views

    WSC - DebateFlow - SpeakerRoles

    Uploaded by

    tamminhld
    The document outlines the roles and responsibilities of speakers in a debate. It provides guidance on what should be covered in each speaker's constructive speech and rebuttals, including setting up definitions, stakeholders, and arguments. It also describes how the third speakers should summarize the key debates and compare the teams' arguments and impacts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    WSC - DebateFlow - SpeakerRoles

    Uploaded by

    tamminhld
    18 views4 pages
    The document outlines the roles and responsibilities of speakers in a debate. It provides guidance on what should be covered in each speaker's constructive speech and rebuttals, including setting up definitions, stakeholders, and arguments. It also describes how the third speakers should summarize the key debates and compare the teams' arguments and impacts.

    Original Title

    [1] WSC_DebateFlow_SpeakerRoles

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document outlines the roles and responsibilities of speakers in a debate. It provides guidance on what should be covered in each speaker's constructive speech and rebuttals, including setting up definitions, stakeholders, and arguments. It also describes how the third speakers should summarize the key debates and compare the teams' arguments and impacts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    18 views4 pages

    WSC - DebateFlow - SpeakerRoles

    Uploaded by

    tamminhld
    The document outlines the roles and responsibilities of speakers in a debate. It provides guidance on what should be covered in each speaker's constructive speech and rebuttals, including setting up definitions, stakeholders, and arguments. It also describes how the third speakers should summarize the key debates and compare the teams' arguments and impacts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    DEBATE FLOW & SPEAKER ROLES SUMMARY

    Affirmative 1 (A1) Negative 1 (N1)

    1. Debate Set-up 1. Respond to A1’s set-up


    +) Definition(s) +) Definition(s)
    +) Stakeholder(s) +) Stakeholders(s)
    +) Team’s Stance & Goal(s) 2. State Negative’s set-up
    +) Team’s Split +) Team’s Stance & Goal(s)
    2. Argument(s) +) Team’s Split
    3. Rebuttal(s)
    4. Argument(s)

    Affirmative 1 (A1) Negative 1 (N1)

    1. Rebuttal(s) 1. Rebuttal(s)
    2. Argument(s) 2. Argument(s)
    3. Team's Case Recap 3. Team's Case Recap

    Affirmative 1 (A1) Negative 1 (N1)

    1. Rebuttal(s) 1. Rebuttal(s)
    2. Summarization & 2. Summarization &
    Comparison Comparison
    By: Minh-Tam Dao Le
    By: Minh-Tam Dao Le

    ROLES OF FIRST SPEAKERS


    A1 & N1

    Affirmative 1 (A1) Negative 1 (N1)


    1. DEBATE SET-UP 1. RESPOND TO A1’s SET-UP
    The set-up in A1 has 4 parts: Consider if A1 has done a good job in
    + Definition: Identify and define the definition and burden or not. If not,
    important keywords in the motion (upto respond to A1 by:
    3 keywords). + In definition: Choose different
    + Stakeholder: Point out the burden of keywords to define or redefine A1’s
    the debate = Identify important keyword.
    + In burden: Point out other
    stakeholders related to the motion and
    stakeholders that are more important
    explain why they matter to the topic at
    than A1’s.
    hand.
    + Team’s Goal: State your team’s goal =
    2. STATE YOUR TEAM’S SET-UP
    Answer “What do we want to achieve?” + Team’s Goal: State your team’s goal =
    + Team’s Split: Introduce your team’s
    Answer “What do we want to achieve?”
    split = Tell the judge who says what in + Team’s Split: Introduce your team’s
    your team.
    split = Tell the judge who says what in
    your team.
    2. CONSTRUCTIVE MATERIALS
    Introducing the team’s argument(s) 3. REBUT A1
    + Present the argument(s) that have + Identify 1-2 most important claims
    been assigned to you in the Team’s from A1 and rebut.
    split.
    4. CONSTRUCTIVE MATERIALS
    Introducing the team’s argument(s)
    + Present the argument(s) that have
    been assigned to you in the Team’s
    split.
    By: Minh-Tam Dao Le

    ROLES OF SECOND SPEAKERS


    A2 & N2

    Affirmative 2 (A1) Negative 2 (N2)


    1. REBUILD 1. REBUILD
    + Identify the rebuttal(s) from N1 that + Identify the rebuttal(s) from A1 & A2
    have damaged your team’s case. that have damaged your team’s case.
    Rebut the their rebuttals to solidify Rebut the their rebuttals to solidify
    your case. your case.

    2. REBUT 2. REBUT
    + Identify 1-2 most important claims + Identify 1-2 most important claims
    from N1 and rebut. from A1 & A2 and rebut.

    3. CONSTRUCTIVE MATERIALS 3. CONSTRUCTIVE MATERIALS


    + Prove the remaining arguments that + Prove the remaining arguments that
    your team has outlined. your team has outlined.

    4. SHORT RECAP OF YOUR TEAM’S CASE 4. SHORT RECAP OF YOUR TEAM’S CASE
    + Briefly mention all the impacts that + Briefly mention all the impacts that
    you and your first speaker has you and your first speaker has
    proven proven
    By: Minh-Tam Dao Le

    ROLES OF THIRD SPEAKERS


    A3 & N3

    Affirmative 3 (A3) Negative 3 (N3)


    1. REBUT THE STANDING CLAIMS FROM 1. REBUT THE STANDING CLAIMS FROM
    NEGATIVE NEGATIVE
    + Go through Negative’s case and + Go through Negative’s case and
    identify the standing claims – i.e. identify the standing claims – i.e.
    the claims that have been the claims that have been
    successfully proven but not fully successfully proven but not fully
    rebutted. rebutted.
    + Rebut said claims. + Rebut said claims.

    2. SUMMARIZE & COMPARE 2. SUMMARIZE & COMPARE


    + Track all arguments from both + Track all arguments from both
    sides and form them into clashes. sides and form them into clashes.
    + Compare your argument with + Compare your argument with
    theirs to prove why your impact is theirs to prove why your impact is
    better, and overall, why that wins better, and overall, why that wins
    you the debate. you the debate.

    HOW TO COMPARE: When comparing arguments and their impacts for a clash, you might want to
    use “metrics” – i.e. the different ways we assess the value of something. The commonly used metrics
    are:
    1. Scale of the impact – How many people will be affected? Is it a good or a bad thing?
    2. Depth of the impact – How significant is the impact to the stakeholders? Is it a good or a bad
    thing?
    3. Long-term vs. Short-term – Is the impact likely to be long-term or short-term?

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy