Lect 18 CopyrightT
Lect 18 CopyrightT
Lect 18 CopyrightT
P K PANDA
Rights
Moral Rights
To protect personality of
author
Economic Rights
To bring economic benefits
2
2
Moral Rights
Right of Authorship
Right of Integrity
Digital Manipulation
No Right for Display
Inalienable Rights
3
3
Economic Rights -1
Right of Reproduction
Making copies e.g. an edition of a novel
Storage in computer memory
Right of Distribution/Issuing Copies
Digital Distribution
Right of Communication to the
Public
Public Performance
Internet Communication
4
4
Economic Rights 2
• Adaptation Rights
– Conversion into another form e.g. literary to drama
– Abridgement
– Picturizations,
– comic formats
• Right to make a cinematograph film or
sound recording
• Translation Rights
• Rental Rights
• Resale Rights for original artistic works.
5
5
Ownership of Rights
• Literary – author
• Drama – Dramatist
• Music – Composer
• Artistic work – Artist e.g. Painter, sculptor,
architect
• Photograph – Photographer
• Author of Computer Programme – Person
who causes the work to be created
• Cinematograph film – producer
• Sound Recording - producer
6
6
Author as Owner of Rights:
Exceptions
7
7
Author as Owner of Rights:
Exceptions
8
8
Author as Owner of Rights:
Exceptions
10
10
Duration of Copyright
11
11
RELATED RIGHTS
12
CUTS Training Programme 14 Jul 11 12
Performer’s Rights
13
13
Rights Of Broadcasting
Organisations
14
14
A CASE 2013 DU Vs. OUP, CUP
etc.
In a move that will benefit million of students in India, a
single judge bench of the Delhi High Court has
dismissed a claim by major publishers (Oxford
University Press, Cambridge University Press, Taylor and
Francis, U.K. and India) that Delhi University, and a
photocopy shop that was licensed to meet the needs of
students, were in violation of the Copyright Act. The
case (The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the
University of Oxford & Others v. Photocopy Services &
Another) revolved around the practice of study
materials that students use for the courses. Students
through the Association of Students for Equitable
Access to Knowledge (ASEAK) and concerned
academics through the Society for Promoting
Educational Access and Knowledge (SPEAK) had
pleaded themselves in the case.
Interpretation of “in the
course of instruction”.
The main legal dispute was around the
interpretation of section 52(1)(i) of the Indian
Copyright Act, which provided an exception to
copyright based on fair use. The manner in which
the law frames this exception is that the
exception applies to materials used by students
and teachers “in the course of instruction”. The
publishers argued that this term refers to a
narrow meaning of materials used in the
classroom during the lecture. The Court, however,
dismissed this argument, and instead held that
the term ‘in the course of instruction’ has to be
interpreted broadly to mean something that the
teacher tells the student to do in the course of
The Court stressed that the right to
education is a fundamental right, and that
exemptions for the purposes of education,
research and teaching have traditionally
been exceptions to copyright law. Stressing
on the way technology is evolving, the
Court said that even if students today take
photographs of material from textbooks,
and get this printed, this would also
amount to fair use and therefore be
exempted from copyright restrictions.
IP Laws of India
Act Ministry/Department