Experimental-Method-and-design-2
Experimental-Method-and-design-2
BROADCASTING LANTAY
RESEARCH METHOD METHOD
STATIONS (KG) (KG)
1 X X
X X
2 X X
3 X X
4 X X
X X
5 X X
6 X X
7 X X
Table 5.3. Two-Group Design
Sample
FLAVOR ACCEPTABILITY
PANELISTS MILKFISH GOATFISH
LUNCHEON LUNCHEON
MEAT MEAT
1 9 8
2 8 8
3 9 8
4 8 8
5 8 8
6 9 8
7 8 8
8 7 8
Pre-test-Post-Test Control
Group Design
Pre-test-Post-test Design
Traditional (Control X X
Group) X X
Modern (Experimental
Group)
Two-pair group Design
This design is an
elaboration of the two-group
design wherein there are two
control groups and two
experimental groups.
Table 5.5. Two- Pair Group Design Sample on the
Acceptability of Canned Milkfish Bone Meal in Salmon
and French Style with and without Sea Vegetable
FLAVOR ACCEPTABILITY
CONTROL GROUP EXPERIMENTAL GROUP
(Without Sea (With Sea Vegetable)
Vegetable)
1 2 1 2
PANELISTS Salmon French Salmon French
Style Style Style Style
1 X X X X
2 X X X X
SOLOMON 4-GROUP
DESIGN
The Solomon four-group design is believed
to be the most prominent experimental
research design because it minimizes the
threat to internal and external validity.
Parallel-group Design
This is a design in which two or more
groups are used at the same time with only
single variable (experimental group)
manipulated or changed. The experimental
group varies while the parallel group
serves as control for comparative
purposes.
Table 5.7. Parallel-Group Design on the Acceptability of
Canned Commercial Liver Spread, Milkfish Bone Meat
Spread and Goatfish Bone Meal Spread
FLAVOR ACCEPTABILITY
CONTROL EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS
GROUP
PANELISTS
Commercial Milkfish Goatfish
1 X X X
2 X X X
3 X X X
4 X X X
Counterbalanced or Latin Square design
SF1
G1 G2 G3 G4
G2 G3 G4 G1
SF2
G3 G4 G1 G2
SF3
G4 G1 G2 G3
SF4
Completely Randomized Design (CRD)
Advantages of a CRD
1. Very flexible design (i.e. number of treatments and
replicates is only limited by the available number of
experimental units).
2. Statistical analysis is simple compared to other designs.
3. Loss of information due to missing data is small compared
to other designs due to the larger number of degrees of
freedom for the error source of variation.
Completely Randomized Design (CRD)
Disadvantages
1. If experimental units are not homogeneous and
you fail to minimize this variation using blocking,
there may be a loss of precision.
2. Usually the least efficient design unless
experimental units are homogeneous.
3. Not suited for a large number of treatments.
Table 5.11. Sample of Complete Randomized Design on the Yield
of Mudcrab
(Scylla serrata) Using Bread Meal as Supplemental Feed
% SUPPLEMENTAL SAMPLING
FEED per
COMPARTMENT
1 (3 %) X X
X
2 (5 %)
3 (7 %) X X
X
4 (10 %)
X X
5 (15 %) X
X X
X
X X
Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD)
This experimental design uses a group of test
plants and animals as subjects of the study which
are studied once but subsequent treatments
applied are replicated to determine the cause of
change. There is control in this design and the
subjects will undergo randomization process.
Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD)
1. Divide the
sample into all
Subgroup 1: gender
Subgroup 2:
All males subgroups (also All females
called blocks)
2. Within each
subgroup,
randomly assign
T C participants to T C
either treatment
or control
Table 5.11. Sample of Randomized Complete Block Design
(RCBD) in Culturing Abalone (Haliotis asinina) in Fish Cages
Using Fish Meal, Shrimp Meal, and Fish Silage as Supplemental
Feeds
SUPPLEMENTAL REPLICATION
FEEDS 1 2
3
Fish Meal X X
X
Shrimp Meal
X X
X
Fish Silage
X X
X
Correlational Design