Research Technique and Methodology - Alternative
Research Technique and Methodology - Alternative
H
TECHNIQUE AND
METHODOLOGY
Mohammed Ali Arshad Chowdhury Phd
Professor
Department of Accounting
University of Chittagong
Contact No. +88-01815664590
E-mail: arshad@cu.ac.bd
Whatsup: +88-01815664590
Introductions
Depth of Scope
Degree of Manipulation of
Types of Research
Variables
Type of Inference
Time
Source
Types of Research
Purpose
Depth of Scope
Correlational
Exploratory Research Descriptive Research Explanatory Research
Research
Degree of Manipulation of
Variables
The researcher actively The researcher does not Examines the effects of an
manipulates one or more manipulate variables or intervention or treatment
variables to observe their conduct controlled without random assignment
effects on other variables. experiments. of participants to different
groups.
Types of Research
Type of Inference
Time
Sources of Information
Ensuring transparency
For example, “Students who receive counselling will show a greater increase in
creativity than students not receiving counselling.”
Characteristics of
Hypothesis
1. Hypothesis should be clear and precise. If the hypothesis is not clear and precise,
the inferences drawn on its basis cannot be taken as reliable.
2. Hypothesis should be capable of being tested. In a swamp of untestable hypotheses,
many a time the research programmes have bogged down. Some prior study may be
done by researcher in order to make hypothesis a testable one. A hypothesis “is
testable if other deductions can be made from it which, in turn, can be confirmed or
disproved by observation.”
3. Hypothesis should state relationship between variables, if it happens to be a
relational hypothesis.
4. Hypothesis should be limited in scope and must be specific. A researcher must
remember that narrower hypotheses are generally more testable and he should
develop such hypotheses.
Characteristics of
Hypothesis
5. Hypothesis should be stated as far as possible in most simple terms so that the
same is easily understandable by all concerned. But one must remember that
simplicity of hypothesis has nothing to do with its significance.
6. Hypothesis should be consistent with most known facts i.e., it must be consistent
with a substantial body of established facts. In other words, it should be one which
judges accept as being the most likely.
7. Hypothesis should be amenable to testing within a reasonable time. One should
not use even an excellent hypothesis, if the same cannot be tested in reasonable
time for one cannot spend a life-time collecting data to test it.
8. Hypothesis must explain the facts that gave rise to the need for explanation. This
means that by using the hypothesis plus other known and accepted generalizations,
one should be able to deduce the original problem condition. Thus hypothesis
must actually explain what it claims to explain; it should have empirical reference.
Testing of Hypothesis
Null Hypothesis and Type I and Type II Two Tailed and One
Level of Significance
Alternative Hypothesis Errors Tailed Test
Making a formal statement
The results section should make up the bulk of the report and should
present, in some logical order, those findings of the project that bear
on the objectives. The results should be organized as a continuous
narrative, designed to be convincing but not to oversell the project.
Summary tables and charts should be used to aid the discussion.
Report Writing
Report is the visible output of the research. The common outline for a
research report as follows:
1. Abstract
2. Introduction
3. Background
a. Literature Review
b. Hypotheses
4. Research Methods
5. Results
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions
8. References
9. Appendices