0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views8 pages

Paraphrased Performance Review Presentation

The document outlines the performance review process for civil design, emphasizing its role in evaluating design quality, effectiveness, and compliance. Key steps include collecting documentation, evaluating against standards, consulting stakeholders, recording lessons learned, and reporting findings. The review process requires collaboration and constructive feedback to enhance future design quality.

Uploaded by

Swastik Shivhare
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views8 pages

Paraphrased Performance Review Presentation

The document outlines the performance review process for civil design, emphasizing its role in evaluating design quality, effectiveness, and compliance. Key steps include collecting documentation, evaluating against standards, consulting stakeholders, recording lessons learned, and reporting findings. The review process requires collaboration and constructive feedback to enhance future design quality.

Uploaded by

Swastik Shivhare
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

PERFORMANCE

REVIEW OF
CIVIL DESIGN
PROCESS
SUMMARY OF KEY CONCEPTS AND STEPS
A structured
assessment used to
evaluate the quality,
UNDERSTANDING effectiveness, and
PERFORMANCE compliance of a
REVIEWS completed design.
Helps identify
strengths, weaknesses,
and improvement
opportunities.
- ENSURE DESIGN - EVALUATE

OBJECTIVE MEETS PROJECT AND


LEGAL
REQUIREMENTS
COMMUNICATION
AND COORDINATION

OF THE
REVIEW

- IMPROVE FUTURE - MAINTAIN QUALITY


DESIGN PROCESSES AND COMPLIANCE
STANDARDS
STEPS 1. COLLECT
DOCUMENTATIO
2. EVALUATE
AGAINST
3. CONSULT
STAKEHOLDERS
INVOLVED IN N STANDARDS

A
PERFORMANC
E REVIEW
4. RECORD 5. REPORT
LESSONS FINDINGS
LEARNED
- Designers:
Explain and
justify design
choices

KEY - Project
PARTICIPANT Managers: Lead
S AND THEIR and coordinate
ROLES the review

- Stakeholders:
Provide feedback
and assess
outcomes
COMMON - CLIENT
SURVEYS
- STAKEHOLDER
INTERVIEWS
- TECHNICAL
PEER REVIEWS
REVIEW
TECHNIQUES

- - KPI
BENCHMARKING EVALUATIONS
(COST, TIME,
QUALITY)
COMMUNICATING
REVIEW RESULTS 1 2 3
- Prepare formal - Share with - Use feedback
reports relevant team to enhance
members future planning
and execution
SUMMARY

PERFORMANCE REVIEWS THEY REQUIRE


ARE ESSENTIAL FOR COLLABORATION,
IMPROVING DESIGN DOCUMENTATION, AND
QUALITY. CONSTRUCTIVE
FEEDBACK.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy