User talk:Giro720

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Thursday
26
December
2024
10:33 UTC
Welcome to my talk page.

Archives: 1 2 3 4

[edit]

Copyright status: File:Brasão de Armas Imperial (Lei Áurea).png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Brasão de Armas Imperial (Lei Áurea).png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright status: File:Pavillon particulier d'Espagne (La connoissance des pavillons, Planche 61).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pavillon particulier d'Espagne (La connoissance des pavillons, Planche 61).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Museu Histórico Nacional - Catálogo geral 1º seção archeologia e historia (1924).pdf

[edit]

Copyright status: File:Museu Histórico Nacional - Catálogo geral 1º seção archeologia e historia (1924).pdf

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Museu Histórico Nacional - Catálogo geral 1º seção archeologia e historia (1924).pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:05, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teimosa guerra de edições nesse ficheiro

[edit]

Olá. Esse ficheiro que já havia sido corrigido para o padrão do livro oficial do governo do Brasil teve a correção revertida, pois um editor está querendo impor a própria escolha pessoal no caso.

Ele diz que reverteu com o argumento, a: "Bandeira revertida por ser mais histórica que as demais. Além disso, todos os videogames e todos os vídeos do YouTube sempre usaram esta bandeira, então não vejo razão para refazer a bandeira, que se tornou horrível, ao invés desta clássica. Então, vamos ficar com esta, pois é a bandeira mais histórica do Império do Brasil". Pelo jeito ele num é brasileiro ( e se baseia somente em games e no YouTube) e o verdadeiro motivo do referida padrão ser o mais usado no que ele chama de: todos os videogames e todos os vídeos do YouTube sempre usaram esta bandeira foi pelo fato de ter ficado muito tempo no ar( de 2006 a 2021) e nesses 15 anos o pessoal dos games, do youtube e todos mais[até mesmo os monarquistas kkk] apenas fizeram o tal do "Copia e cola". E quem vai copiar e colar num se liga na história correta ou em padrões heráldicos definidos em publicação oficial.


Favor tem como você participar da página de discussão sobre o tema e também chamar o editor guerrilheiro para a idem página? Por capricho pessoa o mesmo rejeita o livro oficial que tem o padrão mais brasileiro e que tem o mesmo formato de escudo que tá na Constituição de 1924 e também na base da Coroa de Dom Pedro I, além do nó em formato vermelho que vai contra o decreto do Tope Nacional do Brasil. Gente assim, talvez, só deixa a egolatria em página de discussão.

Penso que precisamos de algum editor com status de ADM para moderar o caso, esse ADM talvez possa ver isso: Yanguas--Almanaque Lusofonista (talk) 12:18, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brasão de Mato Grosso.png

[edit]
File:Brasão de Mato Grosso.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TentingZones1 (talk) 23:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Acetic acid

[edit]
Acetic acid have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wostr (talk) 17:48, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Simetria da Cruz da Ordem de Cristo

[edit]

Caro Giro720 Bom dia, permita-me... Um detalhe fundamental, a Cruz da Ordem de Cristo é totalmente simétrica e baseada em um octógono. As faixas das três cores das hastes - o vermelho, o branco e o vermelho têm a mesma largura. Que estão desproporcionais na sua figura. https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordem_de_Cristo#/media/Ficheiro:Order_of_Christ_Cross_(schematic_drawing).svg


Você poderá entender esta característica nesta imagem. https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordem_de_Cristo#/media/Ficheiro:Flag_of_Madeira.svg E, também, se a haste for alongada - também deverá manter a mesma largura em cada uma das três faixas. As serifas sempre têm 45 graus, e estão corretas. Com calma, quando você puder, te peço para refazer estas características. Saúde e obrigado. Robertolyra (talk) 16:27, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Historia Genealogica da Casa Real Portugueza Tomo 12 Parte 1.pdf

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Historia Genealogica da Casa Real Portugueza Tomo 12 Parte 1.pdf, Don't forget to add a completed {{Book}} template on the file description page for your upload. It helps in providing additional catalog data on Commons, as well as assisting with Index creation at Wiksource. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:07, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of Colonial Brazil.svg

[edit]

Giro720, prazer em falar novamente com vc. Desta vez é para ver se vc pode botar os códigos de aviso que esse Brasão do estado do Brasil está com a cruz na cor errada, pois a fonte escrita página 71 diz que é mesma é em goles e não preta como está no mesmo.--Almanaque Lusofonista (talk) 22:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Olá Almanaque. Talvez seja seja melhor carregar um arquivo com nome diference e a cruz em goles, pois há inconsistência na descrição do Brasão. A referencia usada em ambos é o "Tesouro da Nobreza" de 1675 encontrado na Torre do Tombo. Apesar do Tesouro da Nobreza apresentar prefácio, o brasão do estado do Brasil é apresentado apenas visualmente tal como ilustrado em File:Armas do Estado do Brasil - Tesouro da Nobreza.jpg (página PT-TT-CR-D-A-1-21_m0052.TIF). Acredito que a descrição tenha sido feita pelo pelo Hélio Viana vendo a imagem do brasão (especialmente por usar o termo "Escudo português...") ou usando outra referência além do Tesouro da Nobreza. Giro720 (talk) 06:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Giro720&oldid=879944637"