Wikinews:Deletion requests
 |
Do not list a page here if it meets the speedy deletion criteria or the proposed deletion criteria. |
| Do not list a page here if it meets the speedy deletion criteria or the proposed deletion criteria. |
|
Deletion
|
 Content requests |
This page is where Wikinewsies discuss whether a page or file should be deleted or undeleted through consensus. See the Deletion Log or the Deletion Archives to see which pages have been deleted or kept.
| DELETION | |
|---|---|
| I | Read and be familiar with the Deletion Criteria before listing a page here, or debating on a page here.
|
| II | Add {{Deletion request}} or {{dr}} to the image, category or article page. |
| III | List the link below using the following template:
== Date of request == === [[:Page title]] === State reason for deletion request and sign with ~~~~. ==== Comments ==== ==== Votes ==== |
| IV | The listing will remain open for at least seven days while the community discusses the page(s). The period of time starts at the submission of the deletion request on this page. |
| Admins | To close a Deletion Request
|
| UNDELETION | |
| Note | If you object to speedy deletion of a page, or wish to overturn a closer deletion request, please list it here. An admin may undelete the page(s) at their discretion for the duration of the vote, so that users may view the page they are voting on. |
| I | List the link below using the following template:
== Date of request == === [[:Page title]] === State reason for undeletion request and sign with ~~~~. ==== Comments ==== ==== Votes ==== |
| II | The listing will remain open for at least seven days while the community discusses the page(s). The period of time starts at the submission of the deletion request on this page. |
| Admins | To close an Undeletion Request
|
Deletion requests
[edit]Date of request
[edit]December 5, 2024
[edit]Unused in a news or documentation and was previously marked for speedy deletion. "Stale or not news" is not a valid deletion reason here by the looks of it. I could not confirm it is copyvio. Can you confirm or transfer to commons? Gryllida (talk) 06:53, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]Votes
[edit]- Delete. The file have no license. --MGA73 (talk) 15:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Unused in a news or documentation and was previously marked for speedy deletion. "Stale or not news" is not a valid deletion reason here by the looks of it. I could not confirm it is copyvio. Can you confirm or transfer to commons? Gryllida (talk) 06:53, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]Votes
[edit]- Delete. The file have no license. --MGA73 (talk) 15:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Unused in a news or documentation and was previously marked for speedy deletion. "Stale or not news" is not a valid deletion reason here by the looks of it. I could not confirm it is copyvio. Can you confirm or transfer to commons? Gryllida (talk) 06:53, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]Votes
[edit]- Delete. The file have no license. --MGA73 (talk) 15:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
October 17, 2023
[edit]NurMi spam
[edit]- Full text of the 18 October issue of the Git tutorial reading
- How would you express the emotional repository NurMi in numbers?
- Can NurMi help depressed users?
- NurMi HQ, on the AI for breaking - Breaking friend NurMi that relieves corona blues depression popular as an app to overcome depression
- NurMi CPS: Performance indicators of NurMi, a dailies show repository
- What is your NurMi spooned?
All of these articles appear to be largely incoherent (probably machine translated) spam. Omphalographer (talk) 00:50, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Remove Delete and block account. --Pitille02 (talk) 04:18, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Done Thanks @Omphalographer and @Pitille02. 
Gryllida (talk) 05:03, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
August 28, 2023
[edit]Overly broad. There was near-unanimous agreement in 2018 on the talk page this cat is not suitable as-is.
There, Pi stated something, in fact, I've long thought of this cat: "Few articles get added to this category for much the same reason few get added to Category:World: if interpreted in a simplistic way they would be so absurdly inclusive that they would be useless, so the only way there's any point to populating them at all is they're given some narrower interpretation — but the name of the category gives no obvious support to any narrower interpretation, leaving it up to individuals to occasionally put things here as it's not clear what else to do with them."
I see this as an unsuitable sort of union of a few cats: Women's rights, e.g. Arizona bans abortion for genetic abnormalities, the Wikimedia gender gap, e.g. Wikimedian Cindy Ashley-Nelson dies at conference in Berlin, and, as discussed on the talk, some as-yet nonexistent third cat for articles like Qatar appoints four women to its law-drafting Shura Council which don't exactly relate to women's rights but are more "women breaking glass ceilings". I'm unsure what we should call the hypothetical third cat — perhaps "Gender politics" (in the spirit of Category:Gun politics) — but I think it should replace this one. Heavy Water (talk) 04:25, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]Votes
[edit]- Remove I vaguely recall the 2018 vote, but keeping this will inevitably invite more gendered categories. --SVTCobra 23:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Remove as outlined above. Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 19:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Remove and replace with "Gender politics" as suggested by Heavy Water Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 23:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Remove per Heavy Water. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 13:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Undeletion requests
[edit]Proposed deletions
[edit]For reference, it is currently December 25, 2024.