Talk:2000 Fort Worth tornado outbreak

broadcast parts

"A KXAS camera in downtown Fort Worth was broadcasting during the 6 p.m. weather segment and may have broadcast parts of the tornado."

One should know by now. The comment should be removed.

--145.254.65.18 20:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

This was the camera that was facing away? The commentary mentioned "some slight winds blowing a little debris." The tornado was behind the camera ripping up downtown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.206.155.210 (talk) 00:36, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Name

I moved "Fort Worth Tornado" to "Fort Worth tornado" to comply with [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events).. --Rosiestep (talk) 23:34, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Fujita ranking

I cannot believe so an error has not been caught yet: "with some estimates making it a very low F4" NO. The damage surveys put the tornado at a "minimal f3" And to my understanding that rating has been criticized for being to high. Yes, the damage to the Cash America building was bad, though it probably was hit head on with the worst winds. The tornado was definitely not that strong. Just google images from the Atlanta tornado and one will find the damage to be somewhat similar.

http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:ZW4Hjs1iAZQJ:www.srh.noaa.gov/images/fwd/ftwtor2000writeup/march28.pdf+march+28+2000+fort+worth+tornado+noaa&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEEShbERCjGbKUvhBaZsIIP3Dowpp9b3c6MVOQjHcNPI9mUwssQUC8MLQym_vYf8PxoX0Mx18KAthKnIykisW4PnJ75StXuukEHXKrVe6fKfZ33ZN-mlQ8Bm1lOR_3_gwxHVnZiPPa&sig=AHIEtbRVFlmfj77Qc0MNLVjk3Yy2cWqOww

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.srh.noaa.gov/fwd/ftworthtornado.html
  • In 2000 Fort Worth tornado on 2011-05-25 06:59:33, 404 Not Found
  • In 2000 Fort Worth tornado on 2011-06-10 05:24:40, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:24, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.wind.ttu.edu/Pubs/pdfs/D3-28-00%20Tor%20FtWorth.pdf
  • In 2000 Fort Worth tornado on 2011-05-25 06:59:33, 400 Bad Request
  • In 2000 Fort Worth tornado on 2011-06-10 05:24:51, 400 Bad Request

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:25, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 3

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.srh.noaa.gov/fwd/sd0300.pdf
  • In 2000 Fort Worth tornado on 2011-05-25 06:59:33, 404 Not Found
  • In 2000 Fort Worth tornado on 2011-06-10 05:25:00, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:25, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2000 Fort Worth tornado/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 04:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Reviewing later.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 04:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

• I don't think there's a need to mention the state name after the city name, since all the cities mentioned are within the state of Texas.
• "On the afternoon of March 28" I think you can change to "Later that day", etc.

Mostly tiny issues. It should pass easily.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 04:03, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! I've made adjustments accordingly. TheAustinMan^{(Talk·Works)} 00:44, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2000 Fort Worth tornado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110522140509/http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/misc/000328.html to http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/misc/000328.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Renaming

@ChessEric: I agree that the title here ought to include the word "outbreak", since the article makes clear that there were ten tornadoes that hit the area that day. It looks to me, however, like "2000 Fort Worth tornado outbreak" is the standard sequence of ideas in the title for articles of this sort. When I look for other tornado and tornado outbreak articles with locations and years in the their names in Category:Tornadoes in Texas, which includes this article, I see 1902 Goliad, Texas, tornado, 1922 Austin twin tornadoes, 1997 Central Texas tornado outbreak, 1999 Oklahoma tornado outbreak, etc. They all seem to be structured <year> <location> <event>; I don't see a single one structured <location> <event> of <year>. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 15:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

@Bryanrutherford0: Oh. I have no idea why I renamed it that. LOL! Thanks for changing that.ChessEric (talk) 16:31, 31 July 2020 (UTC)