Talk:Tornadoes of 2001

Tornado photo

This is a great photo of a tornado if you can ignore the reflections off the windshield. This is from Glenville in 2001

http://www.crh.noaa.gov/arx/events/images/glentor.jpg

Gopher backer 01:32, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Public domain? I don't think it can be used on this page.-RunningOnBrains 03:02, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Apparently, {{PD-USGov-NOAA}} applies to all images stored on their servers, unless otherwise specified. This image is still a bit poor with the window reflection, but could be used. What tornado is this (more importantly, what page is this image from?)-RunningOnBrains 23:16, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Content merged for Oct 24 tornado

Following the expert review (thanks to User:Runningonbrains), I have merged the content of North Central Indiana-Michigan Tornado Outbreak into here, with a bit shortening. But someone should have a look at the text and maybe also sort the sources better; I put all the external links of that article as sources into the first paragraph of the section. --B. Wolterding 17:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Criteria

Out of curiosity, what criteria do we use for these articles? Is it any tornado we can find or should be there be some degree of notability?

Gopher backer (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I've been going with the following as criteria of inclusion:

1. Any tornado/outbreak resulting in a fatality/multiple injuries
2. Any tornado/outbreak causing significant damage (generally more than $500K, or F3+ damage)
3. Any outbreak of 20 or more tornadoes.
4. Any tornado in a state/area averaging less than one or two tornadoes per year.
5. Other unusual circumstances

I started this a while ago, and have been pretty liberal with my inclusion; I figure anything determined to be non-notable can be easily removed later. -RunningOnBrains 23:04, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Tornadoes of 2001. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061109060120/http://www.tornadoproject.com/past/pastts01.htm to http://www.tornadoproject.com/past/pastts01.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080325151824/http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/sailing/12/27/sydney.spt/index.html to http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/sailing/12/27/sydney.spt/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061109060120/http://www.tornadoproject.com/past/pastts01.htm to http://www.tornadoproject.com/past/pastts01.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:25, 22 May 2017 (UTC)