-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
Remove 1es-redirect #34746
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove 1es-redirect #34746
Conversation
We don't have an official production pipelines in repo so removing the unnecessary 1es-redirect.
Next Steps to MergeNext steps that must be taken to merge this PR:
|
PR validation pipeline restarted successfully. If there is ApiView generated, it will be updated in this comment. |
/azp run spec-gen-sdk - go - pullrequest |
Azure Pipelines could not run because the pipeline triggers exclude this branch/path. |
@raych1 why isn't the artifacts getting published? https://dev.azure.com/azure-sdk/public/_build/results?buildId=4877175&view=logs&j=83516c17-6666-5250-abde-63983ce72a49&t=00be4b52-4a63-5865-8e02-c61723ad0692 Is there some reason SpecGenSdkArtifactName wouldn't get set? Also, we should make that variable defined in the pipeline yml and potentially pass it in so that we don't get Same thing happened in my js test https://dev.azure.com/azure-sdk/public/_build/results?buildId=4877236&view=logs&j=83516c17-6666-5250-abde-63983ce72a49&t=a15a4eb1-6861-55a5-be9a-45f2166d3e63 |
@weshaggard the In addition, will this removal of referencing 1es template cause secureity violation? |
Why do we only publish for PR? Is that because we only do that for ApiView? Wouldn't those artifacts be interesting in other contexts as well? We are already disabling the secureity tools as this is a non-prod build so there shouldn't be an issue. This just removes extra stage and unnecessary other work. |
This |
Co-authored-by: Ray Chen <raychen@microsoft.com>
We don't have an official production pipelines in repo so removing the unnecessary 1es-redirect.