Content-Length: 326317 | pFad | http://github.com/ethereum/execution-spec-tests/pull/1722

F6 chore: use latest eels resolver by spencer-tb · Pull Request #1722 · ethereum/execution-spec-tests · GitHub
Skip to content

chore: use latest eels resolver #1722

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2025
Merged

chore: use latest eels resolver #1722

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2025

Conversation

spencer-tb
Copy link
Contributor

@spencer-tb spencer-tb commented Jun 8, 2025

🗒️ Description

Bump eels resolver to use the latest commit which includes the following PR: petertdavies/ethereum-spec-evm-resolver#10

The PR silences bloat GET request & I/O error messages so we can debug better when using -s.

🔗 Related Issues

N/A.

✅ Checklist

  • All: Set appropriate labels for the changes.
  • All: Considered squashing commits to improve commit history.
  • All: Added an entry to CHANGELOG.md.
  • All: Considered updating the online docs in the ./docs/ directory.

@spencer-tb spencer-tb force-pushed the chore-eels-resolver-bump branch from c6016f2 to c6ccc05 Compare June 8, 2025 13:09
@spencer-tb spencer-tb added type:chore Type: Chore scope:tooling Scope: Python tools (uv, ruff, tox,...) labels Jun 8, 2025
@spencer-tb spencer-tb self-assigned this Jun 8, 2025
@spencer-tb spencer-tb force-pushed the chore-eels-resolver-bump branch from c6ccc05 to c5b72bd Compare June 9, 2025 11:05
@spencer-tb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@danceratopz - I am not sure about the uv.lock changes here, is this correct? It's what my uv sync gives me!

@danceratopz danceratopz force-pushed the chore-eels-resolver-bump branch from c5b72bd to 85fc225 Compare June 10, 2025 05:23
@danceratopz
Copy link
Member

danceratopz commented Jun 10, 2025

@danceratopz - I am not sure about the uv.lock changes here, is this correct? It's what my uv sync gives me!

Thanks for flagging @spencer-tb 🙏

These changes are due to uv updates and are explained in this PR, which contains no dep changes but simply these format changes:

If you uv self update you shouldn't run into this issue next time.

Copy link
Member

@danceratopz danceratopz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I reset to the prior commit (should have reverted to maintain the diff, sry) and regenerated the uv.lock with uv 0.7.3. The spurious changes have gone.

But LGTM, thanks! I hadn't spotted #1172 was merged! Thanks a lot for silencing these errors. Also benign is such a great word, we should try to use it more often.

@spencer-tb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Amazing thanks for this! Will update my uv now :)

@spencer-tb spencer-tb merged commit 0dfcd92 into main Jun 10, 2025
25 checks passed
@spencer-tb spencer-tb deleted the chore-eels-resolver-bump branch June 10, 2025 10:05
spencer-tb added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2025
Co-authored-by: danceratopz <danceratopz@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
scope:tooling Scope: Python tools (uv, ruff, tox,...) type:chore Type: Chore
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants








ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: http://github.com/ethereum/execution-spec-tests/pull/1722

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy