Summary:
# Changelog: [Internal]

Added OS-agnostic module that will implement 2 basic capabilities:
- Getting current process id
- Getting current thread id

This information will later be used in `PerformanceTracer`, which is trace-engine for recording profiles that can be inspected in Chrome DevTools.

Differential Revision: D69316093

Summary:
# Changelog: [Internal]

Use newly added module to get real OS-level process and thread ids.

We will keep process id on an instance, because I don't think it could change over time? For thread id, we will get it at the time of event registration.

Differential Revision: D69316094

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#49083

# Changelog: [Internal]

> NOTE: Some CI jobs are expected to fail, because changes in Hermes D67353585 should be landed first, and then grafted to Static Hermes.

Added 2 new public methods to `PerformanceTracer` instance for registering metadata Trace Events for processes and threads.

Differential Revision: D68439733

Reviewed By: huntie

Summary:
# Changelog: [Internal]

When we start tracing, we will record metadata event for current process.

We will base it off the assumption that the thread where we handle `Tracing.start` event is the main one.

We can't register the main thread yet:
1. We can't assume that CDP messages are handled on it - this is not the case for Windows and in a long term Inspector will be moved to its own thread
2. We don't have any similar mechanism as Runtime Executor, but for Main thread. This will require Host providing an executor for it.

I've validated at the top of the stack that not registering the main thread should not affect how trace is displayed in CDT.

Differential Revision: D69465926

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#48836

# Changelog: [Internal]

When `Tracing.start` CDP method is received, here is what happens next:
- `TracingAgent`, which intercepts the event will propagate this status to `Instance` by calling `startTracing()` on `InstanceAgent`.
- `InstanceAgent` will propagate it to `Runtime` entities. The only difference, there is no concept of tracing for Runtime, it will only have an API for starting sampling profiler.

When `Tracing.end` CDP method is received, it is propagated in the same order.

There is also `collect*()` methods for collecting profiles.

This has multiple benefits:
- We can control when `Runtime` or `Instance` are recreated and can ask them to start recording trace profiles right away. This may be required when we would add support for Reload and Profile from Performance panel.
- We might leverage this setup in the future, once we add instrumentation for Network panel. `InstanceAgent` will get notified when tracing started and will correspondingly notify other part of the infrastructure that will be responsible for recording network calls.
- We remain being fully agnostic to the actual `Runtime`, see corresponding `RuntimeTargetDelegate` for `V8`. We don't have the capacity for implementing and maintaining sampling profiler capabilities for it, but this approach unblocks it from technical perspective, if someone would want to invest into this.

`InstanceProfile` is a superset of `RuntimeSamplingProfile`. In the future, `InstanceProfile` may also include things like `NetworkProfile`, or similar stuff.

The definition for `RuntimeSamplingProfile` will be added in D68414421 and relies on the availability of new API for sampling profiler in Hermes.

Differential Revision: D68327630

Reviewed By: huntie

Summary:
# Changelog: [Internal]

Adding a new method to `RuntimeTarget` that will register it for Tracing.

In our case, it will schedule a callback on JS executor that will register JavaScript thread with `PerformanceTracer`.

Differential Revision: D69530984

Summary:
# Changelog: [Internal]

We will record event loop ticks and register corresponding `"RunTask"` Trace Event with our Trace Event engine.

Since this is hot path, I've added some gating under macros that are being used for Fusebox initialization.

There are also plans to add a public method to `PerformanceTracer` to get tracing status, so we could avoid cost of serialization / saving timestamps if trace is not being recorded. I believe rubennorte had plans on this, we will add it on top of that.

> Q: Why not add this to TraceSection?

Long-term, we will have a solution that will be one layer above TraceSection and this `EventLoopTaskReporterRAII`, it is risky now to modify existing `TraceSection` and rely on event names and attempt to map them to Trace Events.

Differential Revision: D69399955