CRFS and POHMELFS/AFS
CRFS and POHMELFS/AFS
Posted Feb 8, 2008 3:17 UTC (Fri) by linuxbox (guest, #6928)In reply to: CRFS and POHMELFS by nix
Parent article: CRFS and POHMELFS
A more interesting comparison for me would be CRFS vs. GFS or OCFS--which, I rather suspect, is more what the btrfs authors are aiming at.
Posted Feb 8, 2008 13:03 UTC (Fri)
by Velmont (guest, #46433)
[Link]
Posted Feb 9, 2008 22:42 UTC (Sat)
by giraffedata (guest, #1954)
[Link]
CRFS and POHMELFS/AFS (what about HAMMER?)
How does HAMMER fit into all of this? Yes, it is being developed for DragonflyBSD, but it
could maybe come into Linux. Does anyone know? :-)
I'd like to know how it's better than NFSv4. The only reason NFSv4 exists is to solve those classic NFS problems. It definitely has client-side caching and POSIX inter-user synchronization of file access.
CRFS and POHMELFS/AFS