- Links to the R=T Framework
- Chapter
- University College London
- pp. 242-243
-
- View Citation
- Additional Information
Links to the R=T Framework
Danny Garside
•Educators generally agree that ‘preparing students for the workplace’ is a valid priority. There is no consensus on what exactly this should look like. Jawiria suggests that ‘research skills’ might fit this gap.
The skills required for research share a great deal of similarity with the skills required for a productive career in the future workplace. Skills such as: being able to question critically, to plan an approach to solving a problem, and to present ideas and findings. The value of these skills often overshadows the value of knowledge of specific facts, particularly when careers are more likely to span a wider range of professions than they were previously.
From the perspective of an educator, research-based education should be more than just a lecturer presenting their own research, although this can be a good place to start. It can encompass a wide gamut of practices which can be described as taking an active, innovative, experimental approach to the provision of education. Due to its experimental nature, research-based education is not easy, for students or educators, as for both groups it is a departure from the known and trusted. The educator has to devote more time and effort to plan modules from the ground up, rather than relying on traditional models, and the students have to take time to understand exactly what it being asked of them.
•For students, this type of education sounds decidedly more enjoyable (never mind more valuable) than education dominated by exams and lectures. It requires students to think as well as to respond to tasks in active and novel ways. This will undoubtedly prepare students better for future challenges, where confidence (previously undervalued in education) is immensely valuable.
Judged in the cold light of a ‘return on investment’, in a labour marketplace where a large number of students depart from their subject, an aptitude for flexibility should allow a graduate to fare better in roles that they may not have considered prior to university.
However, departing from the traditional rule book of education takes time and effort, and those most inclined to be active researchers are not necessarily one and the same as those willing to devote time and energy to pedagogical innovation. A balance between the two is desirable at a societal level, but at a more micro level there is often a bias towards research.
It is inherently more difficult to assess flexible education, where rubrics are necessarily looser and, while summative assessment remains the norm, this is a fundamental difficulty.
•The best way to teach a subject will constantly change, and in order to provide valuable education a progressive and experimental approach is required. With transparency and honesty, students can be engaged in the development of their own education, and can assist in the ongoing development of courses. Currently, where broad skill sets seem the most likely to allow graduates to succeed in non-academic environments, educators should strive to push syllabi to provide this. Rather usefully, these broad skill sets can be provided by encouraging students to be active researchers, and this serves the double purpose of preparing them well for a future in academia, should this be their aim.
Additional Information
pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier! Saves Data!
--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!
Fetched URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/pub/354/oa_edited_volume/chapter/2779466
Alternative Proxies: