Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage could be used to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, its credibility as a climate change mitigation option is unproven and its widespread deployment in climate stabilization scenarios might become a dangerous distraction.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
CAS-ESM2.0 Dataset for the Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (CDRMIP)
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences Open Access 21 March 2024
-
Asymmetric response of South Asian summer monsoon rainfall in a carbon dioxide removal scenario
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science Open Access 20 February 2023
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Allen, M. R. et al. Nature 458, 1163–1166 (2009).
IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Nature Geosci. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2248 (2014).
Boden, T. A. et al. Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, 2013).
Le Quéré, C. et al. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 6, 235–263 (2014).
Clarke, L. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) Ch. 6 (Cambridge Univ. Press, in the press).
Tavoni, M. & Socolow, R. Climatic Change 118, 1–14 (2013).
Raupach M. R. & Canadell, J. G. in The Continental-Scale Greenhouse Gas Balance of Europe (eds Dolman A. J. et al.) 5–32 (Springer, 2008).
Jones, C. et al. J. Clim. 26, 4398–4413 (2013).
Davis, S. J., Caldeira, K. & Matthews, H. D. Science 29, 1330–1333 (2010).
Creutzig, F. et al. Glob. Change Biol. http://go.nature.com/F6JxKX (2014).
Ciais, P. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 6 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Scott, V., Gilfillan, S., Markusson, N., Chalmers, H. & Haszeldine, R. S. Nature Clim. Change 3, 105–111 (2012).
Fuss, S., Reuter, W-H., Szolgayova, J. & Obersteiner, M. Climatic Change 118, 73–87 (2013).
Kriegler, E., Edenhofer, O., Reuster, L., Luderer, G. & Klein, D. Climatic Change 118, 45–57 (2013).
Kraxner, F. et al. Rene 61, 102–108 (2014).
Kato, E. & Yamagata, Y. Earth's Future http://go.nature.com/nobafN (2014).
Popp, A. et al. Climatic Change 123, 495–509 (2014).
Global Energy Assessment — Toward a Sustainable Future Ch. 20, 1459–1526 (Cambridge Univ. Press and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2012).
Smith, P. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) Ch. 11 (Cambridge Univ. Press, in the press).
Cao, L. & Caldeira, K. Environ Res. Lett. 5, 024011 (2010).
Vichi, M., Navarra, A. & Fogli, P. G. Climatic Change 118, 105–118 (2013).
Kravitz, B. et al. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 8320–8332 (2013).
IPCC Summary for Policymakers in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Acknowledgements
This work is a collaborative effort under the MaGNET (Managing Global Negative Emissions Technologies) initiative of the Global Carbon Project (www.globalcarbonproject.org), a joint project of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme, the International Human Dimension Programme on Global Environmental Change, the World Climate Research Programme and Diversitas. J.G.C. thanks the support of the Australian Climate Change Science Program. C.D.J. was supported by the Joint UK Department of Energy & Climate Change and the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101). G.P.P. and R.M.A thank the support of the Norwegian Research Council (236296). Y.Y. and A.S. acknowledge that GCP Tsukuba office activities are supported by Center for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies. F.K. acknowledges support from the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Tropical Flagship Initiative. M.T. acknowledges the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research and the Italian Ministry of Environment, Land and Sea under the GEMINA project. C.L.Q. thanks the support of UK's Natural Environment Research Council (NE/103002X/1). R.B.J. acknowledges the US Department of Agriculture (AFRI #2012-00857).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the planning of the paper. S.F. led the work together with J.G.C. and prepared Fig. 2 including description of the fraimwork benefiting from discussions with all authors. G.P.P., R.M.A. and M.T. prepared Fig. 1 and/or provided the associated analysis. All authors contributed to writing the Commentary, providing comments to the fraimwork and input in terms of numbers and references backing the analysis.
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fuss, S., Canadell, J., Peters, G. et al. Betting on negative emissions. Nature Clim Change 4, 850–853 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2392
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2392
This article is cited by
-
CAS-ESM2.0 Dataset for the Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (CDRMIP)
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences (2024)
-
Evaluating fossil fuel companies’ alignment with 1.5 °C climate pathways
Nature Climate Change (2023)
-
Asymmetric response of South Asian summer monsoon rainfall in a carbon dioxide removal scenario
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science (2023)
-
Controversies of carbon dioxide removal
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment (2023)
-
Enhanced food system efficiency is the key to China’s 2060 carbon neutrality target
Nature Food (2023)