Harley Wallace
Hello! I'm a recent graduate from the Department of Sociology, Philosophy and Anthropology at the University of Exeter.
My main interest is political philosophy and morality; how we ought to behave, and, as a result, how we ought to arrange our political and economic institutions to achieve that end.
Phone: 07938 624062
My main interest is political philosophy and morality; how we ought to behave, and, as a result, how we ought to arrange our political and economic institutions to achieve that end.
Phone: 07938 624062
less
Related Authors
Interests
Uploads
Papers by Harley Wallace
This paper investigates the causes of this paradox, specifically addressing the influence of the National Rifle Association. It finds there to be little clear evidence that the lobbyist is responsible for legislative gridlock.
This paper traces the riddle of history to its Hegelian roots and explains why communism is thought to answer it.
Of course the collapse of the Soviet Union leaves the riddle as yet unanswered. In closing, the paper considers the shortcomings of Marx's dialectic materialism.
This paper assesses these 'collectivist' accounts and highlights an ontological problem that risks undoing them. If the traditional definitions of genocide are unpersuasive, then what makes it morally distinct from mass murder?
Recognising the essential humanity of (most) perpetrators, this paper argues that municipal bureaucrats operating in the early years of the Third Reich could make a legitimate claim to diminished responsibility.
This paper investigates the causes of this paradox, specifically addressing the influence of the National Rifle Association. It finds there to be little clear evidence that the lobbyist is responsible for legislative gridlock.
This paper traces the riddle of history to its Hegelian roots and explains why communism is thought to answer it.
Of course the collapse of the Soviet Union leaves the riddle as yet unanswered. In closing, the paper considers the shortcomings of Marx's dialectic materialism.
This paper assesses these 'collectivist' accounts and highlights an ontological problem that risks undoing them. If the traditional definitions of genocide are unpersuasive, then what makes it morally distinct from mass murder?
Recognising the essential humanity of (most) perpetrators, this paper argues that municipal bureaucrats operating in the early years of the Third Reich could make a legitimate claim to diminished responsibility.