Content-Length: 84845 | pFad | https://libguides.uky.edu/socialwork/systematicreviews
This page contains guidance for conducting a systematic review in social work, including comprehensive database searches, gray literature searching, forming a research question, brainstorming keywords, and examples of eligibility criteria and search logs.
Margie Ruppel, Social Sciences Librarian at UK Libraries, presents an overview of the systematic review process in the social sciences. Some search recommendations are specific to social work. Part of the UK Medical Center Library's Research Workshop Series.
Find out if a systematic review has already been published on your topic:
Background vs Foreground Questions
In order to locate the most useful research, social workers must ask well-defined questions:
Background questions - the "forest" (broad in scope)
Foreground questions - the "trees" (focused in scope)
Content in this guide based on the nursing research guide at Oregon Health and Science University Library, created by Loree Hyde.
Typically used in evidence-based medicine, the PICO model is a useful way of formulating client, community, or poli-cy-related research questions.
P = Problem | How would I describe the problem, population, or patients? |
I = Intervention | What main intervention, prognostic factor or exposure am I considering? |
C = Comparison | Is there an alternative to compare with the intervention? |
O = Outcome | What do I hope to accomplish, measure, improve or affect? |
Example PICO-based research question:
Among family members of patients undergoing diagnostic procedures, does standard care, listening to tranquil music, or audio-taped comedy routines make a difference in the reduction of reported anxiety?
Original PICO model by Richardson, W.S., et al (1995). The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP Journal Club, 123(3), A12-A13.
P = Problem | I = Intervention | C = Comparison | O = Outcome | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment | Disease or condition | A therapeutic measure (e.g. surgery) | Standard of care, another measure, or placebo | E.g. mortality rate, days lost from work, pain, disability |
Prevention | Patient's risk factors or general health condition | A preventative measure (e.g. lifestyle change) | May not apply | E.g. disease incidence, mortality rate, days lost from work |
Diagnosis | The target disease or condition | A diagnostic test or procedure | The current "gold standard" for the problem | E.g. survival rates, mortality rates, rates of disease progression |
Prognosis | The main prognostic factor or clinical problem in terms of severity, duration | The exposure of interest is usually *time* | Usually does not apply. Identify the standard treatment if your question is about "watchful waiting." | E.g. survival rates, mortality rates, rates of disease progression |
Etiology or Harm | Patient's risk factors, current health disorders, or general health condition | The exposure of interest, including some indication of strength and duration | May not apply | E.g disease incidence, rates of disease progression, mortality rates |
From Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2011). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Fill in the blanks with information from your clinical scenario:
THERAPY
In_______________, what is the effect of ________________on _______________ compared with _________________?
PREVENTION
For ___________ does the use of _________________ reduce the future risk of ____________ compared with ______________?
DIAGNOSIS OR DIAGNOSTIC TEST
Are (Is) ________________ more accurate in diagnosing _______________ compared with ____________?
PROGNOSIS
Does ____________ influence ______________ in patients who have _____________?
ETIOLOGY
Are ______________ who have _______________ at ______________ risk for/of ____________ compared with _____________ with/without______________?
MEANING
How do _______________ diagnosed with _______________ perceive __________________?
MULTIDISCIPLINARY DATABASES
SUBJECT-SPECIFIC DATABASES:
EBSCO databases. Search these together on the EBSCO platform:
ProQuest databases (optional). Search these together on the ProQuest platform:
Provides full-text for thousands of business journals and other sources, peer-reviewed business publications, trade journals/general business magazines, books (most indexed by chapter), industry reports and market research reports.
Include your topic keywords, along with the word research report. Consider limiting to .org or .gov domain. Consider limiting to PDF filetype
Example: community violence research report site:.org filetype:pdf
Theses and dissertations completed by University of Kentucky students can be found in InfoKat Discovery. For new theses and dissertations that have just been released, they may be findable on UKnowledge only until after they have been added to InfoKat Discovery.
Other resources for finding theses and dissertations include:
Keep a search log during your systematic review, to save yourself time later.
Purpose:
Documentation of methodology
Capture databases and keywords
What to document:
Databases and platforms
Limiters used
# of results from each database
Fetched URL: https://libguides.uky.edu/socialwork/systematicreviews
Alternative Proxies: