Human 3␤-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/isomerase type 1 (3␤-HSD1) is a critical enzyme in the conversion of DHEA to estradiol in breast tumors and may be a target enzyme for inhibition in the treatment of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Human 3␤-HSD2 participates in the production of cortisol and aldosterone in the human adrenal gland in this population. In our recombinant human breast tumor MCF-7 Tet-off cells that express either 3␤-HSD1 or 3␤-HSD2, trilostane and epostane inhibit the DHEA-induced proliferation of MCF-7 3␤-HSD1 cells with 12-to 16-fold lower IC 50 values compared to the MCF-7 3␤-HSD2 cells. The compounds also competitively inhibit purified human 3␤-HSD1 with 12-to 16-fold lower K i values compared to the noncompetitive K i values measured for human 3␤-HSD2. Using our structural model of 3␤-HSD1, trilostane or 17␤-acetoxy-trilostane was docked in the active site of 3␤-HSD1, and Arg195 in 3␤-HSD1 or Pro195 in 3␤-HSD2 was identified as a potentially critical residue (one of 23 non-identical residues in the two isoenzymes). The P195R mutant of 3␤-HSD2 were created, expressed and purified. Kinetic analyses of enzyme inhibition suggest that the high affinity, competitive inhibition of 3␤-HSD1 by trilostane and epostane may be related to the presence of Arg195 in 3␤-HSD1 vs. Pro195 in 3␤-HSD2.

Separate genes encode the human type 1 (placenta, breast tumors, other peripheral tissues) and type 2 (gonad, adrenal) isoforms of 3␤-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/isomerase (3␤-HSD1, 3␤-HSD2). Mutagenesis of 3␤-HSD1 produced the Y154F, H156Y and K158Q mutant enzymes in the probable Y 154 -P-H 156 -S-K 158 catalytic motif. The H 156 Y mutant of the 3␤-HSD1 created a chimera of the 3␤-HSD2 motif (Y 154 -P-Y 156 -S-K 158 ) in 3␤-HSD1. The D241N, D257L, D258L and D265N mutants are in the potential isomerase site of the 3␤-HSD1 enzyme. Homology modeling with UDP-galactose-4-epimerase predicted that Asp 36 in the Rossmann-fold domain is responsible for the NAD(H) specificity of human 3␤-HSD1, and our D36A/K37R mutant tested that assignment. The H 156 Y mutant of the 3␤-HSD1 enzyme shifted the substrate (DHEA) kinetics to the 14-fold higher K m value measured for the 3␤-HSD2 activity. From Dixon analysis, epostane inhibited the 3␤-HSD1 activity with 17-fold greater affinity compared to 3␤-HSD2 and H 156 Y. The mutants of Tyr 154 and Lys 158 exhibited no dehydrogenase activity and appear to be catalytic 3␤-HSD residues. The D257L and D258L mutations eliminated isomerase activity, suggesting that Asp 257 or Asp 258 may be catalytic residues for isomerase activity. The D36A/K37R mutant shifted the cofactor preference of both 3␤-HSD and isomerase from NAD(H) to NADP(H). In addition to characterizing catalytic residues, these studies have identified the structural basis (His 156 ) for an exploitable difference in the substrate and inhibition kinetics of 3␤-HSD1 and 3␤-HSD2. Hence, it may be possible to selectively inhibit human 3␤-HSD1 to slow the growth of hormone-sensitive breast tumor cells and control placental steroidogenesis near term to prevent premature labor.

Human 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/isomerase type 1 (3β-HSD1) is a critical enzyme in the conversion of DHEA to estradiol in breast tumors and may be a target enzyme for inhibition in the treatment of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Human 3β-HSD2 participates in the production of cortisol and aldosterone in the human adrenal gland in this population. In our recombinant human breast tumor MCF-7 Tet-off cells that express either 3β-HSD1 or 3β-HSD2, trilostane and epostane inhibit the DHEA-induced proliferation of MCF-7 3β-HSD1 cells with 12to 16-fold lower IC 50 values compared to the MCF-7 3β-HSD2 cells. Trilostane and epostane also competitively inhibit purified human 3β-HSD1 with 12-fold to 16-fold lower K i values compared to the noncompetitive Ki values measured for human 3β-HSD2. Using our structural model of 3β-HSD1, trilostane was docked in the active site of 3β-HSD1, and Arg195 in 3β-HSD1 or Pro195 in 3β-HSD2 was identified as a potentially critical residue. The R195P-1 mutant of 3β-HSD1 and the P195R-2 mutant of 3β-HSD2 were created, expressed and purified. Kinetic analyses of enzyme inhibition suggest that the high-affinity, competitive inhibition of 3β-HSD1 by trilostane may be related to the presence of Arg195 in 3β-HSD1 vs Pro195 in 3β-HSD2. In addition, His156 in 3β-HSD1 may play a role in the higher affinity of 3β-HSD1 for substrates and inhibitors compared to 3β-HSD2 containing Try156. Structural modeling of the 3β-HSD1 dimer identified a possible interaction between His156 on one subunit and Gln105 on the other. Kinetic analyses of the H156Y-1, Q105M-1 and Q105M-2 support subunit interactions that contribute to the higher affinity of 3β-HSD1 for the inhibitor, epostane, compared to 3β-HSD2.

The somatotropic axis, and particularly growth hormonereleasing hormone (GHRH), is implicated in the regulation of sleep-wake activity. To evaluate sleep in chronic somatotropic deficiency, sleep-wake activity was studied in dwarf (dw/dw) rats that are known to have a defective GHRH signaling mechanism in the pituitary and in normal Lewis rats, the parental strain of the dw/dw rats. In addition, expression of GHRH receptor (GHRH-R) mRNA in the hypothalamus/preoptic region and in the pituitary was also determined by means of reverse transcription-PCR, and GHRH content of the hypothalamus was measured. Hypothalamic/preoptic and pituitary GHRH-R mRNA levels were decreased in the dw/dw rats, indicating deficits in the central GHRHergic transmission. Hypothalamic GHRH content in dw/dw rats was also less than that found in Lewis rats. The dw/dw rats had less spontaneous nonrapid eye movement sleep (NREMS) (light and dark period) and rapid eye movement sleep (REMS) (light period) than did the control Lewis rats. After 4 hr of sleep deprivation, rebound increases in NREMS and REMS were normal in the dw/dw rat. As determined by fast Fourier analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG), the sleep deprivation-induced enhancements in EEG slow-wave activity in the dw/dw rats were only one-half of the response in the Lewis rats. The results are compared with sleep findings previously obtained in GHRH-deficient transgenic mice. The alterations in NREMS are attributed to the defect in GHRH signaling, whereas the decreases in REMS might result from the growth hormone deficiency in the dw/dw rat.

OB,~L, F., JR., B. KACS()H, P. ALF()LDI, L. PAYNE, O. MARKOVIC, C. GROSVENOR AND J. M. KRUEGER. Antiserum to prolactin decreases rapid eye movement sleep (REM sleep) in the male rat. PHYSIOL BEHAV 52(6) 1063-1068, 1992.-Previous reports suggest that blood-born prolactin (PRL) may selectively promote rapid eye movement sleep (REMS). To study the possible involvement of endogenous PRL in sleep regulation, rats were systemically injected with either antiserum to PRL or normal rabbit serum, and the sleep-wake activity was determined during the subsequent 12-h light cycle. The administration of normal rabbit serum in physiological saline did not alter sleep-wake activity compared to control recordings, whereas the PRL antiserum caused a modest and selective suppression in REMS. Immunoreactive PRL was eliminated from the serial plasma samples obtained between 6 to 11 h after the injection of the antiserum. Brain temperature was not affected by the antiserum.

Lewis dwarf (dw/dw) rats exhibit growth hormone (GH) deficiency and growth retardation linked to a malfunction of GHRH signaling. In this study, GHRH-receptor (GHRH-R) binding and mRNA in the pituitary of adult male dw/dw and age-matched normal Lewis rats was measured by radioligand binding assay and real-time PCR. Only one of nine pools of dw/dw pituitary membranes revealed detectable binding of [His 1 , 125 I-Tyr 10 , Nle 27 ]hGHRH(1-32) amide (B max ; 4.3 fmol/mg protein). In contrast, GHRH-R binding was 22.4 ± 2.60 fmol/mg protein in normal Lewis rats. mRNA for GHRH-R was detectable in all dw/dw rat pituitaries examined, averaging 21% that of Lewis rats. Low expression of GHRH-R reflects reduced GHRH-R mRNA as well as a possible reduction in translation of the receptor protein.

Bromocryptine potently decreased prolactin (PRL) secretion of pituitary glands of 2-day-old rats in vitro (up to 85% inhibition; ED5o between 0.1 and 1.0 nM) without altering the bioactivity to immunoreactivity (B/I) ratio. Bromocryptine tended to suppress growth hormone (GH) secretion although the effect did not reach statistical significance. Angiotensin-II (A-H; 1-1000 nM) stimulated PRL secretion in a dose-dependent manner without affecting secretion of GH. The B/I ratio of PRL secreted in response to A-II was increased. Somatostatin (SRIF) had no effect on PRL secretion but inhibited GH secretion in a dose-dependent manner; significant inhibition (50%) was observed at 100 nM. A 6-h exposure to ovine PRL (oPRL) in concentrations equipotent with 1.2-120 ng/ml rat PRL (rPRL) in the Nb2 bioassay had no effect on immunoreactive rPRL secretion. Salmon calcitonin (sCT) and endothelin-3 (ET-3; 0.1-100 nM) failed to inhibit secretion of PRL or GH. PRL secretion was slightly stimulated by sCT with no apparent dose-response relationship. The present findings suggest that neonatal pituitary glands do not display autoregulation of PRL secretion, and sCT and ET-3 (either endogenous or milk-derived) may not function as PRL inhibiting factors in 2-day-old pups. Thus, the receptors of PRL, sCT and ET-3 on lactotropes, or their functional coupling with inhibition of basal PRL secretion, occur at a later stage of development. The specificity of the PRL releasing factor (PRF) activity of A-II at this age is unique for established PRFs and might reflect a physiological function of PRL in osmoregulation. The increased B/I

Hypothalamic growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) is one of the key neurohumoral regulators of non-rapid eye movement sleep. The focus of the present paper is the role of GHRH in the regulation of sleep and body temperature in the context of a larger biochemical regulatory network. This network includes other members of the somatotopic axis such as growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-1, somatostatin and ghrelin and members of the cytokine family such as interleukin-1. r

Spontaneous dwarf rats (SDRs) display growth hormone (GH) deficiency due to a mutation in the GH gene. This study investigated sleep in SDRs and their somatotropic axis and compared to Sprague-Dawley rats. SDRs had almost undetectable levels of plasma GH. Hypothalamic GHreleasing hormone (GHRH) mRNA was increased, whereas GHRH-receptor (GHRH-R) and somatostatin mRNAs were decreased in SDRs. Hypothalamic GHRH and somatostatin peptide content decreased in SDRs. Quantitative immunohistochemistry for GHRH and GHRH-R corroborated and extended these findings. In the arcuate nucleus, the number of GHRH-positive cells was significantly higher, whereas GHRH-R-positive perikarya were diminished in SDRs.

Previous evidence from this laboratory suggested that growth hormone (GH) release induced by milk in vitro and by nursing in vivo from neonatal rat pituitary glands is mediated by an alternative GH-releasing factor(s) (GRF) distinct from GH-releasing hormone (GHRH1–43). In the present experiments we tested whether thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) could fulfil the criteria of this alternative GRF in neonatal rats. The water-soluble fraction of rat milk (infranatant, prepared by ultracentrifugation) and its methanol/acetic acid extract (milk-borne peptides) stimulated GH release from perifused pituitary glands obtained from 2-day-old rats. Dialysis of the infranatant (mol wt cut-off: 2,000) against 500 volumes of culture medium at 4°C eliminated its GH-releasing activity in the perifusion system, while the infranatant retained its full GRF-like activity when incubated at 4°C without dialysis. The milk-borne GRF eluted as a single peak and coeluted with TRH in a combined gel permeation chromatography (Sephadex G-10) and perifusion set-up. Prolactin secretion was also stimulated simultaneously with the release of GH induced either by milk or by TRH. In a stepwise C18 reversed-phase chromatography, milk-borne GRF was highly hydrophilic and coeluted with synthetic TRH. The in vitro GH-releasing bioactivities of synthetic TRH and a milk extract purified in C18 reversed-phase chromatography were abolished by proline-specific endopeptidase. Thus, TRH and milk-borne GRF displayed similar molecular weights, hydropathic characteristics and proteolytic enzyme resistance. In vivo, nursing (which has been reported as a potent stimulus of GH secretion even in the absence of milk-intake) increased serum GH levels in 2-day-old pups. A supramaximal dose of TRH (10 ng/g intraperitoneally) stimulated GH release in 2-day-old pups separated from their mothers for 6 h to a similar extent as nursing. Nursing-induced levels of serum GH were not further elevated by TRH. This failure of TRH to further increase serum GH levels was not due to a maximal GH output by the neonatal pituitary gland, since the GH release induced by the serotonin precursor 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan was augmented either by TRH or by nursing. These data provide evidence that the milk-borne GRF-like activity in vitro is indistinguishable from TRH, and suggest that TRH (probably of hypothalamic origen) might be the mediator of the nursing-induced release of GH in vivo as a physiological GRF in neonatal rats.

Various neural factors are involved in the suckling-induced increase in serum growth hormone (GH) levels in neonatal rats, and, in the present study the serotonergic, cholinergic, somatostatin and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) systems were investigated. The serotonin (5-HT) precursor 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan (5-HTP) and the 5-HT receptor agonist quipazine maleate stimulated serum GH levels in 2-day-old rat pups separated from their mothers for 6 h. The increase in serum GH during suckling was further elevated by 5-HTP. The 5-HT antagonist cyproheptadine decreased serum GH levels in separated 2-day-old pups, and although it reduced the amplitude of the suckling-induced increase in serum GH concentration, it did not alter the increase in serum GH on a percentage basis. The effect of the cholinergic muscarinic antagonist atropine sulfate (ATR) was similar to that of cyproheptadine. Moreover, in separated pups, ATR prevented the increase in serum GH induced by 5-HTP. In contrast with 2-day-old pups, ATR completely eliminated the suckling-induced release of GH in 10-day-old rats. However, ATR failed to prevent GH release induced by the α2-adrenergic agonist clonidine HCI in 10-day-old male pups. While thyrotropin-releasing hormone increased serum GH levels, rat GHRH failed to alter serum GH levels either in separated or in suckled 2-day-old rat pups. Immunoneutralization for rat GHRH eliminated the increase in serum GH induced by clonidine HCI in 10-day-old pups, but (on a percentage basis) failed to prevent the GH-increasing effect of suckling in 2-day-old pups. While somatostatin failed to significantly decrease serum GH in separated 2-day-old pups, it effectively decreased serum GH levels in 2-day-old pups which were suckled. Cysteamine, which depletes hypothalamic somatostatin, increased serum GH in separated 2-day-old pups, and further increased the suckling-induced levels of serum GH. Cysteamine partially prevented the GH-decreasing effect of ATR.The present findings suggest that 1) the serotonergic and cholinergic systems are involved in the regulation of GH secretion as early as day 2 postpartum; 2) the serotonergic and cholinergic systems modulate the basal, and do not modulate the suckling-induced levels of serum GH; 3) the serotonergic system may exert its stimulatory influence on GH secretion only in the presence of a functional muscarinic cholinergic system; 4) the cholinergic system, at least in part, stimulates GH secretion via a cysteamine-sensitive system (probably by inhibiting somatostatin); 5) the cholinergic system is not functionally coupled with the α2-adrenergic system, which stimulates GH secretion via rat GHRH; 6) since in 10-day-old pups clonidine HCI was effective only in males, while suckling was effective in both sexes, the α2-adrenergic system is not involved in the suckling-induced increase of serum GH; and finally 7) neither somatostatin nor rat GHRH seem to be involved in the suckling-induced changes in serum GH. The findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the high circulating GH levels in the neonatal rat are due to alternative GH-releasing factors, perhaps thyrotropin-releasing hormone or γ-aminobutyric acid. The neurohumoral mediator of the suckling-induced GH release in neonatal rats remains to be identified.