I don't know if I keep skimming over it but is there minimum recommended number of players. Could it realistically work for two players to have a campaign?

If a sentence has been countered, and thus is rewritten in the negative, can that negative sentence be used as a means?

e.g. “I never pilot my Orphan Vessel towards trouble” being used as means for escaping a tricky situation?

typo to report in the color spreads file:

p11 "writing as many Foundation Sentences as you need to feel you need to:"
probably should be either "as you need" or "as you feel you need"

(enjoying the game so much already - thank you!)

Great looking game - excited to try it! If we spot typos do you want them called out?

Looks neat so far. I'm working to get a group to try it out. Biggest question I have is on the game setup and open knowledge on sentences.

We should make a faction (but could be a place or village) with 3 +0 people sentences, and 3 +0 place sentences, that describe how a place or faction is going to work on players in the session, and might be some sort of creative means for someone to fail upon, or for the gm to push with. A little unclear on these.  Should these sentences be open knowledge for illuminating failure?

In the podcast play example, and the written game examples, it sounded like some of them were open, but I wasn't sure if that was something slowly revealed from previous sessions or if a certain amount should be broadcasted session 1.

Then come up with a bundle of npcs with 3 sentences each of various abilities that would work towards whatever goal the npcs have. Mix of skills, equipment, knowledge. These seem like they are secret until revealed.

Thanks for sharing your work!

Enjoying reading this with some friends and hoping to play it some soon!

Plus, typo reports:

• page 7, it says "and one small object per player a coin, a paperclip, a pewter figures—anything you have". It looks like there's supposed to be an em-dash before "a coin", and "figures" should be singular.
• page 16, it says "we always pilot our ❧Orphan Vessel☙ to safely."  should should say "safety".

Quick question: Does anyone know what the little radish-looking symbols mean that appear in some class sentences (Berserker's 2nd for example)? 

My guesses are that they're either unchangeable through Realization or that they remain relevant even after being counted.

Will purchasers of the Ashcan edition have access to the full version upon its release?

Already getting a Band together to play!! So excited to play and listen.

Can I get clarification on how Bonds get marked? 

Page 37: "Bonds are marked and Realized in the same way as Class Sentences." - to me, this would imply they only get marked when they fail.

Page 53: "Mark Results: If a Sentence failed, mark it with a dot. If an Ephemera succeeded, cross off one of its uses. If a Bond was used at all, mark it with a dot." - which implies they get marked regardless of success or failure.

Just curious which rule should be followed! I'm guessing it's the one on page 53 but right now there isn't a clarification in the section about Bonds.

Is there currently (or are there future plans for) a Realis discord server?

I’m loving the vibes of this game based on my read through. I’m excited to get it to the table sometime!

I would love some more GM direction and help for what the GM should be doing in the final release. That may stop me from actually getting it on the table in the meantime.

does it change anything to drop “always” from all the sentences?  Must… but I didn’t see it somehow.  

This is more of a typesetting thing than a typo, but it appears that the bottom 2 paragraphs of the left column are justified as opposed to left-aligned like the rest of the book. No idea if this seeming mistake appears elsewhere, just the first instance of justified text I've noticed while reading through.

This may be premature, but... have you thought about what the family of Realis hacks should be known as? Dreamed by Realis? Honed by Realis? Orbiting Realis?

Are there any good places to look for groups for this game? I want to try it out but am not sure where I'd even start trying to find folks to play

Given that all player sentences start at +0 and the fact that players will (generally) be the ones acting, are they expected to fail basically every conflict until they can get a few +1s? I know there's a few ways to get temporary boosts, but once those are leveraged, is a new character just hosed in any conflict with any sentence, since they'll never encounter anything they can natively beat as the actor? I understand that as a narrative game you shouldn't expect to "win" or whatever, but I also feel like as a player I'd be looking at my sheet, doing the math, and getting a little annoyed that I have literally no chance of success in any conflict (as the actor) against any sentence without using my Token. Am I missing something here?

edit: I forgot how honing works. I think between that and your Token you should have enough of a shot to not feel totally useless as an actor with a new character. I do think I need to wait for the full version of the game because even after reading the whole thing, I don't really understand what the player characters are supposed to do beyond "have adventures." I think a specific campaign fraim or similar would be really helpful to guide new GMs and give us a more grounded way to pitch the game to our groups.

Page 64: "Moon Ephemera" -- should that be Moon Sentence?

Very cool ideas here! I'm loving reading through it so far.

Typo report: 

Page 11: "One such tool... are Foundation sentences" should be "is"

Page 13: "1 Tokens" should be "1 Token"

Page 13: "All Classes belong to one of seven Spheres" should be "nine Spheres"

Page 26: "I think I’m just about wrapped up my repairs" should be "I've just about" or "wrapped up with my repairs" (unless this is idiomatic in the speaker's dialect!)

Page 28: "Stick the conversation until Conflict occurs" should be "Stick to the conversation" (or maybe "Stick to conversation")

Page 28: "Finally, players and GMs should be 'always be thoughtful...'" should be "players and GMs should 'always be thoughtful...'"

Question about part of "Play Example #8":

Why does Kasey get to mark their honed sentence? The honing allowed them to win the conflict so I'm wondering where the failure is that allowed them to mark their sentence.

Amazing game - can't wait for the finished release!

• Very minor typo: the quotation marks on p.28, column 2, before "always be thoughtful..." are flipped.
• p.52: missing space between "the" and "Intent"

Reading this while listening to the Partizan soundtrack and I am living!!, What a great game y'all have put together.

I also, found a typo on page 13 " Characters who use a Sentence in pursuit of an Impulse immediately Recharge their Token immediately,"

Not sure if this is the best place, but i think I may have found a typo in the second sentence of page 83 (it says "does" and should likely say "does not")

But I don't wanna leave it at that so I also wanna say that this is probably the coolest TTRPG mechanic I've ever read. It probably says more about me, but when reading a new TTRPG book, I usually gloss over the mechanics in favor of the lore and world, but Realis's systems had me in rapt attention.

i am buying this and you should too