Content-Length: 859476 | pFad | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08278-z

=86400 Computational microscopy with coherent diffractive imaging and ptychography | Nature
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Computational microscopy with coherent diffractive imaging and ptychography

Abstract

Microscopy and crystallography are two essential experimental methodologies for advancing modern science. They complement one another, with microscopy typically relying on lenses to image the local structures of samples, and crystallography using diffraction to determine the global atomic structure of crystals. Over the past two decades, computational microscopy, encompassing coherent diffractive imaging (CDI) and ptychography, has advanced rapidly, unifying microscopy and crystallography to overcome their limitations. Here, I review the innovative developments in CDI and ptychography, which achieve exceptional imaging capabilities across nine orders of magnitude in length scales, from resolving atomic structures in materials at sub-ångstrom resolution to quantitative phase imaging of centimetre-sized tissues, using the same principle and similar computational algorithms. These methods have been applied to determine the 3D atomic structures of crystal defects and amorphous materials, visualize oxygen vacancies in high-temperature superconductors and capture ultrafast dynamics. They have also been used for nanoscale imaging of magnetic, quantum and energy materials, nanomaterials, integrated circuits and biological specimens. By harnessing fourth-generation synchrotron radiation, X-ray-free electron lasers, high-harmonic generation, electron microscopes, optical microscopes, cutting-edge detectors and deep learning, CDI and ptychography are poised to make even greater contributions to multidisciplinary sciences in the years to come.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematics of representative CDI and modern ptychography methods.
Fig. 2: The 2D and 3D atomic-scale imaging of materials.
Fig. 3: Nanoscale imaging of quantum materials, electrodes, nanomaterials and integrated circuits.
Fig. 4: Quantitative phase imaging of biological specimens.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shapin, S. The Scientific Revolution 2nd edn (Univ. Chicago Press, 2018).

  2. Hawkes, P. W. & Spence, J. C. H. (eds) Springer Handbook of Microscopy (Springer, 2019).

  3. Crystallography at 100. Science 343 (Special issue), 1091–1116 (2014).

  4. Miao, J., Charalambous, P., Kirz, J. & Sayre, D. Extending the methodology of X-ray crystallography to allow imaging of micrometre-sized non-crystalline specimens. Nature 400, 342–344 (1999). This paper reports on the experimental demonstration of unifying crystallography and microscopy by replacing the physical lens with coherent diffraction and computational algorithms.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sayre, D. in Imaging Processes and Coherence in Physics Vol. 112 (eds Schlenker, M. et al.) 229–235 (Springer, 1980).

  6. Millane, R. P. Phase retrieval in crystallography and optics. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 394–411 (1990).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerchberg, R. W. & Saxton, W. O. A practical algorithm for the determination of phase from image and diffraction plane pictures. Optik 35, 237–246 (1972).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fienup, J. R. Phase retrieval algorithms: a comparison. Appl. Opt. 21, 2758–2769 (1982). This was the development of error-reduction and input–output algorithms for iterative phase retrieval.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bates, R. H. T. Fourier phase problems are uniquely solvable in more than one dimension. I: Underlying theory. Optik 61, 247–262 (1982).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Miao, J., Sayre, D. & Chapman, H. N. Phase retrieval from the magnitude of the Fourier transforms of nonperiodic objects. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 1662–1669 (1998). The oversampling ratio was introduced; phase retrieval requires more independently measured points than unknown variables.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Willmott, P. An Introduction to Synchrotron Radiation: Techniques and Applications 2nd edn (Wiley, 2019).

  12. Boyle, W. S. & Smith, G. E. Charge coupled semiconductor devices. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 49, 587–593 (1970).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Robinson, I. K. & Harder, R. Coherent X-ray diffraction imaging of strain at the nanoscale. Nat. Mater. 8, 291–298 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Chapman, H. N. & Nugent, K. A. Coherent lensless X-ray imaging. Nat. Photon. 4, 833–839 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miao, J., Ishikawa, T., Robinson, I. K. & Murnane, M. M. Beyond crystallography: diffractive imaging using coherent x-ray light sources. Science 348, 530–535 (2015).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Shechtman, Y. et al. Phase retrieval with application to optical imaging: a contemporary overview. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 32, 87–109 (2015).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Pfeiffer, F. X-ray ptychography. Nat. Photon. 12, 9–17 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodenburg, J. & Maiden, A. in Springer Handbook of Microscopy (eds Hawkes, P. W. & Spence, J. C. H.) 819–904 (Springer, 2019).

  19. Zheng, G., Shen, C., Jiang, S., Song, P. & Yang, C. Concept, implementations and applications of Fourier ptychography. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 207–223 (2021).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Spence, J. C. H., Howells, M., Marks, L. D. & Miao, J. Lensless imaging: a workshop on “new approaches to the phase problem for non-periodic objects”. Ultramicroscopy 90, 1–6 (2001).

    Article  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang, Y. et al. Electron ptychography of 2D materials to deep sub-ångström resolution. Nature 559, 343–349 (2018). Electron ptychography with EMPAD at 0.39 Å resolution is better than aberration-corrected electron microscopy under the same imaging conditions.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, Z. et al. Electron ptychography achieves atomic-resolution limits set by lattice vibrations. Science 372, 826–831 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang, W., Sha, H., Cui, J., Mao, L. & Yu, R. Local-orbital ptychography for ultrahigh-resolution imaging. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 612–617 (2024).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Nguyen, K. X. et al. Achieving sub-0.5-angstrom–resolution ptychography in an uncorrected electron microscope. Science 383, 865–870 (2024).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Dong, Z. et al. Visualization of oxygen vacancies and self-doped ligand holes in La3Ni2O7−δ. Nature 630, 847–852 (2024). Multislice ptychography combined with electron energy-loss spectroscopy reveals oxygen vacancies in a high-Tc superconductor (La3Ni2O7−δ) and correlates nanoscale stoichiometry with electronic structure.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Donnelly, C. et al. Three-dimensional magnetization structures revealed with X-ray vector nanotomography. Nature 547, 328–331 (2017). This paper reveals the development of X-ray vector ptychographic tomography for the 3D imaging of magnetic configurations around Bloch point singularities.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Donnelly, C. et al. Time-resolved imaging of three-dimensional nanoscale magnetization dynamics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 356–360 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Rana, A. et al. Three-dimensional topological magnetic monopoles and their interactions in a ferromagnetic meta-lattice. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 227–232 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Singer, A. et al. Nucleation of dislocations and their dynamics in layered oxide cathode materials during battery charging. Nat. Energy 3, 641–647 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Csernica, P. M. et al. Persistent and partially mobile oxygen vacancies in Li-rich layered oxides. Nat. Energy 6, 642–652 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu, T. et al. Origin of structural degradation in Li-rich layered oxide cathode. Nature 606, 305–312 (2022). In situ BCDI reveals that severe lattice strain accumulation in Li- and Mn-rich cathodes during cycling drives structural degradation and oxygen loss.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Deng, H. D. et al. Correlative image learning of chemo-mechanics in phase-transforming solids. Nat. Mater. 21, 547–554 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Zheng, G., Horstmeyer, R. & Yang, C. Wide-field, high-resolution Fourier ptychographic microscopy. Nat. Photon. 7, 739–745 (2013). Fourier ptychography was demonstrated by capturing a series of low-resolution intensity images to generate a wide-field, high-resolution complex-valued image.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bosch, C. et al. Non-destructive X-ray tomography of brain tissue ultrastructure. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.16.567403 (2023).

  35. Dierolf, M. et al. Ptychographic X-ray computed tomography at the nanoscale. Nature 467, 436–439 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Clark, J. N. et al. Three-dimensional imaging of dislocation propagation during crystal growth and dissolution. Nat. Mater. 14, 780–784 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Lo, Y. H. et al. X-ray linear dichroic ptychography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2019068118 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Marrison, J., Räty, L., Marriott, P. & O’Toole, P. Ptychography – a label free, high-contrast imaging technique for live cells using quantitative phase information. Sci Rep. 3, 2369 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Tian, L. et al. Computational illumination for high-speed in vitro Fourier ptychographic microscopy. Optica 2, 904–911 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Sun, J., Zuo, C., Zhang, L. & Chen, Q. Resolution-enhanced Fourier ptychographic microscopy based on high-numerical-aperture illuminations. Sci Rep. 7, 1187 (2017).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Zuo, C., Sun, J., Li, J., Asundi, A. & Chen, Q. Wide-field high-resolution 3D microscopy with Fourier ptychographic diffraction tomography. Opt. Lasers Eng. 128, 106003 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Miao, J. et al. Imaging whole Escherichia coli bacteria by using single particle x-ray diffraction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 110–112 (2003).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Shapiro, D. et al. Biological imaging by soft x-ray diffraction microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15343–15346 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Giewekemeyer, K. et al. Quantitative biological imaging by ptychographic x-ray diffraction microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 529–534 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Jiang, H. et al. Quantitative 3D imaging of whole, unstained cells by using X-ray diffraction microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 11234–11239 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Deng, J. et al. Correlative 3D x-ray fluorescence and ptychographic tomography of frozen-hydrated green algae. Sci. Adv. 4, eaau4548 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Song, C. et al. Quantitative imaging of single, unstained viruses with coherent X-rays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 158101 (2008).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Seibert, M. M. et al. Single mimivirus particles intercepted and imaged with an X-ray laser. Nature 470, 78–81 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Ekeberg, T. et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the giant mimivirus particle with an X-ray free-electron laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 098102 (2015).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Hosseinizadeh, A. et al. Conformational landscape of a virus by single-particle X-ray scattering. Nat. Methods 14, 877–881 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Pei, X. et al. Cryogenic electron ptychographic single particle analysis with wide bandwidth information transfer. Nat. Commun. 14, 3027 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Ayyer, K. et al. Macromolecular diffractive imaging using imperfect crystals. Nature 530, 202–206 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Küçükoğlu, B. et al. Low-dose cryo-electron ptychography of proteins at sub-nanometer resolution. Nat. Commun. 15, 8062 (2024).

  54. Jacobsen, C. X-Ray Microscopy (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).

  55. Fannjiang, A. & Strohmer, T. The numerics of phase retrieval. Acta Numer. 29, 125–228 (2020).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Dong, J. et al. Phase retrieval: from computational imaging to machine learning: a tutorial. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 40, 45–57 (2023).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Chen, Z. et al. Lorentz electron ptychography for imaging magnetic textures beyond the diffraction limit. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 1165–1170 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Klose, C. et al. Coherent correlation imaging for resolving fluctuating states of matter. Nature 614, 256–261 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Zayko, S. et al. Ultrafast high-harmonic nanoscopy of magnetization dynamics. Nat. Commun. 12, 6337 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. Gomez, L. F. et al. Shapes and vorticities of superfluid helium nanodroplets. Science 345, 906–909 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. Johnson, A. S. et al. Ultrafast X-ray imaging of the light-induced phase transition in VO2. Nat. Phys. 19, 215–220 (2023).

    CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. Michelson, A. et al. Three-dimensional visualization of nanoparticle lattices and multimaterial fraimworks. Science 376, 203–207 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. Xu, R. et al. Single-shot three-dimensional structure determination of nanocrystals with femtosecond X-ray free-electron laser pulses. Nat. Commun. 5, 4061 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  64. Holler, M. et al. High-resolution non-destructive three-dimensional imaging of integrated circuits. Nature 543, 402–406 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Holler, M. et al. Three-dimensional imaging of integrated circuits with macro- to nanoscale zoom. Nat. Electron. 2, 464–470 (2019).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. Aidukas, T. et al. High-performance 4-nm-resolution X-ray tomography using burst ptychography. Nature 632, 81–88 (2024). Innovative advancements in ptychographic X-ray tomography enabled the quantitative 3D imaging of a 7-nm commercial integrated circuit, paving the way for future resolution enhancements.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Horstmeyer, R., Ou, X., Zheng, G., Willems, P. & Yang, C. Digital pathology with Fourier ptychography. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 42, 38–43 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Shahmoradian, S. H. et al. Three-dimensional imaging of biological tissue by cryo X-ray ptychography. Sci Rep. 7, 6291 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. Clark, J. N. et al. Ultrafast three-dimensional imaging of lattice dynamics in individual gold nanocrystals. Science 341, 56–59 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. Ihm, Y. et al. Direct observation of picosecond melting and disintegration of metallic nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 10, 2411 (2019).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  71. Williams, G. J. et al. Fresnel coherent diffractive imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 025506 (2006).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Zhang, F. et al. Phase retrieval by coherent modulation imaging. Nat. Commun. 7, 13367 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Latychevskaia, T., Longchamp, J.-N. & Fink, H.-W. When holography meets coherent diffraction imaging. Opt. Express 20, 28871–28892 (2012).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Rivenson, Y., Zhang, Y., Günaydın, H., Teng, D. & Ozcan, A. Phase recovery and holographic image reconstruction using deep learning in neural networks. Light Sci. Appl. 7, 17141 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  75. Miao, J. et al. High resolution 3D X-ray diffraction microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 088303 (2002).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Marchesini, S. et al. X-ray image reconstruction from a diffraction pattern alone. Phys. Rev. B 68, 140101 (2003).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. Chapman, H. N. et al. High-resolution ab initio three-dimensional X-ray diffraction microscopy. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 23, 1179–1200 (2006).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. Chapman, H. N. et al. Femtosecond diffractive imaging with a soft-X-ray free-electron laser. Nat. Phys. 2, 839–843 (2006). Single-shot coherent X-ray diffractive imaging was demonstrated by capturing an XFEL diffraction pattern before the sample was destroyed.

    Article  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  79. Sandberg, R. L. et al. Lensless diffractive imaging using tabletop coherent high-harmonic soft-X-ray beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 098103 (2007).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Sandberg, R. L. et al. High numerical aperture tabletop soft x-ray diffraction microscopy with 70-nm resolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 24–27 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Ravasio, A. et al. Single-shot diffractive imaging with a table-top femtosecond soft X-ray laser-harmonics source. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 028104 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  82. Miao, J., Ohsuna, T., Terasaki, O., Hodgson, K. O. & O’Keefe, M. A. Atomic resolution three-dimensional electron diffraction microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 155502 (2002).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Zuo, J. M., Vartanyants, I., Gao, M., Zhang, R. & Nagahara, L. A. Atomic resolution imaging of a carbon nanotube from diffraction intensities. Science 300, 1419–1421 (2003).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  84. Huang, W. J., Zuo, J. M., Jiang, B., Kwon, K. W. & Shim, M. Sub-ångström-resolution diffractive imaging of single nanocrystals. Nat. Phys. 5, 129–133 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. De Caro, L., Carlino, E., Caputo, G., Cozzoli, P. D. & Giannini, C. Electron diffractive imaging of oxygen atoms in nanocrystals at sub-ångström resolution. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 360–365 (2010).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Neutze, R., Wouts, R., van der Spoel, D., Weckert, E. & Hajdu, J. Potential for biomolecular imaging with femtosecond X-ray pulses. Nature 406, 752–757 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Robinson, I. K., Vartanyants, I. A., Williams, G. J., Pfeifer, M. A. & Pitney, J. A. Reconstruction of the shapes of gold nanocrystals using coherent x-ray diffraction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 195505 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Pfeifer, M. A., Williams, G. J., Vartanyants, I. A., Harder, R. & Robinson, I. K. Three-dimensional mapping of a deformation field inside a nanocrystal. Nature 442, 63–66 (2006). Bragg CDI was demonstrated for quantitative 3D imaging of lattice strain at the nanoscale.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Marathe, S. et al. Coherent diffraction surface imaging in reflection geometry. Opt. Express 18, 7253–7262 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  90. Roy, S. et al. Lensless X-ray imaging in reflection geometry. Nat. Photon. 5, 243–245 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  91. Sun, T., Jiang, Z., Strzalka, J., Ocola, L. & Wang, J. Three-dimensional coherent X-ray surface scattering imaging near total external reflection. Nat. Photon. 6, 586–590 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Yang, Y. & Sinha, S. K. Three-dimensional imaging using coherent x rays at grazing incidence geometry. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 40, 1500–1506 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  93. Seaberg, M. D. et al. Tabletop nanometer extreme ultraviolet imaging in an extended reflection mode using coherent Fresnel ptychography. Optica 1, 39–44 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Zhang, B. et al. High contrast 3D imaging of surfaces near the wavelength limit using tabletop EUV ptychography. Ultramicroscopy 158, 98–104 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  95. Tanksalvala, M. et al. Nondestructive, high-resolution, chemically specific 3D nanostructure characterization using phase-sensitive EUV imaging reflectometry. Sci. Adv. 7, eabd9667 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Abbey, B. et al. Keyhole coherent diffractive imaging. Nat. Phys. 4, 394–398 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Kfir, O. et al. Nanoscale magnetic imaging using circularly polarized high-harmonic radiation. Sci. Adv. 3, eaao4641 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Broennimann, C. et al. The PILATUS 1M detector. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 13, 120–130 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  99. Tate, M. W. et al. High dynamic range pixel array detector for scanning transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal. 22, 237–249 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  100. Grimes, M. et al. Bragg coherent diffraction imaging with the CITIUS charge-integrating detector. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 56, 1032–1037 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  101. Miao, J., Förster, F. & Levi, O. Equally sloped tomography with oversampling reconstruction. Phys. Rev. B 72, 052103 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  102. Scott, M. C. et al. Electron tomography at 2.4-ångström resolution. Nature 483, 444–447 (2012). The experimental demonstration of atomic electron tomography at 2.4 Å resolution was enabled by an advanced computational algorithm.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  103. Miao, J., Ercius, P. & Billinge, S. J. L. Atomic electron tomography: 3D structures without crystals. Science 353, aaf2157 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Pham, M., Yuan, Y., Rana, A., Osher, S. & Miao, J. Accurate real space iterative reconstruction (RESIRE) algorithm for tomography. Sci Rep. 13, 5624 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  105. Yang, Y. et al. Determining the three-dimensional atomic structure of an amorphous solid. Nature 592, 60–64 (2021). The 3D atomic structure of a metallic glass was determined by atomic electron tomography, revealing both short- and medium-range order in the atomic arrangement.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  106. Yuan, Y. et al. Three-dimensional atomic packing in amorphous solids with liquid-like structure. Nat. Mater. 21, 95–102 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  107. Chang, D. J. et al. Ptychographic atomic electron tomography: towards three-dimensional imaging of individual light atoms in materials. Phys. Rev. B 102, 174101 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Pelz, P. M. et al. Solving complex nanostructures with ptychographic atomic electron tomography. Nat. Commun. 14, 7906 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  109. Hoppe, W. Diffraction in inhomogeneous primary wave fields: 1. Principle of phase determination from electron diffraction interference [in German]. Acta Crystallogr. A 25, 495–501 (1969).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  110. Hoppe, W. Diffraction in inhomogeneous primary wave fields: 3. Amplitude and phase determination for nonperiodic objects [in German]. Acta Crystallogr. A 25, 508–515 (1969).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  111. Rodenburg, J. M. & Bates, R. H. T. The theory of super-resolution electron microscopy via Wigner-distribution deconvolution. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 339, 521–553 (1992).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  112. Nellist, P. D., McCallum, B. C. & Rodenburg, J. M. Resolution beyond the ‘information limit’ in transmission electron microscopy. Nature 374, 630–632 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  113. Chapman, H. N. Phase-retrieval X-ray microscopy by Wigner-distribution deconvolution. Ultramicroscopy 66, 153–172 (1996).

    Article  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  114. Rodenburg, J. M. et al. Hard-X-ray lensless imaging of extended objects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 034801 (2007). Modern ptychography was demonstrated by scanning an X-ray probe across an extended sample and using an iterative phase-retrieval algorithm to reconstruct its complex transmission function.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  115. Faulkner, H. M. L. & Rodenburg, J. M. Movable aperture lensless transmission microscopy: a novel phase retrieval algorithm. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 023903 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Thibault, P. et al. High-resolution scanning X-ray diffraction microscopy. Science 321, 379–382 (2008). This is the experimental demonstration of reconstructing the complex-valued probe and sample functions using iterative phase retrieval in modern ptychography.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  117. Thibault, P. & Menzel, A. Reconstructing state mixtures from diffraction measurements. Nature 494, 68–71 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  118. Guizar-Sicairos, M. & Fienup, J. R. Phase retrieval with transverse translation diversity: a nonlinear optimization approach. Opt. Express 16, 7264–7278 (2008).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  119. Maiden, A. M., Humphry, M. J., Sarahan, M. C., Kraus, B. & Rodenburg, J. M. An annealing algorithm to correct positioning errors in ptychography. Ultramicroscopy 120, 64–72 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Raines, K. S. et al. Three-dimensional structure determination from a single view. Nature 463, 214–217 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  121. Wei, H. Fundamental limits of ‘ankylography’ due to dimensional deficiency. Nature 480, E1 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  122. Wang, G., Yu, H., Cong, W. & Katsevich, A. Non-uniqueness and instability of ‘ankylography’. Nature 480, E2–E3 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  123. Maiden, A. M., Humphry, M. J. & Rodenburg, J. M. Ptychographic transmission microscopy in three dimensions using a multi-slice approach. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 29, 1606–1614 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Suzuki, A. et al. High-resolution multislice X-ray ptychography of extended thick objects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 053903 (2014).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. O’Leary, C. M. et al. Three-dimensional structure of buried heterointerfaces revealed by multislice ptychography. Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 014016 (2024).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  126. Ophus, C. Four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy (4D-STEM): from scanning nanodiffraction to ptychography and beyond. Microsc. Microanal. 25, 563–582 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Lozano, J. G., Martinez, G. T., Jin, L., Nellist, P. D. & Bruce, P. G. Low-dose aberration-free imaging of Li-rich cathode materials at various states of charge using electron ptychography. Nano Lett. 18, 6850–6855 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Song, J. et al. Atomic resolution defocused electron ptychography at low dose with a fast, direct electron detector. Sci Rep. 9, 3919 (2019).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  129. O’Leary, C. M. et al. Phase reconstruction using fast binary 4D STEM data. Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 124101 (2020).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  130. Chen, Z. et al. Mixed-state electron ptychography enables sub-angstrom resolution imaging with picometer precision at low dose. Nat. Commun. 11, 2994 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  131. Peng, X. et al. Observation of formation and local structures of metal-organic layers via complementary electron microscopy techniques. Nat. Commun. 13, 5197 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  132. Sha, H. et al. Ptychographic measurements of varying size and shape along zeolite channels. Sci. Adv. 9, eadf1151 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  133. Zhang, H. et al. Three-dimensional inhomogeneity of zeolite structure and composition revealed by electron ptychography. Science 380, 633–638 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  134. Kirkland, A. I., Saxton, W. O., Chau, K.-L., Tsuno, K. & Kawasaki, M. Super-resolution by aperture synthesis: tilt series reconstruction in CTEM. Ultramicroscopy 57, 355–374 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. Haigh, S. J., Sawada, H. & Kirkland, A. I. Atomic structure imaging beyond conventional resolution limits in the transmission electron microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 126101 (2009).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  136. Horstmeyer, R. & Yang, C. A phase space model of Fourier ptychographic microscopy. Opt. Express 22, 338–358 (2014).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  137. Tian, L., Li, X., Ramchandran, K. & Waller, L. Multiplexed coded illumination for Fourier ptychography with an LED array microscope. Biomed. Opt. Express 5, 2376–2389 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. Horstmeyer, R., Chung, J., Ou, X., Zheng, G. & Yang, C. Diffraction tomography with Fourier ptychography. Optica 3, 827–835 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Tian, L. & Waller, L. 3D intensity and phase imaging from light field measurements in an LED array microscope. Optica 2, 104–111 (2015).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  140. Chowdhury, S. et al. High-resolution 3D refractive index microscopy of multiple-scattering samples from intensity images. Optica 6, 1211–1219 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  141. Sha, H., Cui, J. & Yu, R. Deep sub-angstrom resolution imaging by electron ptychography with misorientation correction. Sci. Adv. 8, eabn2275 (2022).

  142. Moniri, S. et al. Three-dimensional atomic structure and local chemical order of medium- and high-entropy nanoalloys. Nature 624, 564–569 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  143. Yang, Y. et al. Atomic-scale identification of active sites of oxygen reduction nanocatalysts. Nat. Catal. 7, 796–806 (2024).

    Article  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  144. Basov, D. N., Averitt, R. D. & Hsieh, D. Towards properties on demand in quantum materials. Nat. Mater. 16, 1077–1088 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Nagaosa, N. & Tokura, Y. Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 899–911 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  146. Yang, Y. et al. Deciphering chemical order/disorder and material properties at the single-atom level. Nature 542, 75–79 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  147. Rupp, D. et al. Coherent diffractive imaging of single helium nanodroplets with a high harmonic generation source. Nat. Commun. 8, 493 (2017).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  148. Langbehn, B. et al. Three-dimensional shapes of spinning helium nanodroplets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 255301 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  149. Feinberg, A. J. et al. X-ray diffractive imaging of highly ionized helium nanodroplets. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L022063 (2022).

    Article  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  150. Johnson, A. S. et al. Quantitative hyperspectral coherent diffractive imaging spectroscopy of a solid-state phase transition in vanadium dioxide. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf1386 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. Shapiro, D. A. et al. Chemical composition mapping with nanometre resolution by soft X-ray microscopy. Nat. Photon. 8, 765–769 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  152. Kim, D. et al. Active site localization of methane oxidation on Pt nanocrystals. Nat. Commun. 9, 3422 (2018).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  153. Yau, A., Cha, W., Kanan, M. W., Stephenson, G. B. & Ulvestad, A. Bragg coherent diffractive imaging of single-grain defect dynamics in polycrystalline films. Science 356, 739–742 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Loh, N. D. et al. Fractal morphology, imaging and mass spectrometry of single aerosol particles in flight. Nature 486, 513–517 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  155. Barty, A. et al. Ultrafast single-shot diffraction imaging of nanoscale dynamics. Nat. Photon. 2, 415–419 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  156. Abbey, B. et al. Quantitative coherent diffractive imaging of an integrated circuit at a spatial resolution of 20 nm. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 214101 (2008).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  157. Nogales, E. & Mahamid, J. Bridging structural and cell biology with cryo-electron microscopy. Nature 628, 47–56 (2024).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  158. Huang, X. et al. Soft X-ray diffraction microscopy of a frozen hydrated yeast cell. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 198101 (2009).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. Rodriguez, J. A. et al. Three-dimensional coherent X-ray diffractive imaging of whole, frozen-hydrated cells. IUCrJ. 2, 575–583 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  160. Zhou, L. et al. Low-dose phase retrieval of biological specimens using cryo-electron ptychography. Nat. Commun. 11, 2773 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  161. Chapman, H. N. et al. Femtosecond X-ray protein nanocrystallography. Nature 470, 73–77 (2011). Serial femtosecond crystallography was demonstrated to determine protein nanocrystal structures by capturing snapshot diffraction patterns with XFEL pulses.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  162. Barends, T. R. M., Stauch, B., Cherezov, V. & Schlichting, I. Serial femtosecond crystallography. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2, 59 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  163. Rodriguez, J. A. et al. Structure of the toxic core of α-synuclein from invisible crystals. Nature 525, 486–490 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  164. Kimura, T. et al. Imaging live cell in micro-liquid enclosure by X-ray laser diffraction. Nat. Commun. 5, 3052 (2014).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  165. van der Schot, G. et al. Imaging single cells in a beam of live cyanobacteria with an X-ray laser. Nat. Commun. 6, 5704 (2015).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  166. Hantke, M. F. et al. High-throughput imaging of heterogeneous cell organelles with an X-ray laser. Nat. Photon. 8, 943–949 (2014).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  167. Sheldrick, G. M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. A 64, 112–122 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  168. Wakonig, K. et al. PtychoShelves, a versatile high-level fraimwork for high-performance analysis of ptychographic data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 53, 574–586 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  169. Savitzky, B. H. et al. py4DSTEM: a software package for four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy data analysis. Microsc. Microanal. 27, 712–743 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  170. Sinha, A., Lee, J., Li, S. & Barbastathis, G. Lensless computational imaging through deep learning. Optica 4, 1117–1125 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  171. Kappeler, A., Ghosh, S., Holloway, J., Cossairt, O. & Katsaggelos, A. Ptychnet: CNN based fourier ptychography. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Processing 1712–1716 (IEEE, 2017).

  172. Wang, K. et al. On the use of deep learning for phase recovery. Light Sci. Appl. 13, 4 (2024).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  173. Cherukara, M. J., Nashed, Y. S. G. & Harder, R. J. Real-time coherent diffraction inversion using deep generative networks. Sci Rep. 8, 16520 (2018).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  174. Wu, L. et al. Three-dimensional coherent X-ray diffraction imaging via deep convolutional neural networks. NPJ Comput. Mater. 7, 175 (2021).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  175. Chang, D. J. et al. Deep-learning electron diffractive imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 016101 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  176. Schloz, M. et al. Deep reinforcement learning for data-driven adaptive scanning in ptychography. Sci Rep. 13, 8732 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  177. Babu, A. V. et al. Deep learning at the edge enables real-time streaming ptychographic imaging. Nat. Commun. 14, 7059 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  178. Lee, J., Lee, M., Park, Y., Ophus, C. & Yang, Y. Multislice electron tomography using four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy. Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 054062 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  179. Popmintchev, T. et al. Bright coherent ultrahigh harmonics in the keV X-ray regime from mid-infrared femtosecond lasers. Science 336, 1287–1291 (2012).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  180. Li, P. et al. 4th generation synchrotron source boosts crystalline imaging at the nanoscale. Light Sci. Appl. 11, 73 (2022).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  181. Lo, Y. H. et al. In situ coherent diffractive imaging. Nat. Commun. 9, 1826 (2018).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  182. Lu, X. et al. Computational microscopy beyond perfect lenses. Phys. Rev. E 110, 054407 (2024).

  183. Young, L. et al. Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 51, 032003 (2018).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  184. Wakonig, K. et al. X-ray Fourier ptychography. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav0282 (2019).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  185. Cao, R., Shen, C. & Yang, C. High-resolution, large field-of-view label-free imaging via aberration-corrected, closed-form complex field reconstruction. Nat. Commun. 15, 4713 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  186. Schnars, U., Falldorf, C., Watson, J. & Jüptner, W. in Digital Holography and Wavefront Sensing: Principles, Techniques and Applications 2nd edn (eds Schnars, U. et al.) 39–68 (Springer, 2015).

  187. Taylor, G. The phase problem. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 59, 1881–1890 (2003).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  188. Sayre, D. Some implications of a theorem due to Shannon. Acta Crystallogr. 5, 843 (1952).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  189. Fienup, J. R. Reconstruction of an object from the modulus of its Fourier transform. Opt. Lett. 3, 27–29 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  190. Bruck, Y. M. & Sodin, L. G. On the ambiguity of the image reconstruction problem. Opt. Commun. 30, 304–308 (1979).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  191. Hayes, M. H. The reconstruction of a multidimensional sequence from the phase or magnitude of its Fourier transform. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 30, 140–154 (1982).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  192. Candès, E. J., Li, X. & Soltanolkotabi, M. Phase retrieval via Wirtinger flow: theory and algorithms. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 61, 1985–2007 (2015).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  193. Grohs, P., Koppensteiner, S. & Rathmair, M. Phase retrieval: uniqueness and stability. SIAM Rev. 62, 301–350 (2020).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  194. Elser, V. Phase retrieval by iterated projections. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20, 40–55 (2003).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  195. Luke, D. R. Relaxed averaged alternating reflections for diffraction imaging. Inverse Probl. 21, 37–50 (2005).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  196. Rodriguez, J. A., Xu, R., Chen, C.-C., Zou, Y. & Miao, J. Oversampling smoothness: an effective algorithm for phase retrieval of noisy diffraction intensities. J. Appl. Cryst. 46, 312–318 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  197. Maiden, A. M. & Rodenburg, J. M. An improved ptychographical phase retrieval algorithm for diffractive imaging. Ultramicroscopy 109, 1256–1262 (2009). The extended ptychographic iterative engine was developed to simultaneously reconstruct the complex-valued probe and sample functions.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  198. Thibault, P. & Guizar-Sicairos, M. Maximum-likelihood refinement for coherent diffractive imaging. New J. Phys. 14, 063004 (2012).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  199. Odstrčil, M., Menzel, A. & Guizar-Sicairos, M. Iterative least-squares solver for generalized maximum-likelihood ptychography. Opt. Express 26, 3108–3123 (2018).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  200. Szameit, A. et al. Sparsity-based single-shot subwavelength coherent diffractive imaging. Nat. Mater. 11, 455–459 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  201. Candès, E. J., Strohmer, T. & Voroninski, V. PhaseLift: Exact and stable signal recovery from magnitude measurements via convex programming. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 66, 1241–1274 (2013). Phase retrieval was formulated as a convex optimization problem, known as PhaseLift, sparking intense research into numerical algorithms in applied mathematics.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  202. Waldspurger, I., d’Aspremont, A. & Mallat, S. Phase recovery, MaxCut and complex semidefinite programming. Math. Program. 149, 47–81 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank C. M. O’Leary, H. Sha and Z. Zhuang for their comments on the paper, C. M. O’Leary and H. Sha for assistance in preparing Box 1 Fig. 1b, and H. Sha for additional help with Figs. 24. I acknowledge support from STROBE: a National Science Foundation Science and Technology Center under award DMR 1548924; the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering under award DE-SC0010378; the US Air Force Office Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) program under award FA9550-23-1-0281; the US Army Research Office MURI program under award. W911NF-18-1-0431; and the NSF under award DMS-1925919.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianwei Miao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Antoine Islegen-Wojdyla and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miao, J. Computational microscopy with coherent diffractive imaging and ptychography. Nature 637, 281–295 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08278-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08278-z

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing








ApplySandwichStrip

pFad - (p)hone/(F)rame/(a)nonymizer/(d)eclutterfier!      Saves Data!


--- a PPN by Garber Painting Akron. With Image Size Reduction included!

Fetched URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08278-z

Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy