create a website

Unified Container Shipping Industry Data From 1966: Freight Rate, Shipping Quantity, Newbuilding, Secondhand, and Scrap Price. (2022). Otani, Suguru ; Matsuda, Takuma.
In: Papers.
RePEc:arx:papers:2211.16292.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 46

References cited by this document

Cocites: 20

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. , “Competition and cooperation in liner shipping,” in “The Handbook of maritime economics and business,” Informa Law from Routledge, 2013, pp. 463–486.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. , “Ocean shipping cartels: A survey,” Review of Network Economics, 2004, 3 (2).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. , “Some effects of the US Shipping Act of 1984 on ocean liner shipping conferences,” Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 1995, 26, 531.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. , “The stability of market shares in liner shipping,” Review of Industrial Organization, 2013, 42 (1), 85–106.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Aguirregabiria, Victor, Allan Collard-Wexler, and Stephen P Ryan, “Dynamic games in empirical industrial organization,” in “Handbook of Industrial Organization,” Vol. 4, Elsevier, 2021, pp. 225–343.

  6. Asker, John, “Leniency and post-cartel market conduct: Preliminary evidence from parcel tanker shipping,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2010, 28 (4), 407–414.

  7. Bai, Jushan and Pierre Perron, “Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes,” Econometrica, 1998, pp. 47–78.

  8. Bai, Xiwen and Yiliang Li, “The Congestion Effect of Oil Transportation and Its Trade Implications, ” Available at SSRN 3851173, 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Barwick, Panle Jia, Myrto Kalouptsidi, and Nahim Bin Zahur, “China’s industrial policy: An empirical evaluation,” Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Bernhofen, Daniel M, Zouheir El-Sahli, and Richard Kneller, “Estimating the effects of the container revolution on world trade,” Journal of International Economics, 2016, 98, 36–50.

  11. Brancaccio, Giulia, Myrto Kalouptsidi, and Theodore Papageorgiou, “Geography, transportation, and endogenous trade costs,” Econometrica, 2020, 88 (2), 657–691.

  12. Bresnahan, Timothy F, “Competition and collusion in the American automobile industry: The 1955 price war,” The Journal of Industrial Economics, 1987, pp. 457–482.

  13. Broeze, Frank, The Globalisation of the Oceans: Containerisation from the 1950s to the Present number 23, Oxford University Press, 2002.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Byrne, David P and Nicolas De Roos, “Learning to coordinate: A study in retail gasoline,” American Economic Review, 2019, 109 (2), 591–619.

  15. Clyde, Paul S and James D Reitzes, The effectiveness of collusion under antitrust immunity: The case of liner shipping conferences, DIANE Publishing, 1995.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Coşar, A Kerem and Banu Demir, “Shipping inside the box: Containerization and trade,” Journal of International Economics, 2018, 114, 331–345.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Deltas, George, Konstantinos Serfes, and Richard A Sicotte, “American shipping cartels in the pre-World War I era,” Available at SSRN 164608, 1999.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Fan, Lixian and Jingbo Yin, “Analysis of structural changes in container shipping,” Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2016, 18 (2), 174–191.

  19. Fox, Nancy Ruth, “An empirical analysis of ocean liner shipping,” International Journal of Transport Economics/Rivista internazionale di economia dei trasporti, 1992, pp. 205–225.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Fusillo, Michael, “Some notes on structure and stability in liner shipping,” Maritime Policy & Management, 2006, 33 (5), 463–475.

  21. Fusillo, Mike, “Excess capacity and entry deterrence: the case of ocean liner shipping markets,” Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2003, 5 (2), 100–115.

  22. Greenwood, Robin and Samuel G Hanson, “Waves in ship prices and investment,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2015, 130 (1), 55–109.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Igami, Mitsuru, “Market Power in International Commodity Trade: The Case of Coffee,” The Journal of Industrial Economics, 2015, 63 (2), 225–248.

  24. Ishida, Tadamasa and Hiroyuki Sato, “Transition of the Liner Shipping Industry - Overcoming Turbulent Times (Taidan Teikisen Gyokai No Hensen - Gekidou No Jidai Wo Norikoete),” Japan Maritime Daily, 2006.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Japan Maritime Center, Report on Inter-Carrier Agreements in Oceangoing Shipping Industry (Gaikokaiun Ni Okeru Senshakan Kyotei Ni Kakaru Chosa Hokokusho) 2008. Accessed: 202203 -12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Jeon, Jihye, “Learning and investment under demand uncertainty in container shipping,” The RAND Journal of Economics, 2022, 53 (1), 226–259.

  27. Jr, Joseph E Harrington, Kai Hüschelrath, and Ulrich Laitenberger, “Rent sharing to control noncartel supply in the German cement market,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2018, 27 (1), 149–166.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Kalouptsidi, Myrto, “Time to build and fluctuations in bulk shipping,” American Economic Review, 2014, 104 (2), 564–608.

  29. Levenstein, Margaret C and Valerie Y Suslow, “What determines cartel success?,” Journal of economic literature, 2006, 44 (1), 43–95.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Levinson, Marc, The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger-with a new chapter by the author, Princeton University Press, 2016.

  31. Luo, Meifeng, Lixian Fan, and Liming Liu, “An econometric analysis for container shipping market,” Maritime Policy & Management, 2009, 36 (6), 507–523.

  32. Marin, Pedro L and Richard Sicotte, “Exclusive contracts and market power: evidence from ocean shipping,” The Journal of Industrial Economics, 2003, 51 (2), 193–214.

  33. Marshall, Robert C and Leslie M Marx, The economics of collusion: Cartels and bidding rings, Mit Press, 2014.

  34. Martin, Stephen, “Market structure and market performance,” Review of Industrial Organization, 2012, 40 (2), 87–108.

  35. Miller, Nathan H and Matthew C Weinberg, “Understanding the price effects of the MillerCoors joint venture,” Econometrica, 2017, 85 (6), 1763–1791.

  36. Morton, Fiona Scott, “Entry and predation: British shipping cartels 1879–1929,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 1997, 6 (4), 679–724.

  37. Pirrong, Stephen Craig, “An application of core theory to the analysis of ocean shipping markets, ” The Journal of Law and Economics, 1992, 35 (1), 89–131.

  38. Podolny, Joel M and Scott Fiona M Morton, “Social status, entry and predation: The case of British shipping cartels 1879–1929,” The Journal of Industrial Economics, 1999, 47 (1), 41–67.

  39. Porter, Robert H, “A study of cartel stability: The Joint Executive Committee, 1880-1886,” The Bell Journal of Economics, 1983, pp. 301–314.

  40. Reitzes, James D and Kelli L Sheran, “Rolling seas in liner shipping,” Review of Industrial Organization, 2002, 20 (1), 51–59.

  41. Rua, Gisela, “Diffusion of containerization,” Available at SSRN 2514849, 2014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Saito, Tomohiro, Ryuichi Shibasaki, Shinsuke Murakami, Kenmei Tsubota, and Takuma Matsuda, “Global Maritime Container Shipping Networks 1969–1981: Emergence of Container Shipping and Reopening of the Suez Canal,” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2022, 10 (5), 602.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Sjostrom, William, “Collusion in ocean shipping: a test of monopoly and empty core models,” Journal of Political Economy, 1989, 97 (5), 1160–1179.

  44. Study Group on Government Regulation and Competition Policy, The Actual State of Competition in Oceangoing Shipping and Problems with Competition Policy (Gaikoukaiun no Kyousoujittai To Kyousouseisakujou no Mondaiten ni Tsuite) 2006. Accessed: 2021-09-22.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Wilson, Wesley W and Kenneth L Casavant, “Some market power implications of the Shipping Act of 1984: a case study of the US to Pacific rim transportation markets,” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1991, pp. 427–434.

  46. Zeileis, Achim, Friedrich Leisch, Kurt Hornik, and Christian Kleiber, “strucchange: An R package for testing for structural change in linear regression models,” Journal of statistical software, 2002, 7 (1), 1–38. Container Price Year Source Measured Units
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Spillovers from legal cooperation to non-competitive prices. (2024). Treuren, Leonard ; Onderstal, Sander ; Martin, Stephen ; Hinloopen, Jeroen.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20240078.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Sharing the caring? Dynamic interaction between siblings in the provision of care to parents. (2024). Hunt, Timothy.
    In: Economics Series Working Papers.
    RePEc:oxf:wpaper:1042.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Simple model of market share dynamics based on clients’ firm-switching decisions. (2024). Hickey, Joseph.
    In: Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.
    RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:635:y:2024:i:c:s0378437123010440.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Identification and Estimation of Demand Models with Endogenous Product Entry and Exit. (2023). Aguirregabiria, Victor ; Sokullu, Senay ; Iaria, Alessandro.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:tor:tecipa:tecipa-755.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Equilibrium multiplicity in dynamic games: Testing and estimation. (2023). Pesendorfer, Martin ; Otsu, Taisuke.
    In: The Econometrics Journal.
    RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:26:y:2023:i:1:p:c26-c42..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Identification and Estimation of Demand Models with Endogenous Product Entry and Exit. (2023). Aguirregabiria, Victor ; Sokullu, Senay ; Iaria, Alessandro.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2308.14196.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Firms Static Behavior under Dynamic Demand. (2022). Fukasawa, Takeshi.
    In: Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:kob:dpaper:dp2022-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Equilibrium multiplicity in dynamic games: testing and estimation. (2022). Pesendorfer, Martin ; Otsu, Taisuke.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:113588.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Unified Container Shipping Industry Data From 1966: Freight Rate, Shipping Quantity, Newbuilding, Secondhand, and Scrap Price. (2022). Otani, Suguru ; Matsuda, Takuma.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2211.16292.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Estimating Dynamic Games with Unknown Information Structure. (2022). Koh, Paul S.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2205.03706.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Equilibrium multiplicity in dynamic games: testing and estimation. (2021). Otsu, Taisuke ; Pesendorfer, Martin.
    In: STICERD - Econometrics Paper Series.
    RePEc:cep:stiecm:618.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Effects of antitrust prosecution on retail fuel prices. (2019). Moral, Maria J ; Gonzalez, Xulia.
    In: International Journal of Industrial Organization.
    RePEc:eee:indorg:v:67:y:2019:i:c:s0167718719300657.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. The EU Leniency Programme and Recidivism. (2016). Marvao, Catarina ; Marvo, Catarina.
    In: Review of Industrial Organization.
    RePEc:kap:revind:v:48:y:2016:i:1:p:1-27.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The EU Leniency Programme and Recidivism. (2016). Marvao, Catarina ; Marvo, Catarina .
    In: Review of Industrial Organization.
    RePEc:kap:revind:v:48:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11151-015-9474-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Cartels and Leniency: Taking stock of what we learnt. (2016). Spagnolo, Giancarlo ; Marvao, Catarina.
    In: SITE Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:hasite:0039.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The effect of competition on trade: Evidence from the collapse of international cartels. (2015). Suslow, Valerie ; Sivadasan, Jagadeesh ; Levenstein, Margaret.
    In: International Journal of Industrial Organization.
    RePEc:eee:indorg:v:39:y:2015:i:c:p:56-70.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Heterogeneous Penalties and Private Information. (2014). Marvao, Catarina ; Marvo, Catarina .
    In: Konkurrensverket Working Paper Series in Law and Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:kkveco:2014_001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Heterogeneous Penalties and Private Information. (2014). Marvao, Catarina.
    In: SITE Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:hasite:0029.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The EU Leniency Programme and Recidivism. (2014). Marvao, Catarina.
    In: SITE Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:hasite:0027.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-22 22:52:23 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy