create a website

Water the flowers you want to grow? Evidence on private recognition and donor loyalty. (2021). Dwenger, Nadja ; Bittschi, Benjamin ; Rincke, Johannes.
In: European Economic Review.
RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:131:y:2021:i:c:s0014292120302543.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 48

References cited by this document

Cocites: 26

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Thumbs Down for the Thumbs Up Emoji: Experimental Evidence on the Impact of Instantaneous Positive Reinforcement on Charitable Giving. (2022). Grossman, Philip J ; Grodeck, Ben.
    In: Monash Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mos:moswps:2022-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Adena, M. ; Huck, S. Can mass fundraising harm your core business? A field experiment on how fundraising affects ticket sales. 2019 :

  2. Adena, M. ; Huck, S. Giving once, giving twice: a two-period field experiment on intertemporal crowding in charitable giving. 2019 J. Public Econ.. 172 127-134

  3. Altmann, S. ; Falk, A. ; Heidhues, P. ; Jayaraman, R. ; Teirlinck, M. Defaults and donations: evidence from a field experiment. 2019 Rev. Econ. Stat.. 101 808-826

  4. Altmann, S. ; Traxler, C. Nudges at the dentist. 2014 Eur. Econ. Rev.. 72 19-38

  5. Andreoni, J. ; Payne, A.A. Charitable giving, in: Handbook of Public Economics. 2013 Elsevier, B.V.,:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Andreoni, J. ; Serra-Garcia, M. The pledging puzzle: how can revocable promises increase charitable giving?. 2019 :

  7. Andreoni, J. ; Serra-Garcia, M. Time-inconsistent charitable giving. 2019 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Anik, L. ; Norton, M.I. ; Ariely, D. Contingent match incentives increase donations. 2014 J. Market. Res.. 51 790-801
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Apesteguia, J. ; Funk, P. ; Iriberri, N. Promoting rule compliance in daily-life: evidence from a randomized field experiment in the public libraries of Barcelona. 2013 Eur. Econ. Rev.. 64 266-284

  10. Ashraf, N. ; Bandiera, O. ; Jack, B.K. No margin, no mission? A field experiment on incentives for public service delivery. 2014 J. Public Econ.. 120 1-17

  11. Auriol, E. ; Lassebie, J. ; Panin, A. ; Raiber, E. ; Seabright, P. God insures those who pay? Formal insurance and religious offerings in Ghana. 2020 Q. J. Econ.. 135 1799-1848

  12. Bagot, K.L. ; Murray, A.L. ; Masser, B.M. How can we improve retention of the first-time donor? A systematic review of the current evidence. 2016 Transfus. Med. Rev.. 30 81-91
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Berghammer, C. ; Zartler, U. ; Krivanek, D. Looking beyond the church tax: families and the disaffiliation of Austrian Roman Catholics. 2017 J. Sci. Study Relig.. 56 514-535
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Breman, A. Give more tomorrow: two field experiments on altruism and intertemporal choice. 2011 J. Public Econ.. 95 1349-1357

  15. Chetty, R. ; Saez, E. ; Sandor., L. What policies increase prosocial behavior? An experiment with referees at the Journal of Public Economics. 2014 J. Econ. Perspect.. 28 169-188

  16. Chuan, A. ; Kessler, J.B. ; Milkman, K.L. Field study of charitable giving reveals that reciprocity decays over time. 2018 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.. 115 1766-1771

  17. Cunningham, B.M. ; Cochi-Ficano, C.K. The determinants of donative revenue flows from alumni of higher education: an empirical inquiry. 2002 J. Hum. Resour.. 37 540-569

  18. Damgaard, M.T. ; Gravert, C. The hidden costs of nudging: experimental evidence from reminders in fundraising. 2018 J. Public Econ.. 157 15-26

  19. DellaVigna, S. ; List, J.A. ; Malmendier, U. Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. 2012 Q. J. Econ.. 127 1-56

  20. Dwenger, N. ; Kleven, H. ; Rasul, I. ; Rincke, J. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations for tax compliance: evidence from a field experiment in Germany. 2016 Am. Econ. J.. 8 203-232

  21. Falk, A. Gift exchange in the field. 2007 Econometrica. 75 1501-1511

  22. Ferman, B. ; Pinto, C. Inference in differences-in-differences with few treated groups and heteroskedasticity. 2019 Rev. Econ. Stat.. 101 452-467

  23. Fosgaard, T. ; Soetevent, A.R. Promises undone: how committed pledges impact donations to charity. 2018 :

  24. Gilad, Z. ; Levontin, L. The effect of information about previous donation impact on recurring donations. 2017 En : Gneezy, A. ; Griskevicius, V. ; Williams, P. NA - Advances in Consumer Research. Association for Consumer Research, Duluth, MN:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Grant, A.M. ; Gino, F. A little thanks goes a long way: explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. 2010 J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.. 98 946-955
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Gruber, J. ; Hungerman, D.M. The church versus the mall: what happens when religion faces increased secular competition?. 2008 Q. J. Econ.. 123 831-862

  27. Huck, S. ; Rasul, I. Transactions costs in charitable giving: evidence from two field experiments. 2010 B.E. J. Econ. Anal. Policy. 10 -

  28. Karlan, D. ; List, J.A. Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. 2007 Am. Econ. Rev.. 97 1774-1793

  29. Kennedy, P.E. ; Cade, B.S. Randomization tests for multiple regression. 1996 Commun. Stat.-Simul.Comput.. 25 923-936
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Kling, J. ; Liebman, J. ; Katz, L. ; Sanbonmatsu, L. Moving to opportunity and tranquility: neighborhood effects on adult economic self-sufficiency and health from a randomized housing voucher experiment. 2004 :

  31. Kosfeld, M. ; Neckermann, S. Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance. 2011 Am. Econ. J.. 3 86-99

  32. Lacetera, N. ; Macis, M. ; Mele, A. Viral altruism? charitable giving and social contagion in online networks. 2016 Sociol. Rev.. 3 202-238
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Landry, C.E. ; Lange, A. ; List, J.A. ; Price, M.K. ; Rupp, N.G. Is a donor in hand better than two in the bush? Evidence from a natural field experiment. 2010 Am. Econ. Rev.. 100 958-983

  34. Leslie, L.L. ; Ramey, G. Donor behavior and voluntary support for higher education institutions. 1988 J. Higher Educ.. 59 115-132
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Levin, T. ; Levitt, S.D. ; List, J.A. A Glimpse into the World of High Capacity Givers: Experimental Evidence From a University Capital Campaign. 2016 :

  36. McCullough, M.E. ; Kilpatrick, S.D. ; Emmons, R.A. ; Larson, D.B. Is gratitude a moral affect?. 2001 Psychol. Bull.. 127 249-266
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Meier, S. Do subsidies increase charitable giving in the long run? Matching donations in a field experiment. 2007 J. Eur. Econ. Assoc.. 5 1203-1222

  38. Notarantonio, E.M. ; Quigley, C.J. An investigation of the giving behavior of loyal, lapsed, and non-givers to a religious organization. 2009 Int. J. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Market.. 14 297-310
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Perez-Truglia, R. ; Cruces, G. Partisan interactions: evidence from a field experiment in the United States. 2017 J. Polit. Econ.. 125 1208-1243

  40. Rand, D.G. ; Greene, J.D. ; Nowak, M.A. Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. 2012 Nature. 489 427-430

  41. Rooney, P. ; Ottoni-Wilhelm, M. ; Wang, X. ; Han, X. Dynamics of american giving: descriptive evidence. 2019 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Samek, A. ; Longfield, C. Do Thank-you Calls Increase Charitable Giving? Expert Forecasts and Field Experimental Evidence. 2019 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Sargeant, A. Donor Retention: What do we Know and What Can we do About it. 2008 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Sargeant, A. Relationship fundraising: how to keep donors loyal. 2001 Nonprofit Manag. Leadersh.. 12 177-192
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Scharf, K. ; Smith, S. ; Ottoni-Wilhelm, M. Lift and Shift: The Effect of Fundraising Interventions in Charity Space and Time. 2017 :

  46. Slemrod, J. ; Rehman, O.U. ; Waseem, M. (Forthcoming). how do taxpayers respond to public disclosure and social recognition programs? evidence from pakistan. 2020 Rev. Econ. Stat. -

  47. Statistisches Bundesamt, 2019. Statistisches Jahrbuch 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Young, A. Channeling fisher: randomization tests and the statistical insignificance of seemingly significant experimental results. 2019 Q. J. Econ.. 134 557-598

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Does online fundraising increase charitable giving? A nationwide field experiment on Facebook. (2024). Hager, Anselm ; Adena, Maja.
    In: Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbeoc:spii2020302r2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. One thing leads to another: Evidence on the scope and persistence of behavioral spillovers. (2024). Mayr, Harald ; Schubert, Renate ; Goetz, Alexander.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:236:y:2024:i:c:s0047272724001026.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Wealth and charitable giving – Evidence from an Ethiopian lottery. (2024). Somville, Vincent ; Kotsadam, Andreas.
    In: Journal of Development Economics.
    RePEc:eee:deveco:v:167:y:2024:i:c:s0304387823002067.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. A Glimpse into the world of high capacity givers: Experimental evidence from a university capital campaign. (2023). List, John ; Levitt, Steven D ; Levin, Tova.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:212:y:2023:i:c:p:644-658.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Does additional demand for charitable aid increase giving? Evidence from Hurricane Sandy. (2023). Schwirplies, Claudia.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:209:y:2023:i:c:p:53-73.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Quality-Aware Tax Incentives for Charitable Contributions. (2023). Hines, James R ; Halberstam, Zachary.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10250.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Does online fundraising increase charitable giving? A nationwide field experiment on Facebook. (2022). Adena, Maja ; Hager, Anselm.
    In: Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbeoc:spii2020302r.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Intertemporal Prosocial Choice: The Inconsistency Puzzle. (2022). Islam, Marco.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2022_012.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Giving begets giving: Positive path dependence as moral consistency. (2022). Slonim, Robert ; Heger, Stephanie A.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:204:y:2022:i:c:p:699-718.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Incentives and intertemporal behavioral spillovers: A two-period experiment on charitable giving. (2022). Gallier, Carlo ; Alt, Marius.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:200:y:2022:i:c:p:959-972.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Personalized fundraising: A field experiment on threshold matching of donations. (2022). Huck, Steffen ; Adena, Maja.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:200:y:2022:i:c:p:1-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Altruism Begets Altruism. (2022). Slonim, Robert ; Heger, Stephanie A.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_9522.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Incentives and intertemporal behavioral spillovers: A two-period experiment on charitable giving. (2021). Gallier, Carlo ; Alt, Marius.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:21010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. How can we improve tax incentives for charitable giving? Lessons from field experiments in fundraising. (2021). Adena, Maja.
    In: EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters.
    RePEc:zbw:espost:251718.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Altruism born of suffering? The impact of an adverse health shock on pro-social behaviour. (2021). Smith, Sarah ; Petrie, Dennis ; Black, Nicole ; de Gruyter, Elaine.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:191:y:2021:i:c:p:902-915.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Altruism among consumers as donors. (2021). Tymula, Agnieszka ; Heger, Stephanie ; Tausch, Franziska ; Slonim, Robert.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:189:y:2021:i:c:p:611-622.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Water the flowers you want to grow? Evidence on private recognition and donor loyalty. (2021). Dwenger, Nadja ; Bittschi, Benjamin ; Rincke, Johannes.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:131:y:2021:i:c:s0014292120302543.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Does online fundraising increase charitable giving? A nation-wide field experiment on Facebook. (2020). Hager, Anselm ; Adena, Maja.
    In: Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbeoc:spii2020302.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Independent vs. Coordinated Fundraising: Understanding the Role of Information. (2020). Uler, Neslihan ; Eckel, Catherine ; Guney, Begum.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:127:y:2020:i:c:s0014292120301082.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Altruism born of suffering? The impact of an adverse health shock on pro-social behaviour. (2020). Smith, Sarah ; Petrie, Dennis ; Black, Nicole ; de Gruyter, Elaine.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:15535.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Water the Flowers You Want to Grow? Evidence on Private Recognition and Donor Loyalty. (2020). Dwenger, Nadja ; Bittschi, Benjamin ; Rincke, Johannes.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:14996.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Water the Flowers You Want to Grow? Evidence on Private Recognition and Donor Loyalty. (2020). Bittschi, Benjamin ; Rincke, Johannes ; Dwenger, Nadja.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8424.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Altruism born of suffering? The impact of an adverse health shock on pro-social behaviour. (2020). Smith, Sarah ; Petrie, Dennis ; Black, Nicole ; de Gruyter, Elaine.
    In: Bristol Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:bri:uobdis:20/736.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Inter-charity competition under spatial differentiation: Sorting, crowding, and spillovers. (2019). Lohse, Johannes ; Romer, Daniel ; Reif, Christiane ; Kesternich, Martin ; Goeschl, Timo ; Gallier, Carlo.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:19039.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Inter-charity competition under spatial differentiation: Sorting, crowding, and splillovers. (2019). Lohse, Johannes ; Kesternich, Martin ; Goeschl, Timo ; Roemer, Daniel ; Reif, Christiane ; Gallier, Carlo.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:bir:birmec:19-08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-24 08:27:24 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy