create a website

Assessing the Influence of Strategic Resources on the Quality of Life in Spanish Cities. (2021). Vazquez-Sanmartin, Antonio ; Lopez-Lopez, Vicente ; Iglesias-Antelo, Susana.
In: Sustainability.
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13048-:d:687593.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 204

References cited by this document

Cocites: 22

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Agarwal, J.; Osiyevskyy, O.; Feldman, P.M. Corporate Reputation Measurement: Alternative Factor Structures, Nomological Validity, and Organizational Outcomes. J. Bus. Ethics 2015, 2, 485–506. [CrossRef]

  2. Ahmadiani, M.; Ferreira, S. Environmental Amenities and Quality of Life across the United States. Ecol. Econ. 2019, 164, 106341. [CrossRef]

  3. Akande, A.; Cabral, P.; Gomes, P.; Casteleyn, S. The Lisbon Ranking for Smart Sustainable Cities in Europe. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 44, 475–487. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Albu, O.B.; Flyverbom, M. Organizational Transparency: Conceptualizations, Conditions, and Consequences. Bus. Soc. 2019, 58, 268–297. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Alcaide–Muñoz, L.; Rodríguez–Bolívar, M.P.; Cobo, M.J.; Herrera–Viedma, E. Analysing the Scientific Evolution of E-Government Using a Science Mapping Approach. Gov. Inf. Q. 2017, 34, 545–555. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Ali, R.; Lynch, R.; Melewar, T.C.; Jin, Z. The Moderating Influences on the Relationship of Corporate Reputation with Its Antecedents and Consequences: A Meta-Analytic Review. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 1105–1117. [CrossRef]

  7. Andrews, R.; Beynon, M.J.; Mcdermott, A.M. Organizational Capability in the Public Sector: A Configurational Approach. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2016, 26, 239–258. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Andrews, R.; Boyne, G.A.; Walker, R.M. Strategy Content and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Analysis. Public Adm. Rev. 2006, 66, 52–63. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Andrews, R.W.; Boyne, G.A.; Walker, R. The Impact of Management on Administrative and Survey Measures of Organizational Performance. Public Manag. Rev. 2011, 13, 227–256. [CrossRef]

  10. Araujo, J.F.F.E.; Tejedo-Romero, F. Does Gender Equality Affect Municipal Transparency: The Case of Spain. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 2018, 41, 69–99. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Armstrong, C.E.; Shimizu, K. A Review of Approaches to Empirical Research on the Resource-Based View of the Firm. J. Manag. 2007, 33, 959–986. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2021, 13, 13048 19 of 19
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Bérenger, V.; Verdier-Chouchane, A. Multidimensional Measures of Well-Being: Standard of Living and Quality of Life across Countries. World Dev. 2007, 35, 1259–1276. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Bannister, F.; Connolly, R. The Trouble with Transparency: A Critical Review of Openness in e-Government. Policy Internet 2011, 3, 158–187. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Barcaccia, B.; Esposito, G.; Matarese, M.; Bertolaso, M.; Elvira, M.; de Marinis, M.G. Defining Quality of Life: A Wild-Goose Chase? Eur. J. Psychol. 2013, 9, 185–203. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Barnett, M.L.; Jermier, J.M.; Lafferty, B.A. Corporate Reputation: The Definitional Landscape. Corp. Reput. Rev. 2003, 9, 26–38. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2021, 13, 13048 17 of 19
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Barney, J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. J. Manag. 1991, 17, 99–120. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Barney, J.B. The Emergence of Resource-Based Theory: A Personal Journey. J. Manag. 2021, 47, 1663–1676. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Barney, J.B.; Clark, D.N. Resource-Based Theory: Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage; Oxford University Press Oxford: New York, NY, USA, 2007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Barreira, A.P.; Amado, C.; Santos, S.; Andraz, J.; Guimarães, M.H. Assessment and Determinants of the Quality of Life in Portuguese Cities. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 2020, 44, 1–37. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Bearfield, D.A.; Bowman, A.O.M. Can You Find It on the Web? An Assessment of Municipal E-Government Transparency. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 2017, 47, 172–188. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Beeri, I.; Uster, A.; Vigoda-Gadot, E. Does Performance Management Relate to Good Governance? A Study of Its Relationship with Citizens’ Satisfaction with and Trust in Israeli Local Government. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 2019, 42, 241–279. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Belanche, D.; Casaló, L.V. Rebuilding Public Trust in Government Administrations through E-Government Actions. Rev. Española Investig. Mark. ESIC 2015, 19, 1–11. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Berens, G.; van Riel, C.B.M. Corporate Associations in the Academic Literature: Three Main Streams of Thought in the Reputation Measurement Literature. Corp. Reput. Rev. 2004, 7, 161–178. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Bertot, J.C.; Jaeger, P.T.; Grimes, J.M. Using ICTs to Create a Culture of Transparency: E-Government and Social Media as Openness and Anti-Corruption Tools for Societies. Gov. Inf. Q. 2010, 27, 264–271. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Bigerna, S.; Polinori, P. Quality of Life in Major Italian Cities: Do Local Governments Cost Efficiency Contribute to Improve Urban Life Style? An Introductory Analysis. Econ. Policy Energy Environ. 2012, 24, 121–144. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Bollen, K. Structural Equations with Latent Variables; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1989.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Bonsón, E.; Torres, L.; Royo, S.; Flores, F. Local E-Government 2.0: Social Media and Corporate Transparency in Municipalities. Gov. Inf. Q. 2012, 29, 123–132. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Bovaird, T.; Löffler, E. Moving from Excellence Models of Local Service Delivery to Benchmarking ‘Good Local Governance’. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2002, 68, 9–24. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Boyd, B.K.; Bergh, D.D.; Ketchen, D.J. Reconsidering the Reputation–Performance Relationship: A Resource-Based View. J. Manag. 2010, 36, 588–609. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Bustos, E.O. Organizational Reputation in the Public Administration: A Systematic Literature Review. Public Adm. Rev. 2021, 81, 731–751. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Cárcaba, A.; González, E.; Ventura, J. Social Progress in Spanish Municipalities (2001–2011). Appl. Res. Qual. Life 2017, 12, 997–1019. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Cárcaba, A.; González, E.; Ventura, J.; Arrondo, R. How Does Good Governance Relate to Quality of Life? Sustainability 2017, 9,

  33. Caamaño-Alegre, J.; Lago-Peñas, S.; Reyes-Santias, F.; Santiago-Boubeta, A. Budget Transparency in Local Governments: An Empirical Analysis. Local Gov. Stud. 2012, 39, 182–207. [CrossRef]

  34. Cabral, S.; Mahoney, J.T.; McGahan, A.M.; Potoski, M. Value Creation and Value Appropriation in Public and Nonprofit Organizations. Strateg. Manag. J. 2019, 40, 465–475. [CrossRef]

  35. Carmeli, A. A Conceptual and Practical Framework of Measuring Performance of Local Authorities in Financial Terms: Analysing the Case of Israel. Local Gov. Stud. 2002, 28, 21–36. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Carmeli, A.; Tishler, A. Resources, Capabilities, and the Performance of Industrial Firms: A Multivariate Analysis. Manag. Decis. Econ. 2004, 25, 299–315. [CrossRef]

  37. Carmeli, A.; Tishler, A. The Relationships between Intangible Organizational Elements and Organizational Performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 2004, 25, 1257–1278. [CrossRef]

  38. Carpenter, D. Institutional Strangulation: Bureaucratic Politics and Financial Reform in the Obama Administration. Perspect. Politics 2010, 8, 825–846. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Carpenter, D.P.; Krause, G.A. Reputation and Public Administration. Public Adm. Rev. 2011, 72, 26–32. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Chun, R. Corporate Reputation: Meaning and Measurement. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2005, 7, 91–109. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. CIBERP@ÍS VII Radiografía de Las Webs Municipales. Available online: http://elpais.com/diario/2007/07/19/ciberpais/1184 809221_850215.html (accessed on 15 June 2015).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Ciborra, C. Interpreting E-Government and Development: Efficiency, Transparency or Governance at a Distance? Inf. Technol. People 2005, 18, 260–279. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Clardy, A. Organizational Reputation: Issues in Conceptualization and Measurement. Corp. Reput. Rev. 2012, 15, 285–303. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Coggburn, J.D.; Schneider, S.K. The Relationship between State Government Performance and State Quality of Life. Int. J. Public Adm. 2003, 26, 1337–1354. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Colesca, S.E. Understanding Trust in E-Government. Econ. Eng. Decis. 2009, 63, 7–15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Cook, F.L.; Jacobs, L.R.; Kim, D. Trusting What You Know: Information, Knowledge, and Confidence in Social Security. J. Politics 2010, 72, 397. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Cravens, K.S.; Oliver, E.G. Employees: The Key Link to Corporate Reputation Management. Bus. Horiz. 2006, 49, 293–302. [CrossRef]

  48. Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B.; Santis, S.; Bisogno, M. Public-Sector Financial Management and E-Government: The Role Played by Accounting Systems. Int. J. Public Adm. 2021, 1–15. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Cucciniello, M.; Porumbescu, G.A.; Grimmelikhuijsen, S. 25 Years of Transparency Research: Evidence and Future Directions. Public Adm. Rev. 2017, 77, 32–44. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Curtin, D.; Meijer, A.J. Does Transparency Strengthen Legitimacy? A Critical Analysis of European Union Policy Documents. Inf. Polity 2006, 11, 109–122. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Da Cruz, N.F.; Tavares, A.F.; Marques, R.C.; Jorge, S.; de Sousa, L. Measuring Local Government Transparency. Public Manag. Rev. 2016, 18, 866–893. [CrossRef]

  52. Dadashpoor, H.; Khalighi, N. Investigating Spatial Distribution of Regional Quality of Life (RQoL) in Iran between 1996 and 2011. Soc. Indic. Res. 2016, 127, 1217–1248. [CrossRef]

  53. D’Oria, L.; Crook, T.R.; Ketchen, D.J.; Sirmon, D.G.; Wright, M. The Evolution of Resource-Based Inquiry: A Review and Meta-Analytic Integration of the Strategic Resources–Actions–Performance Pathway. J. Manag. 2021, 47, 1383–1429. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Das, D. Urban Quality of Life: A Case Study of Guwahati. Soc. Indic. Res. 2008, 88, 297–310. [CrossRef]

  55. Dasgupta, P.; Weale, M. On Measuring the Quality of Life. World Dev. 1992, 20, 119–131. [CrossRef]

  56. Davies, G.; Chun, R.; da Silva, R.V.; Roper, S. Corporate Reputation and Competitiveness, 1st ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2003; ISBN 041528743X.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. De Castro, G.M.; López, J.E.N.; Sáez, P.L. Business and Social Reputation: Exploring the Concept and Main Dimensions of Corporate Reputation. J. Bus. Ethics 2006, 63, 361–370. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. De Guimarães, J.C.F.; Severo, E.A.; Felix Júnior, L.A.; da Costa, W.P.L.B.; Salmoria, F.T. Governance and Quality of Life in Smart Cities: Towards Sustainable Development Goals. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 253, 119926. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. De Morais, P.A.B.T. Evaluation of Performance of European Cities with the Aim of Increasing Quality of Life; ProQuest: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Del Sol, D.A. The Institutional, Economic and Social Determinants of Local Government Transparency. J. Econ. Policy Reform 2013, 16, 90–107. [CrossRef]

  61. Delgado García, J.B.; de Quevedo Puente, E. The Complex Link of City Reputation and City Performance. Results for FsQCA Analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 2830–2839. [CrossRef]

  62. Diener, E.D.; Suh, E. Measuring Quality of Life: Economic, Social and Subjective Indicators. Soc. Indic. Res. 1997, 40, 189–216. [CrossRef]

  63. Dollinger, M.J.; Golden, P.A.; Saxton, T. The Effect of Reputation on the Decision to Joint Venture. Strateg. Manag. J. 1997, 18, 127–140. [CrossRef]

  64. Dowling, G.R. Defining and Measuring Corporate Reputations. Eur. Manag. Rev. 2016, 13, 207–223. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Eccles, R.G.; Grant, R.M.; van Riel, C.B.M. Reputation and Transparency: Lessons from a Painful Period in Public Disclosure. Long Range Plan. 2006, 39, 353–359. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Esteves, J. Análisis Del Desarrollo Del Gobierno Electrónico Municipal En España; IE Working Paper; Fundación Instituto de Empresa: Madrid, Spain, 2005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Estevez, E.; Janowski, T. Electronic Governance for Sustainable Development—Conceptual Framework and State of Research. Gov. Inf. Q. 2013, 30, S94–S109. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Estoque, R.C.; Togawa, T.; Ooba, M.; Gomi, K.; Nakamura, S.; Hijioka, Y.; Kameyama, Y. A Review of Quality of Life (QOL) Assessments and Indicators: Towards a “QOL-Climate” Assessment Framework. Ambio 2019, 48, 619–638. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Etzioni, A. Is Transparency the Best Disinfectant? J. Political Philos. 2010, 18, 389–404. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Faria, P.A.M.; Ferreira, F.A.F.; Jalali, M.S.; Bento, P.; António, N.J.S. Combining Cognitive Mapping and MCDA for Improving Quality of Life in Urban Areas. Cities 2018, 78, 116–127. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Feeney, M.K.; Welch, E.W. Electronic Participation Technologies and Perceived Outcomes for Local Government Managers. Public Manag. Rev. 2012, 14, 815–833. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Ferreira, P.; Dionísio, A. City Brand: What Are the Main Conditions for Territorial Performance? Sustainability 2019, 11, 3959. [CrossRef]

  73. Fombrun, C.; van Riel, C. The Reputational Landscape. Corp. Reput. Rev. 1997, 1, 5–13. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Fombrun, C.J. List of Lists: A Compilation of International Corporate Reputation Ratings. Corp. Reput. Rev. 2007, 10, 144–153. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Fombrun, C.J.; van Riel, C.B.M. Fame & Fortune: How Successful Companies Build Winning Reputations; FT Press: New Jersey, NJ, USA, 2004.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Gómez, J.; Vargas, P. Intangible Resources and Technology Adoption in Manufacturing Firms. Res. Policy 2012, 41, 1607–1619. [CrossRef]

  77. Galbreath, J. Which Resources Matter the Most to Firm Success? An Exploratory Study of Resource-Based Theory. Technovation 2005, 25, 979–987. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Ganapati, S.; Reddick, C.G. The Use of ICT for Open Government in U.S. Municipalities: Perceptions of Chief Administrative Officers. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 2014, 37, 365–387. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Garrido-Rodríguez, J.C.; López-Hernández, A.M.; Zafra-Gómez, J.L. The Impact of Explanatory Factors on a Bidimensional Model of Transparency in Spanish Local Government. Gov. Inf. Q. 2019, 36, 154–165. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Goerlich Gisbert, F.J.; Reig Martínez, E.; Albert Pérez, C.; Robledo Domínguez, J.C. Las reas Urbanas Funcionales En España: Economía y Calidad de Vida; Fundación BBVA: Bilbao, Spain, 2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Goerlich, F.J.; Reig, E. Quality of Life Ranking of Spanish Cities: A Non-Compensatory Approach. Cities 2021, 109, 102979. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  82. González, E.; Cárcaba, A.; Ventura, J. The Importance of the Geographic Level of Analysis in the Assessment of the Quality of Life: The Case of Spain. Soc. Indic. Res. 2011, 102, 209–228. [CrossRef]

  83. Grant, R.M. Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organ. Sci. 1996, 7, 375–387. [CrossRef]

  84. Grimmelikhuijsen, S. Linking Transparency, Knowledge and Citizen Trust in Government: An Experiment. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2012, 78, 50–73. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  85. Grimmelikhuijsen, S.G.; Piotrowski, S.J.; van Ryzin, G.G. Latent Transparency and Trust in Government: Unexpected Findings from Two Survey Experiments. Gov. Inf. Q. 2020, 37, 101497. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Grimmelikhuijsen, S.G.; Welch, E.W. Developing and Testing a Theoretical Framework for Computer-Mediated Transparency of Local Governments. Public Adm. Rev. 2012, 72, 562–571. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Grosso, A.L.; van Ryzin, G.G. How Citizens View Government Performance Reporting. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 2011, 35, 235–250. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  88. Guillamón, M.D.; Bastida, F.; Benito, B. The Determinants of Local Government’s Financial Transparency. Local Gov. Stud. 2011, 37, 391–406. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  89. Gul, R. The Relationship between Reputation, Customer Satisfaction, Trust, and Loyalty. J. Public Adm. Gov. 2014, 4, 368–387. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  90. Hair, J.F.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L.; Black, W.C. Análisis Multivariante, 5th ed.; Prentice Hall Iberia: Madrid, Spain, 1999.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  91. Harrison, T.M.; Sayogo, D.S. Transparency, Participation, and Accountability Practices in Open Government: A Comparative Study. Gov. Inf. Q. 2014, 31, 513–525. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  92. Hashimoto, A.; Ishikawa, H. Using DEA to Evaluate the State of Society as Measured by Multiple Social Indicators. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 1993, 27, 257–268. [CrossRef]

  93. Heald, D. Varieties of Transparency. Proc.-Br. Acad. 2006, 25–43. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  94. Heimstädt, M.; Dobusch, L. Transparency and Accountability: Causal, Critical and Constructive Perspectives. Organ. Theory 2020, 1, 263178772096421. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  95. Huang-Horowitz, N.C. Public Relations in the Small Business Environment: Creating Identity and Building Reputation. Public Relat. Rev. 2015, 41, 345–353. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  96. Iannacci, F.; Seepma, A.P.; de Blok, C.; Resca, A. Reappraising Maturity Models in E-Government Research: The Trajectory-Turning Point Theory. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2019, 28, 310–329. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  97. Ingrams, A.; Manoharan, A.; Schmidthuber, L.; Holzer, M. Stages and Determinants of E-Government Development: A TwelveYear Longitudinal Study of Global Cities. Int. Public Manag. J. 2020, 23, 731–769. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  98. Iskender, G.; Ozkan, S. Analysis of Success Factors in E-Government Transformation in Turkey: Are These Factors Really the Causes of Success? Inf. Dev. 2013, 90, 1–10. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2021, 13, 13048 15 of 19
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  99. Islam, R. Do More Transparent Governments Govern Better? Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/ 10986/18169 (accessed on 15 June 2015).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  100. Jaeger, P.T. Deliberative Democracy and the Conceptual Foundations of Electronic Government. Gov. Inf. Q. 2005, 22, 702–719. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  101. Jaeger, P.T.; Bertot, J.C. Transparency and Technological Change: Ensuring Equal and Sustained Public Access to Government Information. Gov. Inf. Q. 2010, 27, 371–376. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2021, 13, 13048 16 of 19
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  102. Johnsen, Å. Impacts of Strategic Planning and Management in Municipal Government: An Analysis of Subjective Survey and Objective Production and Efficiency Measures in Norway. Public Manag. Rev. 2018, 20, 397–420. [CrossRef]

  103. Joshi, P.R.; Islam, S. E-Government Maturity Model for Sustainable E-Government Services from the Perspective of Developing Countries. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1882. [CrossRef]

  104. Jun, K.-N.; Wang, F.; Wang, D. E-Government Use and Perceived Government Transparency and Service Capacity. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 2014, 38, 125–151. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  105. Kaklauskas, A.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Radzeviciene, A.; Ubarte, I.; Podviezko, A.; Podvezko, V.; Kuzminske, A.; Banaitis, A.; Binkyte, A.; Bucinskas, V. Quality of City Life Multiple Criteria Analysis. Cities 2018, 72, 82–93. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  106. Kalimeris, P.; Bithas, K.; Richardson, C.; Nijkamp, P. Hidden Linkages between Resources and Economy: A “Beyond-GDP” Approach Using Alternative Welfare Indicators. Ecol. Econ. 2020, 169, 106508. [CrossRef]

  107. Kaplan, R.M. The Significance of Quality of Life in Health Care. Qual. Life Res. 2003, 12, 3–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  108. Kim, S. Individual-Level Factors and Organizational Performance in Government Organizations. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2005, 15, 245–261. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  109. Kim, S.; Lee, J. Citizen Participation, Process, and Transparency in Local Government: An Exploratory Study. Policy Stud. J. 2019, 47, 1020–1041. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  110. Kotha, S.; Rajgopal, S.; Rindova, V. Reputation Building and Performance: An Empirical Analysis of the Top-50 Pure Internet Firms. Eur. Manag. J. 2001, 19, 571–586. [CrossRef]

  111. Kwon, K.; Rupp, D.E. High-Performer Turnover and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Human Capital Investment and Firm Reputation. J. Organ. Behav. 2013, 34, 129–150. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  112. La Porte, T.M.; Demchak, C.C.; de Jong, M. Democracy and Bureaucracy in the Age of the Web: Empirical Findings and Theoretical Speculations. Adm. Soc. 2002, 34, 411–446. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  113. Lévy, J.-P.; Varela, J. Análisis Multivariable Para Las Ciencias Sociales; Pearson: Madrid, Spain, 2003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  114. Lambiri, D.; Biagi, B.; Royuela, V. Quality of Life in the Economic and Urban Economic Literature. Soc. Indic. Res. 2007, 84, 1. [CrossRef]

  115. Lange, D.; Lee, P.M.; Dai, Y. Organizational Reputation: A Review. J. Manag. 2011, 37, 153–184. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  116. Lee-Geiller, S.; Lee, T. (David) Using Government Websites to Enhance Democratic E-Governance: A Conceptual Model for Evaluation. Gov. Inf. Q. 2019, 36, 208–225. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  117. Lee, C.; Chang, K.; Berry, F.S. Testing the Development and Diffusion of E-Government and E-Democracy: A Global Perspective. Public Adm. Rev. 2011, 71, 444–454. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  118. Lee, J. 10 Year Retrospect on Stage Models of E-Government: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. Gov. Inf. Q. 2010, 27, 220–230. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  119. Lee, T.; Lee, B.K.; Lee-Geiller, S. The effects of information literacy on trust in government websites: Evidence from an online experiment. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 52. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  120. Liu, L. Quality of Life as a Social Representation in China: A Qualitative Study. Soc. Indic. Res. 2006, 75, 217–240. [CrossRef]

  121. Luoma-aho, V. Neutral Reputation and Public Sector Organizations. Corp. Reput. Rev. 2006, 10, 124–143. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  122. Makadok, R. Doing the Right Thing and Knowing the Right Thing to Do: Why the Whole Is Greater than the Sum of the Parts. Strateg. Manag. J. 2003, 24, 1043–1055. [CrossRef]

  123. Makarius, E.E.; Stevens, C.E. Drivers of Collective Human Capital Flow: The Impact of Reputation and Labor Market Conditions. J. Manag. 2019, 45, 1145–1172. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  124. Manoharan, A.P.; Ingrams, A.; Kang, D.; Zhao, H. Globalization and Worldwide Best Practices in E-Government. Int. J. Public Adm. 2021, 44, 465–476. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  125. Marans, R.W. Quality of Urban Life Studies: An Overview and Implications for Environment-Behaviour Research. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 35, 9–22. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  126. Marshall, E.; Shortle, J. Using DEA and VEA to Evaluate Quality of Life in the Mid-Atlantic States. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 2005, 34, 185–203. [CrossRef]

  127. Massam, B.H. Quality of Life: Public Planning and Private Living. Prog. Plan. 2002, 58, 141–227. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  128. Mazzola, P.; Ravasi, D.; Gabbioneta, C. How to Build Reputation in Financial Markets. Long Range Plan. 2006, 39, 385–407. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  129. Meijer, A. Understanding Modern Transparency. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2009, 75, 255–269. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  130. Meijer, A.; ’t Hart, P.; Worthy, B. Assessing Government Transparency: An Interpretive Framework. Adm. Soc. 2018, 50, 501–526. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  131. Meijer, A.; Bekkers, V. A Metatheory of E-Government: Creating Some Order in a Fragmented Research Field. Gov. Inf. Q. 2015, 32, 237–245. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  132. Meijer, A.J. Introduction to the Special Issue on Government Transparency. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2012, 78, 3–9. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  133. Meijer, A.J.; Curtin, D.; Hillebrandt, M. Open Government: Connecting Vision and Voice. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2012, 78, 10–29. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  134. Mittal, S.; Chadchan, J.; Mishra, S.K. Review of Concepts, Tools and Indices for the Assessment of Urban Quality of Life. Soc. Indic. Res. 2020, 149, 187–214. [CrossRef]

  135. Money, K.; Saraeva, A.; Garnelo-Gomez, I.; Pain, S.; Hillenbrand, C. Corporate Reputation Past and Future: A Review and Integration of Existing Literature and a Framework for Future Research. Corp. Reput. Rev. 2017, 20, 193–211. [CrossRef]

  136. Monitor Empresarial Reputación Corporativa Merco Ciudad Reputada 2008. Available online: http://villafane.com/files/ Reputacion_ciudad_100709.pdf (accessed on 15 June 2015).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  137. Moon, M.J. Can IT Help Government to Restore Public Trust? Declining Public Trust and Potential Prospects of IT in the Public Sector. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2003, Big Island, HI, USA, 6–9 January 2003. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  138. Moon, M.J. The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? Public Adm. Rev. 2002, 62, 424–433. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  139. Morais, P.; Camanho, A.S. Evaluation of Performance of European Cities with the Aim to Promote Quality of Life Improvements. Omega 2011, 39, 398–409. [CrossRef]

  140. Morais, P.; Miguéis, V.L.; Camanho, A.S. Quality of Life Experienced by Human Capital: An Assessment of European Cities. Soc. Indic. Res. 2013, 110, 187–206. [CrossRef]

  141. Murias, P.; Martinez, F.; de Miguel, C. An Economic Wellbeing Index for the Spanish Provinces: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. Soc. Indic. Res. 2006, 77, 395–417. [CrossRef]

  142. Nason, R.S.; Wiklund, J. An Assessment of Resource-Based Theorizing on Firm Growth and Suggestions for the Future. J. Manag. 2018, 44, 32–60. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  143. Navarro-Azorín, J.M.; Artal-Tur, A. Foot Voting in Spain: What Do Internal Migrations Say About Quality of Life in the Spanish Municipalities? Soc. Indic. Res. 2015, 124, 501–515. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  144. Nielsen, M.M. E-Governance and Stage Models: Analysis of Identified Models and Selected Eurasian Experiences in Digitising Citizen Service Delivery. Electron. Gov. Int. J. 2016, 12, 107–141. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  145. Nissi, E.; Sarra, A. A Measure of Well-Being across the Italian Urban Areas: An Integrated DEA-Entropy Approach. Soc. Indic. Res. 2018, 136, 1183–1209. [CrossRef]

  146. Norris, P. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  147. Oliveira, G.H.; Welch, E.W. Social Media Use in Local Government: Linkage of Technology, Task, and Organizational Context. Gov. Inf. Q. 2013, 30, 397–405. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  148. Park, H.; Blenkinsopp, J. The Roles of Transparency and Trust in the Relationship between Corruption and Citizen Satisfaction. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2011, 77, 254–274. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  149. Pasquier, M.; Villeneuve, J.P. Organizational Barriers to Transparency: A Typology and Analysis of Organizational Behaviour Tending to Prevent or Restrict Access to Information. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2007, 73, 147–162. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  150. Pee, L.G.; Kankanhalli, A. Interactions among Factors Influencing Knowledge Management in Public-Sector Organizations: A Resource-Based View. Gov. Inf. Q. 2016, 33, 188–199. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  151. Perez-Arellano, L.A.; Blanco-Mesa, F.; Leon-Castro, E.; Alfaro-Garcia, V. Bonferroni prioritized aggregation operators applied to government transparency. Mathematics 2021, 9, 24. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  152. Pernagallo, G.; Torrisi, B. A logit model to assess the transparency of Italian public administration websites. Gov. Inf. Q. 2020, 37,
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  153. Peteraf, M.A. The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View. Strateg. Manag. J. 1993, 14, 179–191. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  154. Pham, H.S.T.; Tran, H.T. CSR Disclosure and Firm Performance: The Mediating Role of Corporate Reputation and Moderating Role of CEO Integrity. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 120, 127–136. [CrossRef]

  155. Piña, G.; Avellaneda, C. Central Government Strategies to Promote Local Governments’ Transparency: Guidance or Enforcement? Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 2019, 42, 357–382. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  156. Picci, L. Reputation-Based Governance. Public Adm. 2010, 91, 232–250.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  157. Piening, E.P. Dynamic Capabilities in Public Organizations. A Literature Review and Research Agenda. Public Manag. Rev. 2013, 15, 209–245. [CrossRef]

  158. Piotrowski, S.J. Governmental Transparency in the Path of Administrative Reform; Piotrowski, S.J., Ed.; State University of New York Press: Albany, NY, USA, 2007; ISBN 0791470865.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  159. Podnar, K.; Tuškej, U.; Golob, U. Mapping Semantic Meaning of Corporate Reputation in Global Economic Crisis Context: A Slovenian Study. Public Relat. Rev. 2012, 38, 906–915. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  160. Porumbescu, G. Linking Transparency to Trust in Government and Voice. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 2017, 47, 520–537. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  161. Puron-Cid, G.; Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P. The Effects of Contextual Factors into Different Features of Financial Transparency at the Municipal Level. Gov. Inf. Q. 2018, 35, 135–150. [CrossRef] Sustainability 2021, 13, 13048 14 of 19
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  162. Reddick, C.G.; Roy, J. Business Perceptions and Satisfaction with E-Government: Findings from a Canadian Survey. Gov. Inf. Q. 2013, 30, 1–9. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  163. Reffat, R. Developing a Successful E-Government. Proceedings of the Symposium on E-government: Opportunities and Challenge. Available online: https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkozje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1462856 (accessed on 15 June 2015).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  164. Relly, J.E.; Sabharwal, M. Perceptions of Transparency of Government Policymaking: A Cross-National Study. Gov. Inf. Q. 2009, 26, 148–157. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  165. Rindova, V.P.; Fombrun, C.J. Constructing Competitive Advantage: The Role of Firm–Constituent Interactions. Strateg. Manag. J. 1999, 710, 691–710. [CrossRef]

  166. Rindova, V.P.; Williamson, I.O.; Petkova, A.P. Reputation as an Intangible Asset: Reflections on Theory and Methods in Two Empirical Studies of Business School Reputations. J. Manag. 2010, 36, 610–619. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  167. Rindova, V.P.; Williamson, I.O.; Petkova, A.P.; Sever, J.M. Being Good or Being Known: An Empirical Examination of the Dimensions, Antecedents, and Consequences of Organizational Reputation. Acad. Manag. J. 2005, 48, 1033–1049. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  168. Roberts, P.W.; Dowling, G.R. Corporate Reputation and Sustained Superior Financial Performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 2002, 23, 1077–1093. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  169. Rodriguez-Hevía, L.F.; Navío-Marco, J.; Ruiz-Gómez, L.M. Citizens’ Involvement in e-Government in the European Union: The Rising Importance of the Digital Skills. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6807. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  170. Sá, F.; Rocha, .; Pérez Cota, M. From the Quality of Traditional Services to the Quality of Local E-Government Online Services: A Literature Review. Gov. Inf. Q. 2016, 33, 149–160. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  171. Scholl, H.J. Is e-government research a flash in the pan or here for the long shot? In Electronic Government; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 13–24.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  172. Shim, D.C.; Eom, T.H. E-Government and Anti-Corruption: Empirical Analysis of International Data. Int. J. Public Adm. 2008, 31, 298–316. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  173. Snead, J.T.; Wright, E. E-Government Research in the United States. Gov. Inf. Q. 2014, 31, 129–136. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  174. Stiglitz, J.E.; Sen, A.; Fitoussi, J.-P. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Available online: https://www.economie.gouv.fr/files/finances/presse/dossiers_de_presse/090914mesure_perf_eco_progres_ social/synthese_ang.pdf (accessed on 15 June 2015).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  175. Szymaniec-Mlicka, K. Resource-Based View in Strategic Management of Public Organizations—A Review of the Literature. Management 2015, 18, 19–30. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  176. Tejedo-Romero, F.; de Araujo, J.F.F.E. Determinants of Local Governments’ Transparency in Times of Crisis: Evidence from Municipality-Level Panel Data. Adm. Soc. 2018, 50, 527–554. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  177. Teo, T.S.H.; Srivastava, S.C.; Jiang, L. Trust and Electronic Government Success: An Empirical Study. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2009, 25, 99–132. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  178. Termeer, C.J.A.M.; Dewulf, A.; Breeman, G.; Stiller, S.J. Governance Capabilities for Dealing Wisely With Wicked Problems. Adm. Soc. 2015, 47, 680–710. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  179. Tolbert, C.J.; Mossberger, K. The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government. Public Adm. Rev. 2006, 66, 354–369. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  180. Torres, L.; Pina, V.; Acerete, B. E-Government Developments on Delivering Public Services among EU Cities. Gov. Inf. Q. 2005, 22, 217–238. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  181. Transparency International Spain Transparency Indexes of Municipalities Year 2008. Available online: http://transparencia.org. es/en/ita-2008/ (accessed on 15 June 2015).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  182. Twizeyimana, J.D.; Andersson, A. The Public Value of E-Government—A Literature Review. Gov. Inf. Q. 2019, 36, 167–178. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  183. Uysal, M.; Sirgy, M.J. Quality-of-Life Indicators as Performance Measures. Ann. Tour. Res. 2019, 76, 291–300. [CrossRef]

  184. Veh, A.; Göbel, M.; Vogel, R. Corporate Reputation in Management Research: A Review of the Literature and Assessment of the Concept. Bus. Res. 2019, 12, 315–353. [CrossRef]

  185. Verdugo, M.A.; Navas, P.; Gómez, L.E.; Schalock, R.L. The Concept of Quality of Life and Its Role in Enhancing Human Rights in the Field of Intellectual Disability. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 2012, 56, 1036–1045. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Sustainability 2021, 13, 13048 18 of 19
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  186. Wæraas, A.; Byrkjeflot, H. Public Sector Organizations and Reputation Management: Five Problems. Int. Public Manag. J. 2012, 15, 186–206. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  187. Walker, K. A Systematic Review of the Corporate Reputation Literature: Definition, Measurement, and Theory. Corp. Reput. Rev. 2010, 12, 357–387. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  188. Walker, R.M.; Andrews, R. Local Government Management and Performance: A Review of Evidence. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2015, 25, 101–133. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  189. Walsh, G.; Beatty, S.E. Customer-Based Corporate Reputation of a Service Firm: Scale Development and Validation. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2007, 35, 127–143. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  190. Walsh, G.; Mitchell, V.W.; Jackson, P.R.; Beatty, S.E. Examining the Antecedents and Consequences of Corporate Reputation: A Customer Perspective. Br. J. Manag. 2009, 20, 187–203. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  191. W˛ eziak-Białowolska, D. Quality of Life in Cities—Empirical Evidence in Comparative European Perspective. Cities 2016, 58, 87–96. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  192. Weiss, J. Managing Performance and Strategy: Managerial Practices in German Local Governments. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 2020, 43, 1129–1149. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  193. Weiss, J. Trust as a Key for Strategic Management? The Relevance of Council–Administration Relations for NPM-Related Reforms in German Local Governments. Public Manag. Rev. 2017, 19, 1399–1414. [CrossRef]

  194. Welch, E.W. The Relationship between Transparent and Participative Government: A Study of Local Governments in the United States. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2012, 78, 93–115. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  195. Welch, E.W.; Hinnant, C.C. Internet Use, Transparency, and Interactivity Effects on Trust in Government. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003, Big Island, HI, USA, 6–9 January 2003. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  196. Welch, E.W.; Hinnant, C.C.; Moon, M.J. Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2005, 15, 371–391. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  197. Wernerfelt, B. A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 1984, 5, 171–180. [CrossRef]

  198. Wirtz, B.W.; Daiser, P. A Meta-Analysis of Empirical e-Government Research and Its Future Research Implications. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2018, 84, 144–163. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  199. Yang, K.; Rho, S.-Y. E-Government for Better Performance: Promises, Realities, and Challenges. Int. J. Public Adm. 2007, 30, 1197–1217. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  200. Yavuz, N.; Welch, E.W. Factors Affecting Openness of Local Government Websites: Examining the Differences across Planning, Finance and Police Departments. Gov. Inf. Q. 2014, 31, 574–583. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  201. Yildiz, M. E-Government Research: Reviewing the Literature, Limitations, and Ways Forward. Gov. Inf. Q. 2007, 24, 646–665. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  202. Zhang, H.; Xu, X.; Xiao, J. Diffusion of E-Government: A Literature Review and Directions for Future Directions. Gov. Inf. Q. 2014, 31, 631–636. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  203. Zhao, Y.; Fan, B. Exploring Open Government Data Capacity of Government Agency: Based on the Resource-Based Theory. Gov. Inf. Q. 2018, 35, 1–12. [CrossRef]
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  204. Zhu, J. Multidimensional Quality-of-Life Measure with an Application to Fortune’s Best Cities. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 2001, 35, 263–284. [CrossRef]

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Third-party environmental information disclosure and firms carbon emissions. (2024). Du, Lei ; Zhao, LI ; Wu, Yanping ; Ren, Shenggang.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:131:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324000586.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. How authenticity of corporate social responsibility affects organizational attractiveness: Stakeholder perceptions of organizational ideology. (2023). Arasbeger, Gizem ; Can, Ozge ; Turker, Duygu.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:30:y:2023:i:4:p:1680-1697.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Linking Customer Justice Perception, Customer Support Perception, and Customer Citizenship Behavior to Corporate Reputation: Evidence from the Airline Industry. (2023). Cintamur, Smail Gokhan.
    In: Corporate Reputation Review.
    RePEc:pal:crepre:v:26:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1057_s41299-022-00141-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Measuring customer aggression: Scale development and validation. (2023). Osorio, Mara Lucila ; Wang, Shasha ; Mortimer, Gary.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:73:y:2023:i:c:s0969698923000954.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Media coverage, Environment Protection Law and environmental research and development: evidence from the Chinese-listed firms. (2022). Song, Xiaobao ; Guo, Chun ; Su, Wunhong.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01735-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. How Corporate Reputation Disclosures Affect Stakeholders’ Behavioral Intentions: Mediating Mechanisms of Perceived Organizational Performance and Corporate Reputation. (2022). Fischer, Thomas M ; Ernst, Carolin A ; Baumgartner, Kim T.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:175:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-020-04642-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Cognitive computing based ethical principles for improving organisational reputation: A B2B digital marketing perspective. (2022). Kizgin, Hatice ; Rana, Nripendra P ; Bala, Pradip Kumar ; Behera, Rajat Kumar.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:141:y:2022:i:c:p:685-701.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Modelling the impact of corporate reputation on customers behaviour. (2021). Balan, Dragos Alexandru ; Burleaschiopoiu, Adriana.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:3:p:1142-1156.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Customer-based brand equity and customer engagement in experiential services: insights from an emerging economy. (2021). Olavarria, Ana ; Huerta-Alvarez, Rocio ; Fuentes-Blasco, Maria ; Cambra-Fierro, Jesus J.
    In: Service Business.
    RePEc:spr:svcbiz:v:15:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11628-021-00448-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Assessing the Influence of Strategic Resources on the Quality of Life in Spanish Cities. (2021). Vazquez-Sanmartin, Antonio ; Lopez-Lopez, Vicente ; Iglesias-Antelo, Susana.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13048-:d:687593.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The corporate reputation and consumer-company identification link as a sensemaking process: A cross-level interaction analysis. (2021). Giebelhausen, Michael ; Donavan, Todd D ; Wolter, Jeremy S.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:132:y:2021:i:c:p:289-300.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Impact of customers’ perceptions regarding corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility in the grocery retailing industry: The role of corporate reputation. (2021). Demoulin, Nathalie ; Swaen, Valerie ; Pauwels-Delassus, Veronique.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:131:y:2021:i:c:p:709-721.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Is Corporate Tax Aggressiveness a Reputation Threat? Corporate Accountability, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Tax Behavior. (2020). Roberts, Robin W ; Johnson, Joseph A ; Baudot, Lisa.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:163:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-019-04227-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Impact of customers’ perceptions regarding corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility in the grocery retailing industry: The role of corporate reputation. (2020). Demoulin, Nathalie ; Swaen, Valerie ; Pauwels-Delassus, Veronique.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03132935.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The Antecedents of Corporate Reputation and Image and Their Impacts on Employee Commitment and Performance: The Moderating Role of CSR. (2019). Matos, Arnaldo Fernandes ; da Graa, Maria.
    In: Corporate Reputation Review.
    RePEc:pal:crepre:v:22:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1057_s41299-018-0053-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Loyalty: The Mediating Effect of Reputation in Cooperative Banks Versus Commercial Banks in the Basque Country. (2019). Pescador, Irune Gomez ; Aramburu, Izaskun Agirre.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:154:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10551-017-3438-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Institutional pressures for corporate social responsibility implementation: a study of Indian executives. (2019). Aggrawal, Vijita Singh ; Jha, Aruna.
    In: Social Responsibility Journal.
    RePEc:eme:srjpps:srj-11-2018-0311.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. How Corporate Social Responsibility Helps MNEs to Improve their Reputation. The Moderating Effects of Geographical Diversification and Operating in Developing Regions. (2018). Caracuel, Javier Aguilera ; Guerrerovillegas, Jaime ; Aguileracaracuel, Javier.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:25:y:2018:i:4:p:355-372.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Building corporate reputation through consumer responses to green new products. (2018). Wilson, Theresa ; Pritchard, Mark.
    In: Journal of Brand Management.
    RePEc:pal:jobman:v:25:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1057_s41262-017-0071-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. I Love That Company: Look How Ethical, Prominent, and Efficacious It Is—A Triadic Organizational Reputation (TOR) Scale. (2018). Osiyevskyy, Oleksiy ; Stackhouse, Madelynn ; Agarwal, James.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:153:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10551-016-3421-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The Quest for the Corporate Reputation Definition: Lessons from the Interconnection Model of Identity, Image, and Reputation. (2017). Golob, Ura ; Podnar, Klement.
    In: Corporate Reputation Review.
    RePEc:pal:crepre:v:20:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1057_s41299-017-0027-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-23 04:51:52 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy