create a website

The Heterogeneous Price of a Vote: Evidence from Multiparty Systems, 1993-2017. (2022). Cagé, Julia ; Dewitte, Edgard ; Cage, Julia ; Bekkouche, Yasmine.
In: Post-Print.
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03389172.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 13

Citations received by this document

Cites: 104

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Buying winners. (2024). Louis-Sidois, Charles.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:143:y:2024:i:c:p:1-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Minimum Wages and Voting: Assessing the Political Returns to Redistribution outside the Tax System. (2023). Huet-Vaughn, Emiliano.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp16416.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Another Wind of Change? Evidence about Political Outsiders in the French Parliament. (2023). EL RAFHI, Bilal ; Volle, Alexandre ; Cazals, Antoine.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04095614.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The petit effect of campaign spending on votes: using political financing reforms to measure spending impacts in multiparty elections. (2022). François, Abel ; Visser, Michael ; Franois, Abel ; Wilner, Lionel.
    In: Public Choice.
    RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:192:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-022-00970-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Hosting Media Bias: Evidence from the Universe of French Broadcasts, 2002-2020. (2022). Urvoy, Camille ; Herve, Nicolas ; Hengel, Moritz ; Cage, Julia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03878119.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. When Does Money Matter for Elections?. (2022). Dewitte, Edgard ; Cage, Julia.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03619549.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Technological change, campaign spending and polarization. (2022). Troumpounis, Orestis ; Casas, Agustin ; Balart, Pau.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:211:y:2022:i:c:s0047272722000688.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Is Charitable Giving Political? Evidence from Wealth and Income Tax Returns. (2021). Cagé, Julia ; Guillot, Malka ; Cage, Julia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03877993.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 74(1):235–267.

  2. Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. W. (2011). Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 29(1):1–11.

  3. Abramowitz, A. I. (1988). Explaining senate election outcomes. American Political Science Review, 82(2):385–403.

  4. Acharya, A., Grillo, E., Sugaya, T., and Turkel, E. (2019). Dynamic Campaign Spending. techreport.

  5. Adams, J. (2012). Causes and Electoral Consequences of Party Policy Shifts in Multiparty Elections: Theoretical Results and Empirical Evidence. Annual Review of Political Science, 15(1):401–419.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Adams, J. and Somer-Topcu, Z. (2009). Moderate Now, Win Votes Later: The Electoral Consequences of Parties’ Policy Shifts in 25 Postwar Democracies. The Journal of Politics, 71(2):678–692.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Adams, J. F., Merrill III, S., and Grofman, B. (2005). A Unified Theory of Party Competition: A Cross-National Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors. Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Adams, J., Merrill, S., Simas, E. N., and Stone, W. J. (2011). When Candidates Value Good Character: A Spatial Model with Applications to Congressional Elections. The Journal of Politics, 73(1):17–30.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  9. Altonji, J. G., Elder, T. E., and Taber, C. R. (2005). Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools. Journal of Political Economy, 113(1):151–184.

  10. Alvarez, R. M. and Nagler, J. (1998). When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections. American Journal of Political Science, 42(1):55–96.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. Ansolabehere, S. and Snyder, J. M. (2000). Valence Politics and Equilibrium in Spatial Election Models. Public Choice, 103(3/4):327–336.

  12. Ansolabehere, S., de Figueiredo, J. M., and Snyder, J. M. J. (2003). Why is There so Little Money in U.S. Politics? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1):105–130.

  13. Aragones, E. and Palfrey, T. R. (2002). Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model with a Favored Candidate. Journal of Economic Theory, 103(1):131–161.

  14. Avis, E., Ferraz, C., Finan, F., and Varjão, C. (2017). Money and Politics: The Effects of Campaign Spending Limits on Political Competition and Incumbency Advantage. Working Paper 23508, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  15. Baron, D. P. (1994). Electoral Competition with Informed and Uniformed Voters. The American Political Science Review, 88(1):33–47.

  16. Ben-Bassat, A., Dahan, M., and Klor, E. F. (2015). Does Campaign Spending Affect Electoral Outcomes? Electoral Studies, 40(1):102–114.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  17. Benoit, K. and Marsh, M. (2008). The Campaign Value of Incumbency: A New Solution to the Puzzle of Less Effective Incumbent Spending. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4):874–890.

  18. Berry, S., Levinsohn, J., and Pakes, A. (1995). Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium. Economet34 rica, 63(4):841–890.

  19. Bouton, L., Castanheira, M., and Drazen, A. (2018). A Theory of Small Campaign Contributions. NBER Working Papers 24413, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  20. Bursztyn, L., Egorov, G., and Fiorin, S. (2020). From Extreme to Mainstream: The Erosion of Social Norms. American Economic Review, 110(11):3522–3548.

  21. Cagé, J. (2018). Le prix de la démocratie. Fayard (English version: The Price of Democracy, Harvard University Press, 2020).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  22. Cagé, J. (2020). Media Competition, Information Provision and Political Participation: Evidence from French Local Newspapers and Elections, 1944-2014. Journal of Public Economics, 185.

  23. Cagé, J. and Dewitte, E. (2018). It Takes Money to Make MPs : New Evidence from 150 Years of British Campaign Spending. techreport.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Cagé, J. and Dewitte, E. (2020). The Rising Demand for Representation: Evidence from a 100 of British Political Selection. Working paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Carvalho, B. (2020). Campaign Spending on Local Elections: the More the Merrier? Working paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Coate, S. (2004a). Pareto-Improving Campaign Finance Policy. The American Economic Review, 94(3):628–655.

  27. Coate, S. (2004b). Political Competition with Campaign Contributions and Informative Advertising. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(5):772–804.

  28. Cox, G. (1997). Making Votes Count. Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  29. Da Silveira, B. S. and De Mello, J. M. P. (2011). Campaign Advertising and Election Outcomes: Quasinatural Experiment Evidence from Gubernatorial Elections in Brazil. The Review of Economic Studies, 78(2):590–612.

  30. Dal Bo, E., Finan, F., Folke, O., Persson, T., and Rickne, J. (2019). Economic And Social Outsiders But Political Insiders: Sweden’s Radical Right. Technical report.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  31. de Figueiredo, J. M., Ji, C. H., and Kousser, T. (2011). Financing Direct Democracy: Revisiting the Research on Campaign Spending and Citizen Initiatives. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 27(3):485–514.

  32. Dharmapala, D. and Palda, F. (2002). Are Campaign Contributions a Form of Speech? Evidence from Recent US House Elections. Public Choice, 112(1/2):81–114.

  33. Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper.

  34. Duffy, J. and Tavits, M. (2008). Beliefs and Voting Decisions: A Test of the Pivotal Voter Model. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3):603–618.

  35. Duverger, M. (1954). Political Parties. John Wiley & Sons.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Enos, R. D., Fowler, A., and Vavreck, L. (2014). Increasing Inequality: The Effect of GOTV Mobilization on the Composition of the Electorate. The Journal of Politics, 76(1):273–288.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  37. Epstein, D. and Zemsky, P. (1995). Money Talks: Deterring Quality Challengers in Congressional Elections. The American Political Science Review, 89(2):295–308.

  38. Erikson, R. S. and Palfrey, T. R. (1998). Campaign Spending and Incumbency: An Alternative Simultaneous Equations Approach. The Journal of Politics, 60(2):355–373.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  39. Feigenbaum, J. J. and Shelton, C. A. (2013). The Vicious Cycle: Fundraising and Perceived Viability in US Presidential Primaries. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 8(1):1–40.

  40. Fleitas, D. W. (1971). Bandwagon and Underdog Effects in Minimal-Information Elections. American Political Science Review, 65(2):434–438.

  41. Foucault, M. and François, A. (2005). Le rendement des dépenses électorales en France. Le cas des élections législatives de 1997. Revue économique, 56(5):1125–1143.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  42. François, A., Visser, M., and Wilner, L. (2016). Using Political Financing Reforms to Measure Campaign Spending Effects on Electoral Outcomes. CESifo Working Paper 6232.

  43. Gandhi, A., Iorio, D., and Urban, C. (2015). Negative Advertising and Political Competition. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 32(3):433–477.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Gartner, M. (1976). Endogenous Bandwagon and Underdog Effects in a Rational Choice Model. Public Choice, 25:83–89.

  45. Gerber, A. (1998). Estimating the Effect of Campaign Spending on Senate Election Outcomes Using Instrumental Variables. The American Political Science Review, 92(2):401–411.

  46. Gerber, A. S. (2004). Does Campaign Spending Work? American Behavioral Scientist, 47(5):541–574.

  47. Gerber, A. S. and Green, D. P. (2000). The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. The American Political Science Review, 94(3):pp. 653–663.

  48. Gerber, A., Hoffman, M., Morgan, J., and Raymond, C. (2020). One in a Million: Field Experiments on Perceived Closeness of the Election and Voter Turnout. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 12(3):287–325.

  49. Green, D. P. and Krasno, J. S. (1988). Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections. American Journal of Political Science, 32(4):884–907.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  50. Großer, J. and Schram, A. (2010). Public Opinion Polls, Voter Turnout, and Welfare: An Experimental Study. American Journal of Political Science, 54(3):700–717.

  51. Groseclose, T. (2001). A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4):862–886.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  52. Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1996). Electoral Competition and Special Interest Politics. The Review of Economic Studies, 63(2):265–286.

  53. Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (2001). Special Interest Politics. MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Gunlicks, A. B. (1993). Campaign and Party Finance in North America and Western Europe. Westview Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  55. Guriev, S. and Papaioannou, E. (2020). The Political Economy of Populism. Technical report.

  56. Harteveld, E., Dahlberg, S., Kokkonen, A., and Van Der Brug, W. (2019a). Gender Differences in Vote Choice: Social Cues and Social Harmony as Heuristics. British Journal of Political Science, 49(3):1141–1161.

  57. Harteveld, E., Dahlberg, S., Kokkonen, A., and van der Brug, W. (2019b). Social Stigma and Support for the Populist Radical Right: An Experimental Study. Scandinavian Political Studies, 42(3-4):296–307.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  58. Helsley, R. W. and O’Sullivan, A. (1994). Altruistic voting and campaign contributions. Journal of Public Economics, 55(1):107–119.

  59. Herrera, H., Levine, D. K., and Martinelli, C. (2008). Policy platforms, campaign spending and voter participation. Journal of Public Economics, 92(3-4):501–513.

  60. Herriot, J. G. and Reinsch, C. H. (1973). Algorithm 472: procedures for natural spline interpolation [E1]. Commun. ACM, 16(12):763–768.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  61. Honaker, J., Katz, J. N., and King, G. (2002). A Fast, Easy, and Efficient Estimator for Multiparty Electoral Data. Political Analysis, 10(1):84–100.

  62. Jacobson, G. C. (1978). The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections. The American Political Science Review, 72(2):469–491.

  63. Jacobson, G. C. (1980). Money in Congressional Elections. Yale University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  64. Jacobson, G. C. (1985). Money and Votes Reconsidered: Congressional Elections, 1972-1982. Public Choice, 47(1):7–62.

  65. Jacobson, G. C. (1990). The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments. American Journal of Political Science, 34(2):334–362.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Jacobson, G. C. (2006). Campaign spending effects in U.S. Senate elections: Evidence from the National Annenberg Election Survey. Electoral Studies, 25(2):195–226.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Jacobson, G. C. (2015). How Do Campaigns Matter? Annual Review of Political Science, 18(1):31–47.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Johnston, R. and Pattie, C. (2014). Money and Electoral Politics. Local Parties and Funding in General Elections. Policy Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  69. Kalla, J. L. and Broockman, D. E. (2018). The Minimal Persuasive Effects of Campaign Contact in General Elections: Evidence from 49 Field Experiments. American Political Science Review, 112(1):148–166.

  70. Katz, J. N. and King, G. (1999). A Statistical Model for Multiparty Electoral Data. The American Political Science Review, 93(1):15–32.

  71. Kestilä-Kekkonen, E. and Söderlund, P. (2014). Party, leader or candidate? dissecting the right-wing populist vote in Finland. European Political Science Review, 6(4):641–662.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  72. King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A., and Scheve, K. (2001). Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation. The American Political Science Review, 95(1):49–69.

  73. Larcinese, V. and Miner, L. (2018). Was Obama Elected by the Internet? Broadband Diffusion and Voters’ Behavior in US Presidential Elections. Technical report.

  74. Larreguy, H. A., Marshall, J., and Snyder, J. J. M. (2018). Leveling the playing field: How campaign advertising can help non-dominant parties. Journal of the European Economic Association, 16(6):1812–1849.

  75. Le Bras, H. (2015). Le pari du FN. Angles et Reliefs. Autrement.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Le Pennec-Caldichoury, C. (2019). Strategic Campaign Communication: Evidence from 30,000 Candidate Manifestos. Working paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  77. Lenz, G. S. (2009). Learning and Opinion Change, Not Priming: Reconsidering the Priming Hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4):821–837.

  78. Levitt, S. D. (1994). Using Repeat Challengers to Estimate the Effect of Campaign Spending on Election Outcomes in the U.S. House. Journal of Political Economy, 102(4):777–798.

  79. Lohmann, S. (1993). A Signaling Model of Informative and Manipulative Political Action. The American Political Science Review, 87(2):319–333.

  80. Nassmacher, K.-H. (2009). The Funding of Party Competition: Political Finance in 25 Democracies. Nomos.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Nevo, A. (2000). A Practitioner’s Guide to Estimation of Random-Coefficients Logit Models of Demand. Journal of economics & management strategy, 9(4):513–548.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  82. Oster, E. (2013). Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Validation. Mimeo, Chicago Booth School of Business.

  83. Palda, F. and Palda, K. (1998). The Impact of Campaign Expenditures on Political Competition in the French Legislative Elections of 1993. Public Choice, 94(1/2):157–174.

  84. Panagopoulos, C. (2016). All about that base: Changing campaign strategies in U.S. Presidential elections. Party Politics, 22(2):179–190.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  85. Panagopoulos, C. and Green, D. P. (2008). Field Experiments Testing the Impact of Radio on Electoral Advertisements Competition. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1):156–168.

  86. Peterson, D. A. M. (2009). Campaign Learning and Vote Determinants. American Journal of Political Science, 53(2):445–460.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  87. Piketty, T. (2018). Brahmin Left vs Merchant Right: Rising Inequality & the Changing Structure of Political Conflict. Technical report.

  88. Potters, J., Sloof, R., and van Winden, F. (1997). Campaign expenditures, contributions and direct endorsements: The strategic use of information and money to influence voter behavior. European Journal of Political Economy, 13(1):1–31.

  89. Prat, A. (2002a). Campaign Advertising and Voter Welfare. The Review of Economic Studies, 69(4):999–1017.

  90. Prat, A. (2002b). Campaign Spending with Office-Seeking Politicians, Rational Voters, and Multiple Lobbies. Journal of Economic Theory, 103(1):162–189.

  91. Rekkas, M. (2007). The Impact of Campaign Spending on Votes in Multiparty Elections. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3):573–585.

  92. Scarrow, S. (2007). Political Finance in Comparative Perspective. Annual Review of Political Science, 10:193–210.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  93. Schultz, C. (2007). Strategic Campaigns and Redistributive Politics. The Economic Journal, 117(522):936–963.

  94. Simon, H. A. (1954). Bandwagon and Underdog Effects and the Possibility of Election Predictions. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 18(3):245–253.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  95. Snyder, J. M., Prat, A., and Puglisi, R. (2010). Is Private Campaign Finance a Good Thing? Estimates of the Potential Information Benefits. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 5(3):291–318.

  96. Speck, B. (2013). Money in Politics: Sound Political Competition and Trust in Government. Oecd background paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  97. Spenkuch, J. L. and Toniatti, D. (2018). Political Advertising and Election Results. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(4):1981–2036.

  98. Stock, J. H. and Yogo, M. (2005). Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression. In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, pages pp. 80–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  99. Stockemer, D., Lentz, T., and Mayer, D. (2018). Individual Predictors of the Radical Right-Wing Vote in Europe: A Meta-Analysis of Articles in Peer-Reviewed Journals (1995–2016). Government and Opposition, 53(3):569–593.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  100. Stone, W. J. and Simas, E. N. (2010). Candidate Valence and Ideological Positions in U.S. House Elections. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2):371–388.

  101. Tomz, M., Tucker, J. A., and Wittenberg, J. (2002). An Easy and Accurate Regression Model for Multiparty Electoral Data. Political Analysis, 10(1):66–83.

  102. Vanberg, C. (2008). “One Man, One Dollar”? Campaign contribution limits, equal influence, and political communication. Journal of Public Economics, 92(3–4):514–531.

  103. Williams, L. K. and Whitten, G. D. (2015). Don’t Stand So Close to Me: Spatial Contagion Effects and Party Competition. American Journal of Political Science, 59(2):309–325.

  104. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press. 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 1993 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 Share of total votes (1st round) Share of total spending (a) French Legislative Elections 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 1997 2001 2005 2010 2015 2017 Share of total votes Share of total spending (b) UK General Elections
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The Impact of Bailouts on the Probability of Sovereign Debt Crises: Evidence from IMF-Supported Programs. (2019). Sy, Amadou ; BALIMA, HIPPOLYTE.
    In: IMF Working Papers.
    RePEc:imf:imfwpa:2019/002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. A simple way to assess inference methods. (2019). Ferman, Bruno.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1912.08772.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Forced Sales and Farmland Prices. (2014). Odening, Martin ; Hüttel, Silke ; Jetzinger, Simon ; Huttel, Silke.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:90:y:2014:iii:1:p:395-410.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Additionality and the Adoption of Farm Conservation Practices. (2013). Woodward, Richard ; Newburn, David ; Mezzatesta, Mariano .
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:89:y:2013:iv:1:p:722-742.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. An econometric investigation of impacts of sustainable land management practices on soil carbon and yield risk: A potential for climate change mitigation. (2010). Place, Frank ; Nkonya, Ephraim ; Kato, Edward ; Mwanjalolo, Majaliwa .
    In: IFPRI discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1038.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Random Recursive Partitioning: a matching method for the estimation of the average treatment effect. (2009). Porro, Giuseppe ; Iacus, Stefano.
    In: Journal of Applied Econometrics.
    RePEc:jae:japmet:v:24:y:2009:i:1:p:163-185.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Does Leaving Welfare Improve Health? Evidence for Germany. (2009). Wunsch, Conny ; Lechner, Michael ; Huber, Martin.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp4370.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. How Does Retirement Affect Health?. (2009). Behncke, Stefanie.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp4253.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Flexible pay, firm performance and the role of unions. New evidence from Italy. (2009). Origo, Federica.
    In: Labour Economics.
    RePEc:eee:labeco:v:16:y:2009:i:1:p:64-78.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Institutions, health shocks and labour outcomes across Europe. (2008). Garcia-Gomez, Pilar ; Garciagomez, Pilar.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fda:fdaddt:2008-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Long-run Labour Market Effects of Individual Sports Activities. (2008). Lechner, Michael.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:6886.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. A Caseworker Like Me - Does the Similarity between unemployed and Caseworker Increase Job Placements?. (2008). Lechner, Michael ; Frölich, Markus ; Behncke, Stefanie ; Frolich, Markus.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:6784.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Which Program for Whom? Evidence on the Comparative Effectiveness of Public Sponsored Training Programs in Germany. (2007). Osikominu, Aderonke ; Fitzenberger, Bernd ; Biewen, Martin ; Waller, Marie .
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:5868.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Long-run effects of training programs for the unemployed in East Germany. (2007). Fitzenberger, Bernd ; Volter, Robert .
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:5496.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Fungibility and the flypaper effect of project aid : micro-evidence for Vietnam. (2007). van de Walle, Dominique ; Mu, Ren.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:4133.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Public Employment Services and Employers: How Important Are Networks with Firms?. (2007). Lechner, Michael ; Frölich, Markus ; Behncke, Stefanie ; Frolich, Markus.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp3005.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Which Program for Whom? Evidence on the Comparative Effectiveness of Public Sponsored Training Programs in Germany. (2007). Osikominu, Aderonke ; Fitzenberger, Bernd ; Biewen, Martin ; Waller, Marie .
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp2885.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Electoral Accountability and Corruption in Local Governments: Evidence from Audit Reports. (2007). Finan, Frederico ; Ferraz, Claudio.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp2843.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Long-Run Effects of Training Programs for the Unemployed in East Germany. (2007). Fitzenberger, Bernd ; Volter, Robert .
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp2630.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Are training programs more effective when unemployment is high?. (2007). Wunsch, Conny ; Lechner, Michael.
    In: IAB Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:iab:iabdpa:200707.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Do Fiscal Transfers Alleviate Business Tax Competition? Evidence from Germany. (2007). Smart, Michael ; Koethenbuerger, Marko ; Egger, Peter.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_1955.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Get Training or Wait? Long-Run Employment Effects of Training Programs for the Unemployed in West Germany. (2006). Osikominu, Aderonke ; Fitzenberger, Bernd ; Volter, Robert .
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:4623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. How important is selection ? Experimental versus non-experimental measures of the income gains from migration. (2006). Stillman, Steven ; McKenzie, David ; Gibson, John.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:3906.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. How Important is Selection? Experimental vs Non-experimental Measures of Income Gains from Migration. (2006). Stillman, Steven ; McKenzie, David ; Gibson, John.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:wai:econwp:06/03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Using State Administrative Data to Measure Program Performance. (2006). Troske, Kenneth ; Mueser, Peter ; Gorislavsky, Alexey.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:umc:wpaper:0702.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The Effects of Welfare-to-Work Program Activities on Labor Market Outcomes. (2006). Troske, Kenneth ; Mueser, Peter ; Heinrich, Carolyn ; Dyke, Andrew.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:umc:wpaper:0602.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Do People Vote with Their Feet? An Empirical Test of Environmental Gentrification. (2006). Walsh, Randall ; Banzhaf, Spencer.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-06-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Evaluating the Differential Effects of Alternative Welfare-to-Work Training Components: A Re-Analysis of the California GAIN Program. (2006). Imbens, Guido ; Hotz, V. Joseph ; Klerman, Jacob A..
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11939.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Moving the Goalposts: Addressing Limited Overlap in the Estimation of Average Treatment Effects by Changing the Estimand. (2006). Mitnik, Oscar ; Imbens, Guido ; Hotz, V. Joseph ; Crump, Richard.
    In: NBER Technical Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberte:0330.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. On the Failure of the Bootstrap for Matching Estimators. (2006). Imbens, Guido ; Abadie, Alberto.
    In: NBER Technical Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberte:0325.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Active Labour Market Policy in East Germany: Waiting for the Economy to Take Off. (2006). Wunsch, Conny ; Lechner, Michael.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp2363.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Are Training Programs More Effective When Unemployment Is High?. (2006). Wunsch, Conny ; Lechner, Michael.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp2355.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Moving the Goalposts: Addressing Limited Overlap in Estimation of Average Treatment Effects by Changing the Estimand. (2006). Mitnik, Oscar ; Imbens, Guido ; Hotz, V. Joseph ; Crump, Richard.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp2347.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. From Temporary Help Jobs to Permanent Employment: What Can We Learn from Matching Estimators and their Sensitivity?. (2006). Nannicini, Tommaso ; Mealli, Fabrizia ; Ichino, Andrea.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp2149.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Get Training or Wait? Long-Run Employment Effects of Training Programs for the Unemployed in West Germany. (2006). Osikominu, Aderonke ; Fitzenberger, Bernd ; Volter, Robert .
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp2121.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. How Important Is Selection? Experimental vs. Non-Experimental Measures of the Income Gains from Migration. (2006). Stillman, Steven ; McKenzie, David ; Gibson, John.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp2087.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Active labour market policy in East Germany : waiting for the economy to take off. (2006). Wunsch, Conny ; Lechner, Michael.
    In: IAB Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:iab:iabdpa:200620.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Get training or wait? : long-run employment effects of training programs for the unemployed in West Germany. (2006). Osikominu, Aderonke ; Fitzenberger, Bernd ; Volter, Robert .
    In: IAB Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:iab:iabdpa:200617.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. The Consequences of Child Soldiering. (2006). Blattman, Christopher.
    In: HiCN Working Papers.
    RePEc:hic:wpaper:22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Moral Hazard and the Demand for Health Services: A Matching Estimator Approach. (2006). Sanz-de-Galdeano, Anna ; Machado, Matilde ; Barros, Pedro ; de Galdeano, Anna Sanz.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:5488.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Long-Run Effects of Public Sector Sponsored Training in West Germany. (2005). Wunsch, Conny ; Lechner, Michael ; Miquel, Ruth .
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:2893.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Nonparametric Bounds on the Effect of Deductibles in Health Care Insurance on Doctor Visits – Swiss Evidence. (2005). Gerfin, Michael ; Schellhorn, Martin.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp1616.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Long-run effects of public sector sponsored training in West Germany. (2005). Wunsch, Conny ; Lechner, Michael ; Miquel, Ruth .
    In: IAB Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:iab:iabdpa:200503.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Moral hazard and the demand for health services: a matching estimator approach. (2005). Sanz-de-Galdeano, Anna ; Machado, Matilde ; Barros, Pedro ; de Galdeano, Anna Sanz.
    In: UC3M Working papers. Economics.
    RePEc:cte:werepe:we055928.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Long run Effects of Public Sector Sponsored Training in West Germany. (2005). Wunsch, Conny ; Lechner, Michael ; Miquel, Ruth .
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:4851.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Comparing Open and Sealed Bid Auctions: Theory and Evidence from Timber Auctions. (2005). Levin, Jonathan ; Athey, Susan.
    In: Theory workshop papers.
    RePEc:cla:uclatw:658612000000000098.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Average treatment effect estimation via random recursive partitioning. (2004). Porro, Giuseppe .
    In: Departmental Working Papers.
    RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2004-28.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Long-Run Effects of Public Sector Sponsored Training in West Germany. (2004). Wunsch, Conny ; Lechner, Michael ; Miquel, Ruth .
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp1443.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Comparing Open and Sealed Bid Auctions: Theory and Evidence from Timber Auctions. (2004). Seira, Enrique ; Levin, Jonathan ; Athey, Susan.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2004.142.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Comparing Open and Sealed Bid Auctions: Theory and Evidence from Timber Auctions. (2004). Seira, Enrique ; Levin, Jonathan ; Athey, Susan.
    In: Levine's Bibliography.
    RePEc:cla:levrem:122247000000000524.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-28 22:32:53 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy