Abreu, M. and V. Grinevich (2013). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy 42: 408-422.
Alston, J. M., M. C. Marra, P. G. Pardey and T. J. Wyatt (2000). Research returns redux: a meta-analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 44(2): 185-215.
- Amara, N., M. Ouimet and R. Landry (2004). New Evidence on Instrumental, Conceptual and Symbolic Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies. Science Communication 26(1): 75-106.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Balland, J.P., R. Boschma and K. Frenken (2015) Proximity and Innovation: From Statics and Dynamics, Regional Studies 49(6): 907-920. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2014.883598 Barré, R. (1999). Public research programmes: socio-economic impact assessment and user needs. IPTS Report Special Issue: Evaluation and Research Activities No.20(December 1999): 5-9.
Barry, A. (2021) What is an environmental problem? Theory, Culture & Society 38(2): 93117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276420958043 Bekkers, R. and I. M. Bodas Freitas (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy 37(10): 1837-1853.
- Belcher, B. M., R. Davel and R. Claus (2020). A refined method for theory-based evaluation of the societal impacts of research. MethodsX 7: 100788.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Beyer, J. M. (1997). Research Utilization: Bridging a Cultural Gap between Communities. Journal of Management Inquiry 6(1): 17-22.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bonney, R., J. L. Shirk, T. B. Phillips, A. Wiggins, H. L. Ballard, A. J. Miller-Rushing and J. K. Parrish (2014). Next Steps for Citizen Science. Science 343(6178): 1436-1437.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge, Polity.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bozeman, B. (2003) Public Value Mapping of Science Outcomes: Theory and Method. A Monograph of the Public Value Mapping Project of the Center for Science, Policy and Outcomes, Centre for Science, Policy and Outcomes and School of Public Policy, Georgia Tech.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bozeman, B. (2007). Public Values and Public Interest: Counter-balancing Economic Individualism. Washington, D.C., Georgetown University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bozeman, B. and D. Sarewitz (2011). Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation. Minerva 49: 1-23.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bozeman, B. and G. Kingsley (1997). R&D Value Mapping: A New Approach to Case Study-Based Evaluation. Journal of Technology Transfer 22(2): 33-42.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bozeman, B., J. Rogers, D. Roessner, H. Klein, J. Park, G. Kingsley, S. Silver, S. Sreedhar, T. Sykes, M. Kelman and J. Dietz (1999). The Research Value Mapping Project. Qualitative-Quantitative Case Studies of Research Projects Funded by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences. Department of Energy.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bush, V. (1945). Science, The Endless Frontier. A Report to the President by Vannevar Bush, Director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development. Washington DC, U.S. Government Printing Office.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Buxton, M. and S. Hanney (1996). How can payback from health service research be assessed? J of Health Service Research Policy 1(1).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Callon, M. (1986). The sociology of an actor-network. Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. M. Callon, J. Law and A. Rip. London, Macmillan.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Callon, M. (1990) Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. Sociological Review 38: 132-161.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Callon, M. and V. Rabeharisoa (2007) Research “in the wild” and the shaping of new social identities, Technology in Society 25(2): 193-204.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Callon, M., P. Lascoumes and Y. Barthe (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World. Cambridge MASS, MIT Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Colinet, L., A. Gaunant, A. Hocdé, P.-B. Joly, M. Mat, S. Lemarié and P. Larédo (2013). Une approche multidimensionelle de la mesure des effets de la recherche publique agronomique: les cas de l'INRA. Penser la valeur d'usage des Sciences. O. Glassey, J. P. Leresche and O. Moeschler. Lausanne, Presses Universitaires de Laussane.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Curie, M. (1921). The Discovery of Radium: Address by Madame M. Curie at Vassar College, May 14, 1921, Vassar College.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- DCMS (Department for Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport) (2018) Government response to the consultation on proposals for changes to Gaming Machines and Social Responsibility Measures, DCMS, London.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Donovan, C. (2011). State of the art in assessing research impact: introduction to a special issue. Research Evaluation 20(3): 175-179.
- Donovan, C. and S. Hanney (2011). The ‘Payback Framework’ explained. Research Evaluation 20(3): 181-183.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dow Schüll, N. (2012) Addiction by Design: Machine Gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Edler, J., M. Karaulova and K. Barker (2020). Understanding the Conceptual Impact of Scientific Knowledge on Policy: the Role of Policy-making Condictions. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis. Karlsruhe, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research.
- Engebo, J. (2010) From slot machines to gaming terminals experiences with regulatory changes in Norway, presentation at the European Association for the Study of Gambling (EASG) Annual Conference, Vienna.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Engebo, J. T. Torsheim & S. Pallesen (2021) Regulatory Measures’ Effect on Gambling Participation: Experiences From Norway. Frontiers in Psychology Volume 12, Article 672471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.672471 INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 2022-01 Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff, Eds. (1997). Universities in the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of academic-industry-government relations. London, Casell.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- European Commission (2005). Assessing the Social and Environmental Impact of European Research. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Evaluation Division for Science (2017). Evaluation of the Humanities in Norway. Report from the Principal Evaluation Committee. Oslo, The Research Council of Norway.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Friedman, B., P. Kahn & A. Borning (2002) Value sensitive design: Theory and methods. University of Washington Technical Report, 02-12.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Frost, H., G. Rosemary, S. Haw, C. A. Jackson, R. Jepson, J. D. Mooney and J. Frank (2012). A collaborative approach to defining the usefulness of impact: lessons from a knowledge exchange project involving academics and social work practitioners. Evidence & Policy 8(3): 347-359.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Greenhalgh, T., J. Raftery, S. Hanney and M. Glover (2016). Research impact: a narrative review. BMC medicine 14(1): 78. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0620-8 Hardoy, I. and P. Schøne (2008) The family gap and family friendly policies: The case of Norway. Applied Economics 40: 2857−2871.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hellström, T. and M. Jacob (2017). Policy instrument affordances: a framework for analysis. Policy Studies 38(6): 604-621.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- IDEA Consult, Akilian NV, Ecorys Nederland BV, C. Dolan and E. Boudard (2010). Evaluation of the impact of EU funded research in social sciences and humanities on EU policies. Brussles.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 2022-01 Buisseret, T. J., H. C. Cameron and L. Georghiou (1999). What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management 10(4/5/6): 587-600.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 2022-01 Levitt, R., C. Celia, S. Diepeveen, S. N. Chonaill, L. Rabinovich and J. Tiessen (2010). Assessing the impact of arts and humanities research at the University of Cambridge. Cambridge, RAND Corporation.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 2022-01 Olmos-Peñuela, J., E. Castro-MartÌnez and P. D'Este (2014). Knowledge transfer activities in social sciences and humanities: Explaining the interactions of research groups with non-academic agents. Research Policy 43(4): 696-706.
- Isenson, R. S. (1969). Project Hindsight. Final Report. Washington, DC, Office of the Director of Defense Research and Engineering.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Jewkes, J., D. Sawers and R. Stillerman (1969). The Sources of Invention. London, Palgrave Macmillan.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Joly, P.-B., A. Gaunand, L. Colinet, P. Larédo, S. Lemarié and M. Matt (2015). ASIRPA: A comprehensive theory-based approach to assessing the societal impacts of a research organization. Research Evaluation 24(4): 440-453.
- Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London, Macmillan.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kline, S. J. (1985). Innovation is not a linear process. Research Management 28(No. 4): 36-45.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kline, S. J. and N. Rosenberg (1986). An overview of innovation. The positive sum strategy: harnessing technology for economic growth. R. Landau and N. Rosenberg. Washington DC, National Academy Press: 275-305.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kok, M. O. and A. J. Schuit (2012). Contribution mapping: a method for mapping the contribution of research to enhance its impact. Health Research Policy and Systems 10(21).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Leonelli, S. (2016) Data-Centric Biology: a Philosophical Study. Chicago, Chicago University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Leydesdorff, L. and H. Etzkowitz (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of universityindustry -government relations. Science and Public Policy 23(5): 279-286.
- Luukkonen, T. (1999). Additionality of Publicly-Funded RTD Programmes. IPTS Report(40): 10-15.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Marjanovic, S., S. Hanney and S. Wooding (2009). A historical reflection on research evaluation studies, their current themes and challenges. Technical Reports. Santa Monica, RAND Corporation.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Marshall, C. R., D. Bick, J. W. Belmont, S. L. Taylor, E. Ashley, D. Dimmock, V. Jobanputra, H. M. Kearney, S. Kulkarni and H. Rehm (2020) The Medical Genome Initiative: moving whole-genome sequencing for rare disease diagnosis to the clinic, Genome Medicine 12(1): 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-020-00748-z Martin, B. (2011). The Research Excellence Framework and the Impact Agenda: Are We Creating a Frankenstein Monster? Research Evaluation 20(3): 247-254.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Matt, M., A. Gaunand, P. B. Joly and L. Colinet (2017). Opening the black box of impact – Ideal-type impact pathways in a public agricultural research organization. Research Policy 46(1): 207-218.
- Mayne, J. (2001). Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: using performance measures sensibly. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 16(1): 124.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Molas-Gallart, J. and A. Davies (2006). Program theories and evaluation practice: the experience of Science, Technology and Innovation policies in Europe. American Journal of Evaluation 27(1): 64-82.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Molas-Gallart, J. and I. Ràfols (2018). Why bibliometric indicators break down: unstable parameters, incorrect models and irrelevant properties. BiD: textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació 40.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Molas-Gallart, J. and P. Tang (2011). Tracing Productive Interactions to identify social impacts: an example for the Social Sciences. Research Evaluation 20(3): 219-226.
Molas-Gallart, J., P. Tang and S. Morrow (2000). Assessing the non-academic impact of grant-funded socio-economic research: results from a pilot study. Research Evaluation 9(3): 171-182.
- Molas-Gallart, J., P. Tang, T. Sinclair, S. Morrow and B. Martin (1999). Assessing Research Impact on Non-Academic Audiences. Brighton, SPRU.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Morlacchi, P. and R. R. Nelson (2011). How medical practice evolves: Learning to treat failing hearts with an implantable device. Research Policy 40(4): 511-525.
- Morton, S. (2015). Progressing research impact assessment: A ‘contributions’ approach. Research Evaluation 24(4): 405-419.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Nooteboom, B. (2006). Cognitive Distance in and Between COP's and Firms: where do Exploitation and Exploration Take Place, and How are They Conneceted? CentER Discussion Paper Series, SSRN.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Owen, R., P. Macnaghten and J. Stilgoe (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy 39(6): 751-760.
- Peattie, K. (2010). Written communication to the SIAMPI Workshop. SIAMPI Workshop. Brussels.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Polanyi (1962). The republic of science: its political and economic theory. Minerva 1: 54-74.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Productivity Commission (1999) Australia’s Gambling Industries. Productivity Commission, Canberra.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Productivity Commission (2007). Public Support for Science and Innovation. Canberra, Australian Government. Productivity Commission.
- Productivity Commission (2010) Gambling. Productivity Commission, Canberra.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Regeer, B. and J. Bunders (2009). Knowldge co-creation: Interaction between science and society. Preliminary studies and background studies. The Hague, RMNO - Advisory Countil for Spatial Planning, Nature and the Environment.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rip, A. and J. R. van der Meulen (1995). Non-academic impact in the social sciences - a thinkpiece. Report prepared for the ESRC, University of Twente.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sarewitz, D. (2016). Saving Science. The New Atlantis(Spring/Summer): 5-40.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Schmoch, U. (1999). Interaction of Universities and Industrial Enterprises in Germany and the United States - A Comparison. Industry and Innovation 6(1): 51-68.
- Science Europe (2017). Science Europe Position Statement on a New Vision for a More Meaningful Research Impact Assessment. Brussels, Science Europe.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sherwin, C. W. and R. S. Isenson (1967). Estimating the Science and Technology Components of an R&D Budget. Second Cost-Effectiveness Symposium of the Washington Operations Research Council. Washington D.C. Spaapen, J. and L. van Drooge (2011). Productive interactions in the assessment of social impact of research. Research Evaluation 20(3): 211-218.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- The Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute (1968). Technology in Retrospect And Critical Events in Science, The National Science Foundation.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Turro, E., W. J. Astle, et al. (2020) Whole-genome sequencing of patients with rare diseases in a national health system, Nature 583: 96-120. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-24342 INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 2022-01 van den Hoven, M. J. (2013) Value sensitive design and responsible innovation. In R. Owen, M. Heintz, & J. Bessant (Eds.) Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Chichester, Wiley: pp. 75-84.
- van den Hoven, M. J. (2013) Value sensitive design and responsible innovation. In R. Owen, M. Heintz, & J. Bessant (Eds.) Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Chichester, Wiley: pp. 75-84.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- van Langenhove, L. (2011). Social Sciences and Policy Impact: the case for a participatory approach. Social Science and Policy Challenges. Democracy, values and capacities. G. Papanagnou. Paris, OECD: 95-112.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Van Noorden, R. (2015). Impact of UK research revealed in 7,000 case studies. Nature 518: 150-151.
- Ven, A. H. V. D. and M. S. Poole (1995). Explaining Development and Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review 20(3): 510-540.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- von Hippel, E. (2005) Democratizing Innovation. Boston, MIT Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Wallace, M. L. and I. Ràfols (2018). Institutional shaping of research priorities: A case study on avian influenza. Research Policy 47(10): 1975-1989.
- Weiss, C. (1977). Research for Policy's Sake: The Enlightnment Function of Social Science Research. Policy Analysis 3(4): 531-545.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Weiss, C. B. (1980). Knowledge Creep and Decision Accretion. Knowledge : Creation, Diffusion, Utilisation 1(3): 381-404.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Weiss, C. H. (1986). The circuitry of enlightenment : diffusion of social science research to policymakers. Knowledge : Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 8(2): 274-281.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wilkinson, H., M. Gallagher and M. Smith (2012). A collaborative approach to defining the usefulness of impact: lessons from a knowledge exchange project involving academics and social work practitioners. Evidence & Policy 8(3): 311-327.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now