1. Efficacy of hypothetical bias mitigation techniques: A cross-country comparison. (2024). Ye, Tao ; Hu, Wuyang ; Penn, Jerrod.
   In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
   RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:125:y:2024:i:c:s0095069624000639.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Hypothetical bias mitigation in representative and convenience samples. (2023). Petrolia, Daniel ; Fannin, Matthew J ; Penn, Jerrod M.
   In: Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy.
   RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:45:y:2023:i:2:p:721-743.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Do differences in brute luck influence preferences for redistribution in favour of the environment and health?. (2022). Paul, Pavitra ; Chanel, Olivier.
   In: Palgrave Communications.
   RePEc:pal:palcom:v:9:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-022-01346-7.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Do differences in brute luck influence preferences for redistribution in favour of the environment and health?. (2022). Paul, Pavitra ; Chanel, Olivier.
   In: Post-Print.
   RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03798772.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Real payment priming to reduce potential hypothetical bias. (2022). Hu, Wuyang ; Penn, Jerrod ; Jiang, QI.
   In: Journal of choice modelling.
   RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:45:y:2022:i:c:s1755534522000409.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. The relative performance of ex?ante and ex?post measures to mitigate hypothetical and strategic bias in a stated preference study. (2022). Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Budziski, Wiktor ; Colombo, Sergio ; Glenk, Klaus.
   In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
   RePEc:bla:jageco:v:73:y:2022:i:3:p:845-873.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Conceptualisation of external validity, sources and explanations of bias and effectiveness of mitigation methods. (2021). Oppewal, Harmen ; Bliemer, Michiel ; Haghani, Milad ; Lancsar, Emily ; Rose, John M.
   In: Journal of choice modelling.
   RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:41:y:2021:i:c:s1755534521000555.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Young people s willingness to pay for environmental protection. (2021). Guerriero, Carla ; Dardanoni, Valentino.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:179:y:2021:i:c:s0921800920304523.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Macro-scale analysis of literature and effectiveness of bias mitigation methods. (2021). Oppewal, Harmen ; Lancsar, Emily ; Haghani, Milad ; Rose, John M.
   In: Papers.
   RePEc:arx:papers:2102.02945.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Integrative synthesis of empirical evidence and conceptualisation of external validity. (2021). Rose, John M ; Oppewal, Harmen ; Lancsar, Emily ; Haghani, Milad.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2102.02940.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Consequentiality, elicitation formats, and the willingness-to-pay for green electricity: Evidence from Germany. (2020). Frondel, Manuel ; Andor, Mark Andreas ; Horvath, Marco.
    In: Ruhr Economic Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:rwirep:841.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Hypothetical bias remains at the heart of controversy about the reliability and validity of value estimates from discrete choice experiments (DCEs). This especially applies to environmental valuation,. (2020). Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Glenk, Klaus ; Budziski, Wiktor ; Colombo, Sergio .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2020-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Economic valuation of setting up a social health enterprise in urban poor-resource setting in Kenya. (2020). Donfouet, Hermann ; Pierre, Hermann Pythagore ; Danaei, Goodarz ; Mutua, Martin Kavao ; Wambiya, Elvis ; Otieno, Peter ; Mohamed, Shukri F.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:266:y:2020:i:c:s027795362030513x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Cheap talk efficacy under potential and actual Hypothetical Bias: A meta-analysis. (2019). Hu, Wuyang ; Penn, Jerrod.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:96:y:2019:i:c:p:22-35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. When do social cues and scientific information affect stated preferences? Insights from an experiment on air pollution. (2018). Ami, Dominique ; Luchini, Stephane ; Chanel, Olivier ; Aprahamian, Frederic.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:29:y:2018:i:c:p:33-46.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Mitigating strategic misrepresentation of values in open-ended stated preference surveys by using negative reinforcement. (2018). Zawojska, Ewa ; Louviere, Jordan ; Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre ; Dit, Romain Crastes.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:28:y:2018:i:c:p:153-166.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Cheap Talk, Consequentiality, and Certainty Follow-up as Hypothetical Bias Mitigation Techniques: A Cross Country Comparison. (2018). Hu, Wuyang ; Ye, Tao ; Penn, Jerrod.
    In: 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea18:274018.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Can a Repeated Opt-Out Reminder remove hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments? An application to consumer valuation of novel food products. (2017). Olsen, Søren ; Alemu, Mohammed Hussen.
    In: IFRO Working Paper.
    RePEc:foi:wpaper:2017_05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Measuring Impartial Preference for Biodiversity. (2017). Schmid, Bernhard ; Remy, Alice ; Meinard, Yves.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:132:y:2017:i:c:p:45-54.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. On a way to overcome strategic overbidding in open-ended stated preference surveys: A recoding approach. (2016). Zawojska, Ewa ; Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre ; Crastes, Romain ; Louviere, Jordan.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2016-34.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Making the Most of Cheap Talk in an Online Survey. (2016). Hu, Wuyang ; Penn, Jerrod.
    In: 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts.
    RePEc:ags:aaea16:236171.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Hypothetical bias for private goods: does cheap talk make a difference?. (2015). Saulais, Laure ; Doyon, Maurice ; Bweli, Denise ; Ruffieux, Bernard.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01254936.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Non-market valuation in France: An overview of the research activity. (2014). Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre ; Riera, Pere ; Kristrom, Bengt ; Craste, Romain .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01087365.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Augmenting short Cheap Talk scripts with a repeated Opt-Out Reminder in Choice Experiment surveys. (2014). Olsen, Søren ; Ladenburg, Jacob.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:37:y:2014:i:c:p:39-63.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Willingness to pay of committed citizens: A field experiment. (2014). CHANEL, Olivier ; AMI, Dominique ; Luchini, Stephane ; Joule, Robert-Vincent ; Aprahamian, Frederic.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:105:y:2014:i:c:p:31-39.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Political affiliation and willingness to pay: An examination of the nature of benefits and means of provision. (2012). Dupont, Diane ; Bateman, Ian.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:75:y:2012:i:c:p:43-51.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. The determinants of the willingness-to-pay for community-based prepayment scheme in rural Cameroon. (2011). Malin, Eric ; Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre ; Makaudze, Ephias ; Donfouet, Hermann.
    In: International Journal of Health Economics and Management.
    RePEc:kap:ijhcfe:v:11:y:2011:i:3:p:209-220.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Social psychology and environmental economics: a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation. (2011). James, Alexander ; Luchini, Stephane ; Jacquemet, Nicolas ; Shogren, Jason.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00584247.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Social psychology and environmental economics : a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation. (2010). Shogren, Jason ; Luchini, Stephane ; Jacquemet, Nicolas .
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00462193.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Willingness to Pay of Committed Citizens: A Field Experiment. (2008). CHANEL, Olivier ; AMI, Dominique ; Luchini, Stephane ; Joule, Robert-Vincent ; Aprahamian, Frederic.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00289451.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Aadland D, Caplan AJ (2003) Willingness to pay for curbside recycling with detection and mitigation of hypothetical bias. Am J Agr Econ 85(2): 492–502.

2. Aadland D, Caplan AJ (2006a) Cheap talk reconsidered: new evidence from CVM. J Econ Behav Org 60: 562–578.

3. Aadland D, Caplan AJ (2006b) Curbside recycling: waste resource or waste of resources?. J Pol Anal Manage 25(4): 855–874.

4. Aadland D, Caplan AJ, Phillips O (2007) A Bayesian examination of information and uncertainty in contingent valuation. J Risk Uncert 35: 149–178.

5. Ajzen I, Brown TC, Carvajal F (2004) Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: the case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 30: 1108–1121.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

6. Alberini A, Cropper M, Krupnick A, Simon N (2004) Does the value of a statistical life vary with age and health status? Evidence from the US and Canada. J Environ Econ Manage 48: 769–792.

7. Algan Y, Cahuc P (2007) La société de défiance. Comment le modèle social français s’autodétruit. Editions de la Rue d’Ulm, collection CEPREMAP.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

8. Alpizar F, Carlsson F, Johnsson-Stenman O (2008) Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica. J Pub Econ 92(4–5): 1047–1060.

9. Aprahamian F, Chanel O, Luchini S (2007) Modeling starting point bias and unobserved heterogeneity in contingent valuation surveys: an application to air pollution. Am J Agr Econ 89(2): 533–547.

10. Arrow K, Solow R, Portney P, Leamer E, Radner R, Schuman H (1993) Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Reg 58(10): 4016–4064.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Ash M, Murphy J, Stevens T (2004) Hypothetical Bias in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies. University of Massachusetts Resource Economics Working Paper No. 2004–9.

12. Bishop R, Woodward RT (1995) Valuation of environmental amenities under certainty. In: Bromley DW (eds) Handbook of environmental economics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 543–567.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

13. Blumenschein K, Blomquist GC, Johannesson M, Horn N, Freeman P (2008) Eliciting willingness to pay without bias: evidence from a field experiment. Econ J 118: 114–137.

14. Bonnichsen O, Ladenburg J (2010) Using an ex-ante entreaty to reduce protest zero bias in stated preference surveys - a health economic case. J Choice Model 2(2): 200–215.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Broberg T (2010) Income treatment effects in contingent valuation: the case of the Swedish predator policy. Env Res Econ 46: 1–17.

16. Brown TC, Azjen I, Hrubes D (2003) Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuation. J Environ Econ Manage 46: 353–361.

17. Brummett RG, Nayga EM Jr, Wu X (2007) On the use of cheap talk in new product valuation. Econ Bull 2(1): 1–9.

18. Bulte E, Gerking S, List J, de Zeeuw A (2005) The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated values: evidence from a field study. J Environ Econ Manage 49(2): 330–342.

19. Cameron C, Trivedi P (2005) Microeconometrics, methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

20. Cameron TA, Englin J (1997) Respondent experience and contingent valuation of environmental goods. J Env Econ Manag 33(3): 296–313.

21. Caplan A, Aadland D, Macharia A (2010) Estimating hypothetical bias in economically emergent Africa: a generic public good experiment. Agr Res Econ Rev 39(2): 344–358.

22. Carlberg J, Froehlich E, Ward C (2007) Willingness-to-pay for branded fresh beef products in Canada report submitted to Canfax Research Services, March.

23. Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Lagerkvist CJ (2005) Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments. Econ Lett 89: 147–152.

24. Carlsson F, Martinsson B (2006) Do experience and cheap talk influence willingness to pay in an open-ended contingent valuation survey? Working Papers in Economics no. 190, Göteborg University.

25. Carlsson F, Martinsson P, Akay A (2009) The effect of power outages and cheap talk on willingness to pay to reduce outages, Working Paper IZA 4307, July.

26. Chanel O, Cleary S, Luchini S (2006) Does public opinion influence WTP? Evidence from the field. App Econ Lett 13: 821–824.

27. Cummings RG, Harrison GW, Osborne LL (1995) Can the bias of contingent valuation surveys be reduced? Evidence from the Laboratory. Economics Working Paper B-95-03, College of Business Administration, University of South Carolina.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

28. Cummings RG, Taylor LO (1998) Does realism matter in contingent valuation surveys?. Land Econ 74(2): 203–215.

29. Cummings RG, Taylor LO (1999) Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: a cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. Am Econ Rev 89(3): 649–666.

30. Davidson R, MacKinnon J (1993) Estimation and inference in econometrics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

31. Dziegielewska D, Mendelsohn R (2007) Does “No” mean “No”? A protest methodology. Env Res Econ 38: 71–87.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

32. Ehmke M, Lusk JL, List J (2008) Is hypothetical bias a universal phenomenon? A multinational investigation. Land Econ 84(3): 489–500.

33. Flachaire E, Hollard G, Luchini S (2007) Heterogeneous anchoring in dichotomous choice valuation framework. Rech Econ Louv 73(4): 369–385.

34. Harrison G, Rutström E (2008) Experimental evidence on the existence of hypothetical bias in value elicitation methods. In: Plott C, Smith V (eds) Handbook of experimental economics results, vol 1. Elsevier Press, New York, pp 752–767.

35. Hausman JA (1993) Contingent valuation: a critical assessment, contribution to economic analysis, vol 220. North-Holland: JA Hausman, New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

36. Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1): 153–162.

37. Herriges J, Kling C, Liu C-C, Tobias J (2010) What are the consequences of consequentiality?. J Env Econ Manag 59: 67–81.

38. Horowitz J, McConnell K (2003) Willingness to accept, willingness to pay and the income effect. J Eco Behav Org 51(4): 537–545.

39. Jacobsen J, Hanley N (2009) Are there income effects on global willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation?. Env Res Econ 43: 137–160.

40. Jacquemet N, James A, Luchini S, Shogren J (2011) Social psychology and environmental economics: a new look at ex-ante corrections of biased preference evaluation. Env Res Econ 48(3): 413–433.

41. Jacquemet N, Joule R-V, Luchini S, Shogren J (2009) Earned wealth, engaged bidders? Evidence from a second-price auction. Econ Lett 105(1): 36–38.

42. Künzli N, Kaiser R, Medina S, Studnicka M, Chanel O, Herry M, Horak F, Puybonnieux-Texier V, Quenel P, Schneider J, Seethaler R, Vergnaud JC, Sommer H (2000) Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic-related air pollution: a European assessment. Lancet 356: 795–801.

43. Kennedy PE (1981) Estimation with correctly interpreted dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Am Econ Rev 71: 801.

44. Krupnick A, Alberini A, Cropper M, Simon N, O’Brien B, Goeree R, Heintzelman M (2002) Age, health and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: a contingent valuation study of Ontario residents. J Risk Uncert 24: 161–186.

45. Ladenburg J, Olsen S, (2009) Augmenting short cheap talk scripts with a repeated opt-out reminder in Choice Experiment surveys, 17th EAERE conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

46. Landry C, List J (2007) Using ex ante approaches to obtain credible signals for value in contingent markets: evidence form the field. Am J Agric Econ 89(2): 420–429.

47. List J (2001) Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitation procedures? Evidence from field auction experiments. Am Econ Rev 91(5): 1498–1507.

48. List J, Berrens RP, Bohara AK, Kerkvliet J (2004) Examining the role of social isolation on stated preferences. Am Econ Rev 94(3): 741–752.

49. List J, Gallet CA (2001) What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Env Res Econ 20: 241–254.

50. List J, Sinha P, Taylor M (2006) Using choice experiments to value non-market goods and services. Adv Econ Anal Pol 6(2): 1–37.

51. Little J, Berrens R (2004) Explaining disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values: further investigation using meta-analysis. Econ Bull 3(6): 1–13.

52. Lusk JL (2003) Effects of cheap talk on consumer willingness-to-pay for golden rice. Am J Agric Econ 85(4): 840–856.

53. McFadden D, Leonard G (1993) Issues in the contingent valuation of environmental goods: methodologies for data collection and analysis. In: Hausman J (eds) Contingent valuation: a critical assessment. North-Holland, New York, pp 165–215.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

54. Meyerhoff J, Liebe U (2008) Do protest responses to contingent valuation question and a choice experiment differ?. Env Res Econ 39: 433–446.

55. Mitani Y, Flores NE (2009) Demand revelation, hypothetical bias, and threshold public goods provision. Env Res Econ 44: 231–243.

56. Mitchell R, Carson R (1989) Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future., Washington D.C.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

57. Morrison M, Brown T (2009) Testing the effectiveness of certainty scales, cheap talk, and dissonance-minimization in reducing hypothetical bias in contingent valuation studies. Env Res Econ 44(3): 307–326.

58. Mourato S, Atkinson G, Morse-Jones S, Lanz B, Provins A (2008) When to take “no” for an answer? Using entreaties to reduce protests in stated preference studies, 16th EAERE conference, Gothenburg, Sweden.

59. Murphy J, Allen G, Stevens T, Weatherhead D (2005a) A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation. Env Res Econ 30: 313–325.

60. Murphy J, Stevens T, Weatherhead D (2005b) Is cheap talk effective at eliminating hypothetical bias in a provision point mechanism?. Env Res Econ 30(3): 327–343.

61. Murphy J, Stevens T, Yadav L (2010) A comparison of induced value and home-grown value experiments to test for hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Env Res Econ (forthcoming).

62. Poe GL, Clark JE, Rondeau D, Schulze WD (2002) Provision point mechanisms and field validity tests of contingent valuation. Env Res Econ 23: 105–131.

63. Samnaliev M, Stevens T, More T (2006) A comparison of alternative certainty calibration techniques in contingent valuation. Ecol Econ 57(3): 507–519.

64. Schkade D, Payne W (1994) How people respond to contingent valuation questions: a verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation. J Env Econ Manag 26: 88–109.

65. Sinden JA (1988) Empirical tests of hypothetical bias in consumers’ surplus surveys. Aust J Agric Econ 32(2/3): 98–112.

66. Strazzera E, Genius M, Scarpa R, Hutchinson G (2003) The effect of protest votes on the estimates of WTP for use values of recreational sites. Env Res Econ 25: 461–476.

67. Viscusi W, Magat WA, Forrest A (1988) Altruistic and private valuations of risk reduction. J Pol Anal Manag 7: 227–245.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

68. Whitehead J, Cherry TL (2007) Willingness to pay for a green energy program: a comparison of ex-ante and ex-post hypothetical bias mitigation approaches. Res Energ Econ 29: 247–261.

1. Evaluating Preferences for Organic Product Attributes in Nigeria: Attribute non-attendance under explicit and implicit priming task. (2015). Bello, Muhammad ; Abdulai, Awudu.
   In: 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California.
   RePEc:ags:aaea15:205085.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Hypothetical bias in Stated Choice Experiments: Is it a problem? And if so, how do we deal with it?. (2014). Rose, John ; Greaves, Stephen ; Fifer, Simon .
   In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
   RePEc:eee:transa:v:61:y:2014:i:c:p:164-177.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Augmenting short Cheap Talk scripts with a repeated Opt-Out Reminder in Choice Experiment surveys. (2014). Olsen, Søren ; Ladenburg, Jacob.
   In: Resource and Energy Economics.
   RePEc:eee:resene:v:37:y:2014:i:c:p:39-63.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. 2013WAEA Keynote Address: Strategies for Overcoming Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Surveys. (2014). Loomis, John.
   In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
   RePEc:ags:jlaare:168258.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Using Field Experiments in Environmental and Resource Economics. (2013). Price, Michael ; list, john.
   In: NBER Working Papers.
   RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19289.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Uncertainty of Governmental Relief and the Crowding out of Flood Insurance. (2013). Schwarze, Reimund ; Raschky, Paul ; Schwindt, Manijeh ; Zahn, Ferdinand .
   In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
   RePEc:kap:enreec:v:54:y:2013:i:2:p:179-200.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Preference Elicitation under Oath. (2013). .
   In: Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers).
   RePEc:hal:cesptp:halshs-00731244.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Preference elicitation under oath. (2013). Shogren, Jason ; Jacquemet, Nicolas ; Luchini, Stephane ; Joule, Robert-Vincent .
   In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
   RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:65:y:2013:i:1:p:110-132.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth—A multiple country test of an oath script. (2013). Sterner, Thomas ; Lampi, Elina ; Kataria, Mitesh ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Krupnick, Alan ; Lofgren, SA ; Qin, Ping.
   In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
   RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:89:y:2013:i:c:p:105-121.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Sources of Hypothetical Bias in Public Goods Experiments: A Disaggregated Approach. (2013). Uchida, Emi ; Swallow, Stephen ; Santos, Julie I. ; Anderson, Christopher .
    In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea13:150389.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Heterogeneous Preferences for Community Recycling Programs. (2012). Kipperberg, Gorm ; Larson, Douglas .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:53:y:2012:i:4:p:577-604.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. ‘When to Take “No” for an Answer’? Using Entreaties to Reduce Protests in Contingent Valuation Studies. (2012). Provins, Allan ; Mourato, Susana ; Atkinson, Giles ; Morse-Jones, Sian .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:51:y:2012:i:4:p:497-523.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Preference Elicitation under Oath. (2012). Shogren, Jason ; Luchini, Stephane ; Joule, Robert-Vincent ; Jacquemet, Nicolas .
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00731244.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Behavioral Foundations of Environmental Economics and Valuation. (2012). Murphy, James ; Horowitz, John K. ; McConnell, Kenneth E..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ala:wpaper:2012-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Behavioural responses to vehicle emissions charging. (2011). Hensher, David ; Beck, Matthew ; Rose, John.
    In: Transportation.
    RePEc:kap:transp:v:38:y:2011:i:3:p:445-463.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. The determinants of the willingness-to-pay for community-based prepayment scheme in rural Cameroon. (2011). Malin, Eric ; Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre ; Makaudze, Ephias ; Donfouet, Hermann.
    In: International Journal of Health Economics and Management.
    RePEc:kap:ijhcfe:v:11:y:2011:i:3:p:209-220.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. A Test of Cheap Talk in Different Hypothetical Contexts: The Case of Air Pollution. (2011). CHANEL, Olivier ; AMI, Dominique ; Luchini, Stephane ; Aprahamian, Frederic.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:50:y:2011:i:1:p:111-130.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Social psychology and environmental economics: a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation. (2011). James, Alexander ; Luchini, Stephane ; Jacquemet, Nicolas ; Shogren, Jason.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00584247.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Revisiting Cheap Talk with New Evidence from a Field Experiment. (2011). Park, John ; Nayga, Rodolfo ; Campbell, Benjamin ; Silva, Andres .
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:117168.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth - A Multiple Country Test of an Oath Script. (2010). Sterner, Thomas ; Löfgren, Åsa ; Lampi, Elina ; Krupnick, Alan ; Kataria, Mitesh ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Chung, Susie ; Lofgren, SA ; Qin, Ping.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0473.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Social psychology and environmental economics : a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation. (2010). Shogren, Jason ; Luchini, Stephane ; Jacquemet, Nicolas .
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00462193.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay. (2010). Hensher, David.
    In: Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.
    RePEc:eee:transb:v:44:y:2010:i:6:p:735-752.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. A penny for your thoughts: Inducing truth-telling in stated preference elicitation. (2010). Barrage, Lint ; Lee, Min Sok .
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:106:y:2010:i:2:p:140-142.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Economic valuation of a contemporary art museum: correction of hypothetical bias using a certainty question. (2009). Herrero, Luis César ; Sanz, Jose ; Bedate, Ana.
    In: Journal of Cultural Economics.
    RePEc:kap:jculte:v:33:y:2009:i:3:p:185-199.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. A TEST OF CHEAP TALK IN DIFFERENT HYPOTHETICAL CONTEXTS: THE CASE OF AIR POLLUTION. (2009). CHANEL, Olivier ; AMI, Dominique ; Luchini, Stephane ; Aprahamian, Frederic.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00382511.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. ‘Pocket and Pot’: Hypothetical Bias in a No-Free-Riding Public Contribution Game. (2009). McMillan, Melville ; Adamowicz, Wiktor ; Gubanova, Tatiana .
    In: 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
    RePEc:ags:aaea09:49318.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Valuing Access to U.S. Public Lands: A Unique Pricing Experiment. (2008). Shogren, Jason ; Aadland, David ; Simon, Benjamin ; Taylor, Patricia ; Grandjean, Burke ; Anatchkova, Bistra.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:8724.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Do you do what you say or do you do what you say others do?. (2008). Carlsson, Fredrik ; Daruvala, Dinky ; Jaldell, Henrik .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0309.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. A Bayesian examination of information and uncertainty in contingent valuation. (2007). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David ; Phillips, Owen .
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:35:y:2007:i:2:p:149-178.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Using ex ante approaches to obtain credible signals for value in contingent markets: Evidence from the field. (2007). list, john ; Landry, Craig.
    In: Framed Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:framed:00168.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Willingness to pay for a Green Energy program: A comparison of ex-ante and ex-post hypothetical bias mitigation approaches. (2007). Whitehead, John ; Cherry, Todd.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:29:y:2007:i:4:p:247-261.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. The effect of experience and quantity-based pricing on the valuation of a curbside recycling program. (2007). Grijalva, Therese ; Caplan, Arthur ; Bohara, Alok.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:64:y:2007:i:2:p:433-443.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Comparing Willingness-to-Pay Estimates from Experimental Auctions with Mailed Surveys Incorporating Cheap Talk. (2007). Froehlich, Eve ; Carlberg, Jared .
    In: 2007 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2007, Mobile, Alabama.
    RePEc:ags:saeasm:34945.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Valuing housework time from willingness to spend time and money for environmental quality improvements. (2006). Eom, Young-Sook ; Larson, Douglas .
    In: Review of Economics of the Household.
    RePEc:kap:reveho:v:4:y:2006:i:3:p:205-227.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Using choice experiments to value non-market goods and services: Evidence from field experiments. (2006). list, john ; Sinha, Paramita ; Taylor, Michael.
    In: Natural Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:natura:00278.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. Cheap talk reconsidered: New evidence from CVM. (2006). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:60:y:2006:i:4:p:562-578.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Testing for Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation Using a Latent Choice Multinomial Logit Model. (2006). Whitehead, John ; Groothuis, Peter ; Caudill, Steven B.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:apl:wpaper:06-09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Consumer Valuation of the Second Generation of Genetically Modified (GM) Foods with Benefits Disclosure. (2006). Harrison, R Wes ; Han, Jae-Hwan .
    In: 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:saeaso:35277.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. An Economic Analysis of Mixing Wastes. (2005). Vollebergh, Herman R.J. ; Herman R. J. Vollebergh, ; Rob F. T. Aalbers, ; Herman R. J. Vollebergh, .
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20050094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. A Bayesian Examination of Anchoring Bias and Cheap Talks in Constructed Markets. (2005). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19568.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. A Rose by Another Name: An Objective Analysis of an Established Market for Credence Attributes. (2005). Bailey, DeeVon ; Galloway, Kristin ; von Bailey, Dee.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19493.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Explaining Disparities between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values: Further Investigation Using Meta-Analysis. (2004). Little, Joseph .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2004:i:6:p:1-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Explaining Disparities between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values: Further Investigation Using Meta-Analysis. (2004). Berrens, Robert ; Little, Joseph .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-03c90005.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Willingness-to-Pay for Information: Experiex-post, have been developed to mitigate or eliminate the overstatement of hypothetical willingness to pay. The ex-ante approach addresses hypothetical bias i. (2004). Dickinson, David ; Cherry, Todd.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:apl:wpaper:04-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Contingent Valuation, Hypothetical Bias, and Experimental Economics. (2004). Murphy, James ; Stevens, Thomas H..
    In: Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.
    RePEc:ags:arerjl:31262.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. CURBSIDE RECYCLING: WASTE RESOURCE OR WASTE OF RESOURCES?. (2004). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19971.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. HYPOTHETICAL BIAS: THE MITIGATING EFFECTS OF CERTAINTY QUESTIONS AND CHEAP TALK. (2004). Bishop, Richard C. ; Moore, Rebecca ; Champ, Patricia A..
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19951.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Curbside Recycling: Waste Resource or Waste of Resources?. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0310001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Cheap Talk Revisited: New Evidence from CVM. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0301001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. CHEAP TALK REVISITED: NEW EVIDENCE FROM CVM. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada.
    RePEc:ags:aaea03:22112.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-02-25 19:11:24 || Missing content? Let us know