- Alon, N., Emek, Y., Feldman, M., & Tennenholtz, M. (2013). Adversarial Leakage in Games. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 27, 363–385.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Amaldoss, W., & Rapoport, A. (2009). Excessive expenditure in two-stage contests: Theory and experimental evidence. In F. Columbus (Ed.), Game theory: Strategies, equilibria, and theorems. Nova Science Publishers.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Anderson, L. R., & Stafford, S. L. (2003). An experimental analysis of rent seeking under varying competitive conditions. Public Choice, 115, 199–216.
Anderson, S. P., Goeree, J. K., & Holt, C. A. (1998). Rent seeking with bounded rationality: An analysis of the all-pay auction. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 828–853.
Babington, M., Goerg, S. J., & Kitchens, C. (2020). Do tournaments with superstars encourage or discourage competition? Journal of Sports Economics, 21, 44–63.
Baccara, M. (2007). Outsourcing, information leakage, and consulting firms. Rand Journal of Economics, 38, 269–289.
- Bagwell, K. (1995). Commitment and observability in games. Games and Economic Behavior, 8, 271–280.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Balafoutas, L., Faravelli, M., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2021). Conflict in the pool: A field experiment. University of Innsbruck Mimeo.
Baye, M. R., Kovenock, D., & De Vries, C. G. (1996). The all-pay auction with complete information. Economic Theory, 8, 291–305.
Brandts, J., & Charness, G. (2011). The strategy versus the direct-response method: A survey of experimental comparisons. Experimental Economics, 14, 375–398.
Brosig, J., Weimann, J., & Yang, C.-L. (2003). The hot versus cold effect in a simple bargaining experiment. Experimental Economics, 6, 75–90.
Brown, A., & Chowdhury, S. M. (2017). The hidden perils of affirmative action: Sabotage in handicap contests. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 133, 273–284.
Brown, J. (2011). Quitters never win: The (Adverse) incentive effects of competing with superstars. Journal of Political Economy, 119, 982–1013.
Caruana, G., & Einav, L. (2008). A theory of endogenous commitment. Review of Economic Studies, 75, 99–116.
Chowdhury, S. M., Sheremeta, R. M., & Turocy, T. L. (2014). Overbidding and overspreading in rent-seeking experiments: Cost structure and prize allocation rules. Games and Economic Behavior, 87, 224–238.
- Chowdhury, S.M., Esteve-González, P., Mukherjee, A. (2022). Heterogeneity, Leveling the Playing Field, and Affirmative Action in Contests. Southern Economic Journal, Forthcoming.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Cohen, C., & Shavit, T. (2012). Experimental tests of Tullock’s contest with and without winner refunds. Research in Economics, 66, 263–272.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Connolly, R. A., & Rendleman, R. J., Jr. (2008). Skill, luck, and streaky play on the PGA Tour. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 74–88.
Corazzini, L., Faravelli, M., & Stanca, L. (2010). A prize to give for: An experiment on public good funding mechanisms. Economic Journal, 120, 944–967.
Davis, D., & Reilly, R. (1998). Do too many cooks always spoil the Stew? An experimental analysis of rent-seeking and the role of a strategic buyer. Public Choice, 95, 89–115.
Dechenaux, E., Kovenock, D., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2015). A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments. Experimental Economics, 18, 609–669.
Dixit, A. (1987). Strategic behavior in contests. American Economic Review, 77, 891–898.
Duffy, J., & Matros, A. (2021). All-pay auctions versus lotteries as provisional fixed-prize fundraising mechanisms: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 192, 434–464.
Ernst, C., & Thöni, C. (2013). Bimodal bidding in experimental all-pay auctions. Games, 4, 608–623.
Fallucchi, F., Niederreiter, J., & Riccaboni, M. (2021). Learning and dropout in contests: An experimental approach. Theory and Decision, 90, 245–278.
Fallucchi, F., Renner, E., & Sefton, M. (2013). Information feedback and contest structure in rent-seeking games. European Economic Review, 64, 223–240.
Fang, H. (2002). Lottery versus all-pay auction models of lobbying. Public Choice, 112, 351–371.
Faravelli, M., & Stanca, L. (2014). Economic incentives and social preferences: Causal evidence of non-separability. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 108, 273–289.
- Fehr, D., & Schmid, J. (2017). Exclusion in the all-pay auction: An experimental investigation. WZB Discussion Paper, No SP, II, 2017–202.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171–178.
Fonseca, M. (2009). An experimental investigation of asymmetric contests. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27, 582–591.
Franke, J. (2012). The incentive effects of leveling the playing field-an empirical analysis of Amateur Golf Tournaments. Applied Economics, 214, 1193–1200.
- Fu, Q., & Wu, Z. (2022). Auctions versus Lottery All-Pay Contests: A General Dominance Theorem. National University of Singapore mimeo.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gneezy, U., & Smorodinsky, R. (2006). All-Pay auctions—An experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 61, 255–275.
Greiner, B. (2015). Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1, 114–125.
Guryan, J., Kroft, K., & Notowidigdo, M. J. (2009). Peer effects in the workplace: Evidence from random groupings in professional Golf Tournaments. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4, 34–68.
- Hart, E., Avrahami, J., Kareev, Y., & Todd, P. M. (2015). Investing even in uneven contests: Effects of asymmetry on investment in contests. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28, 395–409.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Herrmann, B., & Orzen, H. (2008). The Appearance of Homo Rivalis: Social Preferences and the Nature of Rent Seeking (pp. 2008–10). CeDEx Discussion Paper Series.
Hirata, D. (2014). A model of a two-stage all-pay auction. Mathematical Social Sciences, 68, 5–13.
Huck, S., & Müller, W. (2000). Perfect versus imperfect observability–An experimental test of Bagwell’s Result. Games and Economic Behavior, 31, 174–190.
Hyndman, K., Ozbay, E. Y., & Sujarittanonta, P. (2012). Rent seeking with regretful agents: Theory and experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 84, 866–878.
Jian, L., Li, Z., & Liu, T. X. (2017). Simultaneous versus sequential all-pay auctions: An experimental study. Experimental Economics, 20, 648–669.
Jiang, Z. Z., Huang, Y., & Beil, D. R. (2022). The role of feedback in dynamic crowdsourcing contests: A structural empirical analysis. Management Science, 68, 4858–4877.
- Kamada, Y., & Kandori, M. (2020). Revision games. Econometrica, 88, 1599–1630.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kamada, Y., Moroni, S. (2018). Games with Private Timing. University of Pittsburgh Working Paper No. 18/010.
Kimbrough, E. O., Sheremeta, R. M., & Shields, T. (2014). When parity promotes peace: Resolving conflict between asymmetric agents. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 99, 96–108.
Konrad, K. A. (2009). Strategy and Dynamics in Contests. Oxford University Press.
Konrad, K. A., & Leininger, W. (2007). The generalized Stackelberg equilibrium of the all-pay auction with complete information. Review of Economic Design, 11, 165–174.
Konrad, K. A., & Morath, F. (2020). Escalation in conflict games: On beliefs and selection. Experimental Economics, Experimental Economics, 23, 750–787.
Lim, W., Matros, A., & Turocy, T. L. (2014). Bounded rationality and group size in Tullock contests: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 99, 155–167.
Liu, T. X. (2018). All-Pay auctions with endogenous bid timing: An experimental study. International Journal of Game Theory, 47, 247–271.
- Llorente-Saguer, A., Sheremeta, R. M., & Szech, N. (2022). Designing contests between heterogeneous contestants: An experimental study of tie-breaks and bid-caps in all-pay auction. European Economic Review, 124, 104327.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lugovskyy, V., Puzzello, D., & Tucker, S. (2010). An experimental investigation of overdissipation in the all-pay auction. European Economic Review, 54, 974–997.
Mago, S. D., & Razzolini, L. (2019). Best-of-five contest: An experiment on gender differences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 162, 164–187.
Mago, S. D., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2019). New Hampshire effect: Behavior in sequential and simultaneous multi-battle contests. Experimental Economics, 22, 325–349.
- Mago, S. D., Samak, A. C., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2016). Facing your opponents: Social identification and information feedback in contests. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 60, 459–481.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Mago, S. D., Sheremeta, R. M., & Yates, A. (2013). Best-of-three contest experiments: Strategic versus psychological momentum. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 31, 287–296.
Matros, A., & Armanios, D. (2009). Tullock’s contest with reimbursements. Public Choice, 141, 49–63.
Matsui, A. (1989). Information leakage forces cooperation. Games and Economic Behavior, 1, 94–115.
- Morgan, J., & Várdy, F. (2004). An experimental study of commitment and observability in Stackelberg games. Games and Economic Behavior, 49, 401–423.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Morgan, J., & Várdy, F. (2007). The value of commitment in contests and tournaments when observation is costly. Games and Economic Behavior, 60, 326–338.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Morgan, J., & Várdy, F. (2013). The fragility of commitment. Management Science, 59, 1344–1353.
Nelson, A., Ryvkin, D. (2019). Contests with Sequential Moves: An Experimental Study. Florida State University Working Paper No. wp2019_11_01.
- Orzen, H. (2008). Fundraising through competition: Evidence from the lab (pp. 2008–11). No: CeDEx Discussion Paper Series.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Parco, J., Rapoport, A., & Amaldoss, W. (2005). Two-stage contests with budget constraints: An experimental study. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 49, 320–338.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Schmitt, P., Shupp, R., Swope, K., & Cadigan, J. (2004). Multi-period rent-seeking contests with carryover: Theory and experimental evidence. Economics of Governance, 5, 187–211.
Schram, A. J., & Onderstal, S. (2009). Bidding to give: An experimental comparison of auctions for charity. International Economic Review, 50, 431–457.
- Selten, R. (1998). Features of experimentally observed bounded rationality. European Economic Review, 42, 413–436.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Sheremeta, R. M. (2010). Experimental comparison of multi-stage and one-stage contests. Games and Economic Behavior, 68, 731–747.
Sheremeta, R. M. (2011). Contest design: An experimental investigation. Economic Inquiry, 49, 573–590.
Sheremeta, R. M. (2013). Overbidding and heterogeneous behavior in contest experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27, 491–514.
Sheremeta, R. M. (2018). Impulsive Behavior in Competition: Testing Theories of Overbidding in Rent-Seeking Contests. Economic Science Institute Working Paper, Chapman University.
Shogren, J. F., & Baik, K. H. (1992). Favorites and underdogs: Strategic behavior in an experimental contest. Public Choice, 74, 191–205.
Shupp, R., Sheremeta, R. M., Schmidt, D., & Walker, J. (2013). Resource allocation contests: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 257–267.
Sunde, U. (2009). Heterogeneity and performance in tournaments: A test for incentive effects using professional tennis data. Applied Economics, 41, 3199–3208.
- Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient rent seeking. In J. M. Buchanan, R. D. Tollison, & G. Tullock (Eds.), Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society (pp. 97–112). Texas A &M University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
van Damme, E., & Hurkens, S. (1997). Games with imperfectly observable commitment. Games and Economic Behavior, 21, 282–308.
- Várdy, F. (2004). The Value of commitment in Stackelberg games with observation costs. Games and Economic Behavior, 49, 374–400.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Vojnovic, M. (2016). Contest theory: Incentive mechanisms and ranking methods. Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Weimann, J., Yang, C. L., & Vogt, C. (2000). An experiment on sequential rent seeking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 41, 405–426.
Yildirim, H. (2005). Contests with multiple rounds. Games and Economic Behavior, 51, 213–227.
Zizzo, D. J. (2003). Money burning and rank egalitarianism with random dictators. Economics Letters, 81, 263–266.