Adamowicz, W. L., J. L. Fletcher, and T. Graham-Tomasi. 1989. Functional Form and the Statistical Properties of Welfare Measures, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72 (May), pp. 414-421.
Alberini, Anna. 1995. Testing Willingness-to-Pay Models of Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Survey Data, Land Economics, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 83-95.
Bishop, Richard C., and Thomas A. Heberlein. 1979. Measuring Values of Extra-market Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, pp. 926-930.
Boyle, Kevin J., F. Reed Johnson, David W. McCollum, William H. Desvousges, Richard W. Dunford, and Sara P. Hudson. 1996. Valuing Public Goods: Discrete Versus Continuous Contingent Valuation Responses, Land Economics, 72 (August), pp. 38 1-396.
Cameron, Trudy A. 1988. A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-Market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Censored Logistic Regression, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15 (Sept.), pp. 355-379.
Cameron, Trudy A. 1992. Combining Contingent Valuation and Travel Cost Data for the Valuation of Non-market Goods, Land Economics, 68 (August), pp. 302-3 17.
Cameron, Trudy A. and David D. Huppert. 1991. Referendum Contingent Valuation estimates: Sensitivity to the Assignment of Offered Values, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 86, no. 416, pp. 910-918.
Cooper, Joseph C. and John Loomis. 1992. Sensitivity to Willingness-to-Pay Estimates to Bid Design in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Models, Land Economics, 68 (May), pp. 211-24.
- Cooper, Joseph C. and John Loomis. 1993. Sensitivity of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates to Bid Design in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Models: Reply, Land Economics, 69 (May), pp. 211-24.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cropper, Maureen L., Leland Deck, and Kenneth E. McConnell. 1988. On the Choice of Functional Form for Hedonic Price Functions, Review of Economics and Statistics, 70 (November), pp. 668-675.
Cummings, Ronald G., Steven Elliott, Glenn W. Harrison, and James Murphy. 1997. Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible? Journal of Political Economy (forthcoming). -24Huang and Smith RFF 97-23 Cummings, Ronald G., Glenn W. Hanison, and Laura L. Osborne. 1995. Can the Bias of Contingent Valuation be Reduced?: Evidence from the Laboratory, Economics Working Paper B-95-03, University of South Carolina.
- Eom, Y. M. and V. Kerry Smith. 1994. Calibrated Nonmarket Valuation, unpublished paper under revision, Center for Environmental and Resource Economics, Duke University.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Goldberger, Arthur 5. 1968. The Interpretation and Estimation of Cobb Douglas Functions, Econometrica, 36 (July-October), pp. 464-472 Hanemann, W. Michael. 1984. Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses, American Journal ofAgricultural Economics, 66, pp. 332-34 1.
- Hanemann, W. Michael. 1988. Three Approaches to Defining `Existence or `Non-Use Value under Certainty, working paper, Dept. of Agricultural & Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley, July.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Harrison, W. Glenn. 1996. Experimental Economics and Contingent Valuation, Discussion Paper B 96-10, Department of Economics, University of South Carolina, October.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hausman, Jerry A., ed. 1992. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment (Amsterdam, North Holland).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Holmes, Thomas P. and Randall A. Kramer. 1995. An Independent Sample Test of YeaSaying and Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29 (July), pp. 121-132.
- Johnson and G. V. Johnson, eds., Economic Valuation of Natural Resources: Issues, Theory, and Applications (Boulder, Cob., Westview Press). Kealy, Mary Jo and Richard C. Bishop. 1986. Theoretical and Empirical Specification Issue in Travel Cost Demand Studies, American Journal ofAgricultural Economics, 69 (August), pp. 660-667.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Johnson, Rebecca. L., N. Stewart Bregenzer, and Bo Shelby. 1990. Contingent Valuation Question Formats: Dichotomous Choice Versus Open-Ended Responses, in R. L.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kealy, Mary Jo and Robert W. Turner. 1993. A Test of the Equality of Close-Ended and Open-Ended Contingent Valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75 (May), pp. 321-33 1.
Kling, Catherine L. 1988. Comparing Welfare Estimates of Environmental Quality Changes from Recreation Demand Models, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15 (September), pp. 33 1-340. -25Huang and Smith RFF 97-23 Kopp, Raymond J. and V. Keny Smith. 1996. Constructing Measures of Economic Value, in R. J. Kopp, W. Pommerhrne, and N. Schwarz, eds., Determining the Value of NonMarket Goods: Economic Psychological and Policy Relevant Aspects of Contingent Valuation (Boston, Mass., Kluwer Nishoff).
- Kristrom, Bengt. 1993. Comparing Continuous and Discrete Contingent Valuation Questions, Environmental and Resource Economics, 3 (February), pp. 63-72.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Madariaga, Bruce, and Kenneth E. McConnell. 1987. Exploring Existence Value, Water Resources Research, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 936-942.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
McConnell, Kenneth E. 1990. Models for Referendum Data: The Structure of Discrete Models for Contingent Valuation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18, pp. 19-34.
McFadden, Daniel. 1994. Contingent Valuation and Social Choice, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 689-708.
Ready, Richard C., Jean C. Buzby, and Dayuan Hu. 1996. Differences Between Continuous and Discrete Contingent Value Estimates, Land Economics, 72 (August), pp. 397-411.