This document has not been cited yet.

1. Adamowicz, W., Louvier, J. and Williams, M. (1994). Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26: 271–292, doi:10.1006/jeem.1994.1017.

2. Allcott, H. (2011a). Consumers’ perceptions and misperceptions of energy costs. American Economic Review 101: 98–104, doi:10.1257/aer.101.3.98.

3. Allcott, H. (2011b). Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics 95: 1082–1095, doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003.

4. Allcott, H. (2013). The welfare effects of misperceived product costs: Data and calibrations from the automobile market. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5: 30–66.

5. Allcott, H. and Knittel, C. (2019). Are consumers poorly informed about fuel economy? evidence from two experiments. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 11: 1–37, doi:10.1257/pol.20170019.

6. Allcott, H. and Rogers, T. (2014). The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation. American Economic Review 104: 3003–3037, doi:10.1257/aer.104.10.3003.

7. Allcott, H. and Sweeney, R. (2016). The role of sales agents in information disclosure: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Science 63: 1–19, doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015. 2327.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

8. Allcott, H. and Taubinsky, D. (2015). Evaluating behaviorally motivated policy: Experimental evidence from the lightbulb market. American Economic Review 105: 2501–2538, doi: 10.1257/aer.20131564.

9. Allcott, N. and Greenstone, M. (2012). Is there an energy efficiency gap? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 26: 3–28, doi:10.1257/jep.26.1.3. Anderson, C. D. and Claxton, J. D. (2014). Barriers to consumer choice of energy efficient products. Journal of Consumer Research 9: 163–170, doi:10.1086/208909.

10. Andor, M. A., Gerster, A. and Sommer, S. (2020). Consumer inattention, heuristic thinking and the role of energy labels. The Energy Journal 40: 83–112, doi:10.5547/01956574.41.1. mand.

11. Aravena, C., Martinsson, P. and Scarpa, R. (2014). Does money talk? – the effect of a monetary attribute on the marginal values in a choice experiment. Energy Economics 44: 483–491, doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2014.02.017.

12. Ayres, I., Raseman, S. and Shih, A. (2009). Evidence from Two Large Field Experiments That Peer Comparison Feedback Can Reduce Residential Energy Usage. Working Paper 15386, National Bureau of Economic Research.

13. Banfi, S., Farsi, M., Filippini, M. and Jakob, M. (2008). Willingness to pay for energysaving measures in residential buildings. Energy Economics 30: 503–516, doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2006. 06.001.

14. Block, L. G. and Keller, P. A. (1995). When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health related behavior. Journal of Marketing Research 32: 192–203, doi:10.2307/3152047.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Brounen, D., Kok, N. and Quigley, L. M. (2013). Energy literacy, awareness, and conservation behavior of residential households. Energy Economics 38: 42–50, doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2013. 02.008.

16. Carroll, J., Aravena, C. and Denny, E. (2016a). Low energy efficiency in rental properties: Asymmetric information or low willingness-to-pay? Energy Policy 96: 617–629, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.019.

17. Carroll, J., Aravena, C., Boeri, M. and Denny, E. (2021). The energy cost information gap and the effects of short and long-term monetary labels on household decisions. The Energy Journal, forthcoming .
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

18. Carroll, J., Denny, E. and Lyons, R. (2016b). The effects of energy cost labelling on appliance purchasing decisions: Trial results from ireland. Journal of Consumer Policy 39: 23–40, doi:10.1007/s10603-015-9306-4.

19. Central Statistics Office (2016a). Census 2016. Available at: https://www.cso.ie/ en/csolatestnews/presspages/2017/census2016profile3-anageprofileofireland/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. Central Statistics Office (2016b). Census 2016. Available at: https://www.cso.ie/en/ releasesandpublications/ep/p-cp11eoi/cp11eoi/. Accessed on February 8, 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. Central Statistics Office (2016c). Census 2016. Available at: https://www.cso.ie/en/ releasesandpublications/ep/pcp10esil/p10esil/. Accessed on February 8, 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Central Statistics Office (2017). Households and families. Available at: https: //www.cso.ie/en/media/csoie/releasespublications/documents/population/2017/ Chapter_4_Households_and_families.pdf. Accessed on February 8, 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
23. Collaborative Labeling and Appliance Standards Program (2005). Global S&L Database, https://clasp.ngo/publications/s-l-guidebook-english-version.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

24. Davis, L. W. and Metcalf, G. E. (2016). Does better information lead to better choices? evidence from energy-efficiency labels. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 3: 589–625, doi:10.1086/686252.

25. Department of Energy and Climate Change (2014). Evaluation of the decc/john lewis energy labelling trial. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/ uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/350282/John_Lewis_trial_report_ 010914FINAL.pdf. Accessed on March 12, 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Dranove, D. and Jin, G. Z. (2010). Quality disclosure and certification: Theory and practice.

27. Greene, W. H. and Hensher, D. A. (2003). A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Resource Part B: Methodology 37: 681–698, doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(02)00046-2.

28. Hanley, N., Wright, R. and Adamowicz, V. (1998). Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environmental Resource Economics 11: 413–428, doi:10.1023/A:1008287310583.

29. Hasseldine, J. and Hite, P. A. (2003). Framing, gender and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology 24: 517–533, doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00209-X.

30. Heinzel, S. (2012). Disclosure of energy operating cost information: A silver bullet for overcoming the energy-efficiency gap? Journal of Consumer Policy 35, doi:10.1007/ s10603-012-9189-6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

31. Heinzle, S. and Wüstenhagen, R. (2012). Dynamic adjustment of eco-labeling schemes and consumer choice - the revision of the eu energy label as a missed opportunity? Business Strategy and the Environment 21: 60–70, doi:10.1002/bse.722.

32. Hensher, D. A. and Louviere, J. (1983). On the design and analysis of simulated choice or allocation choice in travel choice modelling. Transportation Research 890: 1–7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
33. Holler, M., Hoelzl, E., Kirchler, E., Leder, S. and Mannetti, L. (2009). Framing of information of the use on public finances, regulatory fit of recipients and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology 29: 597–611, doi:10.1016/j.joep.2008.01.001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

34. Homar, A. R. and Cvelbar, L. K. (2021). The effects of framing on environmental decisions: A systematic literature review. Ecological Economics 183: 106950, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon. 2021.106950.

35. International Energy Agency (2019). Iea world energy balances 2019. Available at: https:// www.iea.org/subscribe-to-data-services/world-energy-balancesand-statistics.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

36. Jaffe, A. B. and Stavins, R. N. (1994). The energy-efficiency gap what does it mean? Energy Policy 22: 804–810, doi:10.1016/0301-4215(94)90138-4.

37. Jain, M., Rao, A. B. and Patwardhan, A. (2021). Energy cost information and consumer decisions: Results from a choice experiment on refrigerator purchases in india. The Energy Journal 42: 253–272, doi:10.5547/01956574.42.2.mjai.

38. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist 39: 341–350, doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

39. Kallbekken, S., Sælen, H. and Hermansen, E. A. T. (2013). Bridging the energy efficiency gap: A field experiment on lifetime energy costs and household appliances. Journal of Consumer Policy 36: 1–16, doi:10.1007/s10603-012-9211-z.

40. Komarek, T. M. and Kaplowitz, F. L. M. D. (2011). Valuing energy policy attributes for environmental management. choice experiment evidence from a research institution.

41. Lancaster, K. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 74: 132–157, doi:10.1086/259131.

42. Lancsar, E. and Louviere, J. (2008). Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making. a user’s guide. Pharmacoeconomics 26: 661–677, doi:10.2165/ 00019053-200826080-00004.

43. Loroz, P. S. (2007). The interaction of message frames and reference points in prosocial persuasive appeals. Psychology and Marketing 24: 1001–1023, doi:10.1002/mar.20193.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. Louviere, J. and Woodworth, G. (1983). Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregated data. Journal of Marketing Research 20: 350–367, doi:10.2307/3151440.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
45. Lowenstein, G. (1988). Frames of mind in intertemporal choice. Management Science 34: 200–214, doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.2.200.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

46. Lowenstein, G. and Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 573–597, doi:10.2307/2118482.

47. Lowenstein, G. and Thaler, R. H. (1989). Anomalies: Intertemporal choice. The Journal of Economomic Perspectives 3: 181–193, doi:10.1257/jep.3.4.181.

48. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Zarembka, P. (ed.), Frontiers of econometrics. New York: Academic Press, 105–142.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

49. McFadden, D. and Train, K. (2000). Mixed mnl models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15: 447–470, doi:10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5%3C447::AID-JAE570% 3E3.0.CO;2-1.

50. McNeill, D. L. and Wilkie, W. L. (1979). Public policy and consumer information: Impact of the new energy labels. Journal of Consumer Research 6: 1–11, doi:10.1086/208743.

51. Meyers-Levy, J. and Maheswaran, D. (2004). Exploring message framing outcomes when systematic, heuristic, or both types of processing occur. Journal of Consumer Psychology 14: 159–167, doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&218.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

52. Newell, R. G. and Siikamäki, J. (2014). Nudging energy efficiency behavior: The role  of information labels. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 1, doi:10.1086/679281.

53. Office for National Statistics (2017). Graduates in the uk labour market: 2017. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/ employmentandemployeetypes/articles/graduatesintheuklabourmarket/2017# steady-increase-in-the-number-of-graduates-in-the-uk-over-the-past-decade.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
54. Office for National Statistics (2019a). Population estimates by marital status and living arrangements, england and wales: 2019. Available at: https://www.ons.gov. uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/ bulletins/populationestimatesbymaritalstatusandlivingarrangements/latest.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
55. Office for National Statistics (2019b). Population estimates for the uk, england and wales, scotland and northern ireland: mid-2019. Available at: https://www.ons.gov. uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/ bulletins/annualmidyearpopulationestimates/mid2019estimates. Accessed on February 8, 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
56. Office for National Statistics (2021). Labour market overview, uk: January 2021. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/ peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/bulletins/uklabourmarket/latest# employment-unemployment-and-economic-inactivity. Accessed on February 8, 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

57. Revelt, D. and Train, K. (1998). Mixed logit with repeated choices: Households’ choices of appliance efficiency level. The Review of Economics and Statistics 80: 647–657, doi: 10.1162/003465398557735.

58. Rivers, N. and Jaccard, M. (2005). Combining top-down and bottom-up approaches to energy-economy modelling using discrete choice methods. The Energy Journal 26: 83–106.

59. Rothman, A. J. and Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin 121: 3–19, doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3. Rothman, A. J., Salovey, P., Antone, C., Keough, K. and Martin, C. D. (1993). The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 29: 408–433, doi:10.1006/jesp.1993.1019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
60. Ryan, M., Gerard, K. and Amaya-Amaya, M. (2008). Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Dordrecth: Springer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

61. Sammer, K. and Wüstenhagen, R. (2006). The influence of eco-labelling on consumer behaviour - results of a discrete choice analysis for washing machines. Business Strategy and the Environment 15: 185–199, doi:10.1002/bse.522.

62. Shen, J. and Saijo, T. (2009). Does an energy efficiency label alter consumers’ purchasing decisions? a latent class approach based on a stated choice experiment in shanghai. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 3561–3573, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.010.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
63. Statistics Canada (2016). The daily. education in canada: Key results from the 2016 census. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/dailyquotidien/171129/ dq171129a-eng.htm?indid=14431-3&indgeo=0. Accessed on February 8, 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
64. Statistics Canada (2020a). The daily. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/ daily-quotidien/200929/dq200929b-eng.htm. Accessed on February 8, 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
65. Statistics Canada (2020b). Estimates of population as of july 1st, by marital status or legal marital status, age and sex. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/ tv.action?pid=1710006001. Accessed on February 8, 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
66. The World Bank Group (2020). Population growth (annual https://data.worldbank.org/ indicator/SP.POP.GROW. Accessed on September 9, 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
67. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211: 453–458.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
68. U.S. Census Bureau (2019a). Census bureau releases 2020 demographic analy38 sis estimates. Available at: https://www.census.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/2020/ 2020-demographic-analysis-estimates.html. Accessed on Februray 8, 2021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
69. U.S. Census Bureau (2019b). Population estimates 2019. bachelor’s degree or higher, percent of persons age 25 years+, 2015-2019. Available at: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/ fact/table/US/PST045219. Accessed on December 28, 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
70. U.S. Census Bureau (2019c). Population estimates 2019. in civilian labor force, total, percent of population age 16 years+, 2015-2019. Available at: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/ fact/table/US/PST045219. Accessed on December 28, 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
71. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2020). Annual energy outlook 2020. Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Changing with the Tide: Semiparametric Estimation of Preference Dynamics. (2014). Koster, Paul ; Dekker, Thijs ; Brouwer, Roy.
   In: Land Economics.
   RePEc:uwp:landec:v:90:y:2014:i:4:p:717-745.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. The impact of policy elements on the financing costs of RE investment: The case of wind power in Germany. (2011). Breitschopf, Barbara ; Giebel, Olaf .
   In: Working Papers Sustainability and Innovation.
   RePEc:zbw:fisisi:s112011.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Estimating the Value of Achieving ‘Good Ecological Status’ under the Water Framework Directive in the Boyne River Catchment: A Mixed Multinomial Logit Approach. (2011). Hynes, Stephen ; Hanley, Nick ; Campbell, Danny ; Stithou, Mavra .
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:ags:semrui:148928.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Consumers’ Stated Choices versus Purchasing Desires: Case of Hawaii Food Baskets. (2009). Hu, Wuyang ; Cox, Linda.
   In: Agricultural Economics Review.
   RePEc:ags:aergaa:56632.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Testing Different Types of Benefit Transfer in Valuation of Ecosystem Services: New Zealand Winegrowing Case Studies. (2009). Cullen, Ross ; Colombo, Sergio ; Baskaran, Ramesh.
   In: 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia.
   RePEc:ags:aare09:48189.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Alternative Approaches to Incorporating the Opportunity Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Models. (2008). Crooker, John ; Azevedo, Christopher.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:umn:wpaper:0803.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Natural disturbances and natural hazards in mountain forests: a framework for the economic valuation. (2008). Paletto, Alessandro ; Notaro, Sandra.
   In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
   RePEc:trn:utwpde:0808.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Introducing a genetically modified banana in Uganda: Social benefits, costs, and consumer perceptions. (2008). Wesseler, Justus ; Falck Zepeda, José ; Kilkuwe, Enoch ; Falck-Zepeda, Jose.
   In: IFPRI discussion papers.
   RePEc:fpr:ifprid:767.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiments method?. (2007). Rambonilaza, Tina.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:9225.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data to Estimate the Nonmarket Value of Ecological Services: An Assessment of the State of the Science. (2007). Whitehead, John ; Pattanayak, Subhrendu ; Gelso, Brett R. ; Van Houtven, George L..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:apl:wpaper:05-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Curbside recycling: Waste resource or waste of resources?. (2006). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.
    RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:25:y:2006:i:4:p:855-874.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Using Expert Judgment to Assess Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change: Evidence From a Conjoint Choice Survey. (2006). Chiabai, Aline ; Alberini, Anna.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa06p292.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models. (2006). Siikamäki, Juha ; DavidF. Layton, .
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. DOES THE CONSUMERS VARIETY-SEEKING BEHAVIOR CONDITION THE WILLINGNESS TO TRAVEL FURTHER?. (2006). Nicolau, Juan.
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. A NEW MARKETING SEGMENTATION APPROACH BASED ON MARGINAL INDIVIDUAL UTILITIES: APPLYING CRM IS NOT A CHIMERA ANYMORE. (2006). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Using Surveys to Compare the Public’s and Decisionmakers’ Preferences for Urban Regeneration: The Venice Arsenale. (2006). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.137.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. (2005). Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte ; Bech, Mickael.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:14:y:2005:i:10:p:1079-1083.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Public Preferences for Land usesÂ’ changes - valuing urban regeneration projects at the Venice Arsenale. (2005). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa05p756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Convergent Validity of Contingent Behavior Responses in Models of Recreation Demand. (2005). Herriges, Joseph ; Jeon, Yongsik.
    In: Staff General Research Papers Archive.
    RePEc:isu:genres:12473.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Giuda, Alita ; Turner, Robert W. ; Noddin, Laura.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2005:i:7:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (1). (2004). Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:909-912.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. (2004). Savage, Elizabeth ; Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:901-907.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Time is Money: Improved Valuation of Time and Transportation Costs. (2004). Earnhart, Dietrich.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:29:y:2004:i:2:p:159-190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Altruism and the Economic Values of Environmental and Social Policies. (2004). Vázquez Rodríguez, María Xosé.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:28:y:2004:i:2:p:233-249.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. A RANDOM PARAMETER LOGIT APPROACH TO THE TWO-STAGE TOURIST CHOICE PROCESS: GOING ON HOLIDAYS AND LENGTH OF STAY. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-46.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. STOCHASTIC CHOICE ANALYSIS OF TOURISM DESTINATIONS. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare - transportation of farm animals to slaughter versus the use of mobile abattoirs. (2004). Carlsson, Fredrik ; Lagerkvist, Carl Johan ; Frykblom, Peter .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0149.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Heterogeneous preferences for marine amenities: A choice experiment applied to water quality. (2004). Eggert, HÃ¥kan ; Olsson, Bjorn.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Experience, Expectations and Hindsight: Evidence of a Cognitive Wedge in Stated Preference Retrospectives. (2004). Provencher, Bill ; Bishop, Richard ; Bennett, Michael.
    In: Staff Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecl:wisagr:468.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. A choice modelling approach to investigate biases in individual and aggregated benefit estimates due to omission of distance. (2004). .
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200412.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Effects of distance on non-use values. (2004). .
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200411.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Curbside Recycling: Waste Resource or Waste of Resources?. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0310001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Cheap Talk Revisited: New Evidence from CVM. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0301001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics. (2003). Wright, Robert ; Hanley, Nick ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:3-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope. (2003). Mourato, Susana.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:141-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. SELF IMAGE AND CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: HYPOTHETICAL AND ACTUAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY. (2003). Johansson-Stenman, Olof ; Svedsater, Henrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Deriving welfare measures from stated preference discrete choice modelling experiments, CHERE Discussion Paper No 48. (2002). Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:her:chedps:48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. A COMPARISON OF STATED AND REVEALED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR FISHERIES MANAGEMENT. (2002). Hicks, Robert.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19853.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. ARE STATED PREFERENCES INVARIANT TO THE PROSPECT OF REAL-MONEY CHOICE?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Newell, Laurienne Whinstanley.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation. (2001). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Alpizar Rodriguez, Francisco.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0052.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. LOGIT MODELS FOR POOLED CONTINGENT VALUATION AND CONTINGENT RATING AND RANKING DATA: VALUING BENEFITS FROM FOREST BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION. (2001). Siikamäki, Juha ; Siikamaki, Juha ; Layton, David F. ; DavidF. Layton, .
    In: 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea01:20616.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: a multiple-format, stated-preference approach. (2000). Banzhaf, Melissa Ruby ; Desvousges, William H. ; Johnson, Reed F..
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:9:y:2000:i:4:p:295-317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Combining Averting Behavior and Contingent Valuation Data: An Application to Drinking Water Treatment. (2000). Nunes, Luis ; Cunha-E-Sa, Maria A., ; Ducla-Soares, Maria M. ; ROSADO, MARCIA A. ; Cunha-e-Sa, Maria A., .
    In: FEUNL Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:unl:unlfep:wp392.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Comparing Ranking and Contingent Valuation for Valuing Human Lives, Applying Nested and Non-Nested Logit Models. (2000). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:17:y:2000:i:1:p:1-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Binary Choice Valuation Studies with Heteregeneous Preferences Regarding the Program Being Valued. (2000). Huhtala, Anni.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:16:y:2000:i:3:p:263-279.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Preference Structures, Property Rights, and Paired Comparisons. (1999). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:13:y:1999:i:1:p:107-122.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. What do doctors want? developing incentives for doctors to serve in Indonesias rural and remote areas. (1998). Azwar, Azrul ; Widiyarti, ; Ismail, Nusye ; Chomitz, Kenneth M. ; Setiadi, Gunawan.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1888.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Willingness to Pay for Quality Improvements: Can Revealed and Stated Preferences Data be Combined?. (1997). Whitehead, John ; Haab, Tim ; Huang, Ju-Chin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:wop:eacaec:9704.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Willingness-to-Pay for Improved Air Quality in Hamilton-Wentworth: A Choice Experiment. (1997). .
    In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mcm:deptwp:1997-04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data. (1996). Englin, Jeffrey ; Cameron, Trudy.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:7:y:1996:i:2:p:133-147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-02-26 01:05:07 || Missing content? Let us know