Acs, Z. and Mueller, P. (2008). Employment effect of business dynamics: mice, gazelles and elephants. Small Business Economics 30, 85-100.
Audretsch, D.B., Coad, A. and Segarra, A. (2014). Firm growth and innovation. Small Buisness Economics 43, 743-749.
- Birch, D. (1979). The job generation process. The MIT Press: Cambridge MA.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Birch, D. (1981). Who creates jobs?. The Public interest 65(fall), 3-14.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bottazzi, G., Cefis, E., Dosi, G., Secchi, A. (2007). Invariances and Diversities in the Patterns of Industrial Evolution: Some Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Industries. Small Business Economics 29, 137-159.
Bottazzi, G., Coad, A., Jacoby, N. and Secchi, A. (2011). Corporate growth and industrial dynamics: evidence from French manufacturing. Applied Economics 43, 103-116.
Bottazzi, G., Secchi, A., 2006. Explaining the Distribution of Firms Growth Rates. Rand Journal of Economics. 37, 234-263.
- Brunnermeier, S. B., and Cohen, M. A. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries.Journal of environmental economics and management45(2), 278-293.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cainelli, G., Evangelista R., Savona M. (2006). Innovation and economic performance in services: a firm-level analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics 30, 435-458.
Cassia L, Colombelli, A., Paleari, S., 2009. Firms’growth: Does the innovation system matter?. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 20, 211-220.
- Cassia L., Colombelli A. 2008. Do universities knowledge spillovers impact on new firm’s growth? Empirical evidence from UK, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 4 (4), 453-465.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Castaldi, C., Dosi, G. (2009). The patterns of output growth of firms and countries: Scale invariances and scale specificities. Empirical Economics 37, 475-495.
Cefis E., Ciccarelli, M., Orsenigo, L., 2007. Testing Gibrat's legacy: A Bayesian approach to study the growth of firms. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 18, 3, 348-369.
Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar. Coad, A. (2007). A Closer Look at Serial Growth Rate Correlation. Review of Industrial Organization 31(1), 69–82.
Coad, A. (2009). The Growth of Firms: a Survey of Theories and Empirical Evidence.
Coad, A., Hoelzl, W. (2011). Firm growth: empirical analysis, in Dietrich, M. and Krafft, J. (eds), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Coad, A., Rao, R. (2008). Innovation and firm growth in high- tech sectors: A quantile regression approach. Research Policy 37, 633-648.
Coad, A., Rao, R. (2010). Firm growth and R&D expenditure. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 19, 127-1453.
Colombelli, A. and Quatraro, F. (2014). The persistence of firms' knowledge base: a quantile approach to Italian data. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 23, 585-610.
Colombelli, A., Haned, N. and Le Bas, C. (2013). On firm growth and innovation: Some new empirical perspectives using French CIS (1992–2004). Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 26, 14-26.
Colombelli, A., Krafft, J. and Quatraro, F. (2014). High-growth firms and technological knowledge: do gazelles follow exploration or exploitation strategies?. Industrial and Corporate Change 23, 261-291.
Costantini, V., Mazzanti, M., Montini, A. (2013). Environmental performance and regional innovation spillovers. Evidence from a regional NAMEA. Ecological Economics 89, 101– 114.
- Crespi, F., and Quatraro, F. (2013). Systemic technology policies: Issues and instruments.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Crespi, F., and Quatraro, F. (2015). The Economics of Knowledge, Innovation and Systemic Technology Policy. London and New York, Routledge.
- Del RÃo, P. (2009). The empirical analysis of the determinants for environmental technological change: A research agenda. Ecological Economics 68(3), 861-878.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation. Journal of Economic Literature 26, 1120-1171.
Frondel, M., Horbach, J., and Rennings, K. (2008). What triggers environmental management and innovation? Empirical evidence for Germany. Ecological Economics 66(1), 153-160.
- Geroski, P., Machin, S. (1992). Do Innovating Firms Outperform Non-innovators?. Business Strategy Review (summer) 3, 79-90.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Geroski, P.A., Machin, S.J., Walters C.F. (1997). Corporate Growth and Protability. Journal of Industrial Economics 45, 2, 171-189.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ghisetti, C. and Quatraro, F. (2013). Beyond the inducement in climate change: Do environmental performances spur environmental technologies? A regional analysis of cross-sectoral differences. Ecological Economics 96, 99-113.
- Gibrat, R., 1931. Les inégalités économiques, Librairie du Recueil Sirey, Paris.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hölzl, W. (2009). Is the R&D behaviour of fast-growing SMEs different? Evidence from CIS III data for 16 countries. Small Business Economics 33, 59-75.
Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A. and Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics 36, 16-38.
Henrekson, M. and Johansson, D. (2010). Gazelles as Job Creators - A Survey and Interpretation of the Evidence. Small Business Economics 35, 227-244.
Horbach, J., Rammer C., and Rennings C. (2012). Determinants of Eco-innovations by Type of Environmental Impact - The Role of Regulatory Push/Pull, Technology Push and Market Pull. Ecological Economics 78, 112-122.
Jaffe, K. and Palmer (1997). Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel study. The Review of Economics and StatisticsX, 610–619.
Kemp, R. (2010). Eco-innovation: Definition, Measurement and Open Research Issues. Economia politica 3, 397-420.
Laitner, J. Stolyarov, D. (2013), Derivative ideas and the value of intangible assets, International Economic Review 54, 1.
Lanjouw, J. O., and Mody, A. (1996). Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Research Policy25(4), 549-571.
Lanoie,P., Lucchetti, J., Johnstone, N. and Ambec, S. (2011). Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 20(3), 803-842.
Lee, K. (2010). A theory of firm growth: learning capability, knowledge threshold, and patterns of growth. Research Policy 39, 278-289.
Lotti, F., Santarelli, E. and Vivarelli, M. (2009). Defending Gibrat's Law as a Long-Run Regularity. Small Business Economics 32, 31-44.
- Mansfield, E. (1962). Entry, Gibrat’s law, innovation and the growth of firms. American Economic Review 52, 1023-1051.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Marin, G. (2014). Do eco-innovations harm productivity growth through crowding out? Results of an extended CDM model for Italy. Research Policy 43, 301-317.
McGahan, A.M., Silverman B.S. (2006). Profiting from technological innovation by others: The effect of competitor patenting on firm value. Research Policy 35, 1222–1242.
- Mitusch, K. and Schimke, A. (2011). Gazelles – High Growth Companies. Final Report, Task4, Horizontal report 5. Consortium Europe INNOVA Sectoral Innovation Watch.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Mowery, D. (1983). Industrial Research and Firm Size, Survival, and Growth in American Manufacturing, 1921 – 1946: An Assessment. Journal of Economic History 43, 4, 953980.
- Nelson, R.R., Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. The Belknap Press Cambridge, MA, and London.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Nesta, L. (2008). Knowledge and productivity in the world’s largest manufacturing corporations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 67, 886-902.
Nightingale, P. and Coad, A. (2014). Muppets and gazelles: political and methodological biases in entrepreneurship research. Industrial and Corporate Change 23, 113-143.
Pakes, A. and Schankerman, M. (1979). The Rate of Obsolescence of Knowledge, Research Gestation Lags, and the Private rate of Return to Research Resources. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No.346.
Parker, S.C, Storey, D.J. and van Witteloostuijn, A. (2010). What happens to gazelles? The importance of dynamic management strategy. Small Business Economics 35, 203-226.
Popp, D. (2006). Exploring links between innovation and diffusion: adoption of NOx control technologies at US coal-fired power plants . National Bureau of Economic Research w12119.
Porter, M. E., and Van der Linde, C. (1995).Toward a new conception of the environmentcompetitiveness relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4), 97-118.
Rahko J. (2014). Market value of R&D, patents, and organizational capital: Finnish evidence. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 23, 353-377.
Rennings, K., and Rammer, C. (2011).The impact of regulation-driven environmental innovation on innovation success and firm performance. Industry and Innovation 18(03), 255-283.
- Rennings, K., and Rexhäuser, S. (2011). Long-term impacts of environmental policy and ecoinnovative activities of firms. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management 11(3), 274-290.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rexhauser S. and Rammer C., (2011). Unmasking the porter hypothesis: Environmental innovations and firm-profitability. ZEW Discussion Papers 11-036, ZEW - Zentrum fr Europaische Wirtschaftsforschung / Center for European Economic Research.
Schankerman, M. (1998). How valuable is patent protection? Estimates by Technology Field. RAND Journal of Economics 29, 77-107.
Scherer, F.M. (1965). Corporate Inventive Output, Profits, and Growth. Journal of Political Economy 73, 3, 290-297 Schumpter, J.A. (1942). Capitlism, Socialism and Democracy. London, Unwin.
- Schmookler, J. (1954). The level of inventive activity. The Review of Economics and Statistics 36, 183-190.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Schumpeter, J.A. (1947). The creative response in economic history. Journal of Economic History 7, 149–159.
Sutton, J. (1997). Gibrat’s legacy. Journal of Economic Literature 35, 40-59.
Teece D.J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 22, 112-113.