create a website

What drives the relevance and reputation of economics journals? An update from a survey among economists. (2013). Muck, Johannes ; Haucap, Justus.
In: DICE Discussion Papers.
RePEc:zbw:dicedp:103.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 46

References cited by this document

Cocites: 31

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. The Complexity of Economies and Pluralism in Economics. (2017). Gräbner, Claudius.
    In: ICAE Working Papers.
    RePEc:ico:wpaper:69.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Citation Patterns in Economics and Beyond: Assessing the Peculiarities of Economics from Two Scientometric Perspectives. (2017). Kapeller, Jakob ; Aistleitner, Matthias ; Steinberger, Stefan .
    In: ICAE Working Papers.
    RePEc:ico:wpaper:60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Azar, O.H. (2005), ‘The Review Process in Economics: Is it Too Fast?’, Southern Economic Journal 72, 481-491.

  2. Beed, C. and C. Beed (1996), ‘Measuring the Quality of Academic Journals: The Case of Economics’, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 18, 369-396.

  3. Berlemann, M. and J. Haucap (2012), ‘Which Factors Drive the Decision to Boycott and Opt out of Research Rankings?’, CESifo Working Paper No. 3997.

  4. Besley, T. and P. Hennessy (2009), Letter to the Queen, dated 22 July 2009, online at: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/3e3b6ca8-7a08-11de-b86f-00144feabdc0.pdf Blank, R.M. (1991), ‘The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from the American Economic Review’, American Economic Review 81, 1041-1067.

  5. Blaug, M. (1997), ‘Ugly Currents in Modern Economics’, Policy Options (September 1997), 3-8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Bräuninger, M. and J. Haucap (2001), ‚Was Ökonomen lesen und schätzen‘, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 2, 185-210.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Bräuninger, M., J. Haucap and J. Muck (2011), ‚Was schätzen und lesen deutschsprachige Ökonomen heute?‘, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 12, 339-371.

  8. Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011a), ‘What Makes a Great Journal in Economics? The Singer, not the Song’, Journal of Economic Surveys 25, 326361.

  9. Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011b), ‘What Makes a Great Journal Great in Sciences? Which Came First, the Chicken or the Egg?’, Scientometrics 87(1), 17-40.

  10. Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011c), ‘Great Expectatrics: Great Papers, Great Journals, Great Econometrics’, Econometric Reviews 30, 583-619.

  11. Colander, D., M. Goldberg, A. Haas, K. Juselius, A. Kirman, T. Lux and B. Sloth (2009), ‘The Financial Crisis and the Systemic Failure of the Economics Profession’, Critical Review 21(2), 249-267.

  12. Danielson, A. and C. D. Delorme (1976), Some Empirical Evidence on the Variables Associated with the Ranking of Economics Journals, Southern Economic Journal 43, 1149-1160.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Dow, S.C., P.E. Earl, J. Foster, G.C. Harcourt, G.M. Hodgson, J.S. Metcalfe, P. Ormerod, B. Rosewell, M.C. Sawyer and A. Tylecote (2009), ‘The GFC and University Economics Education: An Open Letter to the Queen’, Journal of Australian Political Economy 64, 233-235.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Dulleck, U. and R. Kerschbamer (2006), ‘On Doctors, Mechanics and Computer Specialists: The Economics of Credence Goods’, Journal of Economic Literature 44, 5-42.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Ellis, L.V. and G.C. Durden (1991), ‘Why Economists Rank Their Journals the Way They Do’, Journal of Economics and Business 43, 265-270.

  16. Ellison, G. (2002), ‘Evolving Standards for Academic Publishing: A q-r-Theory’, Journal of Political Economy 110, 994-1034.

  17. Ellison, G. (2011), ‘Is Peer-Review in Decline?’, Economic Inquiry 49, 635-657.

  18. Frey, B.S. (2004), ‚Publizieren als Prostitution?‘, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 5, 333-336.

  19. Frey, B.S. (2005), ‘Problems with Publishing: Existing State and Solutions’, European Journal of Law and Economics 19, 173-190.

  20. Graber, M., A. Launov and L. Wälde (2008), ‘Publish or Perish? The Increasing Importance of Publications for Prospective Economics Professors in Austria, Germany and Switzerland’, German Economic Review 9, 457-472.

  21. Handelsblatt (2011), ‘So funktioniert das VWL-Ranking‘, online at: http://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/oekonomie/vwl-ranking/methodik-sofunktioniert -das-vwl-ranking/4575334.html Harzing, A.W. (2007), Publish or Perish, online at: http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Hawkins, R.G.; L.S. Ritter and I. Walter (1973), ‘What Economists Think of Their Journals’, Journal of Political Economy 81, 1017-1032.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Hirsch, J.E. (2005), ‘An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 (46), 16569-16572.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Hodgson, G.M. and H. Rothman (1999), ‘The Editors and Authors of Economics Journals: A Case of Institutional Oligopoly?’, Economic Journal 109, F165-F186.

  25. Institute for Scientific Information (2010), Journal Citation Report 2009, Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Institute for Scientific Information (2011), Journal Citation Report 2010, Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Kleibergen, F. and R. Paap (2006), ‘Generalized Reduced Rank Tests Using the Singularvalue Decomposition’, Journal of Econometrics 127, 97-126.

  28. Krugman, P. (2009), ‘How Did Economists Get It So Wrong?’, New York Times Online, 02 September 2009, online at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/ magazine/06Economic-t.html.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Krugman, P. (2013), ‘How the Case for Austerity has Crumbled’, The New York Review of Books, 6 June 2013, online at: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/ archives/2013/jun/06/how-case-austerity-has-crumbled/ Laband, D.N. (1990), ‘Is There Value-Added from the Review Process in Economics? Preliminary Evidence from Authors’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 105, 341353.

  30. Mankiw, G. (2007), ‘Is Steve Levitt Ruining Economics?’, Greg Mankiw’s Blog of 27 April 2007, online at: http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2007/04/is-steve-levittruining -economics.html.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. McCabe, M. and C. Snyder (2007), ‘Academic Journal Prices in a Digital Age: A TwoSided Market Approach’, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 7(1): (Contributions), Article 2.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Oswald, A.J. (2007), ‘An Examination of the Reliability of Prestigious Scholarly Journals: Evidence and Implications for Decision-Makers’, Economica 74, 21-31.

  33. Papke, L.W. and J.M. Wooldridge (1996), ‘Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401 (K) Plan Participation Rates’, Journal of Applied Econometrics 11, 619-632.

  34. Ramalho, E.A., J.J.S. Ramalho and J.M.R. Murteira (2011), ‘Alternative Estimating and Testing Empirical Strategies for Fractional Regression Models’, Journal of Economic Surveys 25, 19-68.

  35. Ramalho, E.A., J.J.S. Ramalho and P.D. Henriques (2010), ‘Fractional Regression Models for Second Stage DEA Efficiency Analyses’, Journal of Productivity Analysis 34, 239-255.

  36. Reinhart, C. and K. Rogoff (2013), ‘Open Letter to Paul Krugman’, 25. Mai 2013, online at: http://www.carmenreinhart.com/letter-to-pk/ Ritzberger, K. (2008), ‘A Ranking of Journals in Economics and Related Fields’, German Economic Review 9, 402-430.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Staiger, D., and J.H. Stock (1997), ‘Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments’, Econometrica 65, 557-586.

  38. Statalist (2010), Discussion on “reg3 option –robust-“, online at: http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/reg3-option-robust-td5647547.html.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Sutter, M. and M. Kocher (2001), ‘Tools for Evaluating Research Output: Are Citation-Based Rankings of Economics Journals Stable?’, Evaluation Review 25, 555-566.

  40. The Economist (2009a), ‘What Went Wrong with Economics?’, The Economist 392(8640), 16 July 2009, 11-12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. The Economist (2009b), ‘The Other-wordly Philosophers’, The Economist 392(8640), 16 July 2009, 65-67.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Wall, H.J. (2009), ‘Don't Get Skewed over by Journal Rankings’, B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 9 (1), Article 34.

  43. White, H. (1980), ‘A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity’, Econometrica 48, 817-838.

  44. Wooldridge, J.M. (2010), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd edition, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

  45. Wooldridge, J.M. (2012), ‘Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Testing for Nonlinear Models with Endogenous Explanatory Variables’, mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Wooldridge, J.M. (2013) Introductory Econometrics – A Modern Approach, 5th edition, South-Western, Florence. APPENDIX
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Begutachtungsverfahren nach Zahl, Gewichtung und Fehlern der Gutachten. (2019). Dilger, Alexander.
    In: Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics.
    RePEc:zbw:umiodp:22019.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. On publication, refereeing and working hard. (2018). Popov, Sergey ; Baghestanian, Sascha.
    In: Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique.
    RePEc:wly:canjec:v:51:y:2018:i:4:p:1419-1459.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Academic Research and the Strategic Interaction of Scholars and Editors: A Two-Stage Game. (2017). Faria, Joao ; Besancenot, Damien ; Mixon, Franklin G.
    In: International Game Theory Review (IGTR).
    RePEc:wsi:igtrxx:v:19:y:2017:i:01:n:s0219198916500109.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Priority criteria in peer review of scientific articles. (2016). Dekanski, Aleksandar ; Nedi, Olgica.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:107:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-016-1869-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Social network structure and government provision crowding-out on voluntary contributions. (2016). Chih, Yao-Yu.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:63:y:2016:i:c:p:83-90.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. SUBMISSION DEMAND IN CORE ECONOMICS JOURNALS: A PANEL STUDY. (2016). Zheng, Yuqing ; Kaiser, Harry M.
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:54:y:2016:i:2:p:1319-1338.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. What drives the relevance and reputation of economics journals? An update from a survey among economists. (2015). Muck, Johannes ; Haucap, Justus.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:103:y:2015:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1542-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Which factors drive the decision to opt out of individual research rankings? An empirical study of academic resistance to change. (2015). Haucap, Justus ; Berlemann, Michael.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:44:y:2015:i:5:p:1108-1115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. On Publication, Refereeing, and Working Hard. (2014). Popov, Sergey ; Baghestanian, Sascha .
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:qub:wpaper:1404.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. On Publication, Refereeing and Working Hard. (2014). Popov, Sergey ; Baghestanian, Sascha.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:58539.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. On the marketization of the academic review process. (VF) Sur la marchandisation du processus de referee des revues académiques. (2014). de Mesnard, Louis.
    In: Working Papers CREGO.
    RePEc:dij:wpfarg:1141001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Congestion of Academic Journals Under Papers’ Imperfect Selection. (2014). Faria, Joao ; Besancenot, Damien ; Damien, Besancenot ; Kim, Huynh ; Faria João R., .
    In: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy.
    RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:14:y:2014:i:3:p:23:n:14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. What drives the relevance and reputation of economics journals? An update from a survey among economists. (2013). Muck, Johannes ; Haucap, Justus.
    In: DICE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:dicedp:103.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Which factors drive the decision to boycott and opt out of research rankings? A note. (2012). Haucap, Justus ; Berlemann, Michael.
    In: DICE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:dicedp:72.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Search and research: the influence of editorial boards on journals’ quality. (2012). Faria, Joao ; Besancenot, Damien ; Huynh, Kim.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:73:y:2012:i:4:p:687-702.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Which Factors Drive the Decision to Boycott and Opt Out of Research Rankings?. (2012). Haucap, Justus ; Berlemann, Michael.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_3997.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. A Matching Model of the Academic Publication Market. (2011). Vranceanu, Radu ; Besancenot, Damien ; Huynh, Kim.
    In: Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE).
    RePEc:mhr:jinste:urn:sici:0932-4569(201112)167:4_708:ammota_2.0.tx_2-h.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. A Matching Model of the Academic Publication Market. (2011). Vranceanu, Radu ; Huynh, Kim.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00589186.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The Economic History of the American Economic Review : A Centurys Explosion of Economics Research. (2011). Margo, Robert.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:101:y:2011:i:1:p:9-35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The Economic History of the American Economic Review: A Century’s Explosion of Economics Research. (2010). Margo, Robert.
    In: Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:bos:wpaper:wp2010-027.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The ‘Read or Write’ Dilemma in Academic Production: A Transatlantic Perspective. (2009). Vranceanu, Radu ; Besancenot, Damien ; Huynh, Kim.
    In: The American Economist.
    RePEc:sae:amerec:v:53:y:2009:i:1:p:75-84.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Congestion in academic journals under an impartial selection process. (2009). Faria, Joao ; Huynh, Kim.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00382585.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Publishing in accounting journals: A fair game?. (2009). Moizer, Peter.
    In: Accounting, Organizations and Society.
    RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:34:y:2009:i:2:p:285-304.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Can incentives for research harm research? A business schools tale. (2008). Vranceanu, Radu ; Besancenot, Damien.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:37:y:2008:i:3:p:1248-1265.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Evolution of social norms with heterogeneous preferences: A general model and an application to the academic review process. (2008). Azar, Ofer.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:65:y:2008:i:3-4:p:420-435.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Concentration in Publishing at Top†Tier Business Journals: Evidence and Potential Explanations*. (2007). Zardkoohi, Asghar ; Wolfe, Christopher J ; Swanson, Edward P.
    In: Contemporary Accounting Research.
    RePEc:wly:coacre:v:24:y:2007:i:4:p:1255-1289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Is Peer Review in Decline?. (2007). Ellison, Glenn.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:13272.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Behavioral economics and socio-economics journals: A citation-based ranking. (2007). Azar, Ofer.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:36:y:2007:i:3:p:451-462.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Evolution of Social Norms with Heterogeneous Preferences: A General Model and an Application to the Academic Review Process. (2006). Azar, Ofer.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bgu:wpaper:0602.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Besonderheiten und Wettbewerbsprobleme des Marktes für wissenschaftliche Fachzeitschriften. (2005). Uhde, Andre ; Haucap, Justus ; Hartwich, Tobias.
    In: Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research.
    RePEc:diw:diwvjh:74-3-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Evolution of social norms with heterogeneous preferences: A general model and an application to the academic review process. (2002). Azar, Ofer.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:4482.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-26 21:51:57 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy