Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/04/25

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 25th, 2024
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maria Ley (NYPL b16738855-5240384).tiff

[edit]

not in PD Goesseln (talk) 09:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Goesseln: Why not? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See ongoing discussion at Commons:Forum#kept?. It's surely not a US work, but likely Austrian, and the author died only in 1970. --Túrelio (talk) 10:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maria Ley (NYPL b16738855-5240384).jpg; same image, just another file format. (TIFF vs JPEG). Undelete in 2041. --Rosenzweig τ 12:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CHIGGARDLY.png

[edit]

fails to meet educational scope; it is just a word, and not for Commons  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:موقعیت دقیق مونت کارلو با فلش قرمز نشان داده شده است.jpg

[edit]

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 07:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 13:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mmim-logo.png

[edit]

I put the wrong licensing on this image. Masterizawa (talk) 09:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aile Fotografı.jpg

[edit]

this photograph was uploaded in an online education for trial and containing private people from my family. I don't want it to spread and I want to delete. Vildan Gürmeriç (talk) 13:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 14:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SURF Framework.gif

[edit]

It had already been uploaded in 2014! Susty3 (talk) 18:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abdul Amir al-Uqayli.jpg

[edit]

COM:NETCOPYVIO https://www.algardenia.com/asmafealtareck/39962-2019-05-04-15-42-23.html Seawolf35 (talk) 19:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oops - Meant to do a speedy. Seawolf35 (talk) 19:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Star Evaluator Logo.png

[edit]

screenshort of company logo for non encyclopedically relevant new company which has been spammed cross wiki Hoyanova (talk) 14:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, see also m:Special:CentralAuth/Yvan20190. --Wutsje 21:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:الأرشيدوق.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deletd by علاء. --Rosenzweig τ 07:20, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:عميل امن الدولة.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by علاء. --Rosenzweig τ 07:20, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo de CuerdOS.svg

[edit]

el archivo está subido de manera incorrecta Kazutto (talk) 12:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo de cuerdos.svg

[edit]

Esta imagen está subida de manera incorrecta. Kazutto (talk) 12:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Принц Франц.jpg

[edit]

not useful Prototyperspective (talk) 15:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: CSD G3 - Looking at the uploader's uploads, they seem to be creating a hoax of some sort. F3 may also apply, as they've used commerical stock photography in some of their images. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Принц Даниэль.png

[edit]

not useful and other issues Prototyperspective (talk) 15:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is necessary for preparing the article, like my other files. Acselian (talk) 15:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: It is forged (montage), not completely AI generated. --Achim55 (talk) 16:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Edit: Same on File:Имперский перстень у Карла.jpg and File:Императорский перстень у Даниэля I.jpg. Either fakes or very poor AI generation. --Achim55 (talk) 16:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Аскар 1.jpg, looks like this user is photoshopping personal images onto found backgrounds and claiming that it's AI generated. Possible copyvio, definitely out of COM:SCOPE. Belbury (talk) 21:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: CSD F3 per Belbury. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Регент Джордан.jpg

[edit]

not useful, other issues Prototyperspective (talk) 15:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: CSD G3 - Looking at the uploader's uploads, they seem to be creating a hoax of some sort. F3 may also apply, as they've used commerical stock photography in some of their images. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Аскар 1.jpg

[edit]

Lack of COM:EDUSE. Being AI generated is no reason for keeping unless the image is in use. In fact it isn't AI generated but a fake (montage). Achim55 (talk) 16:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, despite the claim to be AI generated it's just a photoshop, the background is a copyrighted Alamy photo. Belbury (talk) 21:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: CSD F3 per Belbury. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Имперский перстень у Карла.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by User:Prototyperspective as Copyvio Abzeronow (talk) 22:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC). Converting to DR because "it's not useful" is not a speedy deletion reason.[reply]

Deleted: CSD G3 - Looking at the uploader's uploads, they seem to be creating a hoax of some sort. F3 may also apply, as they've used commerical stock photography in some of their images. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Soo Hana At Golf.jpg

[edit]

File was nominated for speedy deletion due to suspected copyvio but tag was removed by uploader - opening a regular deletion request as per protocol. Uploader claims to be the individual in the image but I cannot verify this. Redtree21 (talk) 23:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Copyvio - See [1] Seawolf35 (talk) 23:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Permission would be needed via COM:VRT. Seawolf35 (talk) 23:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
image in publik at instagram https://www.instagram.com/afafe1425/p/C3_9WjYRHBW/ 182.1.228.15 00:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
itu hanya menurut anda, tetapi soo hana terbukti tidak membatasi hak pribadi dan menjadi konsumsi untuk publik, 182.1.228.15 00:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
admin tolong lindungi karena menjadi perang suntingan oleh user: Redtree21? dan semua foto pada riwayat suntingan spam Redtree21 182.1.228.15 00:26, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
anda Redtree21 saya melihat riwayat suntingann anda menjalankan spam tag nominasi hapus? 182.1.228.15 00:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Description: image in publik at South Korea country at instagram 182.1.228.15 00:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dimana kita bisa membaca info lisensi di Instagram? --Achim55 (talk) 06:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: CSD F1 per Seawolf. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CHEOPS Satellite.jpg

[edit]

Copyright from Flickr invalid Jg.lamp (talk) 17:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:20, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Life Magazine - Oil (8684404442).jpg

[edit]

Life Magazine issues for 1937 and 1938 were registered and renewed, i.e. [2], [3]. Yann (talk) 11:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The SMU description page says that "The photographer's notes indicate this photograph was taken for possible submission to Life magazine for the Texas oil article titled, 'Oil: A Business in the Billions' (January 17, 1938, Volume 4, Number 3)." Note "possible submission". Richie would have taken many photographs and then selected a few for the Life article. I did not find this photo in the Richie photos published in pages 28-36 of the 17 January 1938 issue of Life. Apparently, the DeGolyer Library (at SMU) owns the negative, which makes plausible that they acquired the copyright when they acquired the Richie collection. The SMU description page says to contact the DeGolyer Library for information. They tag their flickr copy as NKCR. Someone from Commons can contact the DeGolyer Library if more information is needed. The photo should probably be kept for now, unless a negative reply is received to contradict their tag. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All copyright for issues of Life from 1936 to 1943 have been renewed. So it has to be published independently before or never being published in Life to be in the public domain. Yann (talk) 16:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To repeat, the point is that it was not published in Life. Therefore, renewals of Life issues are irrelevant. Or if it was, then please provide evidence of such publication. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Title- Life - Oil (8553952439).jpg. Yann (talk) 16:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
SMU description page also says This item may be protected by copyright law. Yann (talk) 16:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Boilerplate text, "may" be, and contact for more information. They specify it as NKCR on flickr. See first comment. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't retroactively remove the parts of your comments that have been specifically replied to, making the reply look incomprehensible or forcing the removal of the reply also. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see above. Withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 18:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leomotayo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host. en:User:Leomotayo was also deleted twice.

Achim55 (talk) 13:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aimery10

[edit]

All those pictures uploaded by User:Aimery10 are:

  1. AI generated or heavily edited without it being specified in the description
  2. out of scope: I don't see in what kind of pages / articles those files could be useful
  3. they're copyvios from this Facebook page and seem to have been made by someone else
  4. the faces of personalities represented in the fake "carvings" are quite photorealistic and seem inspired by real photos the AI based itself upon (without being sure if those original photos are free)

List of files :

There are other AI files, like this one or this one, which bother me since they use a real Congolese city's name in their description, as if this was really an event that happened there. But I can't find an outside source and there doesn't seem to be much copyrighted material the AI based itself upon (like for the portraits) to create them.

Thanks --Titlutin (talk) 20:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete All of these images are AI-generated "sludge". This content is all plainly fake and has no educational value whatsoever, regardless of its copyright status. @Aimery10: Please discontinue your uploads of AI-generated images immediately. Omphalographer (talk) 06:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyright issues: unlikely to be own work and derivative works, additional issues. --Strakhov (talk) 08:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aimery10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: additional AI-generated images. Some of these depict obviously impossible objects (like File:Un enfant génie 19.jpg); the others follow the same pattern of oversentimental images of African children crafting "statues" out of wood, stone, or other materials. (For some context, read https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/facebook-users-say-amen-bizarre-ai-generated-images-jesus-rcna143965.) These images are not real, and they do not have educational value especially given their misleading nature.

Omphalographer (talk) 04:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. OOS; same reason as above, no educational value. WhoAteMyButter (talk) 05:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete out of scope, misleading information in some files' description, pretending that the pictures are real. --Titlutin (talk) 10:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope and copyright issues (some of them are derivative works). --Strakhov (talk) 08:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aimery10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused portrait photos of people with no meaningful categories or descriptions. Every single one is described as "soutenance de licence" and categorized as Category:Soutenance de christ; I don't understand what the intent is here.

(One exception: File:Frais 23.jpg is a screenshot of a web page login form. I'm even more confused as to what it's doing here.)

Omphalographer (talk) 22:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:25, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aimery10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violation: none of these images appear to be original photos. I've annotated some of the sources below.

Omphalographer (talk) 20:47, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:39, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GalaxyDoge72 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Myokiara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope fictional images of a bird - File:Pedrito pas plage.jpg especially is a joke image

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Margherita Luisa d'Orléans, Dandini.jpg

[edit]

it´s a copy of File:Justus Sustermans - Marguerite Louise d'Orléans - Museo de'Medici.jpg Ecummenic (talk) 02:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HoldOnAngola (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Above the COM:TOO.

RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:T Series logo.jpg

[edit]

Lower quality duplicate of File:T Series LOGO.jpg detriaskies 04:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nagy saied nesseem (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:OOS. Seems to be a collection of their own artworks (I cannot find any of them anywhere else before upload date), all 487 of them. COM:NOTWEBHOST and not sure what educational value these may have. For the subjects depicted that have an article, there is already numerous artworks of them. They aren't INUSE (more specifically, NOTUSED); out of these 487 files, 0 of them seem to be in use. All of these are artistic interpretations of religious/historical figures with a description of them, with text and a signature imposed atop. I don't know what an artist's own interpretation or impression of these figures could be useful for. Additionally, these may be derivatives of some other work, as many (if not all, I have not checked exhaustively) seem to have obvious clipping and sharp edges that are not consistent with a painting (see File:البابا غبريال الثامن.jpg for a clear example: hands, arms, clothes). These may not be their entire own work, as well.

WhoAteMyButter (talk) 04:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plus:

WhoAteMyButter (talk) 00:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Lorbank

[edit]

Elaborate hoax/fantasy country

Dronebogus (talk) 11:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bvprasadtewiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW book covers, missing permission.

P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

THESE ARE POPULAR MEDICAL BOOKS WRITTEN BY PROF RAFI MD, HE IS A FACULTY, PROFESSOR, EXAMINER, PAPER SETTER, MEMBER OF THE IONSPECTION TEAMS AND IMC MEMBER, FELLO AWARDEE Bvprasadtewiki (talk) 15:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bvprasadtewiki (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data. Many previous copyvios by this user.

P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PROF RAFI MD IS A PROFESSOR IN SURABHI MEDICAL COLLEGE IN SIDDIPETA OF TELANGANA STATE INDIA. HE WROTE POPULAR MEDICAL BOOKS , THESE ARE WRITTEN BY PROF RAFI MD, HE IS A FACULTY, PROFESSOR, EXAMINER, PAPER SETTER, MEMBER OF THE IONSPECTION TEAMS AND IMC MEMBER, FELLO AWARDEE Bvprasadtewiki (talk) 15:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bvprasadtewiki (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

Likely not own works, small crops from unknown source. Credit in EXIF data of File:Nallu indra 1.jpg not matching this uploader. This uploader has a history of not understanding licensing rules.

P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bgtclan1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logos.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eustaquio Martínez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

3 images of a fictional microstate in Antarctica by single-time uploader. In total 3 images distributed over 2 maps, 5 flags and 7 coats of arms

Enyavar (talk) 15:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kilbazas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused files, likely promotional images. File:Code Poetry.jpg is poster and unlike that own work

Estopedist1 (talk) 16:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Harshit Seth and his achievements.pdf

[edit]

Out of scope: plain text. To create a Wikipedia article, insert this text into the article, not a PDF file of the text. Omphalographer (talk) 17:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Catherine Wolfe Donohue.pdf

[edit]

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 17:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Charlotte Stern Friedman.pdf

[edit]

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 17:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Life, 1939

[edit]

Copyright of issues of Life magazine in 1939 were renewed: [15].

Yann (talk) 17:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete That is too bad. I uploaded most of those 13 years ago and do not remember the details of checking the license. However as I usually do not work with {{PD-US-not-renewed}} license, I think the consensus that 1939 Life magazine were OK to upload under this license come after a lot of discussion somewhere. Too bad it is not so. --Jarekt (talk) 02:39, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Glitchforum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused screenshots of a non-notable web site.

Omphalographer (talk) 17:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MVinhas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused logo and screenshots of a non-notable web site.

Omphalographer (talk) 18:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The homepage of latest update..png

[edit]

Out of scope: unused screenshot of a non-notable web site. Omphalographer (talk) 18:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JasonEmilyBrooks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused logos and images of a non-notable (and defunct) web site.

Omphalographer (talk) 18:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Website of Living in Tehran.png

[edit]

Out of scope: unused screenshot of a non-notable web site. Omphalographer (talk) 18:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Katiieclarke (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Confusing low quality diagrams which are no better than just listing the words as text. Removed from enwiki when added there, not educationally useful for Commons per COM:SCOPE.

Belbury (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom Prototyperspective (talk) 12:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Asra Mohammadi.jpg

[edit]

COM:SCOPE Unused personal file Seawolf35 (talk) 19:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jan brunclík radule.png

[edit]

Because is my photo and the man does bad things on the internet and i need to delete this foto please Dasa221133 (talk) 20:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with "Truthful Eyes" Waltzes

[edit]

dupe of the same name files ("Truthful eyes" waltzes instead of "Truthful Eyes" Waltzes), these files (capitalized) are typically smaller, newer and are more poorly categorized

— Draceane talkcontrib. 20:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:المهندس عبدالرحمن معلث الحسيني الحربي.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo by non-contributors (Out of scope) --Alaa :)..! 20:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Discovering A Coruña.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope as plain text. Might be recreation of deleted material (log says there was a File:Discovering A Coruña.pdf that no longer exists but I don't see its deletion in the logs). The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Christosal.png

[edit]

Out of scope fictional image - It's not clear if the sandbox article is of a real person because the sources are fake - so either the entire article is a hoax, or the article is on a real person that this AI image doesn't depict. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A public education sign at the edge of the wetland in Beijing's Zizhuyuan Park explains that here's a night-heron's habitat.jpg

[edit]

No COM:FOP for text in China MPF (talk) 00:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ドイツ連邦 フラグマップ.png

[edit]

Out of scope: Fantasy flag map. (Flag of modern Germany, with the borders of a fusion of 1830s KuK Austria?? and ?Prussia???) Enyavar (talk) 07:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:大日本帝国 フラグマップ.png

[edit]

Out of scope: Fantasy flag map (modern Japanese flag, borders of ?Japanese Empire... when??) Enyavar (talk) 07:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:دكتور-محمد-الحديدى.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:طارق الحاج 264.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:طارق الحاج 69358.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:طارق الحاج 252.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:مشاهير العالم 58.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:مشاهير العالم 693.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:مشاهير العالم 695.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IngFah.jpg

[edit]

photo from twitter, didn't get permission from owner. there's watermark in the picture. KodokunaSmile (talk) 09:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Generalstabsarzt Dr. med. Ralf Hoffmann als Chef des Stabes Kommando Sanitätsdienst der Bundeswehr.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 13:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Carly Cosgrove (Band).png

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Carlucci Antonello.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Used in sandbox. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bvprasad.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal selfie, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Julien Bryan - Life - 47205.jpg

[edit]

Copyright was renewed: [16]: B431558. Yann (talk) 17:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Imamzadeh Seyed Morteza2021-03-27 12.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Imamzadeh Morteza (Kashmar) {{User|POS78}} talk 17:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo Bridor.jpg

[edit]

I cannot find evidence of a CC license for the logo on the website. Company is French so logo would need to be below the ToO of France to keep. Abzeronow (talk) 17:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Donato Benincasa.jpg

[edit]

From this evidence the image was deleted on flickr within 2 days of upload on the flickr account. This is rather suspicious if the image was legitimate. Leoboudv (talk) 20:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cartoon image wiki loves democracy, 75 years of german contitution and parlament.jpg

[edit]

AI generated image of malformed cartoon people and oddly constructed flags, with nonsense pseudo-text. Out of COM:SCOPE with no educational use. Belbury (talk) 21:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't raise any objections. This image was a quick replacement idea for File:Logo GLAM - 75 Jahre BRD und GG.svg while we await permission to use from our big sister. I won't use the cartoon anywhere, but I thought it is funny being so messed up, so I decided to take it into the selection of 4 (out of, idk, 30 or so) and showed it to some colleagues and friends as an example of AI-BSery. Thank you Belbury for taking care of the commons! Cheers Christoph Jackel (WMDE) (talk) 09:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom Prototyperspective (talk) 12:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom Palemeditation (talk) 05:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Nude or partially nude women by Stable Diffusion

[edit]

Per logic of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lovers on a beach (SD).jpg, part of same set

Dronebogus (talk) 21:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Nude or partially nude women by Stable Diffusion

[edit]

These are AI-generated images of nude women, and are de facto lacking in educational value as such. Although at the first one seems to be in use on another project to depicted "Body-Horror" but the already the articles where it's being used on are already being illustrated with more factually relevant contemporary sources. And there is no special pass in the guidelines for questionably educational or useful images that are being used elsewhere.

Adamant1 (talk) 03:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JPxG: If you don't mind me asking what part of COM:SCOPE and COM:AI am I incorrect about? Because you've made the same accusation several times now in other discussions but I have yet to hear an example of what I'm getting wrong. At least not one that doesn't just involve you misciting things and taking what I said out of context. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, here is what COM:AI says:
Per the Commons project scope, only media that are realistically useful for an educational purpose should be hosted on Commons. Just because an AI image is interesting, pretty, or looks like a work of art, that doesn't mean that it is necessarily within the scope of Commons. While some AI-generated media fall within our scope, media that lack a realistic educational use may be nominated for deletion.
Here is what COM:SCOPE says:
  • The expression "educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative".
  • A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like. Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough.
The meaning of these policies seems extremely clear to me. The term "educational" is given a specific, clearly explained definition. Not only does this definition fail to make an exception for low-quality images, it explicitly says that there is not such an exception. The claim that "there is no special pass in the guidelines for questionably educational or useful images that are being used elsewhere" is false. JPxG (talk) 10:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not only does this definition fail to make an exception for low-quality images, it explicitly says that there is not such an exception. I've explained to you multiple times now that this has nothing to do with the quality of the images. What are you finding so hard to understand about that? Your quote would matter if I had nominated the images for deletion because of them being low quality, but that has nothing to do with this or any other DR where you've falsely claimed it's why I nominated the images for deletion.
The claim that......is false. I've already cited it several times now but COM:SCOPE clearly states "any use that is not made in good faith does not count" and that "file not legitimately in use include ones that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose." So again, what are you having such a hard time understanding about either one of those exceptions? --Adamant1 (talk) 11:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are entitled to your opinion, and you can certainly go there and propose they change their policies, but this is obscene. If the Vietnamese Wikipedia thinks this image has enough educational value to use it in their article, why on Earth would you presume to know better than them? Do you speak Vietnamese, Bengali and German? You have never made any edits on any projects in any of those languages. What makes you think you are allowed to dictate to them which freely-licensed images they can use? JPxG (talk) 11:53, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What changes would I be proposing? I literally cited the guideline. Your the one who disagrees with the exceptions and keeps acting like they don't exist. I 100% agree that in use files aren't "liable to deletion simply because it may be they of poor quality." That's why I've never nominated an in use image for deletion "simply because it's of poor quality." So I don't really know what your talking about. Again, your the one acting like that's what I'm doing while ignoring the part of the guideline that I'm actually basing this on. It's totally your issue and your problem to resolve though. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Adamant1, do not misquote policy. You claim above that COM:SCOPE clearly states "any use that is not made in good faith does not count" and that "file not legitimately in use include ones that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose." However, anyone can verify that your second quote in fact does not occur in the linked policy. Instead, Commons:Project_scope#File_not_legitimately_in_use reads as follows:

File not legitimately in use
A media file which is neither:
• realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor
• legitimately in use as discussed above
falls outside the scope of Wikimedia Commons.

In other words, the tampered quote in your comment misleadingly omits the reference to COM:INUSE (legitimately in use as discussed above).
Regards, HaeB (talk) 22:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep first image. The OP is effectively trying to override COM:INUSE as part of a campaign to purge commons of as many AI generated images as possible, based on some vague-wave claim it’s not educationally useful in their opinion (which is apparently better than the opinions of entire other projects). This is a gross violation of policy and I’m half thinking of reporting them if it continues apace. Weak keep the rest because they haven’t really made a convincing case to delete them either. Dronebogus (talk) 15:26, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep the first one per COM:INUSE. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:40, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stable Diffusion - In space - 4.jpg was already discussed separately in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stable Diffusion - In space - 4.jpg and kept by Holly Cheng. I think that one was discussed enough, no really new arguments have been brought forward here, and we should respect the original decision, so  Keep that, as well as File:AI-generated horror.jpg which is a clear case of COM:INUSE in several Wikipedia language versions as of today. Neutral on the usefulness of the other files listed here. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Algorithmically-generated abstract art of short haired women in dynamic posing.png and File:Algorithmically-generated artworks of classical European women.png were previously kept after a DR that mistakenly claimed they were copyright violations. However, I would agree that this does not prejudice the present request with a different deletion rationale. Regards, HaeB (talk) 23:24, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:AI-generated horror.jpg per COM:INUSE (currently used in content pages on three different Wikipedias and Wikidata, e.g. for over a year already at [17]) and (per Gestumblindi) File:Stable Diffusion - In space - 4.jpg .  Delete the others. Regards, HaeB (talk) 23:24, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - all. Or we will simply have ten million AIs uploading ten billion AI images and posting them to minor language entries and the Commons will be but a memory. Is there perhaps a policy discussion brewing about this somewhere? mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mr.choppers and the Commons will be but a memory Can you explain what you meant with that? RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It will lose all usefulness as we are drowned in meaningless images. It's already happening to various stock photo vendors; AI images are creeping in and some searches mostly return AI results. As with free speech, which can be obscured by meaningless noise in great profusion.
We volunteers cannot be expected to keep up with an onslaught of AI images, which can be churned out at a much higher rate than we can look at them, not to mention our ability to debate their merits and whether or not to erase them. See this conversation - someone had these images made in a few clicks of buttons and several of us volunteers have wasted hours and days on discussing them. I am aware this is not the place to debate this, but I think all AI images should be removed unless there is a strong reason to include them. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 12:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough.  Agreed.  Delete all of them, I myself being the uploader of one of them, the one in use. RodRabelo7 (talk) 14:24, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The one in use is quite bad and low quality. But it's in use. It must be kept for now due to COM:INUSE which you recently supported to keep some AI images after arguing to have unexpected porn show up in sexuality-unrelated search results earlier. The problem can and needs to be addressed on the Wikipedias where the file is in use. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:02, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why are we suddenly taking Adamant1’s side here, that “AI bad, nuke-em-all-god-knows-his-own, INUSE be damned”? Need I remind you that Adamant1 is currently blocked for 2 weeks for, among other things, this exact behavior? Dronebogus (talk) 17:36, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ten million AIs uploading ten billion AI images / an onslaught of AI images, which can be churned out at a much higher rate than we can look at them - this argument seems rather speculative to me, not to say an apocalyptic "The sky is falling!" claim.
DALL-E was first announced three and a half years ago already, and has been publicly available for about two years. The novelty of text-to-images models has worn off for many by now, and on a quick glance at the 500 newest files I can't spot a single AI-generated artwork. (Instead lots of low-quality road photos, probably a substantial amount of copyvios, and many other non-AI items that could use cleanup - as it has always been). Regards, HaeB (talk) 04:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The “logic” here seems to be that since AI images are easy to generate, they require literally no effort whatsoever to generate well, therefore they have no value and will flood commons, therefore they’re intrinsically bad, therefore we should delete as many as possible to increase the quality of Wikimedia Commons. Or something. Dronebogus (talk) 05:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete AS (Artifical Stupididy) again, delete all except File:AI-generated horror.jpg that could be used to illustrate the concept or word "horror". Taylor 49 (talk) 11:11, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not just "could", that particular image is COM:INUSE, as discussed above. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:33, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most per disuccsion. Kept: the one that's in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:AI-generated nude women

[edit]

Per logic of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lovers on a beach (SD).jpg and COM:PORN

Dronebogus (talk) 21:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Country of Blatta (1).pdf

[edit]

Out of scope: plain text, apparent hoax. Omphalographer (talk) 22:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Fanta Apple

[edit]

Does the angle and reduced prominence of the copyrightable parts of the artwork on these cans reduce it to "de minimis" level? Even here, that's not an argument I'd be 100% confident in trying to defend.

Ubcule (talk) 22:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I don't think so; the product packaging is central to both photos. See COM:PACKAGING. (The second image is also simply wrong; "Dr. Shasta" is a Shasta Beverages product unrelated to Dr Pepper.) Omphalographer (talk) 23:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete for Fanta Apple.jpg; I was not aware of how copyright worked back when I uploaded the photo; you may also want to see my photo File:Crystal Pepsi for sale.jpg, because that might also warrant deletion. I'm not clear on de minimis distinctions and figured I'd be transparent about that. Packer1028 (talk) 23:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Packer1028: - Thanks for being open about that. I suspect the Crystal Pepsi photo will be okay because- assuming you're in the US as your other photos suggest- it's primarily a text label, which I believe is trademarkable but not copyrightable. The Pepsi logo might be, but- I'm guessing- probably isn't, and is only a very small part of that photo regardless. Ubcule (talk) 17:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prince France.jpg

[edit]

This file looks like it is probably not the own work of the uploader (low resolution, camera shot consistent with a film still), and is probably not very useful anyway unless the main person in the picture can be identified. Redtree21 (talk) 22:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. This looks AI-generated; if you zoom in a bit, the handshake on the left is a mess of supernumerary fingers. Omphalographer (talk) 23:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Флаг сельского поселения сумон Шекпээрский Барун-Хемчикского кожууна..png

[edit]

A new version of a non-existent flag of the same village, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Shekpeer (Barun-Khemchiksky District). Out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kaisa wallpaper.jpg

[edit]

Copyrighted artwork of the character. White DemΩn (talk) 23:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:中國成都古蹟376.jpg

[edit]

too blurry to be of use Krok6kola (talk) 23:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:21, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Buildings in Belgium illuminated in support of Ukraine during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine

[edit]

EC - Audiovisual service source states "Information and education only, Non-commercial use"

// sikander { talk } 🦖 01:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sikander, did you take {{EC-Audiovisual Center}} into account? RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:48, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'm quite sure the template allowed everything to be uploaded here. That's strange... RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:07, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RodRabelo7: Yes, EC-Audiovisual copyright page states "Unless otherwise indicated (e.g. in individual copyright notices), content owned by the EU on this website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence" and unfortunately for all five of these photos the site has a individual copyright notice about non-commercial use only. // sikander { talk } 🦖 13:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I got it now. Thanks for explaining it to me. RodRabelo7 (talk) 16:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:31, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:نقشه پرجزئیات موناکو و شهر مونت کارلو.png

[edit]

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 06:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No license since 24 April 2024. --Alaa :)..! 19:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vivat Slovakia art.png

[edit]

copyrighted image straight copied from the official website Matroxko (talk) 00:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think, that if I would message the entire Vivat Team, they would agree that the image can stay. I am not claiming this art and even credited the author. And it is not even from the official website. Roman Tička (talk) 13:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is not how this site works. You need explicit permission, not forgiveness. If you really think they would allow the works, you are more than welcome to consult COM:VRT and look into actually getting permission. @Matroxko Copyright violations should get the {{copyvio}} tag, as they qualify for speedy deletion rather than needing to go through the request process. detriaskies 18:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Taffy Dare by thekingofart16.png

[edit]

The artwork was originally posted under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, but unfortunately it was removed from the source without any evidence of thie author using this license. 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 06:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:موقعیت موناکو در کره زمین.jpg

[edit]

copyvio from Maphill.com - That website offers free images under CC BY-ND 3.0 but those are marked with the word "Free" in the url as per that info page.,
This map can be found under http://www.maphill.com/monaco/monaco/location-maps/shaded-relief-map/ note how the link doesn't denote it as free. Enyavar (talk) 07:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eberhard Daerr.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ernst Rebentisch.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Herbert Hockemeyer.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Albert Klotz (Sanitätsoffizier).jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kurt-Bernhard Nakath.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wilhelm Albrecht.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Karl Wilhelm Demmer.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1968 FAdm Ostertag.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flottillenadmiral Wilhelm Tobias Abry.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Generalarzt Dr. Gesine Krüger (l.) übernimmt die Führung der Sanitätsakademie der Bundeswehr von Generaloberstabsarzt Dr. Michael Tempel (r.).jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Volker Grabarek.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Michael Tempel.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hans-Georg Stemann.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bernhard Häfner.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Georg Finger (Sanitätsoffizier).jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Matthias Jaeger.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Theodor Joedicke.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flottillenadmiral Jens Nemeyer.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Karsten Ocker.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Roland Hemeling.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gunter Desch.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Erika Franke.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mit einem Handschlag besiegelt Generaloberstabarzt Dr. Michael Tempel (M.) die Kommandoübergabe von Generalstabsarzt Dr. Erika Franke (l.) an Generalarzt Dr. Gesine Krüger (r.).jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ingo Patschke.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wolfgang Krawietz.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hubertus Grunhofer.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jürgen Blätzinger.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Silesaurus Silhouette.png

[edit]

Explicitly has non-commercial license IJReid (talk) 17:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:Clause 63 Warning

[edit]

Unused template funplussmart (talk) 21:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Château de la Jayère 1.JPG

[edit]

Il s'agit d'une ancienne photo du château qui ne le met pas en avant. Merci de la supprimer. De nouvelles photos ont été déposées sur commons prises depuis la propriété. Pierre Bailleul (talk) 15:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is an old photo of the castle which does not highlight it. Please delete it. New photos have been posted on commons taken from the property.
translator: Google Translate via   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour,
Pouvez vous donner des nouvelles si la demande est acceptée ou si il y a d'autres problèmes qui empêche la suppression s'il vous plaît? Merci bonne journée. Pierre Bailleul (talk) 08:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, no valid reason for deletion.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    We are taking the necessary steps to have the image removed after receiving several pieces of feedback pointing out that the file ‘Château de la Jayère 1.JPG’ gives a false image of the château. The photo dates from 2010 and work has been carried out on the grounds and on the building itself. We have provided a number of new photographs from different angles to provide recent, high-quality information.
    The request is justified under paragraphs ‘2.2.1 Not educationally useful’ and ‘2.4.5 Redundant/poor quality’ of the Commons removal policy for the reasons given above.
    We have taken care to inform the author of the file, who has not replied, and have checked that the file is no longer used on any wikipedia page. Pierre Bailleul (talk) 10:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep No valid reason for deletion.
The photograph is dated and whatever has changed today, this is still a valid representation of the grounds of the chateau in 2010. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per consensus. --Yann (talk) 19:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File talk:Gaetano Salvemini.jpg

[edit]

This person is not Gaetano Salvemini but Mario A. Fei. The wrong person has been extracted. DonCalo (talk) 07:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason for deletion. --Krd 10:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2023 Hong Kong District Council Election Publicity in Tai Po.jpg

[edit]

Like the UK terms, No FOP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Benda, Marion ca. 1924.webp

[edit]

The person is misidentified--she in not Marion Benda; she is Mary Lange Bixly777 (talk) 00:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:08, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:International Village Kyrgyzstan (Alilz x Bek).jpg

[edit]

This file is used by attackers to blackmail the author Alilzz (talk) 00:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: if there are issues, then please contacte an oversighter; no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:International Village Kyrgyzstan 2 (Alilz x Bek).jpg

[edit]

This file is used by attackers to blackmail the author Alilzz (talk) 00:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: if you have issues of concern, then please talk to an Oversighter; no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Đèn tìn hiệu giao thông đường bộ phố Hoàng Đạo Thúy.jpg

[edit]

I (Stvk Công Cuối (VN)) am the author of this media and i want this to be deleted for privacy reasons, sorry for uploaded it in the first place, please forgive me -Stvk Công Cuối (VN) (talk) 15:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Privacy reasons Stvk Công Cuối (VN) (talk) 05:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion of somewhat recent upload, low quality and redundant anyway. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Caminhos1.jpg

[edit]

and

not suitably identified location; and without context has little educational value  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. They are almost certainly taken at Ilha do Mel State Park in Brazil. It was a simple question of googling/translating what is on the signs and seeing where a battery of cannons and a "Morro de Baleia" (Whale Mountain) exist in the same place. The latter image was taken on the same day by the same photographer (and is on the coast) so it would follow that it is in the same place. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:IronGargoyle. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:38, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Никита Михайлис.jpg

[edit]

As per description, the uploader is not the author. 188.123.231.69 00:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alikhan Asetov.jpg

[edit]

As per description, the uploader is not the author. 188.123.231.69 00:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HH-200760444-scaled.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. This photo is copied from https://www.spoorpro.nl/spoorbouw/2020/06/15/grote-spoorwerkzaamheden-bij-amsterdam-amstel/?gdpr=accept&gdpr=accept (visible with Firefox), where is written: "Bron: Hollandse Hoogte, voor éénmalig gebruik!" (Source: Hollandse Hoogte, for single use only!) I do not see a VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 03:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Some more engine noise (4276530323).jpg

[edit]

This appears to be a low quality image and out of Common's scope. Leoboudv (talk) 07:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a screenshot from a freely licensed video. Honestly, the video would have been a better upload. Abzeronow (talk) 18:11, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/MarsMad97

[edit]

Crappy MS paint doodles used on some long-inactive user’s vanity page

Dronebogus (talk) 10:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2020CanadaUSA.png

[edit]

Imaginary map, useless Dronebogus (talk) 11:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Autonomous Megacities.png

[edit]

Only used in a non-contributor’s sandbox Dronebogus (talk) 11:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:49, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1999-12 - 'L'Aiguille et la Porte d'Aval à Etretat' - Marie-Claire Lefébure.JPG

[edit]

Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 11:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1999-12-15 - 'Barques sur la Plage et Porte d'Amont à Etretat' - Marie-Claire Lefébure.JPG

[edit]

Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 11:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2000 - 'Etretat' - Marie-Claire Lefébure.JPG

[edit]

Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 11:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Étretat - Les barques.jpg

[edit]

Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 11:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Île-de-Bréhat - La petite maison fleurie - MCL.jpg

[edit]

Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 11:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jules Coenegracht (Jonathan Vos Photography).jpg

[edit]

no own work, but work of a photographer Thieu1972 (talk) 12:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Jeremy Brett

[edit]

Uncredited, copyrighted photograph by Marcus Tylor, taken from the book https://www.blurb.co.uk/books/1613794-a-roll-with-jeremy-brett (confirmed at https://jeremybrett.livejournal.com/88385.html which includes several photos from it, including this one).

Belbury (talk) 12:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok if the uploader was not the copyright holder, then please delete. Judithcomm (talk) 12:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:APM (1).jpg

[edit]

Not own work 186.172.210.92 12:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, small crop from an unknown source. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Leverage Redemption title card.jpg

[edit]

I take it that the initial upload was copyrighted or something. Then the uploader added a white page to cover it up? Can we delete both? -- Deadstar (msg) 13:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tessa June MerelvanDooren.jpg

[edit]

This photo was taken by professional photographer Merel van Dooren, not by the uploader. And the photo was made for this website: https://www.sena.nl/nl/event/artiesten-aan-het-woord-tessa-june No permission has been given by Merel van Dooren. Mondo (talk) 14:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AI modified paintings uploaded by User:Fecece

[edit]

All these files were uploaded by User:Fefecece, who was blocked last February 26, when it was proven to be a sockpuppet of User:Giorgio Pallavicini, who had already been blocked in March 2023. All the files have the same problem: they are photos of paintings that have been upscaled and 'enhanced', using AI. While it is true that some of the original files are not exactly ideal (small photos), the result of those modified with AI is totally contrary to the intentions of our project. As the PD-Art disclaimer precisely states, the photo of a painting must be "a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art". This issue was recently discussed by our community precisely because of another one of these modified paintings uploaded by User:Fefecece. The comment of @Omphalographer: is particularly poignant for me: "Using AI upscaling on a low-resolution photograph of a painting will inevitably result in an image which differs from the original work. No matter how good an upscaler is, it'll never know the difference between a detail which was blurry because it's working from a low resolution photo and a detail which was blurry because the original painting was indistinct (for example). Worse, a lot of AI upscalers are primarily trained on photographs, and will frequently add details in an inappropriate style, like inferring photorealistic, smooth-shaded faces in engravings where those details should have been rendered with patterns of lines". To give a clear idea of how much the AI-edited images differ from the originals, you will find below a table comparing the incriminated files with the source files and, if available, an additional file showing the original painting with correct color grading/details. A final note: the source of some of the files is admittedly incorrect and there is almost never a link back to the original file that was modified. --Kaho Mitsuki (Dis-moi) 14:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. These upscaled images are materially worse than the originals. Whatever tool is being used here is inappropriately boosting contrast, causing detail to be lost. Probably the most obvious example is File:Portrait of Gian Gastone de' Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany.jpg, where a lot of detail in the background (particularly in the dome to the left of the Duke's face) has been crushed to black; there's similar issues with most of the images listed, as well as some questionable color shifts. Some of these paintings could use higher-resolution images, but they need to be sourced from the actual painting, not machine inference. Omphalographer (talk) 17:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Files comparison
File to delete Source file Extra comparative file
File:Giuseppe Bezzuoli - Princess Maria Antonietta of the Two Sicilies, Grand Duchess of Tuscany.jpg
File:Ferdinando I de' Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany, by Scipione Pulzone.jpg
File:Portrait of Ferdinando I de' Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany, by Scipione Pulzone.jpg
File:Portrait of Violante Beatrice of Bavaria, Grand Princess of Tuscany.jpg
File:Justus Sustermans - Vittoria della Rovere, Grand Duchess of Tuscany - Poggio a Caiano.jpg
File:Justus Sustermans - Vittoria della Rovere, Grand Duchess of Tuscany.jpg
File:Tiberio di Tito - Portrait of Maria Maddalena of Austria, Grand Duchess of Tuscany.jpg
File:Scipione Pulzone - Official portrait of Francesco I de' Medici as Grand Duke of Tuscany.jpg
File:Joanna of Austria, Grand Duchess of Tuscany, by Giovanni Bizelli.jpg
File:Christina of Lorraine, Grand Duchess of Tuscany by Scipione Pulzone.jpg
File:Anna Maria Franziska of Saxe-Lauenburg, Grand Duchess of Tuscany.jpg
File:Portrait of Gian Gastone de' Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany.jpg File:Retrato oficial de Gian Gastone Medici, por Ferdinand Richter.jpg
 Delete per PD-Art. These so-called "enhancements" are a waste of storage space. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Қазақстанның Еңбек Ері.jpg

[edit]

So blurry as to be unusable. Zenwort (talk) 15:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:04-13-2019 TAAL VOLCANO DISTANCE FROM TAGAYTAY.jpg

[edit]

Trabajo propio? 186.173.20.117 15:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, my mom took photo of me when i was going home from vacation to Calatagan with my family on April 2019, so please don't delete it. Ryansean071 (talk) 04:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Amateur photo made by family member, technically it is not clear if uploader has required permission to upload, practically it would be an absurd case of copyright paranoia, so  Keep. TheImaCow (talk) 17:29, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. In use. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:10-15 cm photo.jpg

[edit]

Trabajo propio? Escope? 186.173.20.117 15:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:18913WhatsApp Image 2021-09-08 at 08.38.33.jpg

[edit]

WhatsApp 186.173.20.117 15:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, likely not own work. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kurmanchal kingdom,a medieval himalayan kingdom.jpg

[edit]

File not useful for educational context:
The map is untitled, undated and unexplained; the red smear is supposed to show the greatest extent of medieval Kurmanchal / Kumaon (in which year though - 560? 1420?). The talk page claims that it lacks parts of Tibet; and in the west there seems to be missing territory in Afghanistan.
No sources given, and abysmal-looking from a cartographer's viewpoint.
Unused.

(Please also delete the talk page.) Enyavar (talk) 15:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:08, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cartiera Mediterranea di Barletta.jpg

[edit]

copyviol from http://www.comitatoprocanne.com/public/mini/CARTIERA%20CCI01032017.jpg Fresh Blood (talk) 15:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:08, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wiki rmc estrecho.jpg

[edit]

Screenshot of Wikipedia infobox All the best -- Chuck Talk 15:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:08, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Keksikeke (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.

Estopedist1 (talk) 16:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, all those pictures are uploaded by me and they are pictures of me. I am singer, songwriter. I have pay all those pictures and I own copyright for them. so there should not be any problem. Maybe " Estopedist1" want to make some harm for me? Am I right?

Here are my artist links so You can see I am real person and real singer & songwriter and my songs really are played in finnish radio stations so that wikipedia has for example used by radio persons in their speaks when my music is played on the radio. So my pictures are mine and they are free to use when It is about my music and so on...

Wikipedia: https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antti_Kuosmanen_(muusikko)
Sincerely, Antti Kuosmanen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keksikeke (talk • contribs) 16:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is obviously false: EXIF in File:Antti Kuosmanen.jpg says Author Jussi Eerola, Copyright holder: Jussi Eerola. Yann (talk) 16:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:11, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arminas Stočkus Gabija Domarkaitė.jpg

[edit]

from Facebook. Unlike that own work Estopedist1 (talk) 16:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:11, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aatu Itkonen 2.jpg

[edit]

Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, credit in watermark not matching the uploader. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:12, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maxhütte 1900.jpg

[edit]

Very likely copyright violation Arnd 🇺🇦 (talk) 16:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-old-assumed. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maxhütte 1930.jpg

[edit]

Very likely copyright violation Arnd 🇺🇦 (talk) 16:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Failed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Grundsteinlegung Elektrostahlwerk 1992.jpg

[edit]

Very likely copyright violation Arnd 🇺🇦 (talk) 16:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Failed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CO2-reduzierter Stahl SWT Stahlwerk Thüringen.jpg

[edit]

Very likely copyright violation Arnd 🇺🇦 (talk) 16:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Failed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jonathan Seagullis.jpg

[edit]

Disparaging image collage of living person. COM:IDENT says "Images must not unfairly ridicule or demean the subject". Counterfeit Purses (talk) 19:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bad pun at worst, to illustrate a (minor) newsworthy event. I think it's a lot harder to understad without the photograph you unilaterally removed. Do I think it should be used outside the reporting? Probably not unless this becomes a much bigger event than it currently is. But it's extreme hyperbole to call it "unfair ridicule" or "demeaning" in a country with the Liz Truss lettuce Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You literally recreated schoolboy ridicule of a teacher. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 04:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A newsworthy one, though. Not by any means advocating for it to go on his page or anything. Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and really out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:17, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted COM:INUSE at the Signpost. Abzeronow (talk) 19:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jonathan Seagullis.jpg

[edit]

COM:IDENT states Images must not unfairly ridicule or demean the subject. ... Defamation is both a legal and moral issue; therefore, Commons does not base decisions on whether the subject is able or likely to sue.. This image is clearly demeaning to the subject. It has been used to illustrate an article in English Wikipedia's Signpost. It is not used in a Wikipedia article and it is unlikely ever to be used anywhere else.

The SIgnpost usage is just two sentences long and is reporting on vandalism to the subject's article. The source for this (not the Signpost) states that a student once photoshopped the subject's head on to the body of a seagull when the subject was their teacher.

This is a schoolboy's prank recreated by an adult who should know better. Being in-use should not be a way around COM:IDENT. If they want it on The SIgnpost, they can upload it to English Wikipedia. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 20:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Including link to previous Undeletion request: [18]. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The deletion request cites COM:IDENT, emphasizing that images must not unfairly ridicule or demean the subject. However, the context and intent of the image should be considered. This image is a form of satire or political humor, similar to political caricatures which are widely accepted and prevalent on Wikimedia Commons. The depiction of Jonathan Gullis as a seagull is a play on words and a common form of meme culture, not inherently demeaning. Satirical images are a recognized and protected form of expression, particularly in political discourse.
Wikimedia Commons hosts numerous political caricatures that exaggerate and parody political figures, see e.g. Category:Caricatures of politicians. The existence of these images sets a precedent (regardless of OTHERSTUFF) for allowing humorous or satirical depictions of politicians. The image in question falls under this category and should be afforded the same consideration. Caricatures and memes serve as a form of commentary and are valuable for their cultural and political significance.
The image is currently in use in The Signpost on English Wikipedia. According to COM:INUSE, an image in use on a Wikimedia project is considered within scope. The policy explicitly states that Commons does not overrule other projects regarding what is in scope. The usage of the image in The Signpost, a recognized and legitimate publication on Wikipedia, satisfies this criterion. The fact that it is used in a Wikipedia namespace does not disqualify it per the policy, as the policy does not make such a distinction.
The Signpost article where the image is used reports on an incident related to the subject, adding educational value by documenting the cultural phenomenon surrounding the meme. The image contributes to the completeness of this report, making it relevant and significant.
Additionally, the image captures an actual phenomenon outside the wiki (as linked by the user above), serving as a snapshot of real meme history. If an image taken of an event simply causes embarrassment, but newspapers write about the event, should we not have photos of said event? This reinforces the image's value as a historical and cultural artifact, documenting contemporary digital culture.
The claim that the image is defamatory is subjective. For an image to be defamatory, it must be proven that it unfairly damages the subject's reputation. Given that political satire is a protected form of speech and the image in question is a lighthearted meme, it is not reasonable to categorize it as defamatory. Moreover, political figures are often subject to scrutiny and satire, which is a normal part of public life.
If The Signpost wishes to retain the image, moving it to English Wikipedia instead of Commons could be an unnecessary complication. Commons serves as a central repository for media files used across Wikimedia projects, and having the image on Commons ensures it remains accessible and usable where needed.
TL;DR  Keep The image depicting Jonathan Gullis as a seagull is a satirical representation akin to political caricatures, widely accepted on Wikimedia Commons. It meets the criteria outlined in COM:SCOPE, being actively used in a legitimate Wikipedia publication. Removing the image would set a concerning precedent against the hosting of satirical and humorous content, which plays a vital role in political and cultural discourse. Therefore, the image should be retained on Wikimedia Commons. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:11, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
----Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:11, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Josve05a This isn't a caricature of a politician. If it was, I wouldn't be asking for it to be deleted. If Adam Cuerden wants to draw a caricature of the subject and upload it to Commons, that's fine with me.
COM:IDENT is clear that Commons does not consider a legal standard of defamation or likelihood that a subject will sue. It's in the part I quoted, so I'm not sure why you are invoking legal and protected speech arguments here. Is the image derogatory? Yes. It is explicitly intended to ridicule the subject. Is the image the image "a historical and cultural artifact"? No. A similar image (not this one) got mentioned in one article.
You appear to be grasping straws here. The question is simple - does this image align with what COM:IDENT says or not? Counterfeit Purses (talk) 16:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The image should still be considered a form of political satire, even if it is not a traditional caricature. Political satire includes a broad range of expressions beyond traditional drawings, such as memes, which are a significant part of contemporary digital culture. The depiction of Jonathan Gullis as a seagull fits within this context and serves as a humorous commentary rather than a purely derogatory image. IDENT emphasizes that images must not unfairly ridicule or demean the subject. The image in question uses wordplay and meme culture, which are common and widely accepted forms of political and social commentary. It is important to consider the broader context and intent of the image, which is to engage in political humor rather than to demean. The invocation of legal standards, the point was to highlight that political satire is a protected form of expression, reflecting its societal value, and therefore isn't necessary defamatory. The image should be evaluated within this context, rather than being dismissed solely based on subjective interpretations of it being derogatory - which it is not in my opinion. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added link to this DR to en:Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2024-04-25/In the media. I'm not going to take a position on if it violates COM:IDENT or not. Abzeronow (talk) 21:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's far easier to understand the reporting on the incident with the image, and, frankly, this fuss over it feels more likely to cause a Streissand effect situation than just, y'know, moving on. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:55, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Adam Cuerden Here's the complete text of the Signpost item:

Jonathan Livingston... Seagullis?: Indy100 reports on the vandalism Jonathan Gullis's Wikipedia page has been subject to since his promotion to deputy chairman of the British Conservative Party. Acts of vandalism include changing his last name to Seagullis as a reference to a Reddit meme.

How does the image make that any easier to understand? This is a bit of tangential and ephemeral fluff which is as self-explanatory as it is historically unimportant. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 16:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's for the The Signpost editors (or the larger English Wikipedia community) to decide, not for Commons to dictate over. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 10:26, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Josve05a True, but if Adam Cuerden can post claims about the usefulness of the image here, I can question the veracity of those claims. Notice that his statement does not address the reason for the requested deletion, namely violation of COM:IDENT. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 20:04, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that a mere pun rises to the level of defamation and demeaning; repeatedly nominating something for deletion is just drawing a lot more attention to it and risking a en:Streisand effect that no-one - including me - wants. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep COM:INUSE. Furthermore, this isn't already Defamation and per Dronebogus.
Prototyperspective (talk) 10:12, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Does the image unfairly ridicule or otherwise demean the subject? Yes or no? Trade (talk) 19:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. Prototyperspective (talk) 21:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There is consensus that this file is within project scope, as a media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, and there is consensus that this image does not defame the politician whose face has been superimposed onto a seagull. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Circulatory system.jpg

[edit]

Low quality diagram and photograph. Jmarchn (talk) 20:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:17, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ґодзілла 2014.jpg

[edit]

Clear copyright violation Dronebogus (talk) 21:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Godzilla King of the Monsters Fan Poster.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation Dronebogus (talk) 21:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ґодзілла 2014 Білий Фон.png

[edit]

Copyvio. Dronebogus (talk) 21:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stable Diffusion AI-generated painting of nude woman.png

[edit]

This picture is the user's own work and used for harassment but I deleted this file with F10 criteria because I do not think that this file is in scope. By the reason of User:Dronebogus's request in my talk page, I undeleted it and nominated for deletion. Kadı Message 04:41, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep as uncommon subject— how many pictures of AI generated nude women do we have, let alone ones that actually look this good? Dronebogus (talk) 05:19, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete (on behalf of uploader Benlisquare, who is blocked – see their reply to the DR notification on their talk page) Brianjd (talk) 14:02, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dronebogus and Kadı: The AI prompt includes names (of artists?). See Commons:Deletion requests/Algorithmically generated AI artwork in specific styles by User:Benlisquare for scope and copyright concerns. Brianjd (talk) 14:14, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Per Dronebogus, it sounds like there's a lot more that'll need deletion review. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:11, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Um, I voted keep? And my argument was that it was in scope because it was not a common subject, so why are you seemingly suggesting I said it was common? Dronebogus (talk) 01:49, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Pbritti I agree that your comment makes no sense. Brianjd (talk) 07:21, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dont remove, i liked it ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 04:17, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: same as Commons:Deletion requests/Algorithmically generated AI artwork in specific styles by User:Benlisquare. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:10, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stable Diffusion AI-generated painting of nude woman.png

[edit]

Run-of-the-mill AI image. No realistic educational purpose, fails COM:SCOPE. This image seems to have been deleted and undeleted twice before, first because of a request for a full deletion discussion and second due to premature closure of the deletion discussion. Please let this discussion run its proper course. Nosferattus (talk) 15:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Porn without any educational value as far as I can see. Don't know why it's still there when the outcome above seems to be delete. Prototyperspective (talk) 16:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@GPSLeo: — Rhododendrites talk |  13:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Frances Marion, 1918 in uniform during WWI as a war correspondent.jpg

[edit]

This is a real image with AI extending out the edges with... well... nonsense. The random fog and squiggles doesn't add anything. Unused and unlikely to be used. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree. It is very useful for possible insertions into other online content, such as research, presentations, social content. The photo we are analyzing, now having much more "air" around it, makes it much more usable unlike the original version. the fact that the "neutral" background is so as not to alter the original content. adding elements would have been anachronistic and this was not done here. Jack Il Corvo (talk) 08:07, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment. I don't think the AI version should be kept, but could this just be cropped back to the historical photo or replaced with it directly? An image of a WWI war correspondent in uniform is likely in scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - The original is here if you want it. https://www.womenshistory.org/education-resources/biographies/frances-marion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:19, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flaks Merowitsch.jpg

[edit]

Nonsense PD rationale, this must be treated as per COM:Russia. 188.123.231.69 01:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This work was originally published anonymously between January 1, 1943 and January 1, 1946, and the name of the author did not become known during 70 years after publication, counted from January 1 of the year following the year of publication. Now also licensed by COM:Russia. Venzz (talk) 12:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - URAA applies. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:19, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Monogram Canvas.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Wcam as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G4|Commons:Deletion requests/File:Louis Vuitton portemonnee.JPG; this is definitely not the same image from that discussion, so putting before the community for discussion  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as multiple variants of the Louis Vuitton Monogram pattern are registered with U.S. Copyright Office [19] including that shown in this image. Wcam (talk) 02:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nike Air Max 2090.jpg

[edit]

image owner(me) requests deletion Doge24190 (talk) 02:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Muslim Wojak Detailed with Obscured.png

[edit]

Derivative work of [20] 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 06:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Orthodox Christian Wojak.png

[edit]

Derivative work of [21] 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 06:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Muslim Wojak Detailed.png

[edit]

Derivative work of [22] 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 06:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Muslim wojak with upper facial features obscured.png

[edit]

Derivative work of [23] 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 06:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Muslim wojak with face.png

[edit]

Derivative work of [24] 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 06:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Intuitive-machines-nova-c-lunar-lander.jpg

[edit]

Source website credits the image to Intuitive Machines. As such, it is unlikely to be in public domain. Ixfd64 (talk) 06:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Google plus it is END?.png

[edit]

Out of scope: low-quality ungrammatical illustration, unused outside userspace. Omphalographer (talk) 07:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. Given the context, I think this is an allowable personal image from a Wikipedia editor with a decent number of mainspace contributions on the Ukrainian language Wikipedia. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:24, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gaetano Salvemini.jpg

[edit]

This person is not Gaetano Salvemini but Mario A. Fei. The wrong person has been extracted. DonCalo (talk) 07:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then rename the file. 186.172.6.153 01:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:24, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ibrahim Sagna2.jpg

[edit]

I doubt the license on Flickr is valid. Probably license washing. Yann (talk) 09:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, why are you doubting the license on Flickr? 6eeWikiUser (talk) 11:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user has only a few pictures of people, and no follower. Typical account created for license washing. Yann (talk) 11:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I do not know much in the use of Flickr, also account seems to be new at the platform. 6eeWikiUser (talk) 19:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:24, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:American way of life.jpg

[edit]

See [25]. Life Magazine issues for February 1937 were registered and renewed, i.e. [26]. Yann (talk) 11:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:24, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:At the Time of the Louisville Flood- Bourke-White photo 1937 (colorized).png

[edit]

See [27]. Life Magazine issues for February 1937 were registered and renewed, i.e. [28]. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:American way of life.jpg. Yann (talk) 11:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Islamic Estelada Blava.svg

[edit]

Only used virtually, not a really used flag Brunnaiz (talk) 13:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Virtually? It is being used as political symbols on posters throughout Catalonia. SnowieLuna1212 (talk) 21:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Image of a non-existent, unused flag, unknown author, and terrorist connotations. Miguel Perdiguero (talk) 12:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adai tribe flag.jpg

[edit]

An unhistoric, fictitious flag made for a Kazakh tribe, that, when used, may create intertribal conflicts between Kazakhs. Simply not a file worth having on this website, it will only cause confusion and division. 2001:4BC9:A45:4D27:34D1:4BFF:FE68:2612 13:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - in use. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BVPRASADTEWIKI.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal selfie, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is purely Educational , Social, Information value , BVPRASAD is an Editor in the TV satellite Channel , Asst Editor in a Print News Paper and highly qualified . He did MPhil in Communication, MPhil in Education, MSc in Psychology , MSc in Maths, LLM in Law, MEd in Education, MCJ in Journalism
He wrote more than 500 articles in Wikipedia under IIIT Project, His articles Published in News Papers More than 3000, we are uploading un necessary photos in Wikipedia, when we upload useful photos , with no time objection raises , I don't know how can we upgrade our wiki commons in the coming days Bvprasadtewiki (talk) 14:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jean Ackerman Life 12-05-1938.jpg

[edit]

Copyright notice p. 11: [29]. Yann (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:28, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jean Ackerman, Indian Princess Life 12-05-1938.jpg

[edit]

Copyright notice p. 11: [30]. Yann (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:28, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Title- Life - Oil (8553952439).jpg

[edit]

Copyright notice p.7: [31]. Life Magazine issues for 1937 and 1938 were registered and renewed, i.e. [32], [33]. Yann (talk) 16:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:28, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JRussell.jpg

[edit]

Maybe this can be kept; but uploader wrote on Wikipedia ([34]) "I hired the photographer that took the photo and have rights to the image." - so it is not "own work" Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just got off the phone with the photographer and he said I own the image and that I created the file that was uploaded. He confirmed we have permission to post. GableGotwalsLaw (talk) 16:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@GableGotwalsLaw, that's not how this works. Was there a signed legal document transferring ownership to you personally? 57.140.16.48 17:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Someone who claims to be the photographer has now posted here. They seem to be saying there is joint ownership. I'm not sure how that would work. 57.140.16.48 19:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A duplicate copy of the image (albeit at lower resolution) has been uploaded, at File:Russell John.jpg. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:28, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:André Rolet 1937.png

[edit]

Copyright notice p.21: [35]. Life Magazine issues for 1937 were registered and renewed, i.e. [36]: B354341. Yann (talk) 16:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Life attributes the photograph to "European" [37]. Possibly the name of a photo agency active at that time. The contest itself was on 19 September 1937 in Paris and was backed by two Parisian newspapers. The photo was likely first published in France in September 1937 but the publication in Life on 11 October 1937 probably makes this publication a U.S. publication for the U.S. law. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:16, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PMT Logo 2000x1000px Purple.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Logo: Not above COM:TOO US but maybe above COM:TOO UK. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 17:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - ToO for this type of image is very low in the UK. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:COLDSPLAY (32816990783).jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative of copyrighted prints in clothing.: Some of these prints are below TOO, also the ones that aren't might be COM:DM. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 17:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Templar (sign), Leeds. 2011.jpg

[edit]

Historic pub sign in the UK. No FoP in the UK for 2D graphical works, but if the sign is old enough, it could be public domain. Abzeronow (talk) 21:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abzeronow: What would be the age theshold on PD in this instance? Rcsprinter123 (talk) 23:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely would have to be from before 1954 for the UK Before 1929 for the US. Abzeronow (talk) 23:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- proabably 1928 -- see WP:EN. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Temple of Ehécatl - México 2024.jpg

[edit]

Likely copyright violation as images and text are not de minimis. Redtree21 (talk) 23:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Please refer to Mexican Freedom of Panorama. "Reproduction, communication and distribution by means of drawings, paintings, photographs and audiovisual processes of works that are visible from public places (lugares publicos)." José Luiz disc 04:58, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Mexican FoP is very broad. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Temple of Ehécatl - México 2024 (2).jpg

[edit]

Likely copyright violation as images and text are not de minimis. Redtree21 (talk) 23:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Please refer to Mexican Freedom of Panorama. "Reproduction, communication and distribution by means of drawings, paintings, photographs and audiovisual processes of works that are visible from public places (lugares publicos)." José Luiz disc 23:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:China-6764 - Pilgrim (2213518170).jpg

[edit]

I haven't seen Disney drawings on the bag Sintegrity (talk) 23:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Walk the Labyrinth.jpg

[edit]

Contents of the sign are the main subject of the photograph and therefore are not de minimis. Redtree21 (talk) 23:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Having the sign allowed me to avoid transcribing its contents and allows naming an open street map entity. Iragersh (talk) 00:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abdullah-rushdy.jpg

[edit]

Not own work 186.172.210.92 12:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:16, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:181004 GOSA Dr Baumgärtner Insp Kdo SanDstBw Dittrich 018.jpg

[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site, and the Exif data explicitly claim a copyright. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 16:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2024-04-25 2Фрида Биллиет в Мейсе с Philodendron billietiae, май 2019 г. Фото Эними ван Стинберге.png

[edit]

неправильный перевод Ko tamakami (talk) 21:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wrong translation
translator: Consigned (talk) 20:22, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Писатель Грибов Юрий Тарасович 4.jpg

[edit]

Probably not own work, permission missing. 188.123.231.69 06:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:48, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Missak Manouchian 1940.png

[edit]

Better version at File:Missak Manouchian sous les drapeaux.png RSVartanian (talk) 09:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Visually distinct from the other file and COM:INUSE. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:49, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ubawin (cropped) (cropped).jpg

[edit]

This file should be deleted because it is an AI-enhanced image. KhantWiki (talk) 16:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE and AI enchancment alone is not a valid reason to delete. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Algirdas Vrubliauskas.jpg

[edit]

unused file, single uploading by the user. Small image. Unlike that own work. Deletion per COM:PCP Estopedist1 (talk) 16:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:23, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Проф. Мати Пинкас.jpg

[edit]

Явно ложные сведения об авторстве, времени создания и лицензии: https://digilib.nalis.bg/xmlui/handle/nls/26076; фото сделано в 1950-60-е годы -- Tomasina (talk) 18:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly false information about authorship, time of creation and license: https://digilib.nalis.bg/xmlui/handle/nls/26076; photo taken in 1950-60s
translator: Consigned (talk) 20:17, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, doesn't appear to be an own work. Not PD. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:General Arnaldo Ochoa.png

[edit]

Definitely not an own work but might be free according to COM:ANGOLA. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader didn't provide publication information. Deleted per COM:PCP. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:25, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Erzurum büyükşehir belediyesi logo.jpg

[edit]

There is no appropriate copyright authorization information, and it is impossible to determine whether the coat of arms is protected by copyright based on the information provided by COM:TOO Turkey. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 02:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kadı: for their thoughts. Abzeronow (talk) 19:47, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Admin Kadi, is this him? 186.173.233.129 19:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Kadi was active, but did not comment. File can be undeleted if an expert consideres otherwise. --Ellywa (talk) 15:54, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/04/25&oldid=906452506"